Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 09 Jul 2017 9:44 am » wrote: .

You're deranged.

.

She suffers from Trump derangement syndrome!!!

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 5:28 pm » wrote:Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.
They were talking about an adoption program?

Do you go to bed each and pray to the god of conspiracy nuts? Saying "please oh please let there be evidence of collusion. I am too far into this Russia Russia Trump talking point to back out now".

It is looking more and more like the DNC is hanging you out to dry.

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 5:28 pm » wrote:Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.

Oh my gosh, I'm sure you have the smoking gun this time!

Oh wait, a Democrat group set Trump up to spread this stupid false Russian-Trump-collaboration-conspiracy.

Late Saturday, Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the president’s lawyer, issued a statement implying that the meeting was a setup. Ms. Veselnitskaya and the translator who accompanied her to the meeting “misrepresented who they were,” it said.


In an interview, Mr. Corallo explained that Ms. Veselnitskaya, in her anti-Magnitsky campaign, employs a private investigator whose firm, Fusion GPS, produced an intelligence dossier that contained unproven allegations against the president. In a statement, the firm said, “Fusion GPS learned about this meeting from news reports and had no prior knowledge of it. Any claim that Fusion GPS arranged or facilitated this meeting in any way is false.”


Sara Carter and John Solomon expand on the backstory here at Circa. They write:


The president’s legal team said Saturday they believe the entire meeting may have been part of a larger election-year opposition effort aimed at creating the appearance of improper connections between Trump family members and Russia that also included a now-discredited intelligence dossier produced by a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele who worked for a U.S. political firm known as Fusion GPS.


“We have learned from both our own investigation and public reports that the participants in the meeting misrepresented who they were and who they worked for,” said Mark Corallo, a spokesman for President Trump’s legal team. “Specifically, we have learned that the person who sought the meeting is associated with Fusion GPS, a firm which according to public reports, was retained by Democratic operatives to develop opposition research on the President and which commissioned the phony Steele dossier. ”


“These developments raise serious issues as to exactly who authorized and participated in any effort by Russian nationals to influence our election in any manner,” Corallo said.
Who sought the meeting? Someone is apparently saving that for tomorrow in “collusion.”
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... sion-2.php

Termin8tor » 09 Jul 2017 10:15 am » wrote: Oh my gosh, I'm sure you have the smoking gun this time!

Oh wait, a Democrat group set Trump up to spread this stupid false Russian-Trump-collaboration-conspiracy.

Umm, Fake dossiers, set up meetings, done by a company in the employ of those Misty voted for. Seems there was an attempt to influence the election in a neferious manner BUT it is becoming more apparent it was done by those Misty voted for.

Misty » 08 Jul 2017 5:28 pm » wrote:Oh look. Another undisclosed meeting with a Russian.
They were talking about an adoption program?

The NYT's and your masters at the DNC may have made you look like an *** yet again.
Shortly before his father was formally nominated for president last summer, Donald Trump Jr. was approached by a Russian lawyer who set up a meeting to discuss a Russian policy, according to interviews with Trump family lawyers.

President Trump’s eldest son briefly gathered others for the meeting, including his brother-in-law Jared Kushner, as well as then-presidential campaign manager Paul Manafort for the meeting at Trump Tower in New York City with the lawyer, identified by Trump family lawyers as Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Veselnitskaya used the meeting in June 2016 to have a conversation about a U.S. law called the Magnitsky Act that Russia leader Vladimir Putin reviles and has retaliated against by blocking U.S. adoptions of Russian children.

The encounter was short and the Trump team had no further contact with the woman or the policy issue, lawyers said.

The meeting was recently disclosed to congressional investigators by one of the attendees, according to sources directly familiar with the disclosure.

President Trump was not aware of the meeting and did not attend it, according to the lawyers. A translator and an American businessman working for a pro-Russian business lobby also attended the meeting, which lasted about 20 minutes, according to the interviews.

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/07/08/ ... -follow-up

DID THE WHITE HOUSE JUST USE THE TIME WARNER-AT&T DEAL TO THREATEN CNN?

Threatening to use the Justice Dep't to silence and/or intimidate the press.
Can you say abuse of power?

The rotten apple doesn't fall far from the diseased tree.

Donald Trump Jr. one-ups his dad with new Instagram that shows the president shooting down 'CNN'

Less than a week after President Donald Trump posted a video on Twitter edited to show the president body slamming the CNN logo, Donald Trump Jr. is continuing the anti-media meme war.

On Saturday, Donald Trump Jr. posted a video on Instagram that shows footage from "Top Gun" edited to appear as if Donald Trump is shooting a missile at a jet covered with the CNN logo.

The CNN jet explodes after being hit by a missile from the Trump jet (the president's face is superimposed over that of Tom Cruise's "Maverick" character).

According to the Daily Caller, a far right news site, the video was originally posted on Twitter by the website's chief video editor, Richard McGinnis.

https://youtu.be/R8WXD4HTy44

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 11:32 am » wrote: Can you say abuse of power?

Exactly WHICH part shows a possible abuse of power? You really need to read these articles ALL the way to the end.

There has been talk of pressure on Zeckerberg for a while. Nowhere in the entire article is a case for "abuse of power".

I stickies this thread to show the craziness of the left as they are fueled with **** from the MSN. And right on queue we get ten other speculative article.

Thanks!

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 11:39 am » wrote:The rotten apple doesn't fall far from the diseased tree.
https://youtu.be/R8WXD4HTy44

I love the lack of political correctness.

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 11:43 am » wrote:

I guess those that think for her have not fed her a rebuttal to the actual issues she posts.

Typical snowflake.

I promise not to be to hard on the loinfo. Last time she started **** She couldn't handle it. Had to leave for a few weeks.

And yes, that picture represents what happens at the thought of you fixated on my dick. Is your husband aware?

Inglorious Bastards » 08 Jul 2017 6:14 pm » wrote:i'd love to slice malias cloritiris to shreds

Cloritiris?

Let's hope you know how to find it better than you know how to spell it.

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 11:54 am » wrote:

That is great **** butch. Why you making fun of tens of millions of men who use it?

But the cool part is no amount of pills would get one excited about you.

Hey, you got any rebuttals for the shaky articles you posted?

This is your tactic. Post a loinfo news article and when discussion starts on it divert to hide your ignorance.

Huey » 09 Jul 2017 11:41 am » wrote: Exactly WHICH part shows a possible abuse of power? You really need to read these articles ALL the way to the end.

There has been talk of pressure on Zeckerberg for a while. Nowhere in the entire article is a case for "abuse of power".

I stickies this thread to show the craziness of the left as they are fueled with **** from the MSN. And right on queue we get ten other speculative article.

Thanks!

Huey » 09 Jul 2017 10:37 am » wrote: The NYT's and your masters at the DNC may have made you look like an *** yet again.
Shortly before his father was formally nominated for president last summer, Donald Trump Jr. was approached by a Russian lawyer who set up a meeting to discuss a Russian policy, according to interviews with Trump family lawyers.

President Trump’s eldest son briefly gathered others for the meeting, including his brother-in-law Jared Kushner, as well as then-presidential campaign manager Paul Manafort for the meeting at Trump Tower in New York City with the lawyer, identified by Trump family lawyers as Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Veselnitskaya used the meeting in June 2016 to have a conversation about a U.S. law called the Magnitsky Act that Russia leader Vladimir Putin reviles and has retaliated against by blocking U.S. adoptions of Russian children.

The encounter was short and the Trump team had no further contact with the woman or the policy issue, lawyers said.

The meeting was recently disclosed to congressional investigators by one of the attendees, according to sources directly familiar with the disclosure.

President Trump was not aware of the meeting and did not attend it, according to the lawyers. A translator and an American businessman working for a pro-Russian business lobby also attended the meeting, which lasted about 20 minutes, according to the interviews.

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/07/08/ ... -follow-up

Misty » 09 Jul 2017 11:50 am » wrote: Cloritiris?

Let's hope you know how to find it better than you know how to spell it.

my job is to lick them and make them orgasm...not spell it

Allah Obakmar

Huey » 09 Jul 2017 10:24 am » wrote:
Umm, Fake dossiers, set up meetings, done by a company in the employ of those Misty voted for. Seems there was an attempt to influence the election in a neferious manner BUT it is becoming more apparent it was done by those Misty voted for.

Come on, give credit where credit is due.

Deranged Little Miss Marxist wants to play as big a role in the scam as she can.

Termin8tor » 09 Jul 2017 1:31 pm » wrote: Come on, give credit where credit is due.

Deranged Little Miss Marxist wants to play as big a role in the scam as she can.

We won't know concerning her latest posts. As usual when challenged on substance she goes all loinfo on us.

Huey » 09 Jul 2017 1:33 pm » wrote: We won't know concerning her latest posts. As usual when challenged on substance she goes all loinfo on us.

What, she's going to develop integrity in her old age?