More proof that you're a psychopathic liar.Misty » 12 Jul 2017 11:49 pm » wrote: The only 'crucial evidence' you've ever presented is that you should be sedated and locked in a padded room.
if my memory is correct....which it probably is......... she frequented the whip and chain nipple clamping sex clubs in NYC.............must be like the rocky horror picture show.....i would not know...i have never even been to a tittie bar beforeSgt Bilko » 13 Jul 2017 9:16 am » wrote: After posting the video and you now understand mens thoughts have you seen your husband grope any women's pussies??
Cite one single source I've cited that lied for months about a Democrat, like the corrupt MSM did in falsely claiming that Trump was under investigation.Misty » 12 Jul 2017 12:18 pm » wrote:You have no problem with biased sources as long as they lean your way.
![]()
![]()
Here's more information you'll refuse to read, psychopath that you are.Misty » 12 Jul 2017 11:15 pm » wrote:**** the rest of your post.
I didn't even read it.
You're as crazy as a loon.
Breaking: TOP HILLARY SUPPORTER Was Russian Lawyer Veselnitskaya’s Chaperone in Washington DC
Jim Hoft Jul 13th, 2017 8:37 am 110 Comments
The Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. in Trump Tower also spent quite a bit of time in Washington DC after her meeting with Trump Jr. at Trump Tower.
Her chaperone Ron Dellums was a huge Hillary Clinton supporter.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... ington-dc/
Commander-in-Creep: Trump tells French First Lady “you’re in such good shape”
Only hours after inflicting his infamous shake-and-yank handshake on French First Lady Brigitte Macron, Trump made things even more embarrassing by gushing about what “good shape” First Lady Macron was in.
Trump looks at Mrs. Macron, fixates on her, and then says nothing. It was uncomfortable to watch; I can only imagine being Mrs. Macron.
“You’re in such good shape,” Trump tells the French First Lady. “She’s in such good physical shape,” Trump then tells President Macron. “Beautiful,” he adds.
Oh my gosh, how dare he compliment a womyn!Misty » 13 Jul 2017 2:05 pm » wrote:Uggh! What a pig!
Ameriblog? One of their claims:
Trump did literally nothing for the past two weeks
Hey psycho, do you have an actual crime that Trump or officials are guilty of?Misty » 13 Jul 2017 2:05 pm » wrote:Uggh! What a pig!
So when did you cut your husband's nuts off, psycho?Misty » 13 Jul 2017 2:05 pm » wrote:Uggh! What a pig!
BOOM! Pro-Russia Hacker Site “Cyber Berkut” Publishes Links Between Ukraine and Clinton
Jim Hoft
.
.
According to Cyber Berkut the Ukrainian foundation transferred 10 to 25 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation.
Ukraine sponsored Hillary Clinton using IMF loans!
The Ukrainian investigation case connected to commercial banks that laundered IMF’s money from the National Bank of Ukraine is still going on. According to the investigation, such banks as Tavrika, Pivdenkom Bank, Avtokraz Bank, CityCommerce Bank, Finrost Bank, Terra Bank, Kyivska Rus Bank, Vernum Bank, Credit Dnepr Bank, Delta Bank were involved in the criminal scheme. Funds were transferred through Austrian Meinl Bank AG."
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... e-clinton/
So you wanna play guilt by association?Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 10:54 am » wrote:Here's more information you'll refuse to read, psychopath that you are.
Looks like the Clinton campaign was colluding with the Russians to interfere in a presidential election.
According to wackjobs, that's "treason" and a criminal act.
Something else I happened upon.........As for his former congressional colleague Dellums, Rohrabacher said he recalled having a conversation about the Magnitsky Act and the adoption issue: “Ron and I like each other … I have to believe he was a hired lobbyist but I don’t know."
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... with-trump
A pro-Russian Congressman who is also a big Trump supporter.Last year, Dana Rohrabacher, a pro-Russian Republican congressman, told the FT that while he was in Moscow, Konstantin Kosachev, a senior member of Russia’s upper house, asked if he would “at least take a look at something that our prosecutors would like the Americans to know about”, related to the Magnitsky case.
https://www.ft.com/content/38532856-658 ... 4?mhq5j=e1
Right. It was just a joke.Democrats Are Setting Their Sights on “Putin’s Favorite Congressman”
Recently, Rohrabacher has been swept up in the scandal over the possible collusion between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.
Like Trump, Rohrabacher, who claims to once have lost a drunken arm-wrestling match with Vladimir Putin in the 1990s, believes the Russian government is being unfairly demonized.
(During the 1980s, Rohrabacher was a staunch anti-communist who hung out with the anti-Soviet mujahedeen in Afghanistan.)
He has shrugged off allegations of Moscow’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election by pointing out that the United States is guilty of similar actions.
In May, the New York Times reported that in 2012 the FBI warned Rohrabacher that Russian spies were trying to recruit him.
Two days earlier, the Washington Post reported on a recording from June 2016 in which House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump.”
(McCarthy assured Rohrabacher the remarks were meant as a joke.)

And a few days later she appeared in the front row of a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on Russia.Misty » 13 Jul 2017 2:49 pm » wrote:So you wanna play guilt by association?
She also attended a dinner in DC with the chairman of the House subcommittee overseeing Russia policy, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.)
Why did you dodge my question, psycho?Misty » 13 Jul 2017 2:49 pm » wrote: So you wanna play guilt by association?
That's how I met him.Sgt Bilko » 13 Jul 2017 9:16 am » wrote:After posting the video and you now understand mens thoughts have you seen your husband grope any women's pussies??
I told you in my other thread.Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 3:43 pm » wrote: Why did you dodge my question, psycho?
Do you have an actual crime that Trump or officials are guilty of?

That's **** up. Someone would choose the chicken over you.Misty » 13 Jul 2017 4:07 pm » wrote: I told you in my other thread.
Glory hole oral sex with a chicken.
You do understand that there are several ongoing investigations don't you?
I'm sure if any crimes were committed they will be brought to light.
There is no way that you can definitively say that no crimes were committed until all of the investigations have been concluded.
Wow, that's brilliant! And informative!Misty » 13 Jul 2017 4:07 pm » wrote: I told you in my other thread.
Glory hole oral sex with a chicken.
I don't have to say anything definitive, psycho. You're the accuser, and it's your obligation to provide proof, or at least evidence.You do understand that there are several ongoing investigations don't you?
I'm sure if any crimes were committed they will be brought to light.
There is no way that you can definitively say that no crimes were committed until all of the investigations have been concluded.
You dishonestly tried to lecture me on "innocent until proven guilty" when I simply offered my persona opinion about Clinton's felonies, based on the mountain of evidence against him.Misty » 13 Jul 2017 4:07 pm » wrote:You do understand that there are several ongoing investigations don't you?
I'm sure if any crimes were committed they will be brought to light.
There is no way that you can definitively say that no crimes were committed until all of the investigations have been concluded.
She has very, very high standards!Huey » 13 Jul 2017 4:14 pm » wrote:That's **** up. Someone would choose the chicken over you.
And remember, this is the bitch that is lecturing larry and others about crossing a line.
So let me get this straight.House Democrats demand AG Jeff Sessions turn over info on money laundering deal linked to Russian lawyer.
House Judiciary Committee Democrats are questioning why the Trump Justice Department decided to settle a money laundering case on the cheap with a Russian real estate concern repped by the same Russian lawyer who met with his son in June 2016.
House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers and other Dems wrote a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions asking whether lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya had a hand in settlement talks between Russian real estate firm Prevezon Holdings Ltd. and the U.S. Department of Justice.
Prevezon agreed in May to pay a $6 million penalty in order to avoid a trial for allegedly laundering money from a $230 million tax fraud.
The Dems’ letter said “the department may have settled the case at a loss for the United States in order to obscure the underlying facts.”
Manhattan Federal Court documents filed in January 2016 indicate that Dennis Katsyv, Prevezon’s owner, hired Veselnitskaya to help his U.S. lawyers "prepare their defense."
Katsyv was behind a lobbying effort last year to thwart Magnitsky Act sanctions against Russian interests.
Veselnitskaya did help the defense's efforts from late 2015 to early 2016, but whether she was involved in settlement negotiations remains unclear.
In filing, she complained that the U.S. didn't want help from Russia's Prosecutor General, saying prosecutors "strangely refused his offer of assistance in investigating this matter."
The New York Times recently revealed Donald Trump Jr. met with Veselnitskaya in June 2016 after he was told she had dirt on Hillary Clinton courtesy of the Russian government.
Following the bombshell revelations, Trump Jr. tweeted four pages of emails indicating he was clearly told that Russia was supporting his dad's campaign.
In one of the emails, publicist Rob Goldstone said the “Crown prosecutor of Russia” was offering “to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.”
He then arranged a meeting between Trump Jr. and Veselnitskaya, who was described to him as Russian government lawyer.
Veselnitskaya told NBC on Tuesday that Trump's campaign was on the hunt for Clinton intel.
She claimed she met with Trump after getting a phone call from a man she didn't know, who told her to attend the meeting.
While Veselnitskaya has denied Kremlin ties, a letter in the Prevezon case indicates she had at least some interaction with the Russian government.
After graduating from Moscow State Legal Academy in 1998, she worked at the Prosecutor's Office for three years, "overseeing the legality of statutes that were adopted by legislators of Moscow Oblast," which refers to the area around the city.
She also said her clients include "large state-owned and private corporations."
Court records in the Prevezon case show the attorney had problems with her immigration status in the U.S.
Veselnitskaya had applied for a visa in order to work for them in the U.S., but her application was denied, she wrote in a Jan. 5, 2016 letter to the court.
While the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office did give her a short-term "parole letter" — which allowed her to enter the country without a visa for the case — it expired sometime in winter 2016.
It’s unclear how she was in the country for the June meeting with Trump Jr.
The Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office did not issue her an additional "parole letter," according to court documents and a source.
Veselnitskaya also complained about being "harassed by the Government despite being paroled into the United States."
Veselnitskaya claimed that she was detained at London's Heathrow Airport in November 2015, after leaving the U.S. for a brief trip.
"During this detention I was unjustifiably subjected to a strip search, for no apparent reason," Veselnitskaya wrote.
"I should not be subjected to such humiliation when I have been promised entry into the United States to defend against the scandalous accusations in this lawsuit on behalf of my clients."
The case against Prevezon was brought by then Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in 2013.
The case settled just two days before trial earlier this year — after Bharara was fired by Trump.