Liberal Forum

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 6:40 pm » wrote:So Peter Smith who died 10 days after he told the Wall Street Journal that he was trying to obtain Hillary Clinton's emails in 2016, and who named Michael Flynn as his ally in that pursuit committed suicide.

Right.


Peter W. Smith, GOP operative who sought Clinton's emails from Russian hackers, committed suicide, records show.

Smith was found in a hotel room with a bag over his head with a source of helium attached.
A helium tank was also found in the room.
That seems to be a very unusual way to commit suicide.

Trump Lawyer Replies To Stranger’s Email, “Watch Your Back, Bitch”

With any other public servant, this would be cause for immediate firing.

With Trump, it probably puts Kasowitz next in line to replace Jeff Sessions as Attorney General.

The man, a retired public relations professional in the western United States who asked not to be identified, read ProPublica’s story this week on Kasowitz and sent the lawyer an email with the subject line: “Resign Now.’’

Kasowitz replied with series of angry messages sent between 9:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. Eastern time.

One read: “I’m on you now.

You are f*cking with me now let’s see who you are watch your back, bitch.”

In another email, Kasowitz wrote: “Call me.

Don’t be afraid, you piece of sh*t.

Stand up. If you don’t call, you’re just afraid.”

And later: “I already know where you live, I’m on you.

You might as well call me.

You will see me. I promise. Bro.”

roadkill » 13 Jul 2017 7:03 pm » wrote: Looks like the Russian Lawyer Lady has plenty of connections in DC in both parties, etc.
Sumpin be stinky here.

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 7:46 pm » wrote: She had a former Democratic Socialist Congressman (Ron Dellums) who worked as a lobbyist for her.
Commie lover.

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 6:22 pm » wrote:So let me get this straight.
Preet Bharara who was first asked to stay on as a U.S. Attorney, and then abrubtly fired was working on this $230 million dollar money laundering case against a Russian.

Coincidentally Fredo's Russian lady lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, was assisting the defense is that case.

After Bharara is fired the DOJ settles the case for a measly $6 million.

Smells awfully fishy to me.
Like I keep saying, follow the money.

The Russian oligarchs are notorious for money laundering the money that they steal from the Russian people and real estate is a great vehicle for laundering money.

I could be wrong, but it is my opinion that T'Bag is up to his eyeballs in helping Russians launder their dirty money.

On May 12, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Joon H. Kim, filling in after U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara was fired by President Trump on March 11, announced a settlement of $5,896,333.65 with Prevezon.


The Justice Department declared the deal to be a victory as they could directly trace just $1,965,444.55 of the laundered Russian funds to the company.


https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/2 ... an-lawyer/

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 6:40 pm » wrote:So Peter Smith who died 10 days after he told the Wall Street Journal that he was trying to obtain Hillary Clinton's emails in 2016, and who named Michael Flynn as his ally in that pursuit committed suicide.

Right.


Peter W. Smith, GOP operative who sought Clinton's emails from Russian hackers, committed suicide, records show.

Smith was found in a hotel room with a bag over his head with a source of helium attached.
A helium tank was also found in the room.
That seems to be a very unusual way to commit suicide.

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 7:40 pm » wrote: That is our fearless leader's lawyer.
Why am I not surprised?

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 8:12 pm » wrote:There was little money to collect, Dim. Can you get blood from a stone?

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 8:13 pm » wrote:Donald Jr. was seen leaving the room shortly before.
No, really!

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 8:35 pm » wrote:
I don't believe one word that anyone in this administration (including the Justice Dep't) says about anything.

Pajamas media?


Don't you dare ever say anything about any of my sources.
All you cite now are wingnut sites.

One line in the piece that did stand out to me was this:
"Prevezon Holdings was charged with laundering their share into luxury Manhattan real estate."

Luxury Manhattan real estate?
Isn't that how T-Bag made his money?
By selling luxury Manhattan real estate?

Like I said in a prior post, Russians like to launder their dirty money through real estate.
And I would bet good money that T-Bag was involved in helping get them accomplish that goal.

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 8:39 pm » wrote: What's wrong Puss?
You don't like a good conspiracy theory any more?

Your sure seemed to enjoy it when it was about the young guy who worked for the DNC (Seth Rich) that was killed.

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 8:14 pm » wrote:Fake outrage from the psychopath who lied all over the board that I "don't care about rape."

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 8:46 pm » wrote:Here's the tiny little difference between us. Almost everything I cite is fact-based, with infrequent mistakes made by my sources.
Almost everything you babble about is **** without a shred of evidence to back it up.

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 8:44 pm » wrote:Can you cite one single criminal act?

Nope, just lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, vlie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie,

Trump-Russia investigators probe Jared Kushner-run digital operation.

Investigators at the House and Senate Intelligence committees and the Justice Department are examining whether the Trump campaign’s digital operation – overseen by Jared Kushner – helped guide Russia’s sophisticated voter targeting and fake news attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Congressional and Justice Department investigators are focusing on whether Trump’s campaign pointed Russian cyber operatives to certain voting jurisdictions in key states – areas where Trump’s digital team and Republican operatives were spotting unexpected weakness in voter support for Hillary Clinton, according to several people familiar with the parallel inquiries.

Also under scrutiny is the question of whether Trump associates or campaign aides had any role in assisting the Russians in publicly releasing thousands of emails, hacked from the accounts of top Democrats, at turning points in the presidential race, mainly through the London-based transparency web site WikiLeaks.

Rep. Adam Schiff of California, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told McClatchy he wants to know whether Russia’s “fake or damaging news stories” were “coordinated in any way in terms of targeting or in terms of timing or in terms of any other measure … with the (Trump) campaign.”

By Election Day, an automated Kremlin cyberattack of unprecedented scale and sophistication had delivered critical and phony news about the Democratic presidential nominee to the Twitter and Facebook accounts of millions of voters.

Some investigators suspect the Russians targeted voters in swing states, even in key precincts.

Russia’s operation used computer commands knowns as “bots” to collect and dramatically heighten the reach of negative or fabricated news about Clinton, including a story in the final days of the campaign accusing her of running a pedophile ring at a Washington pizzeria.

One source familiar with Justice's criminal probe said investigators doubt Russian operatives controlling the so-called robotic cyber commands that fetched and distributed fake news stories could have independently "known where to specifically target … to which high-impact states and districts in those states."

All of the sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation, led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, is confidential.

Top Democrats on the committees investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election have signaled the same.

Schiff said he wants the House panel to determine whether Trump aides helped Russia time its cyberattacks or target certain voters and whether there was “any exchange of information, any financial support funneled to organizations that were doing this kind of work.”

Trump son-in-law Kushner, now a senior adviser to the president and the only current White House aide known to be deemed a “person of interest” in the Justice Department investigation, appears to be under the microscope in several respects.

His real estate finances and December meetings with Russia’s ambassador and the head of a sanctioned, state-controlled bank are also being examined.

Kushner’s “role as a possible cut-out or conduit for Moscow’s influence operations in the elections,” including his niche overseeing the digital operations, will be closely looked at, said the source knowledgeable about the Justice Department inquiry.

Kushner joined Donald Trump Jr. and Trump campaign Chairman Paul Manafort at a newly disclosed June 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer at Trump Tower in New York.

The meeting, revealed by The New York Times, followed emails in which Trump Jr. was told the lawyer for the Russian government would provide him with incriminating information on Clinton and he replied “If it’s what you say I love it.”

That disclosure could only serve to heighten interest in whether there was digital collaboration.

Mike Carpenter, who in January left a senior Pentagon post where he worked on Russia matters, also has suspicions about collaboration between the campaign and Russia’s cyber operatives.

“There appears to have been significant cooperation between Russia’s online propaganda machine and individuals in the United States who were knowledgeable about where to target the disinformation,” he said, without naming any American suspects.

Trump has repeatedly repudiated or equivocated about the finding of four key intelligence agencies – the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency and the Directorate of National Intelligence – that Russian cyber operatives meddled with the U.S. election.

Last Friday, during their first face-to-face meeting, Trump questioned Putin about Russia’s role in the election meddling and Putin denied culpability, said Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who was present.

Trump then said the two countries should find ways to move forward in their relationship, Tillerson said.

A Russian official who was at the meeting said the two sides agreed to form a working group to address cybersecurity, including interference in other countries’ internal affairs.

However, Trump backtracked Sunday night, saying in a tweet that he doesn’t believe such an effort can happen.

As more has been learned about the breadth of the Russian cyber onslaught, congressional Democrats have shown growing resolve to demand that the Republican-controlled intelligence committees fully investigate ways in which Trump associates may have conspired with the Russians.

Among other things, congressional investigators are looking into whether Russian operatives, who successfully penetrated voting registration systems in Illinois, Arizona and possibly other states, shared any of that data with the Trump campaign, according to a report in Time.

“I get the fact that the Russian intel services could figure out how to manipulate and use the bots,” Virginia Sen. Mark Warner told Pod Save America recently.

“Whether they could know how to target states and levels of voters that the Democrats weren’t even aware (of) really raises some questions … How did they know to go to that level of detail in those kinds of jurisdictions?”

The Russians appear to have targeted women and African-Americans in two of the three decisive states, Wisconsin and Michigan, “where the Democrats were too brain dead to realize those states were even in play,” Warner said.

Twitter’s and Facebook’s search engines in those states were overwhelmed, he said, meaning they couldn’t discern fake news from real news.

“On your news feed, you suddenly got … ‘Hillary Clinton’s sick’ or ‘Hillary Clinton’s stealing money from the State Department,’” said Warner.

It started even before Trump locked up the nomination.

Throughout the Republican primary elections in early 2016, Russia sent armies of bots carrying pro-Trump messages and deployed human “trolls” to comment in his favor on Internet stories and in social media, former FBI special agent Clint Watts told Congress weeks ago.

Watts, now a cybersecurity specialist with the Foreign Policy Research Institute, said the targets included former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham.

As Donald Trump was locking up the Republican presidential nomination in May 2016, a U.S. intelligence intercept picked up Russians discussing ways to spread news damaging to Clinton, two people familiar with the matter said.

No one has proved that Russia’s attack influenced the vote count in the Nov. 8 general election., but it wouldn’t have taken much to tip the results and change the course of history.

Clinton lost the decisive states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania by a combined 77,744 votes out of 13.9 million ballots cast.

She could have won Michigan if 5,353 Trump voters had gone for her instead, Wisconsin if 11,375 votes had flipped to her and Pennsylvania if 22,147 Trump voters had instead picked her.

Kushner’s pivotal role in the Trump cyber effort was underscored by his hiring in 2015 of Brad Parscale, a Texas-based digital guru who previously had done work for the Trump Organization, said two GOP operatives familiar with the campaign.

Parscale’s company raked in about $90 million for work targeting many states with paid advertisements, social media messages and other cyber tools.

As the Trump campaign’s top digital director, Parscale ran much of the operation from his San Antonio offices.

He is expected to appear before at least one of several congressional committees investigating aspects of Russia’s interference in the election.

Parscale could not be reached for comment.

CNN quoted him last month as dismissing suggestions that Russian-directed online bots would have been effective in swinging votes to Trump.

He said the campaign did not find Twitter -- where those bots mainly functioned – to be an effective tool.

Washington attorney Abbe Lowell, who was recently hired to be Kushner’s chief defense counsel and has “a reputation as a guy you hire if you're going to do battle with the government,” according to one former federal prosecutor, declined to comment on the Russia inquiries facing Kushner.

Shortly after his name arose in the inquiry, Kushner publicly volunteered to tell Congress about his Russia contacts and to answer questions about all issues for which he’s being scrutinized.

Another of Kushner’s lawyers, Jamie Gorelick, says he will cooperate with both congressional and Justice Department investigations.

However, no interview date has been set, and Kushner’s attorneys decline to say whether he has produced records sought by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

UPDATE: THIS STORY HAS BEEN UPDATED TO CLARIFY THAT SOME INVESTIGATORS SUSPECT RUSSIA TARGETED VOTERS IN SWING STATES AND EVEN KEY PRECINCTS.

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 8:58 pm » wrote: OMG!
Not that old **** again!

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 9:02 pm » wrote: No, the 'tiny' difference between us is that I am a relatively sane person and you are certifiably insane.

Peter W. Smith committed suicide the same day a reporter investigating Donald Trump died by falling down stairs.

Peter W. Smith, a Republican operative who confessed to the Wall Street Journal that he had tried to collude with Russian hackers and the Donald Trump campaign to rig the election, died just ten days after he spoke with the reporter.

It’s now been revealed that Smith’s official cause of death was suicide.

And it turns out he wasn’t the only one to die suspiciously on May 14th who had become a liability for Donald Trump.

Smith is said to have committed suicide in an Illinois hotel room, according to a new report by the Chicago Tribune (link).

This is made suspicious not only because he had just begun confessing his Trump-Russia collusion role to the media, but because his suicide note strangely insists there was “no foul play whatsoever” in all capital letters.

But on that same day, in Massachusetts, a reporter named Scott Christianson died in equally suspicious fashion.

Christianson had been investigating Donald Trump’s scandals for the news outlet McClatchy.

But he fell down a flight stairs on May 14th, according to the Times Union (link).

This has long seemed suspicious because Christianson had spent his decades long career focusing on other topics, and he had just joined McClatchy so he could begin reporting on Trump’s scandal.

He had only gotten one article about Trump out the door before he suddenly died in bizarre fashion.

The deaths of Peter W. Smith and Scott Christianson, both on the same day, both under suspicious circumstances, both immediately after they had become liabilities for Donald Trump, will no doubt cause the public to speculate that they may have both been murdered by the Kremlin or some other entity trying to protect Trump.

There is no known evidence to connect Smith and Christianson directly to each other.

But this gets pretty deeply into “what are the odds this is a coincidence” territory.

Termin8tor » 13 Jul 2017 11:03 pm » wrote:How should one describe someone who told years of lies in defense of a serial felon /serial rapist?

Misty » 13 Jul 2017 11:34 pm » wrote: How should one describe someone who has repeated the same old **** every day for years?

On NRA TV, Gun Companies Bankroll a Culture War

Major firearms brands are underwriting provocative videos that cast liberals and the media as enemies of America.

In the face of condemnation over its fiery political videos, the National Rifle Association is gleefully escalating its culture-war offensive.

On July 9, it posted a new video to NRA TV, a website that disseminates original programming produced by the gun organization.

https://youtu.be/kSrM8kq12-g

In the nearly six-minute spot, Dom Raso, a former Navy SEAL, condemns protesters who have marched against the Trump administration, the Democratic politicians who have applauded the protest movement, and journalists who publish stories that are the source of so much outrage.

In a voiceover, Raso declares that liberals are motivated by “an extreme ideology.”

The protests and increasing anger on the left reminds Raso, he says, of an overseas “radical Islamic country” where he’d served in the military.

An excerpt of the clip was tweeted out with the hashtag #ClenchedFistOfTruth, a reference to another video produced by Dana Loesch, an NRA spokeswoman.

Loesch’s video became the center of a media controversy in early July after some on the left said it endorsed violence against protesters.

Ruger and Sig Sauer are among the other major gun companies that have underwritten provocative videos produced by NRA TV.

Notably, the gun makers are bankrolling content that often has little or nothing to do with firearms, instead stoking the fires of conservative political fear and cultural resentment.