Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 669 670 671 672 673 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 9:51 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 18 Jul 2017 10:27 pm » wrote:
No, it's not that important.
It's not like anyone hacked our election or anything.
:\
Obama was trying to get the federal government involved in what should be a state matter, according to the Constitution.

Why would you object to abiding by the Constitution?

Do you find the Constitution suspicious? Did the Russians help write it? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 9:52 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Bump for the psychopath.

.
Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 9:02 pm » wrote: Where did I write "everyone," liar?

Most on your side either actively sided with Communist, both domestic and abroad, or played the role of Useful Idiots in their defense.
Ted Kennedy committed literal treason, colluding with the Russian against Reagan at the height of the Cold War.

Liberals despised Reagan, one of our greatest presidents, while fawning over Gorbachev.

Three prominent Democrats including later presidential candidate John Kerry flew to Nicaragua to collude with our Communist enemies to protect them from Reagan's attempt to overthrow them.

Journalists wept at Communist Sandinista Daniel Ortega's concession speech.

Liberals for years viciously attacked scholar Robert Conquest for his slow careful research on the death toll in the Soviet Union.

Get some meds, psycho. :loco:
User avatar
Huey
19 Jul 2017 9:59 am
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
Misty » 18 Jul 2017 10:27 pm » wrote: No, it's not that important.
It's not like anyone hacked our election or anything.
:\

Nobody hacked the election. There was an attempt to hack both major political parties, one successful and one not. Phishing attempts were used.

I know you loinfos want to perpetuate the lie the election was hacked but it wasn't.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 10:05 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 18 Jul 2017 6:42 pm » wrote:The Russians are threatening us now.
Talk about a day late and a dollar short. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The Cold War ended decades ago.

Liberals viciously attacked conservatives who warned about the danger from the Soviet Union, or actively sided with our literal enemies.
To be on the left today is to look around and see nutty ideas accepted as perfectly reasonable, everywhere and at all times. Speech is violence, but violent acts are just a really neat form of expression. Gender is a social construct, so you can be a boy on Monday and a girl on Tuesday. :clap:

If Paul Ryan calls for a spending increase that’s less than what Democrats want, in the progressive imagination this amounts to pushing Granny off a cliff. If the federal government considers ending its subsidy for the leading abortion provider in the country, or if a House dress code that didn’t bother Nancy Pelosi is discovered to have lingered on into Ryan’s term, we’re living in The Handmaid’s Tale.

Just this week, the Women’s March celebrated a cop-killer; a self-proclaimed member of the “resistance” said, in Cosmopolitan, “My seven-year-old asked if the president was going to hurt him”; Phil Donahue called the election of Trump “the darkest political moment in American history” and USA Today complained that Dunkirk didn’t feature enough minorities and women. After using the term “fake news” while talking to a dinner companion in a Beverly Hills restaurant, the writer and non-Trump voter Bret Easton Ellis was accosted and yelled at by a total stranger who accused the novelist of “colluding with Russia” at a West Hollywood hotel. :blink:

Asked Ellis on Twitter, “Is the Left f—ing NUTS?” Why, yes, Bret. Yes they are. :rofl: :rofl:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... -democrats
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 10:08 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Huey » 19 Jul 2017 9:59 am » wrote:Nobody hacked the election. There was an attempt to hack both major political parties, one successful and one not. Phishing attempts were used.

I know you loinfos want to perpetuate the lie the election was hacked but it wasn't.
Never try to point out the facts to this psychopath.

She'll do something intellectual, like put up a cartoon. :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
19 Jul 2017 10:50 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 19 Jul 2017 10:08 am » wrote:But Hillary........
Keep following the FOX News talking points Puss.
Diversion, diversion, diversion.
Image
User avatar
roadkill
19 Jul 2017 10:55 am
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 10:50 am » wrote: Keep following the FOX News talking points Puss.
Diversion, diversion, diversion.
Image

Yes...goodness gracious. We wouldn't want to address Hillary's crime and corruption. She's not the president.


If I rob a bank and then get fired...am I good to go cause I'm not employed?


You have a funny way of dealing with failure. :rofl:
User avatar
Huey
19 Jul 2017 10:56 am
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
roadkill » 19 Jul 2017 10:55 am » wrote: Yes...goodness gracious. We wouldn't want to address Hillary's crime and corruption. She's not the president.

If I rob a bank and then get fired...am I good to go cause I'm not employed?

You have a funny way of dealing with failure. :rofl:

And during the campaign she just blantantly ignored Clinton.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
roadkill
19 Jul 2017 10:58 am
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Huey » 19 Jul 2017 10:56 am » wrote:
And during the campaign she just blantantly ignored Clinton.

That too...she was engaged in diversion diversion diversion.


I'm so glad she was registered as a republican. :die:
User avatar
Huey
19 Jul 2017 11:01 am
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
roadkill » 19 Jul 2017 10:58 am » wrote: That too...she was engaged in diversion diversion diversion.

I'm so glad she was registered as a republican. :die:

A pro life republican.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Nobody
19 Jul 2017 11:08 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 19 Jul 2017 10:08 am » wrote:Never try to point out the facts to this psychopath.
She'll do something intellectual, like put up a cartoon. :rofl: :rofl:
Maybe you should point out this FACT to your loinfo BFF Huey.
Russia hacked election systems in 39 states.
Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known

Russia’s cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump’s election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost twice as many states as previously reported.

In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data.

The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database.

Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.
Facts are irrelevant to you Trumpanzees.
User avatar
roadkill
19 Jul 2017 11:12 am
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 11:08 am » wrote: Maybe you should point out this FACT to your loinfo BFF Huey.
Russia hacked election systems in 39 states.


Facts are irrelevant to you Trumpanzees.

Nope!


The Russians only hacked the dems...they used an ingenious phishing strategy.


"click here to receive your free gift" :rofl:
User avatar
Huey
19 Jul 2017 11:17 am
User avatar
      
35,606 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 11:08 am » wrote: Maybe you should point out this FACT to your loinfo BFF Huey.
Russia hacked election systems in 39 states.
Facts are irrelevant to you Trumpanzees.
Not what you posted misty. The election WAS NOT HACKED. Th data bases of private information was attacked.

Facts are irrelevant to this lying nitwit turd. Ps, turd, what did your hero do about it?
Huey » 19 Jul 2017 9:59 am » wrote: Nobody hacked the election. There was an attempt to hack both major political parties, one successful and one not. Phishing attempts were used.

I know you loinfos want to perpetuate the lie the election was hacked but it wasn't.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 1:15 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 10:50 am » wrote: Keep following the FOX News talking points Puss.
Diversion, diversion, diversion.
Diversion? Liar.

I've repeatedly asked you to cite a crime committed by Trump of officials, and other than lie, you've dodged the question.

While engaging in your usual propagandistic diversions.

Why didn't you write one single word during the election campaign about Hillary's crimes, scandals and collusion?


Because you're a psychopath and a Democrat Talking Point Liar.
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 1:17 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 10:50 am » wrote: Diversion, diversion, diversion.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.

Why did you dodge this post that gives a few examples of liberal collusion with the Soviet Union, if not outright treason, psycho?
Termin8tor » 18 Jul 2017 9:02 pm » wrote:Most on your side either actively sided with Communist, both domestic and abroad, or played the role of Useful Idiots in their defense.
Ted Kennedy committed literal treason, colluding with the Russian against Reagan at the height of the Cold War.

Liberals despised Reagan, one of our greatest presidents, while fawning over Gorbachev.

Three prominent Democrats including later presidential candidate John Kerry flew to Nicaragua to collude with our Communist enemies to protect them from Reagan's attempt to overthrow t
them.

Journalists wept
at Communist Sandinista Daniel Ortega's concession speech.

Liberals for years viciously attacked
scholar Robert Conquest for his slow careful research on the death toll in the Soviet Union.
Get some meds, psycho. :loco:
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 1:24 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Huey » 19 Jul 2017 10:56 am » wrote:And during the campaign she just blantantly ignored Clinton.
Little Miss Marxist is part of the corrupt Swamp. She's a retired postal worker.

Everyone knows the work ethic of most Post Office workers. :rofl: :rofl:
Given how absolutely dedicated she is to the rule of law, when it applies to conservatives, I wonder if she'll demand prosecution for these federal crimes.
And You Paid for It! US Postal Workers Found Guilty of Campaigning for Hillary Clinton During Work Hours
Jim Hoft Jul 19th, 2017 10:48 am 102 Comments


On Wednesday the Office of Special Council ruled the US Postal Service broke the law when they allowed workers to campaign for Hillary Clinton during work hours on the taxpayer dime.
The OSC found the U.S. Postal Service broke the law last year by letting employees do union-funded work for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and other Democratic candidates.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07 ... ork-hours/
That's also fraud.
User avatar
Sgt Bilko
19 Jul 2017 1:32 pm
User avatar
   
777 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 10:50 am » wrote: Keep following the FOX News talking points Puss.
Diversion, diversion, diversion.
Image
:die: :die: :die: :die: :die: :die: :die: :die:
: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Let's look at the alternatives.
ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, etc. all progressive news media. They select what and how news is reported using a very biased point of view. At least FOX attempts to remain neutral. Personally I use the internet most of the time. Searches ferret out fact from fiction.
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 1:35 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 18 Jul 2017 5:04 pm » wrote:Remember how T-Bag praised his son Fredo's 'transparency' when he released his emails (that were about to be released by the NY Times)?
Obviously this is a huge scandal, because little Miss Marxist never makes a false accusation or empty insinuation. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And why is the unbiased, objective MSM trying to smear Trump again?
TRUMP’S “UNDISCLOSED” MEETING WITH PUTIN
President Trump chatted at some length with Vladimir Putin during a dinner for G-20 leaders in Hamburg, Germany last week. The Washington Post and New York Times describe the meeting as “undisclosed,” an accurate description in the sense that Trump’s team didn’t tell the press about it.


But the press acts as if Trump was obligated to tell it. He wasn’t.


The press also acts as if there was something furtive about the talk. There wasn’t. It took place in plain view of nearly two dozen world leaders.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... -putin.php
User avatar
Nobody
19 Jul 2017 2:28 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 19 Jul 2017 1:35 pm » wrote:The press also acts as if there was something furtive about the talk. There wasn’t. It took place in plain view of nearly two dozen world leaders.
So what was said during that little talk?
Do you know?
Does anybody besides Trumplethinskin, Putin or Putin's translator know?
It was the leaders of some of our allies that disclosed it because they were 'startled, flummoxed and disheartened by T-Bag's actions.
It may have been in plain view of others, but it was out of earshot, so unless there were some lip readers watching, no one knows what they discussed.
Later that evening, Trump and Putin met again informally, a White House official acknowledged on Tuesday – but only after it was publicly revealed by Ian Bremmer, the president of the international consulting firm Eurasia Group.

Bremmer said there was a dinner that evening for the G20 heads of state and their spouses, though not all of them attended.

“There were a lot of empty seats,” he continued.

“Donald Trump got up from the table and sat down with Putin for about an hour.

It was very animated and very friendly.

Putin’s translator was translating.

I found out about it because people were startled.”

There was no one else within earshot, Bremmer added, and it is not known what the men discussed.

Trump was not joined in the conversation by his own translator, which is thought to be a breach of national security protocol.

The White House later said that the translator who accompanied Trump spoke Japanese, not Russian, and that was why Trump and Putin spoke through the Russian translator.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... e-confirms
How does Golf-T even know if his words were being translated accurately to Putin?
He has no idea what Putin's translator was saying to him.
The Terror of Twitter spent way more time with the man who **** with our election than he did with any of our allies.
But you're good with that.
The bromance continues.

Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
19 Jul 2017 2:31 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 19 Jul 2017 2:28 pm » wrote: So what was said during that little talk?
Do you know?
Does anybody besides Trumplethinskin, Putin or Putin's translator know?
It was the leaders of some of our allies that disclosed it because they were 'startled, flummoxed and disheartened by T-Bag's actions.
It may have been in plain view of others, but it was out of earshot, so unless there were some lip readers watching, no one knows what they discussed.
Here's a hint, Dim. I don't have to prove anything.

You're the accuser and the lying psychopath, so if you think he was doing something wrong, you prove it.

So far, you can't even name a crime, let alone provide evidence one was committed. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
1 669 670 671 672 673 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 6999 users online :: 7 registered, 15 bots, and 6977 guests
Bots: NING, TTD-Content, CriteoBot, YandexBot, okhttp, ADmantX, CensysInspect, proximic, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search