Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 67 68 69 70 71 1,190
User avatar
RichClem
11 Jun 2013 5:22 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
You're a liar and everyone knows it.Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?Little Miss Marxist said:Here's a hint Puss.An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.Oh, so if a rapist is never convicted, he's not a rapist? You'll make any ridiculous claim to defend a serial rapist like Clinton.
User avatar
Shaquita Lashay
11 Jun 2013 5:27 pm
User avatar
 
2 posts
Misty castrates Glory Hole with every post. It's just so funny.
jayjay
12 Jun 2013 4:30 am
jayjay
posts
Misty castrates Glory Hole with every post. It's just so funny. Man, that guy has a lot of balls.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
12 Jun 2013 4:44 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
And his thuggish Chicago background and track record as a candidate. Hey, don't feel bad. Slightly built black fellows from large cities scare the crap out of me, too. Frankly, I can't tell the dangerous ones from the safe ones. It's maddening. Misty castrates Glory Hole with every post. It's just so funny. Glory Hole has been running around the forum copy-pasting talking points from the heritage foundation INSISTING that socialist singapore, where the government singlehandedly owns 60% of all the means of production, is not just "capitalist," but economically "more free than the USA." Indeed, the FREE-EST ON EATH. How can business people in Singapore be economically more free, when their competitor gets to MAKE AND ADJUDICATE the laws under which they compete? Simple: THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO COMPETE WITH THE GOVERNMENT. Capitalism. It's always changing, like Glory Hole's definitions...
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jun 2013 3:34 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
This is how a lying troll operates. It's blatantly obvious that Clem knew that I was specifically talking about a claim he made that Conservative groups were unfairly singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, since I put the word in quotes every time I typed it. Being unable to back up his false claim, he has now moved the goalpost to make it look like we were discussing the 'general topic' of harassment and/or bullying of right wing groups by the IRS. Clem's claim: Most (Conservative groups) had trouble raising funds once donors found out about the audits, harassment and intrusive questions. It's all been in the news. I've cited evidence in my threads. Misty: Which right wing group was 'audited' by the IRS. Give me a name. RichClem: There are several threads about the topic, moonbat. If you're too lazy to read them, don't bother me. You'll just stonewall and lie whatever evidence I cite. Misty: So IOW you just made it up. Got it. RichClem: So because you're too freaking lazy to read the threads, I "made it up?" Misty: So I'm supposed to know which threads contain posts about the so-called 'auditing' of Tea Party groups? What am I, a **** mind reader? Why don't you point out the threads? RichClem: They're holding hearings on it, troll. Conservatives on the board have reported details for weeks now. But because you couldn't find anything with a quick google search, I'm the liar. Misty: You made a very specific accusation that the IRS has been 'auditing' Tea Party groups. And when asked to prove it, you can't, because it is not true. An IRS 'audit' is very different from being asked to answer questions when applying for tax exempt status. You made a false claim, refused to prove it, then told me to go find some mystery threads where you say it was posted. Of course if it did actually happen, I should be able to find it on an internet search, which I wasn't. It's so **** ironic that you go around accusing others of being liars all the time, when in actuality, you are the biggest liar on this forum. RichClem: F*** you and your false accusation. You accused me of lying simply because I refused to provide you with info. Likely 3, 4, 5 threads are available on the most recent pages, but you refused to even check. Misty: No I accused you of lying because you lied about Tea Party groups being 'audited' by the IRS. RichClem: I just brought up one of my threads about this, with a new source cited. It's been sitting there in front of your beady little troll eyes. Misty: I haven't been online for a couple of days, and since I'm not clairvoyant, I have no idea which thread you are talking about. If there was such a thread that contained proof of Tea Party groups being singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, then why can't you just post a link to it or at the very least give the title? You can't, because it never happened, and once again you have proven that you are the one guilty of being a liar and that's why you always project that accusation onto others. RichClem: So you haven't the slightest idea how much evidence I've cited, or anyone else, even though one of my threads was high on the board when you were posting online. Yet you accused me of lying because I refuse to waste time showing evidence to you personally. Thanks for again confirming what a dishonest hack you are.Misty: More projection and proof that you are nothing but a filthy liar. If you really had any proof, you would either post a link, or at least give the title of the thread. You have taken the time to repeat this same crap over and over, yet you won't take a few seconds to copy and paste the title of the thread? RichClem: There must have been 6, 7, 8 different threads on this top by different people. But because you can't find your a** with both hands and a hunting dog, we're all liars. Is this the best the liberal-left can do, shameless lying trolls and hopeless imbeciles?Misty: 6, 7 or 8 threads on Tea Party groups being 'audited' by the IRS? And yet you can't seem to name one. You're a liar and everyone knows it. And this is where Clem pretends that we were never talking specifically about IRS 'audits'. On the general topic of harassment, bullying and harassment by Obama's IRS. Yet you can't manage to find one of those threads. Just like you never "saw" pages and pages and pages of evidence against Clinton. Just like how you dishonestly denied that the boxes and boxes and boxes of EVIDENCE collected by Schippers et al were evidence. Your vision always fades when evidence is presented or you simply stonewall and lie. Consult a doctor, troll, or better yet, a psychiatrist. IRS audits Puss. We were talking about IRS audits, not the general topic of harassment and/or bullying by the IRS. And this is why arguing with you is about as useful as repeatedly smashing your head into a brick wall.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 3:40 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
This is how a lying troll operates.Like the following lie you told?Since you seem to think that sex is only for procreation, why would you suppose that Rush Limbaugh was traveling to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra?Was he going there to start a family? Isn't it curious that a man of Rush's means can't get laid here in the United States?I wonder what he can find in the DR, that he can't get here?I'm just sayin'.....The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector.Get stuffed, liar. It's blatantly obvious that Clem knew that I was specifically talking about a claim he made that Conservative groups were unfairly singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, since I put the word in quotes every time I typed it.Being unable to back up his false claim, he has now moved the goal post to make it look like we were discussing the 'general topic' of harassment and/or bullying of right wing groups by the IRS.Clem's claim:Misty: Which right wing group was 'audited' by the IRS.Give me a name.RichClem:There are several threads about the topic, moonbat. If you're too lazy to read them, don't bother me.You'll just stonewall and lie whatever evidence I cite.Misty: So IOW you just made it up.Got it.RichClem: So because you're too freaking lazy to read the threads, I "made it up?"Misty: So I'm supposed to know which threads contain posts about the so-called 'auditing' of Tea Party groups?What am I, a **** mind reader?Why don't you point out the threads?RichClem: They're holding hearings on it, troll. Conservatives on the board have reported details for weeks now. But because you couldn't find anything with a quick google search, I'm the liar.Misty: You made a very specific accusation that the IRS has been 'auditing' Tea Party groups.And when asked to prove it, you can't, because it is not true.An IRS 'audit' is very different from being asked to answer questions when applying for tax exempt status.You made a false claim, refused to prove it, then told me to go find some mystery threads where you say it was posted.Of course if it did actually happen, I should be able to find it on an internet search, which I wasn't.It's so **** ironic that you go around accusing others of being liars all the time, when in actuality, you are the biggest liar on this forum.RichClem: F*** you and your false accusation. You accused me of lying simply because I refused to provide you with info.Likely 3, 4, 5 threads are available on the most recent pages, but you refused to even check.Misty: No I accused you of lying because you lied about Tea Party groups being 'audited' by the IRS.RichClem: I just brought up one of my threads about this, with a new source cited. It's been sitting there infront of your beady little troll eyes. Misty: 6, 7 or 8 threads on Tea Party groups being 'audited' by the IRS?And yet you can't seem to name one.You're a liar and everyone knows it.zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 3:49 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
I haven't been online for a couple of days, and since I'm not clairvoyant, I have no idea which thread you are talking about.If there was such a thread that contained proof of Tea Party groups being singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, then why can't you just post a link to it or at the very least give the title?You can't, because it never happened, and once again you have proven that you are the one guilty of being a liar and that's why you always project that accusation onto others.If the evidence fell on her empty head and gave her a concussion, she'd still deny it existed. Don't worry about government being oppressive, insists Obama. That's just a conservative myth! Which is essentially the opposite of our central Founding Principle.As chairman of the House Homeland Security oversight subcommittee, [Jeff] Duncan (R-S.C.) toured a federal law enforcement facility in late May and noticed agents training with the semi-automatic weapons at a firing range. They identified themselves as IRS, he said. “When I left there, it’s been bugging me for weeks now, why IRS agents are training with a semi-automatic rifle AR-15, which has stand-off capability,” Duncan told POLITICO. “Are Americans that much of a target that you need that kind of capability..? “I think Americans raise eyebrows when you tell them that IRS agents are training with a type of weapon that has stand-off capability. It’s not like they’re carrying a sidearm and they knock on someone’s door and say, ‘You’re evading your taxes,’” Duncan said.A bureaucracy is bad. A politicized bureaucracy is worse. A paramilitary politicized bureaucracy is nuts. And, in fact, evil. There is no reason in a civilized society why the Deputy Assistant Commissioner of Paperwork should have his own Seal Team Six.... in the developed world, the paramilitarized bureaucracy is uniquely American. This is the only G7 government whose education minister has his own SWAT team — for policing student-loan compliance. The other day, the Gibson guitar company settled with the feds over an arcane infraction of a law on rare-wood importation — after their factories were twice raided by “agents” bearing automatic weapons. Like the man said, don’t bring a knife to a guitar fight. Do musical-instrument manufacturers have a particular reputation for violence?The Gibson raid looks a little different in light of recent revelations.http://www.nationalr...r-15-mark-steyn
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jun 2013 4:02 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Like the following lie you told?The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector.The DR doesn't have a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector?If the evidence fell on her empty head and gave her a concussion, she'd still deny it existed. What evidence?You were unable to cite one iota of evidence to support your claim that the IRS has singled out right wing groups for 'audits'.Now you're just going to pretend that we were never talking about 'audits' at all, but just the 'general topic' of harassment.Anyone with functioning eyes can read the posts for themselves and see that you have zero credibility on this.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 4:11 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
The DR doesn't have a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector? So Rush is going there for child sex? What an absolute scuzzball you are.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 4:35 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
The DR doesn't have a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector? You're a shameless lying smear artist without a shred of integrity. Smearing decent people while defending serial felons/ serial rapists.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jun 2013 7:10 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
So Rush is going there for child sex?What an absolute scuzzball you are. I have no idea what Rush was going to the DR for.He did have a bottle of Viagra with him, so I doubt he was just sight seeing.BTW the Viagra scrip was in someone else's name.That's not exactly legal.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 7:33 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
I have no idea what Rush was going to the DR for. He did have a bottle of Viagra with him, so I doubt he was just sight seeing. BTW the Viagra scrip was in someone else's name. That's not exactly legal. Oh, so it was just an innocent question that he might be engaged in child sex. F*** you and your endless smears. You're a deeply twisted wackjob.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 7:44 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
More projection and proof that you are nothing but a filthy liar. Tell everyone again how there was no evidence in the boxes and boxes and boxes of EVIDENCE that Schippers et al collected for months.That's so hilarious. Oh gosh, maybe in the boxes and boxes and boxes of evidence and sworn testimony that Schippers, House Managers and their employees collected?The ones Clinton demanded by sealed for 50 years?Does that give you a hint?Yes. It gives me a big hint that you're bad word Looney Tunes.You think you can see things that are in sealed boxes.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jun 2013 7:47 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Tell everyone again how there was no evidence in the boxes and boxes and boxes of EVIDENCE that Schippers et al collected for months. That's so hilarious. Tell everyone again how the IRS has been singling our right wing groups for 'audits'. That's so hilarious.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 7:49 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Tell everyone again how the IRS has been singling our right wing groups for 'audits'. That's so hilarious. Oh gosh, is your vision failing again? It's been all over the news, and the IRS admitted they targeted conservative groups for special treatment. Get some meds, really.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jun 2013 7:58 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Oh gosh, is your vision failing again? It's been all over the news, and the IRS admitted they targeted conservative groups for special treatment.Get some meds, really. Special treatment?Are we playing dumb again Puss?You made the specific charge that right wing groups are being 'audited'.Not singled out for extra scrutiny on an application for tax exempt status, but 'audited'.You do know the difference between reviewing an application and an 'audit' don't you Puss?An income tax audit is an examination of a tax return, it is not an application filed to receive tax exempt status.You can't get away with that, Jackhole.But I'm sure you'll keep trying.
User avatar
RichClem
13 Jun 2013 9:27 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Oh gosh, is your vision failing again? It's been all over the news, and the IRS admitted they targeted conservative groups for special treatment. Get some meds, really. Special treatment? Are we playing dumb again Puss? You made the specific charge that right wing groups are being 'audited'. Not singled out for extra scrutiny on an application for tax exempt status, but 'audited'. You do know the difference between reviewing an application and an 'audit' don't you Puss? An income tax audit is an examination of a tax return, it is not an application filed to receive tax exempt status. You can't get away with that, Jackhole. But I'm sure you'll keep trying. Look troll, no matter what evidence I cite of the broad IRS abuses, you'll lie and stonewall. As you did for years for Clinton and continue to even now. So take your demands for proof and get stuffed.
User avatar
Nobody
14 Jun 2013 10:43 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Look troll, no matter what evidence I cite of the broad IRS abuses, you'll lie and stonewall.As you did for years for Clinton and continue to even now.So take your demands for proof and get stuffed.Translation....I just made up that stuff about right wing groups being singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, now I'm stuck, so I'll just keep insulting you.
User avatar
Nobody
14 Jun 2013 11:01 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Darrell Issa Wont Release IRS Transcripts Because They Prove Him WrongDarrell Issa (R-CA) is going to ignore facts once again, and forge ahead, even though he was called out Sunday by Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD), the top Democrat on the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee.Cummings released a partial official interview transcript to Candy Crowley on CNN's State of the Union Sunday, and it was revealed that the IRS manager behind the extra review of Tea Party groups described himself as a conservative Republican during the interviews.This fact kills Darrell Issa's entire premise that there was a political agenda behind the reviews. But Issa said in a statement released to the press that the IRS managers comments "did not provide anything enlightening or contradict other witness accounts." No? They sure contradict Issa's accounts to the press.Issa's office released a statement in which Issa danced quickly to avoid commenting on the actual fact that a conservative Republican was behind the 'targeting', "I strongly disagree with Ranking Member Cummings' assertion that we know everything we need to know about inappropriate targeting of Tea Party groups by the IRS and the case is, in his word, 'solved,'. His extreme and reckless assertions are a signal that his true motivation is stopping needed Congressional oversight and he has no genuine interest in working, on a bipartisan basis, to expose the full truth.""The American public wants to know why targeting occurred and who was involved. The testimony excerpts Ranking Member Cummings revealed today did not provide anything enlightening or contradict other witness accounts. The only thing Ranking Member Cummings left clear in his comments today is that if it were up to him the investigation would be closed. Fortunately, the decision to close the investigation is not his to make. Both House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp and I are committed to leading a fact based investigation that fully exposes all relevant facts about IRS efforts to target Americans for their political beliefs."Issa does not say that the IRS manager is not a conservative Republican.Darrell Issa is great at spin, but here's the thing. If he really is committed to exposing all of the facts, why doesn't he release the full transcripts for the public? This is very similar to his insistence that testimony that contradicted the Republican version of Benghazi gate be relegated to behind closed doors, when the cameras were no longer rolling.Cummings demanded that Darrell Issa release all of the transcripts from the IRS hearings, and was so confident that the full transcripts would prove his point that he threatened to release them himself if Issa won't by the end of this week.Cummings: Listen up now. He was a 21-year veteran of the IRS. And he was - he described himself in the interviews in response to a Republican attorney's question as a conservative Republican. Very significant. He is a conservative Republican working for the IRS. I think this interview and these statements go a long way to what's showing that the White House was not involved in this. We knew that - and this is the guy by the way, this conservative 21-year veteran of IRS is the same one who sent the initial case, the Tea Party case, up to the Washington technical office.Darrell Issa should be forced to release the full transcripts, instead of only the pieces that reinforce his Heritage-induced 2014 politicking for the Republican Party on our dime. If the manager did not identify himself as a conservative Republican, let us all hear the truth.Let the public decide for themselves, based on all of the facts. But if it turns out that Issa knew he was wrong when he accused the White House of being behind the IRS review of Tea Party groups, perhaps the press might consider no longer taking Darrell Issa's clown show so seriously. It's not as if he has any credibility to carry him through his inability to back up his claims.Darrell Issa won't release the full transcripts because they prove him wrong. If they had an ounce of White House scandal in them, theyd have been gussied up, exaggerated, sold and devoured by the Issa-fawning press by now. Issa just can't bear to see yet another scandal die due to reality not coinciding with his claims.During a recent appearance on CNN, Issa promised that the full transcripts would be released.Now he seems to backing down.This tells me that the transcripts don't reveal what Issa wants them to reveal, or he would have no problem releasing them.He already came to his conclusions about what happened, before he ever held one hearing.Now he's searching for the facts to fit his conclusion.That's how he operates.You are supposed to examine the facts and let them lead you to a conclusion, not the other way around.
User avatar
Nobody
14 Jun 2013 11:19 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
WTF is going on in Virginia?Governor Bob (ultrasound) McDonnell is being investigated by the FBI for gifts he got from Jonnie Williams, the CEO of Star Scientific Inc. a company that makes dietary supplements.Ken Cuccinelli, the state's attorney general and Republican gubernatorial nominee also has ties to the same businessman.And the Republican nominee for lieutenant governor of Virginia, a one time syndicated radio preacher named E.W. Jackson, has said things like yoga leads to Satanism, or birth defects in children are caused by their parents' sin.Republicans sure know how to pick 'em.
1 67 68 69 70 71 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 3622 users online :: 8 registered, 12 bots, and 3602 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, NING, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, proximic, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Googlebot, YandexBot, Baiduspider, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search