Liberal Forum

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 1:32 am » wrote: I swear none of you Trump Fluffers ever went to school.

He said he loves the poorly educated and it's obvious they love him too.

Uh, then why don't liberal Dims like you even make any attempt to debate issues?

Why do conservatives crush board liberals on almost every topic?


You can't debate issues on the merit, so you lie, smear and spread dishonest propaganda.

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 12:14 am » wrote: No it wasn't jackhole.
The blame was on the white supremacists and neo-Nazis who invaded the city of Charlottesville to provoke a riot.

People don't dress this way to peacefully protest.

I never claimed or implied that they were blameless. I only claim that there were two sides showing hate and committing violence.

You're lying, as usual.

Jesse Watters Hits One Out of the Park
By Peter Barry Chowka
....The New York Times said, and she was on the ground, their reporter [Sheryl Gay Stolberg]: “The hard left seemed as hate-filled as the alt-right. I saw Antifa beating a white nationalist.” The ACLU of Virginia: “Not sure who provoked first. Both sides were hitting on each other.” And then one of the four people who were arrested was a left-wing radical who punched a reporter in the face, a female reporter.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... z4ppbcUNwo

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 12:14 am » wrote: No it wasn't jackhole.
The blame was on the white supremacists and neo-Nazis who invaded the city of Charlottesville to provoke a riot.

People don't dress this way to peacefully protest.

"invaded" ?



I don't like the white supremacists any more than you do...but they were issued a legal permit.


The city then revoked it...then the ACLU forced the city to reinstate the permit.


Hey Misty...you're having another "Zoom!" moment.

So Little Donnie Tantrump retweeted this picture of a train hitting a CNN reporter, before his keepers reminded him that maybe that was in bad taste considering the fact that a bunch of people were just mowed down by a car driven by one of his supporters in Charlottesville, so he deleted it, but not before it was retweeted many times and many screenshots were taken of it.



Maybe his keepers need to remind him that his Tweets are considered official presidential records and deleting them would be a violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 12:52 pm » wrote:So Little Donnie Tantrump retweeted this picture of a train hitting a CNN reporter, before his keepers reminded him that maybe that was in bad taste considering the fact that a bunch of people were just mowed down by a car driven by one of his supporters in Charlottesville, so he deleted it, but not before it was retweeted many times and many screenshots were taken of it.

Maybe his keepers need to remind him that his Tweets are considered official presidential records and deleting them would be a violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.

Wow, another huge scandal discovered by the psychotic!

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 12:52 pm » wrote:So Little Donnie Tantrump retweeted this picture of a train hitting a CNN reporter, before his keepers reminded him that maybe that was in bad taste considering the fact that a bunch of people were just mowed down by a car driven by one of his supporters in Charlottesville, so he deleted it, but not before it was retweeted many times and many screenshots were taken of it.



Maybe his keepers need to remind him that his Tweets are considered official presidential records and deleting them would be a violation of the Presidential Records Act of 1978.

If this bothers you there is something truly wrong with you. This goes beyond snowflakery

roadkill » 15 Aug 2017 8:55 am » wrote:"invaded" ?
I don't like the white supremacists any more than you do...but they were issued a legal permit.
The city then revoked it...then the ACLU forced the city to reinstate the permit.

By 'invaded' I meant that they do not live in Charlottesville, or even in the state of Virginia.
They came from other states to stir up trouble there.
The militia guys in that photo were from my state of Pennsylvania.

roadkill » 15 Aug 2017 8:55 am » wrote:Hey Misty...you're having another "Zoom!" moment.

I have no idea what that means.

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 12:56 pm » wrote:Wow, another huge scandal discovered by the psychotic!

I didn't know there was a rule here that we could only post about 'huge' scandals.
Do you only post about 'huge' scandals?

First of all, it was tone deaf of him to post that image considering that a crowd of people were just mowed down by a car driven by one of his Nazi supporters, and secondly he violated a law by deleting a presidential record.

So I haven't looked, have you commented on the fact that he also retweeted a tweet posted by an alt-right conspiracy theorist?

http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f ... 80#p941367

And before you say that he didn't know the guy was an alt-right conspiracy theorist, in order for him to be able to see this guy's Tweets, that means he follows him on Twitter, and this guy has been given credentials to attend WH press briefings.

He regularly retweets the Tweets of people like this.

Sgt Bilko » 14 Aug 2017 9:06 pm » wrote: Misty the Trump hater doesn't answer the simple question of why would Trump go to Charlottesville. What purpose would it serve to offset the cost of him going there. It costs millions every time the president travels. With Misty it doesn't matter which decision he would make. He would be wrong according to the mentally Impaired Misty!!!

So when he golfs every other week you don't care about the cost. But when he has a chance to show some leadership and aid in the healing it's wasteful?

Is this how you go to a rally?

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 12:57 pm » wrote: By 'invaded' I meant that they do not live in Charlottesville, or even in the state of Virginia.
They came from other states to stir up trouble there.
The militia guys in that photo were from my state of Pennsylvania.
I have no idea what that means.

The ANTIFA goons you love also came from out is state.

But anyhoo, is this how you go to a rally:




Are you really this stupid?

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 1:07 pm » wrote: I didn't know there was a rule here that we could only post about 'huge' scandals.
Do you only post about 'huge' scandals?

You haven't found any big scandals, psycho, despite your months and months and months of lying, smearing and shrieking.

First of all, it was tone deaf of him to post that image considering that a crowd of people were just mowed down by a car driven by one of his Nazi supporters, and secondly he violated a law by deleting a presidential record.

Oh wow, another huge scandal!

So I haven't looked, have you commented on the fact that he also retweeted a tweet posted by an alt-right conspiracy theorist?

And before you say that he didn't know the guy was an alt-right conspiracy theorist, in order for him to be able to see this guy's Tweets, that means he follows him on Twitter, and this guy has been given credentials to attend WH press briefings.

He regularly retweets the Tweets of people like this.

Give me a reason I should believe this, after all the lies you've told that I've exposed.

You're like the boy who cried wolf, psycho.

Huey » 15 Aug 2017 1:12 pm » wrote: The ANTIFA goons you love also came from out is state.

But anyhoo, is this how you go to a rally:



Are you really this stupid?

.

.

No, if those pictures are accurate, that means little Miss Marxist lied.

And she never does that!

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 8:47 am » wrote:Uh, then why don't liberal Dims like you even make any attempt to debate issues?

I can only speak for myself.
First of all, I find that debating with you brainwashed Trumpkins is as useful as bashing my head into a brick wall.

You guys have your own version of reality.

And secondly, I'm really not interested in engaging in long drawn out debates that go nowhere.
What's the point?
You're never going to change my mind, and I'm never going to change yours.

It seems like the new Libs have been been willing to engage in debate, but all you do is call them childish names like Dims, so they will probably give up engaging with you soon, if they haven't already.

Why would anyone want to engage in debate with someone who constantly calls people LIARS and Dims?

That's not debate, it's childish name calling and it turns people off.
If you really wanted serious debate then you would act like a grown up.

But you don't really want debate,
You just want to bully people into agreeing with you.

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 8:47 am » wrote:Why do conservatives crush board liberals on almost every topic?

**** delusional.

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 8:47 am » wrote:You can't debate issues on the merit, so you lie, smear and spread dishonest propaganda.

Looking in the mirror again?

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 1:31 pm » wrote: I can only speak for myself.
First of all, I find that debating with you brainwashed Trumpkins is as useful as bashing my head into a brick wall.

You guys have your own version of reality.

And secondly, I'm really not interested in engaging in long drawn out debates that go nowhere.
What's the point?
You're never going to change my mind, and I'm never going to change yours.

It seems like the new Libs have been been willing to engage in debate, but all you do is call them childish names like Dims, so they will probably give up engaging with you soon, if they haven't already.

Why would anyone want to engage in debate with someone who constantly calls people LIARS and Dims?

That's not debate, it's childish name calling and it turns people off.
If you really wanted serious debate then you would act like a grown up.

But you don't really want debate,
You just want to bully people into agreeing with you.
**** delusional.
Looking in the mirror again?

I think you have bashed your head against a brick wall literally. By choice. No one can be as partisanly stupid as you.

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 1:31 pm » wrote: I can only speak for myself.
First of all, I find that debating with you brainwashed Trumpkins is as useful as bashing my head into a brick wall.

We can stop right there.

You're lying.

You guys have your own version of reality.

You mean like Obama being a successful president?

I could write for hours about the stupid claims made from the fake reality of Liberal La-La-Land.

Imbecile.

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 1:31 pm » wrote: **** delusional.

She lies.

Name one single board liberal who can hold their own in debate honestly, psycho.

But like always, you'll refuse to answer the question because your dishonesty and idiocy would be exposed before everyone.

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 1:30 pm » wrote:No, if those pictures are accurate, that means little Miss Marxist lied.
And she never does that!

Lied about what?
I never said that members of ANTIFA did not come from out of state.

But Heather Heyer and the two friends she attended the counter-protest with were residents of Charlottesville and they were not members of ANTIFA.

The people in the image are dressed in black and holding plastic garbage pails.
The members of the militia from PA that I posted are wearing body armor, and are armed with batons and AR-15 rifles.

Not quite the equivalent.

I don't know much about ANTIFA, but it seems like they have grown out of a desire to condemn the hate and racism on display at these white supremacist/ neo-Nazi rallies.

You guys love to pretend that ANTIFA are part of the Democratic Party and that all Democrats/Liberals support ANTIFA. Neither of those things are true.

ANTIFA's political beliefs might lean toward the left, often toward the far left, but they do not conform with the Democratic Party platform.

And run of the mill Libs/Dems do not support the use of vandalism or violence.

That said, the violence is out of hand on both sides.

And unfortunately we have a POTUS who refuses to issue a full- throated condemnation of the white supremacists and Nazis who support him.

He needs to tell them in no uncertain terms that he does want their support and that they are not welcome in the Republican Party.

Other Republicans have done that in the past.
Why won't he do it?

Speaking of lying, your BFF Huey just said that I 'love' the ANTIFA goons.
Why don't you ask him to post the quote where I professed my love for them.
Good luck with that, because it doesn't exist.

But you won't call him a liar, will you?

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 1:28 pm » wrote:You haven't found any big scandals, psycho, despite your months and months and months of lying, smearing and shrieking.

And neither have you.
Has Obama been arrested yet for the many felonies you say he committed?

Termin8tor » 15 Aug 2017 1:28 pm » wrote:Give me a reason I should believe this, after all the lies you've told that I've exposed.

The only thing you have exposed is that you are a boot-licking ***-kissing Trump Humper.

I posted the Tweet that he retweeted jackass.
He couldn't see this guy's Tweet if he did not intentionally choose to follow him on Twitter.
That's how Twitter works.

A quick Google search will show you that Jack Posobiec has promoted wacky far right conspiracy theories like Pizzagate, and that in May he was given credentials to attend a WH press briefing.

I would post the link for you, but you never read my links anyway, so what's the point?
You are not interested in the truth.

Misty » 15 Aug 2017 2:30 pm » wrote: And neither have you.
Has Obama been arrested yet for the many felonies you say he committed?

I don't believe I've ever made that claim, psycho.
Can you quote me? No?

As usual.

I have called both Clinton's serial felons and have cited the mountain of evidence against them.

That's why Clinton was impeached, duuu.

The only thing you have exposed is that you are a boot-licking ***-kissing Trump Humper.

Blah, blah, blah from a psychopath.

I would post the link for you, but you never read my links anyway, so what's the point?
You are not interested in the truth.

Liar. I am always interested in the truth, but won't wallow through pages and pages and pages of your lies to find a little.
Even that claim is the truth, it only shows that Trump occasionally is misinformed.

Big freaking deal.