Liberal Forum

The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For JesusOn a pain scale of one to 10, Chelsea ranks the epidural-free birth of her child as a six. Her husbands spankings? Those are an eight.First, he uses his hands for warm-up slaps. Then comes a combination of tools based on the specific infraction. The wooden spoon is the least severe; for the worst rule-breaking like texting while driving (It could kill me, Chelsea admits) or moving money between accounts without his permission she'll be hit with something else: a hairbrush, a paddle, or a leather strap.But this isnt domestic abuse, Chelsea says. This is for Jesus.Chelsea and her husband Clint, who asked that I use only their first names, belong to a small subculture of religious couples who practice 'Christian Domestic Discipline,' a lifestyle that calls for a wife to be completely submissive to her husband. Referred to as CDD by its followers, the practice often includes spanking and other types corporal punishments administered by husbands and ostensibly ordained by God.(...)When a wife breaks her husband's rules-rolling her eyes, maybe, or just feeling "meh," as one blogger put it-that can equal punishments which are often corporal but can also be "corner time"; writing lines (think "I will not disobey my master" 1,000 times); losing a privilege like internet access; or being "humbled" by some sort of nude humiliation. Some practice "maintenance spanking," wherein good girls are slapped on a schedule to remind them who's boss; some dont.Read more at link in title.Domestic abuse under the guise of religion.How nice.

RichClem, on 20 Jun 2013 - 11:50, said: All I can do is bleat, dissemble and lie in defense of corrupt Republicans. I know. Thanks for once again clearing that up. Which one of us lied for years on behalf of a deeply corrupt serial felon/ serial rapist? And still does? You can't even tell believable lies? The Latest Trend In Christianity: Beating Your Wife For Jesus Domestic abuse under the guise of religion. How nice. The real unemployment rate is 11%. Obama needs $1 trillion annually in Fed-created money to keep it even at that pathetic level. Obama-care is becoming an obvious "train wreck" even according to Democrats, and it's killing hiring. What does little Miss Marxist bleat about? Fringe Christians who effect no one outside their marriage. Look, a squirrel!

Misty, that was quite a kick to the nutz you delivered. I was laughing the whole way through, and so thankful I'm not on the side of angry, scared, racists losers.

Misty, that was quite a kick to the nutz you delivered. I was laughing the whole way through, and so thankful I'm not on the side of angry, scared, racists losers.

RichClem, on 20 Jun 2013 - 11:50, said:All I can do is bleat, dissemble and lie in defense of corrupt Republicans.I know.Thanks for once again clearing that up.Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?Little Miss Marxist said:Here's a hint Puss.An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.No, a "rapist" is someone who has committed rape.You'll tell any absurd lie on behalf of a corrupt Democrat.

Could a sane, honest person really believe the following?Being neither sane nor honest, how in the world would you know what such a person could believe?

Being neither sane nor honest, how in the world would you know what such a person could believe? Then you define what a "rapist" is, troll. Rotsa ruck reconciling the actual definition with your pathetic attempt to defend serial rapist Bill Clinton. Little Miss Marxist said: Here's a hint Puss. An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.

rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton,rapist Clinton, rapist Clinton, What does it say that you dishonestly defended a low-life like that for years and still do? That your party stood behind a serial felon/ serial rapist? That your side adulates him to this day? Stupid moonbat.

I guess we don't want to talk about "auditing" the Tea Party anymore, lol.

I guess we don't want to talk about "auditing" the Tea Party anymore, lol.No.Clem isreverting to Clinton and rape again, his two favorite subjects.

I guess we don't want to talk about "auditing" the Tea Party anymore, lol. I cited two examples and she typically stonewalled them. As she stonewalls all evidence about corrupt Democrats. No.Clem isreverting to Clinton and rape again, his two favorite subjects. It's established history. A troll like you who'll lie about rape and felonies will lie about anything and everything. That takes a special kind of sociopath.

I haven't been online for a couple of days, and since I'm not clairvoyant, I have no idea which thread you are talking about. If there was such a thread that contained proof of Tea Party groups being singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, then why can't you just post a link to it or at the very least give the title? You can't, because it never happened, and once again you have proven that you are the one guilty of being a liar and that's why you always project that accusation onto others. I'm the liar because you won't read the evidence I've cited in two or three threads? Why don't you just hang a sign around your neck labelled "TROLL?" FLASHBACK: Romney donor vilified by Obama campaign, then subjected to 2 audits Just months after being slimed by President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, Mitt Romney supporter and businessman Frank VanderSloot was informed that he was going to be audited not only by the Internal Revenue Service, but by the Labor Department as well.... VanderSloot, who served as the national co-chair of Mitt Romney’s presidential finance committee, was one of eight Romney backers to be defamed as ”wealthy individuals with less-than-reputable records” in a post on the Obama campaign’s website..... Two months later, the IRS informed VanderSloot he and his wife were going to be audited, Strassel reported. Two weeks after that, VanderSloot was notified by the Labor Department that it was going to “audit workers he employs on his Idaho-based cattle ranch under the federal visa program for temporary agriculture workers,” reported Strassel. “The H-2A program allows tens of thousands of temporary workers in the U.S.; Mr. VanderSloot employs precisely three,” Strassel wrote. “All are from Mexico and have worked on the VanderSloot ranch—which employs about 20 people—for five years.http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz2TIBu8yXB

I guess we don't want to talk about "auditing" the Tea Party anymore, lol.I cited two examples and she typically stonewalled them.You cited ZERO examples of Tea Party groups being 'audited'.The examples you gave were either private businesses or individuals.A 'manufacturing firm' and/or a man named 'Frank VanderSloot' are not a Tea Party groups.

You cited ZERO examples of Tea Party groups being 'audited'. The examples you gave were either private businesses or individuals. A 'manufacturing firm' and/or a man named 'Frank VanderSloot' are not a Tea Party groups. come on now, it is serious enough to stonewall, but to do so typically is just so far beyond the pale, that is downright into the mist.

Apropos of the fact that the Farm bill went down yesterday, I thought this article from May was rather interesting.BLESSED ARE THE HYPOCRITESTenn Rep. Stephen Fincher Pocketed $9 Million in Ag Subsidies, Says Jesus Hates Food StampsWonkette-May 21, 2013So in our story yesterday on the Congressional debate over just how deeply Jesus wants food stamps to be cut, we missed a tiny detail that is probably worth mentioning. One of the special flowers seeking to slash the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, aka food stamps, was Tennessee Bible-humper Stephen Fincher, who argued against feeding the hungry by quoting Jesuss message of love and indifference in Matthew chapter 26: the poor will always be with us, and they will always be nasty tricksy takerses. They takes the precious and we hates them, we do."Only it turns out that we were unaware of one other delightful factoid about Rep. Fincher, brought to light by the blog Southern Beale: when hes not busy saving taxpayers money by telling hungry children to **** off and die, Rep. Fincher is a proud member of the agribusiness community, and according to the source of all knowledge, Finchers family agribiz has received $8.9 million in farm subsidies over the past decade, mostly from the cotton program, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.(Yes, theres a source, so you just knock off your wiki-bashing, you.)And while other candidates in the 2010 primary made some noise about those subsidies, Fincher nonetheless won his district as a Tea Partier who hates big government. Just not when its lining his pocket, because he is a Maker, not a Taker.Son of God Jesus Christ was unavailable for comment at press time, as He was busy saving some but not all children from a tornado.Read more at http://wonkette.com/...AJz9MvoVUVQv.99Why is this filthy hypocrite even allowed to serve on the Agriculture Committee, when he stands to gain financially by their decisions?Fincher invoked biblical verses to back up his belief that food stamp spending should be cut by at least $20 billion, while he voted to increase crop insurance by $9 billion.In relation to money for the SNAP program, Fincher said, "This is other peoples money that Washington is appropriating."I wonder whose money he thinks goes to pay his farm subsidies?Apparently both the House and Senate bills contained language that would deny us the right to know which members of Congress are receiving these subsidies.The Farm Bill Will Make Some Subsidized Congressmen Anonymous

I cited two examples and she typically stonewalled them. You cited ZERO examples of Tea Party groups being 'audited'. The examples you gave were either private businesses or individuals. A 'manufacturing firm' and/or a man named 'Frank VanderSloot' are not a Tea Party groups. The scandal is that Obama's IRS and other agencies singled out conservative groups to bully, intimidate, audit and silence. Typical that you'd dishonestly try to narrow the scope. Can't have a coverup without a dishonest troll like you bleating loudly.

Fincher invoked biblical verses to back up his belief that food stamp spending should be cut by at least $20 billion, while he voted to increase crop insurance by $9 billion. simple but sound policy: be suspicious of anyone that claims that they know that god is on their side.

I haven't been online for a couple of days, and since I'm not clairvoyant, I have no idea which thread you are talking about. If there was such a thread that contained proof of Tea Party groups being singled out for 'audits' by the IRS, then why can't you just post a link to it or at the very least give the title? You can't, because it never happened, and once again you have proven that you are the one guilty of being a liar and that's why you always project that accusation onto others. It takes a special kind of psychopath to lie about felonies and rape. As you have for years and years. IRS targeted groups critical of government, documents from agency probe show By Juliet Eilperin, Published: May 12 At various points over the past two years, Internal Revenue Service officials singled out for scrutiny not only groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names but also nonprofit groups that criticized the government and sought to educate Americans about the U.S. Constitution, according to documents in an audit conducted by the agency’s inspector general. The documents, obtained by The Washington Post from a congressional aide with knowledge of the findings, show that the IRS field office in charge of evaluating applications for tax-exempt status decided to focus on groups making statements that “criticize how the country is being run” and those that were involved in educating Americans “on the Constitution and Bill of Rights.” .....On June 29, 2011, according to the documents, IRS staffers held a briefing with Lerner in which they described giving special attention to instances where “statements in the case file criticize how the country is being run.” She raised an objection, and the agency adopted a more general set of standards. Lerner, who is a Democrat, is not a political appointee. But six months later, the IRS applied a new political test to social welfare groups, the document says. On Jan. 15, 2012, the agency decided to look at “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform movement,” according to the appendix in the IG’s report.http://www.washingto...ry.html?hpid=z1