AND?

Misty » 17 Aug 2017 10:19 pm » wrote: AND?
You think I'm going to defend that **** because she's a Democrat?
As much as I don't like 45 I have never wished him any harm, and for a State Senator to say that was shameful.
She should resign.
So why did you post that in here, looking for my opinion, if you were only going to dismiss it anyway?roadkill » 17 Aug 2017 10:55 pm » wrote:Everyone here knows you don't mean it...your party has always gone too far.
This time your party went too too far.
The dems are now ****!
I've never even heard of that **** woman that you call my Dem sweetheart.roadkill » 17 Aug 2017 11:02 pm » wrote:Misty is now on the ropes after her dem sweetheart threatened assassination.

The American Civil Liberties Union, taking a tougher stance on armed protests, will no longer defend hate groups seeking to march with firearms, the group’s executive director said.
Following clashes over the weekend in Charlottesville, Va., the civil-rights group also will screen clients more closely for the potential of violence at their rallies, said Anthony Romero, who has been the ACLU’s executive director since 2001.
The ACLU’s Virginia branch defended the right of white nationalists, neo-Nazis and other groups under the banner “Unite the Right” to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from a Charlottesville park.
“The events of Charlottesville require any judge, any police chief and any legal group to look at the facts of any white-supremacy protests with a much finer comb,” said Mr. Romero.
The revised policy marries the 97-year-old civil-rights group’s First Amendment work with the organization’s stance on firearms, which aligns with many municipalities and states that bar protesters from carrying weapons.
“If a protest group insists, ‘No, we want to be able to carry loaded firearms,’ well, we don’t have to represent them.
They can find someone else,” Mr. Romero said, adding that the decision was in keeping with a 2015 policy adopted by the ACLU’s national board in support of “reasonable” firearm regulation.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/aclu-c ... ign=buffer
Trump used to love destroying beautiful statues.
President Donald Trump said Thursday he is “sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful [Confederate] statues and monuments.”
But Trump’s appreciation of art and historical significance, if genuine, is certainly newfound — in 1980, he demolished the iconic Bonwit Teller building and reneged on a promise to the Met to save a pair of Art Deco sculptures and metal grillwork from the front of the building so that the museum could include them in its 20th century sculpture collection.
Trump had initially promised to donate the grillwork and the sculptures — two limestone relief panels created by Beaux-Arts designers Whitney Warren and Charles Wetmore and appraised by art dealer Robert Miller at “several hundred thousand dollars” — if the cost was not “prohibitive.”
“The reliefs are as important as the sculptures on the Rockefeller building,” Miller told the Times.
“They’ll never be made again.”
“Trump Organization vice president” John Baron — an alias Trump once admitted under oath he uses to feed reporters information about himself — told the New York Times Trump had come to a different conclusion.
It would have cost $32,000 and a week-and-a-half of construction on the $100 million building to remove them, and “Baron” ultimately decided it wasn’t worth the effort to save the panels because they were “without artistic merit.”
The Met disagreed.
“We are certainly very disappointed and quite surprised,” Ashton Hawkins, then the vice president of the Met board, told the Times in 1980.
“Can you imagine the museum accepting them if they were not of artistic merit?”
But Trump says he does see artistic merit in the Confederate statues, which were largely erected in the 1920s and 30s — decades after the Civil War — at the behest of Southern activist groups.
![]()
What a despicable bunch of scum-sucking subhumans.Mother of Charlottesville victim Heather Heyer has received death threats.
The mother of the woman killed during racially motivated violence last weekend in Charlottesville, Va., has received death threats, she said Thursday.
Susan Bro, mother of Heather Heyer, the 32-year-old killed Saturday when a car rammed into a group of protesters, told NBC News on Thursday that she has received multiple threats following the publicity surrounding her daughter's death.
“I’ve had death threats already ... because of what I’m doing right this second," Bro told NBC.
Yes, they're all Fake News.Misty » 18 Aug 2017 1:24 am » wrote:Here are the latest covers of three major news magazines. Notice any similarities?
Proving there are more lunatics in the country than I ever would have thought.Misty » 17 Aug 2017 11:40 pm » wrote:MSNBC ranks as No. 1 cable network in total views for the first time.
Yes, we all know how you love ugly lies about conservative public figures.Misty » 17 Aug 2017 11:20 pm » wrote:I love it.
The president of the United States is a known racist and Nazi sympathizer.
Oh my, yet another obvious, ugly lie from the psychopath.Misty » 17 Aug 2017 10:52 pm » wrote:Oh look Clem, it's the woman on horse video guy that you like so much.
Termin8tor » 18 Aug 2017 7:33 am » wrote:
Proving there are more lunatics in the country than I ever would have thought.![]()
Say, what ever happened to that huge Russian collaboration conspiracy that Rachie babbled about for months?![]()