Hey psycho. have you come up with an actual crime yet?Misty » 08 Sep 2017 3:14 pm » wrote:That's the best euphemism for collaboration.
He didn't call it a liberal hoax, and he long ago lost weight and broke his drug habit.Misty » 08 Sep 2017 1:58 pm » wrote: So just as I predicted, the drug addled gasbag is getting his fat *** out of the path of Irma.
I defend what he does right and criticize what he does wrong. What's wrong with that, psycho?Misty » 07 Sep 2017 4:35 pm » wrote: That's hilarious coming from someone who defends the Liar-In-Chief every day on this forum.
Propaganda and **** from a corrupt newspaper that almost NEVER called Clinton and Obama out for their many whoppers.Misty » 07 Sep 2017 4:35 pm » wrote:In 227 days, Pres.. trump has adse 1,114 false and misleading claims.
Here's a hint, psycho; he made the prediction well before any damage was done; before anyone really know how big it was.Misty » 07 Sep 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: Reasonable my ***.
Have you seen what this storm has already done?
Yes, you dishonestly sear every conservative public figure you can, psycho.And yes, I will smear him for being the asshole .....
I haven't one single time defended him for something he's done wrong.Misty » 07 Sep 2017 4:35 pm » wrote: That's hilarious coming from someone who defends the Liar-In-Chief every day on this forum.

Son of former Fox News Channel anchor Eric Bolling commits suicide.
The son of former Fox News Channel anchor Eric Bolling has committed suicide, TMZ reports.
Sources told the website that 19-year-old Eric Chase Bolling, Jr., took his life Friday night.
The news comes just one day after FNC announced the network had “parted ways” with Bolling amid allegations that he had sent lewd photos to co-workers.
Bolling had been suspended since August.
Further details about the reported death were not immediately released.
Stick with Fox 8 News and FOX8.com for more information on this developing story.
****. He said that on Tuesday when it was well known how big the storm was, and that it was rated a Category 5.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2017 8:31 am » wrote:Here's a hint, psycho; he made the prediction well before any damage was done; before anyone really know how big it was.
Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2017 8:48 am » wrote: I haven't one single time defended him for something he's done wrong.
First of all, you have no idea if he still doing drugs or not.Termin8tor » 09 Sep 2017 7:58 am » wrote:He didn't call it a liberal hoax, and he long ago lost weight and broke his drug habit.
Proving once again what a psychopathic liar you are.
Trump Wanted to Kill This Obama Rule. Then Came the Hurricanes.
Three weeks ago, President Donald Trump signed an executive order that reversed an Obama-era requirement that future construction in areas likely to flood need to be built at a higher elevation.
But after the devastation Hurricane Harvey caused in Houston and with Hurricane Irma barreling toward Florida, the White House is now trying to walk back Trump’s order.
In 2015, the Obama White House updated flood-risk standards for the first time since the 1970s, incorporating climate models and sea-level rise into calibrations for building elevations.
The new standard meant that any federally funded building in flood plains must be built at higher elevations, especially for critical infrastructure like hospitals and fire stations.
On August 15, Trump erased those standards with one line buried in a broader infrastructure order.
But it appears the recent string of natural disasters has made the administration change its mind.
On Friday, Homeland Security adviser Tom Bossert told reporters that the White House might put out another executive order or additional guidance in the next month.
“We shouldn’t use federal money to rebuild in ways that don’t anticipate future flood risk,” Bossert said.
“So we need to build back smarter and stronger against flood plain concerns when we use federal dollars.”
While not providing any details on what those new standards would entail, the broad strokes of what Bossert proposed sounds an awful lot like the standards Trump just reversed—except Bossert didn’t mention the words “sea level rise.”
Obama’s update of the 40-year-old standards was popular not just among environmentalists but fiscal conservatives worried about government spending.
It only appeared to be on Trump’s radar for two reasons: 1) It was an Obama executive order. 2) It was about climate change.


You made an accusation, psycho. Either back it up or admit you're a psychopathic smear artist.Misty » 09 Sep 2017 2:19 pm » wrote: First of all, you have no idea if he still doing drugs or not.
Hey Dim, no damage had been done, and given that there have been huge exaggerations previously and that there was no proof of its strength, it was not unreasonable for him to speculate.Misty » 09 Sep 2017 2:09 pm » wrote: ****. He said that on Tuesday when it was well known how big the storm was, and that it was rated a Category 5.
Mandatory evacuations had already begun that same day.
Keep lying for the drug addled gasbag.
You keep exposing your total meteorological ignorance. If you ever bothered to watch the ongoing information about the proposed track of a hurricane you would know that nobody really knows where it will really go. They make best guesses and have even changed the method of showing it. Instead of lines they went to a widening graphic depicting the most likely area it will go. Even then hurricanes fool them. Living in Florida since 1956 I have watched the fact that hurricanes keep fooling the experts. Get your head out of your ***.Misty » 08 Sep 2017 1:58 pm » wrote: So just as I predicted, the drug addled gasbag is getting his fat *** out of the path of Irma.
Latests info as of 22 min ago says that is not likely. As far s Irma, it has turned out to be more fizzle and drizzle than the armageddon storm it was forecast to be.bobgnote » 11 Sep 2017 9:23 am » wrote:
Fact ONE:
Jose is BIG, so it'll hit Florida, anyway, striped swim-team freak.
Don't get your Speedos all bunched up your big, striped BUTT.
The wind blows one way, then the other, BUTT COWBOY.
Mind your skiddles.
Sitting here in Sarasota where the eye went over it is obvious you are ranting idiocy. No damage to my property. Power lines down and trees dropped their bad branches. Same as always when a hurricane hits here. Big damage to keys and property near the water. I made sure I bought property miles from the coast on a slight hill surrounded by mature oak trees. Water flows downhill both ways in the ditches from my property.bobgnote » 11 Sep 2017 9:53 am » wrote: My link is minutes old.
YOUR link does not exist.
MY link says Jose will gather warm water and stay, for THREE DAYS.
Where's your link, ****?
You are an ignorant atheist windbag spouting gibberish nonsense about the hurricane. Living in Sarasota where the eye went over your idiocy is very apparent to me. Major damage on the keys and near the coast. Elsewhere tree branches down, power lines down people advised to stay home and not venture out until roads and power workers clear the roads and fix the live power lines. At my home a few branches down and no other problems. I bought a house inland on a slight hill in an area of lots of mature oak trees. Water flows downhill in the ditches both ways from my house. The oak trees dampen the wind speed at ground level thus preventing major wind damage. I grew up in Florida so made a sensible decision about buying a house.bobgnote » 11 Sep 2017 9:53 am » wrote: My link is minutes old.
YOUR link does not exist.
MY link says Jose will gather warm water and stay, for THREE DAYS.
Where's your link, ****?
Aight, ****. It is basically running in a circle and only ONE model has it coming close to Florida.bobgnote » 11 Sep 2017 9:53 am » wrote:
My link is minutes old.
YOUR link does not exist.
MY link says Jose will gather warm water and stay, for THREE DAYS.
Where's your link, ****?