Not before I hit 1300.Stinky McPeterson » 15 Sep 2017 9:00 pm » wrote: lol....I'm just funning..............I wish she would start a new one though...this is so old
this is 2017........does zero equal zero?.......if so there is moral equivalence.......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 5:52 pm » wrote: Just to make a point that there is no moral equivalence between Antifa and white supremacists who have been murdering people for a very long time in this country.
Way before 1963 even.
they didn't say she didn't unmask.....they said they had received no evidence that she had unmasked......she said she DID unmask......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 5:48 pm » wrote: Are you calling Trey Gowdy and Tom Rooney liars?

Why indeed.Why would his first reaction to a dangerous, unfolding situation be to seemingly chastise the people on the front lines for not having been on top of it, or aggressive enough?
It’s the same question that came up when Trump responded to a North Korean nuclear test by deriding the South Koreans as appeasers.
Both the United Kingdom and South Korea are our allies; both had a right to expect that the American President’s first expression would be one of sympathy or support—of respect, one way or the other.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/amy-davi ... -migration
And yet you spend an awful lot of time on her '****.'Huey » 15 Sep 2017 8:33 pm » wrote:Don't spend much time on her ****. She is a certifiable fruit loop.
He has more posts in the Peanut Gallery version of this thread.Stinky McPeterson » 15 Sep 2017 8:50 pm » wrote:damned. your 9 posts shy of 1300 in this thread. that is some serious *** posting
33 pages
damen, I have 84.lol..i never realized it
Get back to me when you learn the difference between unmasking and outing someone.PostmodernProphet » 15 Sep 2017 9:30 pm » wrote:they didn't say she didn't unmask.....they said they had received no evidence that she had unmasked......she said she DID unmask......
Gowdy and Rooney did not say that they had received no evidence that she had unmasked.PostmodernProphet » 15 Sep 2017 5:40 pm » wrote:are you calling her a liar?.....

Nice guy.ALEX JONES: I got an idea, why doesn't somebody do a Quran burning in front of J.K. Rowling's house, just to point out she's not afraid of the Islamists, you know, just come to her.
I mean how do we get the Islamists to her house, do we put an ad out that she's saying 100 Islamist men can move in with her?
Maybe they can genitally mutilate her.
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2017/ ... her/217958

On Friday, President Donald Trump told pool reporters he still believes former National Security Adviser Susan Rice did something wrong when she unmasked Trump administration officials late last year.
“She’s not supposed to be doing that,” said Trump, who in April accused Rice of committing a crime without presenting any evidence she actually did so. “What she did was wrong.”
There’s just one problem — now, more than ever before, there’s absolutely no reason to believe Rice did anything improper at all. Even well-informed Republican members of Congress acknowledge as much.
Rice detailed the reason she unmasked Trump officials to House investigators in a classified setting. On Wednesday, CNN reported more details about what Rice privately told the House Intelligence Committee about the incident.
According to CNN’s report, Rice told House investigators that she unmasked certain Trump officials because wanted “to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York” late last year.
Rice said the crown prince, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al-Nahya, made the trip to New York without informing the Obama administration, which piqued the intelligence community’s curiosity.
CNN reported that the crown prince met with several top Trump officials during that trip, including Michael Flynn, Jared Kushner, and Steve Bannon. Later, the UAE was later involved in an effort to set up a back-channel communication between Trump officials and Russia, according to the outlet.
This explanation satisfied Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, including Rep. Tom Rooney (FL), who told CNN that “I didn’t hear anything to believe that she did anything illegal.”
CNN quotes a number of Rooney’s colleagues who all basically say the same thing — after hearing her rationale for unmasking Trump officials, they’re now convinced that Rice did nothing wrong.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-lying-s ... 2a880/amp/
I guess you will have to teach me.........I see no practical difference whatsoever......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 11:34 pm » wrote: Get back to me when you learn the difference between unmasking and outing someone.
.
that's an exact quote of what Gowdy said......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 11:34 pm » wrote:
Gowdy and Rooney did not say that they had received no evidence that she had unmasked.
?????.....what difference does that make......who controls it being "peanut gallery" or whatever it is when its not?......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 11:17 pm » wrote: He has more posts in the Peanut Gallery version of this thread.
Why do you think he's wasting so much time on the **** of a certifiable fruit loop?
whats really ironic is that lib'ruls have been gloating about nailing Trump for Russian collusion based on surveillance that happened BEFORE the election, demmycrats were up to their eyeballs in bending the rules trying to find evidence that would stop Trump and put Hilliary in office and here we sit, with Trump in the Oval Office, zero evidence of collusion and the only people at risk of being held in violation of the law are the lib'ruls.......Misty » 15 Sep 2017 11:34 pm » wrote:
Ironically it is probably the three Trump officials who broke the law by not reporting that meeting on their security clearance forms which they were required to do.
Your statements about Trump is pure ****.Misty » 15 Sep 2017 7:56 pm » wrote: That would have been a good trick, since they were running against each other, and I only voted once. I sincerely wish that John Kasich was the president right now.
I would sleep a whole lot better at night.
There weren't many Conservatives to vote for in NY, but I did vote for Giuliani for mayor, and Reagan for president.
And I voted for Rick Lazio and against Hillary Clinton in the 2000 Senate race. And yet you never stop trying.
Why are you so interested in how I vote anyway?
And FYI, we have an anti-women's rights president now that will appoint Supreme Court Justices that will overturn Roe Valley Wade.
He's probably worse than John Kasich on women's rights.
I don't agree with Kasich on everything, but I don't need to agree with a president on everything.
You have to keep in mind Misty is by far not the brightest bulb on the progressive tree.PostmodernProphet » 16 Sep 2017 9:45 pm » wrote: you shouldn't burn that hat so close to your strawman........
Poor Misty doesn't understand the difference between the medical care of those serving and those who have left the service and try to rely on the VA. It has been all over the news for decades about the long wait times getting treatment for the veterans. New administrators come in promising to fix the problem but it never gets fixed. The needed resources are never provided. Your government in action with allocation of resources.Misty » 16 Sep 2017 4:54 pm » wrote: