Liberal Forum

And you're a shameless apologist for any and all Republicans. Sigh, is there any blatant lie you won't tell? To cite just my criticisms of Bush, I condemned his drug benefit policy, his education policy, his allowing overspending and at one point admitted the Iraq War might be a huge disaster. Is that what you call an "apologist," liar? From a man who enjoys bestiality videos to a man who beds both a mother and her daughter. Hilarious coming the lying, fawning, groveling Clinton toady who to this day lies on behalf of a serial felon/ serial rapist. One video sent as a practical joke doesn't disqualify that Repub for office. Fund was seduced by a 31-year-old woman many, many years after he'd had an affair with her mother, but you're too dishonest to describe the "offense" honestly. What, are you saying a 31-year-old woman can't make her own decisions in life? A**hole. And again, Obama's spiritual adviser is a virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist wackjob. MistyBlue, on Oct 17 2008, 02:42 PM, said: I have no problem with Obama's church or his pastor. Rand Paul unknowingly hired a racist, and you bleat loudly in outrage. You "have no problem with" a virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist wackjob.

You have defended every Republican criminal and slimeball.That's what I call an apologist.

You have defended every Republican criminal and slimeball. That's what I call an apologist. That's a lie, but since when do facts get in the way of your smears. You on the other hand have for years dishonestly defended a serial felon/ serial rapist. Combine that with your ugly smears, and you're obviously a freaking psychopath.

As usual, the lying troll dodges my important point. MistyBlue, on Oct 17 2008, 02:42 PM, said: I have no problem with Obama's church or his pastor. So you have no problem with a virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist having been the spiritual adviser to the sitting president. Who said that Obama accepted what he preached. With Obama having attended that church for twenty years. And you have no problem with that virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist philosophy. Just as I have many times noted; you're a leftist wackjob.

As usual, the lying troll dodges my important point.As usual, the lying troll deflects from the actual subject.The subject was Rand Paul's racist buddy, not Reverend Wright.

As usual, the lying troll deflects from the actual subject. The subject was Rand Paul's racist buddy, not Reverend Wright. Typical troll behavior. Evade the huge issues and bleat endlessly about small ones. Far, far, far more important than Rand's racist aide is the racism and radical leftism of our sitting president. Which you dishonestly deny.

Another lie, the president has put forth proposals for major cuts. Everytime a republican mentions the word "deficit" they look like such a fool b/c every single one of their heroes were for EXPLODING the deficit by pushing the Bush tax cuts for the rich to the tune of $3.9 trillion.$3.9 TRILLION. That's the name of that tune. You are the liar. The Laffer curve proves this. Keep in mind that the Romers found that for each 1% of tax increase above 33% there is a corresponding 3% reduction in the GDP. Obama demanded that increase and now the GDP fell.

Typical troll behavior. Evade the huge issues and bleat endlessly about small ones. Far, far, far more important than Rand's racist aide is the racism and radical leftism of our sitting president. Which you dishonestly deny. clemmy is a paid propaganda provocateur. a slimy piece of shiit in the hire of big oil lobbyists. this is certain. notice I didn't say "professional". not even his handler qualifies as "professional. a bunch of sloppy amateurs. rand is already dead. another proposed hero of pathological scum is smacking his head on the pavement.

clemmy is a paid propaganda provocateur. a slimy piece of shiit in the hire of big oil lobbyists. this is certain. notice I didn't say "professional". not even his handler qualifies as "professional. a bunch of sloppy amateurs. rand is already dead. another proposed hero of pathological scum is smacking his head on the pavement.

Responding to a question about how little Congress is doing these days, House Speaker John Boehner said Congress should not be judged by how many new laws they create, but ought to be judged on how many laws they repeal.Okay.So how many laws have they repealed?That would be zero.So I'll judge them on that.

Responding to a question about how little Congress is doing these days, House Speaker John Boehner said Congress should not be judged by how many new laws they create, but ought to be judged on how many laws they repeal. Okay. So how many laws have they repealed? That would be zero. So I'll judge them on that. Because you're a hopeless lying troll. They've passed a lot of good legislation, but it dies in Reid's Senate without even a vote. Geez, is this the best the brilliant, lojical, ejucated liberal-left can do, Democrat Talking Point Lies and transparent bulls***? clemmy is a paid propaganda provocateur. a slimy piece of shiit in the hire of big oil lobbyists. this is certain. notice I didn't say "professional". not even his handler qualifies as "professional. a bunch of sloppy amateurs. rand is already dead. another proposed hero of pathological scum is smacking his head on the pavement. Applauding a stupid, entirely unbelievable lie? Can't you even tell believable lies?

Misty, on 05 Aug 2013 - 11:39, said:Responding to a question about how little Congress is doing these days, House Speaker John Boehner said Congress should not be judged by how many new laws they create, but ought to be judged on how many laws they repeal.Okay.So how many laws have they repealed?That would be zero.So I'll judge them on that.Because you're a hopeless lying troll.They've passed a lot of good legislation, but it dies in Reid's Senate without even a vote.Can you read?Boehner said we should judge them on how many laws they have repealed, which is none.So what was I lying about Jackhole?Are you saying that they have actually repealed some laws?If so, which ones?And I'm not talking about symbolic votes, I mean actual LAWS that were wiped off the books.I challenge you to name one.Because you're a hopeless lying troll.That doesn't even make sense grammatically in response to my post.

Because you're a hopeless lying troll. They've passed a lot of good legislation, but it dies in Reid's Senate without even a vote. Can you read? Boehner said we should judge them on how many laws they have repealed, which is none. So what was I lying about Jackhole? Are you saying that they have actually repealed some laws? If so, which ones? And I'm not talking about symbolic votes, I mean actual LAWS that were wiped off the books. I challenge you to name one. On this issue you're "just" being deeply deceitful, because it isn't Boehner's fault in the slightest that Reid won't even allow votes on the many, many good bills that the House has passed. Only someone deeply dishonest would even try to blame Repubs for Reid's obstruction. The point is, once Repubs take the Senate and the presidency, these bills will pass, assuming they can get by a Democrat filibuster. Certainly Obamacare will be repealed and spending cut.

On this issue you're "just" being deeply deceitful, because it isn't Boehner's fault in the slightest that Reid won't even allow votes on the many, many good bills that the House has passed.That has nothing to do with my post.Boehner is the one who asked that we judge them on the laws they have repealed, and they haven't repealed any, so I said I would judge them on that.So how exactly is that 'deeply deceitful'?

Because if Paul did, that would be the end of his career. Duuuh. Plenty of people publicly express limited views while hiding their more radical opinions, just like Obama does. No, it's all but impossible that Rand Paul ever would have knowingly hired someone with those views. So you have no problem with a virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist having been the spiritual adviser to the sitting president. Who said that Obama accepted what he preached. With Obama having attended that church for twenty years. And you have no problem with that virulently racist, anti-semitic, anti-American, Marxist-Communist philosophy. Just as I have many times noted; you're a leftist wackjob. How do you know Wright is any of that stuff? Prove it.

On this issue you're "just" being deeply deceitful, because it isn't Boehner's fault in the slightest that Reid won't even allow votes on the many, many good bills that the House has passed. That has nothing to do with my post. Boehner is the one who asked that we judge them on the laws they have repealed, and they haven't repealed any, so I said I would judge them on that. So how exactly is that 'deeply deceitful'? Because Boehner obviously was referring to the actions of the House, not what made it through the Reid-obstructed Senate. As well as to the time when Repubs do control both houses and the presidency. And was making an important philosophical point as to the differences between the two parties; Democrats want far larger, more powerful government with higher taxes to pay for it. The want to micromanage Americans' lives by force of federal law under penalty of fine or imprisonment. And Repubs roughly the opposite. But you'll ignore what he meant and bleat your usual lies.

But you'll ignore what he meant and bleat your usual lies.It's you who is bleating lies.Boehner was asked specifically about THIS congress being so unproductive, and he said we should not judge THIS congress on how many laws they have passed, but how many laws THIS congress has repealed.So Puss.......How many laws has THIS congress (the 113th) repealed?

How do you know Wright is any of that stuff? Prove it.I have a cave where I keep a guy for screaming at. I'm looking to expand my enterprise. This cave that you live in, would it be for sale?

Hey teacher!How's your summer going?

But you'll ignore what he meant and bleat your usual lies.It's you who is bleating lies.What's the matter, aren't there any Democrat rapists and felons for you to dishonestly defend? Tired of smearing conservatives as child molesters?Since you seem to think that sex is only for procreation, why would you suppose that Rush Limbaugh was traveling to the Dominican Republic with a bottle of Viagra?Was he going there to start a family? Isn't it curious that a man of Rush's means can't get laid here in the United States?I wonder what he can find in the DR, that he can't get here?I'm just sayin'.....The Dominican Republic has a well-documented child sex trade with a thriving sex tourism sector.F*** off, troll.