Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2017 12:53 am » wrote:And you are in excellent company with new posters such as prolapsedposterior, hooey. You inhabit the same fact-free intellectual environment.
Anybody who says the NHL is not a predominately white sport is an idiot. Ya **** moron. So tell me, moron, why does nobody complain that the NBA (not basketball in general) is a predominately BLACK. Yet the same people turn around and complain that the NHL is predominantly white?Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2017 12:48 am » wrote:Are you so stupid that you don't know you just agreed with her that hockey is a predominately white sport, buttressing her argument? And that basketball is heavily black - buttressing her argument?
"But Nascar has some outreach going on - so there."
Weak *** weakness and ****.
Those Tweets are considered Presidential records and are not supposed to be deleted, but the laws no longer seem to apply.Trump deletes tweets backing Luther Strange after primary loss.
President Trump on Tuesday apparently began deleting his tweets supporting Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.) in Alabama's Senate GOP primary runoff after Strange lost the race to former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore.
Trump had tweeted about Strange several times in the days leading up to the primary, including the day of, but those tweets had disappeared as of Tuesday night.
The deleted tweets included those he sent the night before the election and the day of the race.
A project from ProPublica documents the deleted tweets.
I'm glad someone else noticed that.Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2017 12:45 am » wrote:You just agreed with her and called her a liar in the same post. She said precisely what you quoted her saying.
And on and on and on he goes.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote:Anybody who says the NHL is not a predominately white sport is an idiot. Ya **** moron. So tell me, moron, why does nobody complain that the NBA (not basketball in general) is a predominately BLACK. Yet the same people turn around and complain that the NHL is predominantly white?
IDIOT, NASCAR has had outreach going on for the last 14 years and is among the biggest outreach programs on sports. There is why she was embarrassed when I pointed out all the black and minority participation in the sport.
Now you wanna argue about why there are not more black hockey players or say that I was complaining about that?Misty » 26 Sep 2017 1:25 pm » wrote: How many black DRIVERS in NASCAR or black hockey players in the NHL?
He argues about the argument, rather than about the topic of the argument. It's 100% - you can set your watch by it. It's how he makes it appear he's tackling the issue, without having to summon any rigor or be held to account.Misty » 27 Sep 2017 12:03 pm » wrote: I'm glad someone else noticed that.
First of all, he was responding to what was meant to be a rhetorical question, since the fact that there are many more black players in the NFL and the NBA than there are black NASCAR drivers or black hockey players in the NHL is self evident.
He's trying to say that I am lying when I say that the question was meant to be rhetorical, and that I was seriously asking how many black drivers there are in NASCAR or black hockey players in the NHL, since I guess he thinks that I don't know how to use the Google, and need him to educate me.
Then he accuses me of 'reframing' the argument, when there was no argument.
It's just his usual MO.
He likes to to pick small petty arguments over nothing.
If he can't find a reason to argue with me, he invents one.
If I said that water was wet, he would deny it and call me a liar.
Sigh...Misty » 27 Sep 2017 12:19 pm » wrote: And on and on and on he goes.
Let's keep pretending that I was not talking specifically about NASCAR drivers.
Now you wanna argue about why there are not more black hockey players or say that I was complaining about that?
Talk about reframing an argument.
In your zeal to disagree with anything I say, you are making yourself look like a moron.
![]()
![]()
So you are finally admitting that her question was rhetorical - and that your "but but outreach" did nothing to discredit it?Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote: Anybody who says the NHL is not a predominately white sport is an idiot. Ya **** moron.
I didn't see anyone complaining about either obvious fact, until this post.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote: So tell me, moron, why does nobody complain that the NBA (not basketball in general) is a predominately BLACK. Yet the same people turn around and complain that the NHL is predominantly white?
Link to anyone denying that. Then explain what relevance it has.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote: IDIOT, NASCAR has had outreach going on for the last 14 years and is among the biggest outreach programs on sports.
Link to her being embarrassed.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote:There is why she was embarrassed when I pointed out all the black and minority participation in the sport.
Quote the lie and I will call her out.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:46 am » wrote: Be that as it may it does not change the fact that she lied and got busted.
Yet again.
This is what I posted.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:46 am » wrote:Be that as it may it does not change the fact that she lied and got busted.
Yet again.
The question (in bold print) was rhetorical, since it is a FACT that there are many more black players in both the NFL and the NBA than there are black NASCAR drivers and black players in the NHL.Misty » 26 Sep 2017 1:25 pm » wrote: He (45) slams the NFL and the NBA, but he praises NASCAR and the NHL.
How many black drivers in NASCAR or black hockey players in the NHL?
But it's not about race.![]()
Misty » 27 Sep 2017 12:36 pm » wrote: This is what I posted.
The question (in bold print) was rhetorical, since it is a FACT that there are many more black players in both the NFL and the NBA than there are black NASCAR drivers and black players in the NHL.
My point being that as usual, 45 has no trouble criticizing people of color, while praising white people, then denying that there is a racial component to his remarks.
For example, he slammed Steph Curry for not wanting to go to the White House, while he remained silent when Tom Brady skipped the Patriots White House visit.
I guess that point is over Huey's head.
He want's to argue about NASCAR 'outreach' or the reasons why more blacks don't play hockey, which has absolutely nothing to do with the point I was making.
Just a bunch of extraneous ****, as usual.
Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:Quote the lie and I will call her out.
The portion in red isn’t the lie. That was never asked, not mentioned or even implied in my answers. What the **** is she talking about?Misty » 26 Sep 2017 2:24 pm » wrote: You are the one who looks ridiculous for trying to prove that there are just as many African-Americans in NASCAR and the NHL as there are in the NFL and the NBA.
You named ONE American black NASCAR driver, then you dragged in a Mexican, an Asian American and a Cuban, which had nothing to do with what I said.
I didn't want to embarrass you, but you couldn't keep your big mouth shut, so there you are.
You look like a fool.
Huey » 27 Sep 2017 8:51 am » wrote: Anybody who says the NHL is not a predominately white sport is an idiot. Ya **** moron. So tell me, moron, why does nobody complain that the NBA (not basketball in general) is a predominately BLACK. Yet the same people turn around and complain that the NHL is predominantly white?
IDIOT, NASCAR has had outreach going on for the last 14 years and is among the biggest outreach programs on sports. There is why she was embarrassed when I pointed out all the black and minority participation in the sport.
Try again.Cannonpointer » 27 Sep 2017 12:29 pm » wrote:So you are finally admitting that her question was rhetorical - and that your "but but outreach" did nothing to discredit it?
That's a bold step out of cockroachville - please know that you have support. Do you need a sponsor?
I didn't see anyone complaining about either obvious fact, until this post.
Will you link me to anyone complaining bout that?![]()
Link to anyone denying that. Then explain what relevance it has.
Link to her being embarrassed.
Huey » 27 Sep 2017 12:46 pm » wrote:
Try again.
No, I'm sorry for you that you obviouslyHuey » 27 Sep 2017 12:39 pm » wrote: Sorry, you are lying. You asked how many. You said nothing. About there being more.
Whether it was rhetorical or not contrary to your lie I never said anything about there being more as you said I did.Misty » 27 Sep 2017 12:56 pm » wrote: No, I'm sorry for you that you obviously
1. don't not understand the concept of a rhetorical question
Or
2. do understand that the question was rhetorical, but are lying about it.
If I seriously wanted to know how many black NASCAR drivers there are, I would not post the question on the forum, I would Google it.
Yeah, okay - you pointed out what isn't the lie.Huey » 27 Sep 2017 12:45 pm » wrote:
Already did.
Her original question:
How many black drivers in NASCAR or black hockey players in the NHL
She the answered my response with this:
The portion in red isn’t the lie. That was never asked, not mentioned or even implied in my answers. What the **** is she talking about?
I’m telling ya the chic is not right in the head.
Misty » 27 Sep 2017 12:56 pm » wrote: No, I'm sorry for you that you obviously
1. don't not understand the concept of a rhetorical question
Or
2. do understand that the question was rhetorical, but are lying about it.
If I seriously wanted to know how many black NASCAR drivers there are, I would not post the question on the forum, I would Google it.
roadkill » 27 Sep 2017 12:49 pm » wrote: That's what the dems will do in Alabama.
It will be Roy Moore vs the loser.
Congratulations on sending another wingnut to the U.S. Senate.roadkill » 27 Sep 2017 12:49 pm » wrote:That's what the dems will do in Alabama.
It will be Roy Moore vs the loser.