Liberal Forum

Hey teacher!Yo.How's your summer going?Hot, sweaty, productive.I do, however, notice that as I age there is less and less of summer bikini action coming my way. Maybe it has sumpin to do with my shiny pate. Gotta be. I can still lift a greyhound bus over my head, eat my weight in chicken wings and I continue to dominate at Jeopardy. Sooner or later I gots to take the hat off and then the jig is up.

Yo.Hot, sweaty, productive.I do, however, notice that as I age there is less and less of summer bikini action coming my way. Maybe it has sumpin to do with my shiny pate. Gotta be. I can still lift a greyhound bus over my head, eat my weight in chicken wings and I continue to dominate at Jeopardy. Sooner or later I gots to take the hat off and then the jig is up.Some women are stupid.Bald men are sexy.A bald man with a beard changed my life. LOLF*** off, troll.Whatever it is that crawled up your *** and died, you should have it removed.

Some women are stupid.Bald men are sexy.A bald man with a beard changed my life. LOLI have no beard.

I have no beard.You should grow one. LOL

It's amazing what you can come across on this forum sometimes.This is where Clem defended the deplorable working and living conditions that were celebrated by people like Tom Delay, in the sweat shops in the Northern Mariana Islands....paying workers five times what they'd earn at home is a success.He considers keeping workers penned up like cattle, and forcing them to pay for their housing, food and medical care a success.Not surprising that he would also defend a man who enjoys bestiality videos and a man who sleeps with both a mother and her daughter.

F*** off, troll. Whatever it is that crawled up your *** and died, you should have it removed. You're the psychopath who smears innocent people while dishonestly defending serial felons/ serial rapists. Your entire psyche died years ago, if it ever was alive. It's amazing what you can come across on this forum sometimes. This is where Clem defended the deplorable working and living conditions that were celebrated by people like Tom Delay, in the sweat shops in the Northern Mariana Islands. He considers keeping workers penned up like cattle, and forcing them to pay for their housing, food and medical care a success. Oh my gosh, I support above people being able to by free will choose to work for higher pay and better conditions than they'd get elsewhere? Shocking! Moonbats consider that a scandal. Not surprising that he would also defend a man who enjoys bestiality videos and a man who sleeps with both a mother and her daughter. The same tired bulls***? Why don't you ever point out that Fund was seduced likely 15, 20 years later by the woman's daughter, that she was 31 years old by that time? Because that would refute the dishonest smears of anyone you disagree with, while you dishonestly defend serial felons/serial rapists. You're literally a psychopath.

Oh my gosh, I support above people being able to by free will choose to work for higher pay and better conditions than they'd get elsewhere?Better conditions?Guest workers were lured to the Marianas by recruiters in countries like China, the Philippines and Bangladesh, who told them they were going to the United States. The recruiters charged workers around $5,000 for the trip.A lot of the females were told you work during the day in the garment factory and then at night you can go and work in a club and they'd force them into prostitution. If a female got pregnant, they either had to go back to their country to give birth or have a forced abortion.Only you would call that 'better conditions'.Why don't you ever point out that Fund was seduced likely 15, 20 years later by the woman's daughter, that she was 31 years old by that time?How do you know that Fund was seduced by her?Were you in the room?And what if he was?She was the daughter of his former girlfriend/lover and had been a Father figure to her.Anyone with any kind of morals would see that as wrong and not cross that line.

Oh my gosh, I support above people being able to by free will choose to work for higher pay and better conditions than they'd get elsewhere? Better conditions? Guest workers were lured to the Marianas by recruiters in countries like China, the Philippines and Bangladesh, who told them they were going to the United States. The recruiters charged workers around $5,000 for the trip. A lot of the females were told you work during the day in the garment factory and then at night you can go and work in a club and they'd force them into prostitution. If a female got pregnant, they either had to go back to their country to give birth or have a forced abortion. Only you would call that 'better conditions'. There is zero chance you'll address this or any issue honestly, so f*** off. Why don't you ever point out that Fund was seduced likely 15, 20 years later by the woman's daughter, that she was 31 years old by that time? How do you know that Fund was seduced by her? Were you in the room? And what if he was? She was the daughter of his former girlfriend/lover and had been a Father figure to her. The woman admitted under oath that she seduced Fund. How typically dishonest of you that you'd dishonestly smear him without every having researched what the facts are. Are you saying a 31-year-old woman isn't capable of making decisions about relationships? Sexist. But on a more serious note, you leftist hacks re-write standards to fit whatever is convenient at the moment. Never saw you complain about Clinton having an affair with a 21-year-old kid, Monica Lewinsky. So again, f*** off. Anyone with any kind of morals would see that as wrong and not cross that line. Oh yeah, someone like you who has for years dishonestly defended a serial rapist / serial felon is going to lecture me on morals. Psycho.

The woman admitted under oath that she seduced Fund.I don't suppose you have any proof of that?Of course not.When and where did she admit this under oath?The civil suit was settled before it ever went to trial.Here is a transcript of the settlement agreement.So I guess what you're saying is that Fund has no control over his own genitals, because aside from being his former girlfriend's daughter, he has said that she had some mental issues, so he should not have gone there.Have you been helpless to say no to every woman who ever came on to you?What am I saying?A woman coming on to you.......ROFL

The woman admitted under oath that she seduced Fund. I don't suppose you have any proof of that? Of course not. "Of course not." Hilarious given that whenever I present proof or evidence, you disappear and refuse to read it. So as usual, f*** off. So I guess what you're saying is that Fund has no control over his own genitals, because aside from being his former girlfriend's daughter, he has said that she had some mental issues, so he should not have gone there. If he were a liberal Democrat rapist, you'd be lying and stonewalling and dishonestly defending him, like the psychopath you are.

I don't suppose you have any proof of that?Of course not."Of course not." Hilarious given that whenever I present proof or evidence, you disappear and refuse to read it.So as usual, f*** off.Translation..."Of course I have no proof. Like most of the stuff I post, I pulled that out of my ***."So tell me Puss, if as you said, Morgan Pillsbury 'seduced' John Fund, was he helpless to resist her?Are you saying that men have no control over their own sexual conduct?

"Of course not." Hilarious given that whenever I present proof or evidence, you disappear and refuse to read it. So as usual, f*** off. Translation... "Of course I have no proof. Like most of the stuff I post, I pulled that out of my ***." Lie much? I have multi-page threads filled with sources, evidence and proof, without one single word from you, other your usual evasive bleating.

Lie much?I have multi-page threads filled with sources, evidence and proof, without one single word from you, other your usual evasive bleating.I'm not asking about your multiple pages of sources, evidence and proof on other subjects.I'm asking about this one specific allegation you made that Morgan Pillsbury 'admitted under oath' that she seduced John Fund.When and where did she admit such a thing?And again I ask you, was John Fund helpless to resist a seduction by his former lover's daughter?Does he have no control over his own sex organs?

Lie much? I have multi-page threads filled with sources, evidence and proof, without one single word from you, other your usual evasive bleating. I'm not asking about your multiple pages of sources, evidence and proof on other subjects. I'm asking about this one specific allegation you made that Morgan Pillsbury 'admitted under oath' that she seduced John Fund. When and where did she admit such a thing? You're the lying troll who claimed that there was no evidence in the boxes of EVIDENCE collected by Schippers and co. So why would I waste my time citing anything to you?You'll simply lie and stonewall.

You're the lying troll who claimed that there was no evidence in the boxes of EVIDENCE collected by Schippers and co. So why would I waste my time citing anything to you?You'll simply lie and stonewall.Here we go........Clem reverts back to Schippers and his 'boxes of evidence' again.So you think that you have a pass to say whatever you want and never have to provide any kind of proof?Try again Puss.That's just the lame excuse you use so you can lie with impunity.Sorry. That doesn't work.

You're the lying troll who claimed that there was no evidence in the boxes of EVIDENCE collected by Schippers and co. Here we go........ Clem reverts back to Schippers and his 'boxes of evidence' again. So you think that you have a pass to say whatever you want and never have to provide any kind of proof? No troll, that's one of endless examples in which I have cited extensive evidence, if not indisputable proof, but you were so psychopathically dishonest that you couldn't even admit the undeniable facts. You can't admit the truth to save your worthless little troll life. So f*** off.

f*** offBITE ME!

BITE ME! Wow, that's insightful. Here's what was important. Clem reverts back to Schippers and his 'boxes of evidence' again. So you think that you have a pass to say whatever you want and never have to provide any kind of proof? No troll, that's one of endless examples in which I have cited extensive evidence, if not indisputable proof, but you were so psychopathically dishonest that you couldn't even admit the undeniable facts. You can't admit the truth to save your worthless little troll life.

Somebody bring me a young boy. Typical ugly smear from a lying troll who has for years dishonestly defended a serial felon/ serial rapist. Is this the best the liberal-left can do?