Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 28 Sep 2017 5:02 am » wrote:Here's my thread of Trump successes in great detail. You haven't left one single thoughtful post, of course.
http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=27543

I don't read your threads very often.
I prefer non-fiction.

Termin8tor » 28 Sep 2017 4:57 am » wrote:He isn't "lawless" at all. He took an oath presumably to uphold the Constitution, and he did.

Presumably?

There you go with the weasel words.
No 'presumably' about it.
He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, period.

Article VI of that document says 'no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.'

Yet Moore says that Muslims should not be allowed to serve in Congress.

Do you agree with him that people who engage in homosexual conduct should go to jail?
And that homosexuals should lose custody of their children?
Do you agree that homosexuality is “the same thing” as having sex with a cow?
Do you think it's okay to refer to Native-Americans and Asian-Americans as 'reds' and 'yellows?'
Do you believe that there are communities in this country that are living under Sharia law?
Do you believe there is no such thing as evolution?
Do you believe that God is the only source of our law, liberty and government and that God's law supercedes man's law?
Do you agree that 9/11 was punishment for the U.S. turning away from God and for 'legitimized sodomy?'
Do you believe that President Obama was not born in America?

Those are all views that Roy Moore holds.

Riddle me this Puss, why was he removed from the bench twice?
Did he or did he not defy court orders?
That is a yes or no question.

Poll: Majority of voters say Trump isn't fit to be president.



A majority of American voters say Donald Trump is not "fit to serve as president," according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday, with 51 percent of respondents saying they are embarrassed to have Trump serve as president.

The poll reports that 59 percent say Trump is not honest, 60 percent say he does not have good leadership skills and 61 percent say he does not share their values.

Notably, voters say — 69 percent to 26 percent — that Trump should stop tweeting.

Actually the poem that the song was based on was written in 1814 but..........

The Star-Spangled Banner" was recognized for official use by the United States Navy in 1889, and by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in 1916, and was made the national anthem by a congressional resolution on March 3, 1931 (46 Stat. 1508, codified at 36 U.S.C. § 301), which was signed by President Herbert Hoover.

http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/ ... rategy?amp

Huey » 27 Sep 2017 2:16 pm » wrote:
Really? You made it personal with your lies and attacks.

So are you really done this time? Do I need to pull up the other 1000 times you said it?

Also, is this just one of the voices in your head or do the other ten voices agree you are done?

And how long is it gonna last this time? Until expose your next lie?

WHY WON'T MISTY STOP STALKING YOU?

Huey » 27 Sep 2017 2:45 pm » wrote: As usual Misty is really really super duper really done with me this time. Or does each of the voices in your head need to respond. This could take a while.

Bless her heart.....

That is a signature line of Crimson's.

Huey » 27 Sep 2017 2:45 pm » wrote: Ps. Get some originality.

The irony is thick with this one.

Misty » 27 Sep 2017 6:56 pm » wrote:

https://mobile.twitter.com/RawStory/sta ... 9951177728

Of course they are.

Sounds like maybe some of our conjobs are comrades.

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2017 12:37 pm » wrote:That is a signature line of Crimson's.
The iron is thick with this one.

I’m sure is crimson’s. It is pretty much a signure line of anyone who has lived in the south.

PostmodernProphet » 27 Sep 2017 9:20 pm » wrote: according to this "fee churning" is charging an illegal fee......as a lawyer who specializes in representing landlords I saw no fees mentioned in the article that would be illegal in Michigan. Perhaps you can show me where they are illegal in Baltimore.....the article says the firm was charging a 5% fee....

Postpartumpretender is an internet lawyer now.

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2017 12:44 pm » wrote:Postpartumpretender is an internet lawyer now.

well, in the sense that I am a lawyer who is on the internet, yes.....(is this where I have to condescending to you again?).......

PostmodernProphet » 28 Sep 2017 2:48 pm » wrote: well, in the sense that I am a lawyer who is on the internet, yes.....(is this where I have to condescending to you again?).......

I've seen split infinitives before - but never an infinitive that split.

I'm a navy seal.

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2017 12:34 pm » wrote:WHY WON'T MISTY STOP STALKING YOU?

It's those God damned voices in my head that keep telling me to stalk him in my own thread.

He must be hearing the same voices.
He wrote these, a little before he wrote the quote you just posted.

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2017 12:44 pm » wrote:Postpartumpretender is an internet lawyer now.

One would think that a lawyer would be able to read.
This was actually my reply to one of his posts.

Misty » 27 Sep 2017 7:14 pm » wrote:The tenants are alleging that Kushner's company is engaging in a illegal practice called 'fee churning.'

Now it will be up to them to prove that in court.

Apparently he took that to mean that I said that Kushner's company had definitely charged illegal fees.

These are the ALLEGATIONS:

The Public Justice Center said Westminster charges tenants “excessive, illegal fees, regularly misapply tenants’ subsequent payments in part to the illegal fees, and then deem the next rent payments ‘late’ to justify additional excessive fees.”

If tenants “do not pay the improper fees,” the plaintiffs allege, the company files “summary eviction proceedings to collect these fees, even when the tenant’s rent is current. …

If a tenant has not paid his or her monthly rent in full by the end of the fifth day of a month, [the company] charge not only a ‘late fee,’ which purports to be 5 percent of the monthly rental payment, but also other fees.”

The plaintiffs allege that Westminster charges court-related fees that are improper because judges have not awarded those costs.

The tenants allege that the charging of such fees violates Maryland law, which states that landlords may not collect penalties in excess of 5 percent of the rent due.

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/re ... story.html

I'm not a legal expert, so maybe the lawyer can tell me if it is legal to charge 'court-related fees' that have not been awarded by any judge?

Misty » 28 Sep 2017 3:18 pm » wrote: One would think that a lawyer would be able to read.
This was actually my reply to one of his posts.


Apparently he took that to mean that I said that Kushner's company had definitely charged illegal fees.

These are the ALLEGATIONS:


I'm not a legal expert, so maybe the lawyer can tell me if it is legal to charge 'court-related fees' that have not been awarded by any judge?

That illiterate, cognitively impaired *** is a lawyer like I'm heavyweight champion of the UFC.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:03 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:04 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:05 pm » wrote:Bump. Lmao!

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:35 pm » wrote:Bump.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:Bump.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:02 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:02 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:03 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:09 pm » wrote:Bump

Bump this.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:You post lies I post truth. I understand you use peanut gallery to bury the truth.

How many more times are you going to spam this thread with that ****?

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:03 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:04 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:05 pm » wrote:Bump. Lmao!

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:35 pm » wrote:Bump.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 3:36 pm » wrote:Bump.

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:02 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:02 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:03 pm » wrote:Bump

Huey » 28 Sep 2017 4:09 pm » wrote:Bump

Now if I lock it, will you run off squealing like a stuck pig and start another thread about me?
You have some very serious issues that you need to deal with.
It is totally irrational to fixate and hate on someone on an internet forum like this.
You look like a deranged lunatic.

Toddler shoots playmates at Michigan daycare.

Two toddlers were hospitalized in serious condition after a playmate accidentally shot them with a loaded gun at a daycare in the US state of Michigan.

Both of the children’s conditions were upgraded from critical a day earlier, police said Thursday, as they wrapped up their investigation and planned to meet with prosecutors to consider charges.

The accidental shooting took place Wednesday at a private home that functioned as a daycare in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn, when a child managed to get a hold of a loaded handgun.

Very responsible gun owner.
She runs a day care out of her home, but keeps a gun around where the kids she watches can get hold of it.
Never mind that she has 6 kids of her own in the house.

As many as 1.7 million American children live in homes with an unlocked, loaded gun, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun violence, and the incident was the latest case of children being injured by unsecured firearms.

Nearly 1,300 children die and 5,790 are treated for gunshot wounds each year in the United States, according to a recent study published in the medical journal Pediatrics.

Michigan state law does not prohibit guns at home child care facilities, but requires them to be unloaded and stored in a locked location away from children, according to the state’s Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.