Liberal Forum

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 11:32 am » wrote: No, he said that he never said it.....period.
He said nothing about framing.
I'm sure he said it with his usual total lack of empathy, which is why the family felt disrespected.

Yesterday, John Kelly provided the context to President Trump’s call to the family of Sergeant La David Johnson. Kelly said that he has talked with Trump about the kind of words that offer some small solace to grieving Gold Star families.

Gen. Kelly is uniquely qualified to counsel the president about this. He has made consoling calls to families and received such a call when his son was killed while serving in Afghanistan.


The words that Rep. Fredericka Wilson found objectionable were along the lines that Kelly says he recommended to the president. It’s important to keep in mind that, as Kelly suggested, families in the midst of unbearable grief don’t all react the same way to these kinds of calls.


Clearly, it was reasonable of Trump to consult with Kelly. However, this seems to have been a case in which Trump didn’t need advice.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... -widow.php

Misty » 13 Oct 2017 1:09 am » wrote:See the difference?

Yes, Trump is Winning
By Roger Kimball
in the real world, Trump is methodically pushing ahead with the agenda he campaigned on. That includes:
Nominating judges and justices who can be counted on to interpret and enforce the law but do not endeavor to use the law to promote their social agenda;

Addressing the problem of illegal immigration and securing the borders of the United States;

Developing America’s vast energy resources;

Rolling back the regulatory state, especially the administrative overreach of agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency;

Pursuing policies that put America, and American workers, first, not to the detriment of our relationships with our international partners but through a recognition that strength and sovereign independence make nations more reliable actors;

Restoring the combat readiness and morale of the United States military;

Simplifying the U.S. tax code, making it more competitive for U.S. businesses and more equitable for individuals;

Getting a handle on the unconstitutional and shockingly inefficient monstrosity ironically called the Affordable Care Act;

Putting a stop to the obscene violation of due process that Title IX fanatics brought to college campuses across the country.

And many other initiatives large and small.
https://amgreatness.com/2017/10/15/yes- ... s-winning/

Pro-Trump ‘War Hero’ Featured on Fox News Never Actually Served in War

A military veteran glowingly featured by Fox News earlier this month for his pro-Trump artwork and his record as a “war hero” admitted Thursday to lying about his military service.

John Garofalo, 72, was featured in a Bryan Llenas report as having served seven years as a Navy SEAL, receiving 22 commendations, including two Purple Hearts, and having been listed twice as missing in action during Vietnam.

Garofalo, who personally carved a presidential seal to gift President Trump, is a “tough, tough man,” Llenas said, after calling him a “hero” during an interview.

Fox News anchor Eric Shawn later remarked: “God bless John Garofalo.

We certainly hope maybe the president is listening.”

However, when the Navy Times reached out to Garofalo on Thursday, he confessed to having lied about his military service.

“What I did I’m ashamed of, and I didn’t mean to cause so much disgrace to the SEALs,” he told the Times.

Fox News has since removed the video, which went viral on Facebook, and issued a statement apologizing for the error.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 12:35 pm » wrote:
FAKE NEWS!

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 12:28 pm » wrote: More **** from the psychopathic liar.

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 12:37 pm » wrote:You mean the corrupt liberal MSM lying for roughly six months when they claimed that Trump was under investigation?
When they all knew that wasn't true; that it was a counter-intelligence investigation?
One mistake by Fox hardly compared, psycho.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: What part of 45 said that he NEVER said that Sgt.Johnson 'knew what he was getting into' do you not understand?

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 12:46 pm » wrote: What part of,blah,blah.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 11:57 am » wrote:Hey look, a squirrel!

You really need help for your Clinton obsession.

HILLARY CLINTON, URANIUM, AND A RUSSIAN SPY RING
J. Michael Waller, writing in the Daily Caller, says that new FBI information about corruption in a Clinton-approved uranium deal with Russia raises questions about Clinton’s actions after the FBI broke up a deep-cover Russian spy ring in 2010. The FBI ran an elaborate and highly successful operation called Ghost Stories to monitor and rip apart a deep-cover Russian agent network. It tracked a ring of Russian spies who lived between Boston and Washington, D.C. under false identities.

In 2010, thanks to the Ghost Stories operation, the FBI arrested 10 spies. According to Waller, “Secretary of State Clinton worked feverishly to return the Russian agents to Moscow in a hastily arranged, lopsided deal with Putin.”

If this is true, why did Clinton do so? Waller ties her actions to the Russia uranium deal:

For the Clintons, the FBI’s biggest counterintelligence bust in history couldn’t have come at a worse time. . .It all happened as the uranium deal was in play: An arrangement to provide Moscow’s state Rosatom nuclear agency with 20 percent of American uranium capacity, with $145,000,000 to pour into the Clinton Family Foundation and its projects.

Indeed, the day the FBI arrests occurred the day before Bill Clinton was to give a speech in Moscow. A Kremlin-connected investment bank, Renaissance Capital, paid the former president $500,000 for the hour-long appearance.

At the time of the arrests, a spokesperson for Hillary Clinton told told ABC News that there was “no reason to think the Secretary was a target of this [Russian] spy ring.” But this statement appears to have been false....

In addition, says Waller:

[Clinton] immediately used her position as America’s top diplomat to pour Russia-related money into her family foundation. One of her earliest acts as secretary of state was personally to authorize the State Department to arrange for 28 American tech CEOs and venture capitalists – 17 of them Clinton Foundation donors – to visit a Russian high-tech hub called Skolkovo. With Skolkovo, the SVR doesn’t need to steal when it can arrange legal purchases.

The US military calls Skolkovo “an overt alternative to clandestine industrial espionage.” The Skolkovo visit, which reportedly began as a Clinton Foundation initiative, occurred in May, 2010, a month before the arrests.

When the FBI broke up the Russian spy ring, Eric Holder claimed the sudden arrests were made to prevent one of the spies from fleeing the United States. However, FBI counterintelligence chief Frank Figliuzzi later gave a different reason: “We were becoming very concerned they were getting close enough to a sitting US cabinet member that we thought we could no longer allow this to continue.”

According to Waller, Hillary Clinton, almost certainly the cabinet member is question, had her own concern:

Hillary Clinton was mining Kremlin cash for her personal benefit while secretary of state, at the exact time Putin’s SVR spies were targeting her and penetrating her inner circle. She had every personal motivation to make the spy problem disappear and deny that she had been a target. . . .

She toiled feverishly to get the 10 Ghost Stories spies back to Moscow as quickly as possible. She accepted whatever Putin would give her to pass off as a face-saving swap.

The swap occurred during the Fourth of July weekend, when few in Washington were paying attention.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... y-ring.php

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:Maybe he didn't use those exact words.
No matter what the facts are, you're going to lie and smear Trump and ignore everything positive he does and says.
While supporting the smear artist who lied about Trump.
Because you're a psychopathic liar.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 12:50 pm » wrote:One mistake?
Have you ever watched those three clowns in the morning?
They quote unvetted crap from wingnut blogs all the time.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 1:02 pm » wrote:Oh STFU.
Your Circus Peanut Messiah has never shown one ounce of compassion or empathy for anyone but himself.

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 1:02 pm » wrote: I have no doubt that whatever he said, it came off as insensitive to the family.

Are you calling Sgt.Johnson's widow and Mother smear artists, because they said they felt disrespected.

Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2017 3:56 pm » wrote:
How typically dishonest of the psychopath to ignore months of great news to babble about one month.

You people are **** wacked.

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 1:02 pm » wrote:Oh yeah, who cares that the corrupt hack who's again running for president is a deeply corrupt serial felon?

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 1:08 pm » wrote:
Please stop with this **** that she is running for president again.
That's just your lame excuse for using her as a distraction from the dumpster fire taking place in the WH.

Anyway, the presidential election is over 3 years away.
Are you going to whine about it for the next 3 years?

Don't answer that.
It's rhetorical.

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2017 1:07 pm » wrote:Explain why the dow jones does so much better under democrat administration, dick sucker.

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 1:12 pm » wrote:Wow, two sentences, two lies. Quite the record!
Most Democrats believe she's running again.

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 1:12 pm » wrote:Worrying about vast corruption at the top of the federal government is "whining?"

Misty » 20 Oct 2017 1:22 pm » wrote: How the **** do you know what most Democrats believe?
I haven't heard one Democrat say that she is running again.

Oh please. Don't even try to pretend that you are the least bit concerned about corruption at the top of the government as long as it is run by R's.

Have you ever said one word about 45's conflicts of interest regarding his businesses, not to mention all the conflicts involving members of his cabinet?

Again....rhetorical.

Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2017 1:13 pm » wrote:
Why, so you can lie and babble and dissemble some more?

Like you have whenever I waste my time explaining basic Economics?

**** off, psycho.

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2017 1:39 pm » wrote:All that fapping, and you still have not addressed the issue.

Why does the dow perform so much better under democrats, if republicans are so much better on the economy, *** hat?