Liberal Forum

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote:
This smells real bad.
U.S.Attorneys are supposed to be independent.

45 seems to only have an interest in those that will have jurisdiction over him and his businesses.

I heard he is also taking a keen interest in who will be the U.S. Attorney that will oversee Mar-A-Lago.
He could be interviewing candidates there and we would never know because he refuses to tell us who he is meeting with there.

For the but Obama did it too crowd:
"Former President Barack Obama never interviewed a U.S. attorney candidate during his two terms."
This is highly unusual.

LOL Yeah right.

Not to mention, Mueller has loaded his investigation with leftist lawyers. Go figure.

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 12:33 pm » wrote:These are the kinds of radical judges that 45 is so proud of nominating.
Third-rate Christian right bombthrowers.

Jeff Mateer compares the religious crackdowns in Nazi Germany to the way Christians are treated in this country.

He also said that transgender children are evidence of Satan's plan, lamented that states were banning conversion therapy and argued that sanctioning same-sex marriage would lead to polygamy and bestiality.

White leftist judges spend their careers legislating from the bench.

Crocodile tears Misty.

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 12:33 pm » wrote:These are the kinds of radical judges that 45 is so proud of nominating.
Third-rate Christian right bombthrowers.

The “separation of church and state” is “nowhere” in the U.S. constitution

Which is factually true, Dim.

Quote where it is in the Constitution.

Rotsa ruck, psycho.

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote:This smells real bad.

Speaking of smelling bad, you had high praise for moonbat Rachel Madcow, who you claimed "tells it like it is."

Here's your straight shooter, psycho.

What The Hell Was This Rachel Maddow Segment?
“Everybody that I know is appalled by this.”
By Willa Frej
It was a vintage Rachel Maddow stemwinder. A deft, 25-minute weaving of carefully curated sound bites, screenshots of news reports, slick maps and graphics, all strung together to make the case that something fishy is afoot. It’s a style Maddow has perfected, and it has propelled her to the top of the ratings heap.


There was just one problem. Maddow’s theory was so flimsy that it could be debunked by a quick glance at a map, let alone a phone call with an expert.

Janet Malcolm of The New Yorker recently described Maddow’s show as “a piece of sleight of hand presented as a cable news show.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ra ... 4f1c3ad52f

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2017 10:06 pm » wrote: Carter, who inherited a crashing economy,

Liar.

.

And look how great Carter was in incomes, Dim.

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote:This smells real bad.

Here's what you never thought smelled bad.

.

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 1:24 pm » wrote:
Liar.

That looks like Carter kept up with the average, son. Haven't you always lied that he was the worst president on the economy?

Why are you a liar?

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 1:24 pm » wrote: And look how great Carter was in incomes, Dim.

Why aren't you showing the source of these claims? Ashamed?

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 3:09 pm » wrote: That looks like Carter kept up with the average, son. Haven't you always lied that he was the worst president on the economy?

Why are you a liar?

Why aren't you showing the source of these claims? Ashamed?

"The prime rate outstripped the Federal funds rate, reaching 20% in March 1980. Carter then enacted an austerity program by executive order, justifying these measures by observing that inflation had reached a "crisis stage"; both inflation and short-term interest rates reached 18 percent in February and March 1980."

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 3:09 pm » wrote: That looks like....

It looks like you're too much of a coward to respond to my point.

Where's the "collapsing economy" Carter inherited, psycho?

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 3:09 pm » wrote: That looks like Carter kept up with the average, son. Haven't you always lied that he was the worst president on the economy?

Why are you a liar?

Why aren't you showing the source of these claims? Ashamed?

As I noted, Carter inherited a moderately healthy economy from Ford.

Thanks to Carter's incompetence, the Misery Index rose by more than any president since WWII other than the economically incompetent Nixon.

12% inflation and rising as he left office.

The worst income losses in recorded US history.

18% or so Prime Rate.
Collapsing business and consumer confidence.

That's what a psychotic claims is success.

And it got much worse after he left office, that Reagan had to overcome.

Gerald Ford 1974–1976 16.00 12.66 – Dec 1976 19.90 – Jan 1975 16.36 12.66 -3.70
Jimmy Carter 1977–1980 16.26 12.60 – Apr 1978 21.98 – Jun 1980 12.72 19.72 +7.00
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misery_index_(economics)

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 3:59 pm » wrote:
As I noted, Carter inherited a moderately healthy economy from Ford.

Thanks to Carter's incompetence, the Misery Index rose by more than any president since WWII other than the economically incompetent Nixon.

12% inflation and rising as he left office.

The worst income losses in recorded US history.

18% or so Prime Rate.
Collapsing business and consumer confidence.

That's what a psychotic claims is success.

And it got much worse after he left office, that Reagan had to overcome.

And then there's your own source - oops:

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 3:55 pm » wrote:
It looks like you're too much of a coward to respond to my point.

Where's the "collapsing economy" Carter inherited, psycho?

It's at thoity thoid and thoid, you ignorant *** - right across the street from the "collapsing economy" that reagan inherited, you prattling dick sucker.

Oopsie doopsie, YOUR SOURCE says you lie about everything, dick sucker:

roadkill » 21 Oct 2017 3:14 pm » wrote: "The prime rate outstripped the Federal funds rate, reaching 20% in March 1980. Carter then enacted an austerity program by executive order, justifying these measures by observing that inflation had reached a "crisis stage"; both inflation and short-term interest rates reached 18 percent in February and March 1980."

Thank you for acknowledging that Carter took corrective actions to account for the **** that he was handed by nixon-ford.

Have you seen how closely his economic performance tracked to reagan's? Here, it's a little something that dick sucker clem gave me - have a look and learn to think like a white man, boy:

roadkill » 21 Oct 2017 3:14 pm » wrote: "The prime rate outstripped the Federal funds rate, reaching 20% in March 1980. Carter then enacted an austerity program by executive order, justifying these measures by observing that inflation had reached a "crisis stage"; both inflation and short-term interest rates reached 18 percent in February and March 1980."

Here's another little something clemtard gave me. Forgive me that it isn't just a couple of cherry picked data points from an entire administration - your preferred quality of evidence. I can only share what clemjob gave me, and sadly, it covers carter's ENTIRE performance - not just some cherry picked moments.



As you can see, the economy performed well above average for most of his presidency, then went into some trauma, briefly, toward the end (just as you noted, out of context, like a gay). Then, as you noted, HE TOOK CORRECTIVE MEASURES, and the economy climbed back up to average, where reagan maintained it for the next eight years.

Let's look at their respective jobs numbers, shall we?

Carter accomplished in four years the kind of jobs numbers it took nixon and ford EIGHT years to accomplish. Reagan only surpassed his numbers by 60%, though he had TWICE THE TIME to do it in. Observe:

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 4:20 pm » wrote: It's at thoity thoid and thoid, you ignorant *** - right across the street from the "collapsing economy" that reagan inherited, you prattling dick sucker.

Here you go again, liar, a healthy, strengthening economy as Carter took office.

.

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 4:30 pm » wrote:
As you can see, blah, blah, blah

Everyone can see that you'll lie, then change the subject when the lie is proven.

Carter didn't inherit a "collapsing economy" as you claimed, troll.
Go **** yourself, psycho.

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 4:38 pm » wrote:
Here you go again, liar, a healthy, strengthening economy as Carter took office.

Agreed - the economy was on the upswing when carter began AND WHEN HE LEFT, according to your own graph.

Thank you for admitting that, dick sucker.

Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2017 4:40 pm » wrote: Carter didn't inherit a "collapsing economy" as you claimed, troll.

Neither did reagan, dick sucker - I was mocking you, ya **** ape.

But don't take MY word for it, you queer - take YOUR WORD FOR IT.

Here's the source that YOU presented:


Your graph proves that the economy grew at about an average rate under Carter, notwithstanding the oil, hostage, and monetary crises he had to deal with - all of which were caused by the policies of past presidents.

More to the point, your graph proves that the economy was heading in an almost vertical growth trajectory when reagan took office, and then stayed the carter/volcker course.

Of course, you've already admitted that both Clinton and Johnson outperformed reagan on the economy - and I appreciate that. And you have CERTAINLY admitted - by skirt flapping away from my proofs - that carter was much better than reagan on creating jobs.

In all, it's fair to say that reagan and carter were about identical on the economy in general - nothing to write home about, but as good as or better than most. Neither was a super star, but neither was a nixon or a bush, either.

I'm glad we can finally agree, dick sucker.

Cannonpointer » 21 Oct 2017 4:22 pm » wrote:Thank you for acknowledging that Carter took corrective actions to account for the **** that he was handed by nixon-ford.

Have you seen how closely his economic performance tracked to reagan's? Here, it's a little something that dick sucker clem gave me - have a look and learn to think like a white man, boy:

It was at the end of Carter's term, not the beginning.


Reagan was busy fixing Carter's inflation, etc.


Then Reagan carried Clinton's economy.


Then Clinton started us into a recession.

Then the dems finished it off with the subprime crisis.


Then Obama doubled the debt.


Other than that...the dems are way cool.

roadkill » 21 Oct 2017 6:30 pm » wrote:
It was at the end of Carter's term, not the beginning.

Reagan was busy fixing Carter's inflation, etc.

Then Reagan carried Clinton's economy.

Then Clinton started us into a recession.

Then the dems finished it off with the subprime crisis.

Then Obama doubled the debt.

Other than that...the dems are way cool.

See, this is what queer children do. They hog all the credit to whoever they perceive as having the biggest dick.

If reagan caused clinton's economy - SKIPPING OVER BUSH, who inherited a crashing economy and had to raise taxes to stop reagan's inflation, - then carter caused reagan's.

Only bisexual dick suckers insist they have the right to take it both ways (mouth AND ***).