What high office does Weinstein hold, psycho?Misty » 22 Oct 2017 4:05 pm » wrote:
Yeah, just like I did for that disgusting pig Harvey Weinstein, right?
An actual asshole defends felons and rapists like you have for years.Asshole.
Stop smearing conservative public figures and maybe I'll consider believing something you say.This **** is bi-partisan jackass, and it needs to stop.
Are you really such a partisan hack that you can't agree to that?
Have I written one single word in his defense like you did for years for Clinton?You wanna defend a piece of **** like Bill O'Reilly who according to the settlement repeatedly harassed a woman, had a nonconsensual sexual relationship with her, and sent her gay pornography and other sexually explicit material.
What was that about Puss?
Just another form of vulgar seduction?
Go **** yourself, psychopath.I don't ever want to hear anything about me defending anyone ever again from your filthy mouth.
You don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to that.
You have defended every criminal, pervert and racist who has an R after their name.
Misty » 22 Oct 2017 6:31 pm » wrote:Does anybody remember that whole kerfuffle about how Hillary said that what happened in Benghazi was because of a video?
Well, these are the four things we have been told so far about the attack that killed four Green Berets in Niger.
#Trump'sBenghazi
Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote:This smells real bad.
The big story this week is that the FBI uncovered a Moscow bribery plot just before the Obama Administration approved the transfer of 20 per cent of American uranium into the hands of the Russians.
And who precisely were the Russkies trying to bribe?
They also obtained an eyewitness account - backed by documents - indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.
The racketeering scheme was conducted "with the consent of higher level officials" in Russia who "shared the proceeds" from the kickbacks, one agent declared in an affidavit years later.
Fancy that! A racketeering scheme centered on the Clintons! Who'da thunk it?![]()
![]()
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1017/s ... 6EkXzSS.99
Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote:This smells real bad..
Psychopath.it was the New York Times that first reported the Uranium One story. Peter Schweizer, author of Clinton Cash, shared his research with the Times, and reporters Joe Becker and Mike McIntire developed it into a compelling story about the scandal.
Of the origins of their story, Becker and McIntire wrote:
Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... ut-her.php
Wall Street furious over proposal to slash 401(k) limits.
Wall Street pushed back hard on Friday against a report that congressional Republicans are weighing a plan to severely limit the amount of money Americans can contribute to their 401(k)s.
The Capitol Hill lawmakers, searching for ways to pay for President Trump’s broad proposed tax cuts, are eyeing a $2,400 cap on pre-tax contributions to 401(k) plans, used by millions of US workers to save for retirement.
Currently, the pre-tax limit for such contributions is $18,000 a year.
FYI jackass, she lost the election.Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 10:30 am » wrote:Look, a squirrel!
Pay absolutely no attention to the Clinton's vast criminal conspiracy and corruption!![]()
There's the new Democrat Talking Point Liar standard; if you lost an election, you shouldn't be prosecuted for the felonies you've committed.Misty » 23 Oct 2017 12:05 pm » wrote:
FYI jackass, she lost the election.
Great judges, a likely growth stimulating tax cut, a stronger military, more respect in the world, widespread deregulation.You need to stop using her as your 'squirrel' to distract from the cluster **** you voted for.
Anyone who can afford to put away $18,000/year almost certainly isn't middle class, liar.Misty » 23 Oct 2017 12:02 pm » wrote:What a good idea, she said sarcastically.
Let's give the rich huge tax cuts while we make middle class retirement savers pay for it.
Investigative author?Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 11:59 am » wrote:Speaking of smelling bad, you lied that investigative author Peter Schweizer was "discredited."
Twenty-Plus Errors, Fabrications, And Distortions In Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash
Schweizer claimed Clinton played a "central role" in approving the purchase of Uranium One by the Russian State Atomic Nuclear Agency (Rosatom).
During an ABC News interview, Schweizer admitted he had no "direct evidence" proving Clinton intervened on the issue:
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: But the assistant secretary who sat -- the assistant secretary of State who sat on the committee said she never intervened on any CFIUS issue at all.
SCHWEIZER: Well, I think that deserves further scrutiny. I would question that. To argue that (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: But based on what? Based on what?
SCHWEIZER: Well, I think based on her (INAUDIBLE)...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you have any evidence that she actually intervened in this issue?
SCHWEIZER: No, we don't have direct evidence. But it warrants further investigation because, again, George, this is part of the broader pattern. You either have to come to the conclusion that these are all coincidences or something else is afoot.
[ABC, This Week with George Stephanopoulos, 4/26/15]
Says the economic genius.Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 12:16 pm » wrote:Anyone who can afford to put away $18,000/year almost certainly isn't middle class, liar.
Proposals floating around Washington to cap the amount that Americans can contribute before taxes to 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts are unsettling professionals in the retirement industry.
Republicans are looking for ways to generate revenue to support broad reductions in individual tax rates. One idea is to limit the amount of pretax money households can sock away for retirement saving.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/there ... 2017-10-20
How the GOP Tax Bill Could Squeeze Your 401(k)
Talk of limiting the amount of retirement money that people can save before taxes is worrying the financial industry.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/talk-of-re ... 1508497200
Mediamatters? You're actually citing that dishonest wackjob site as a source?
My mistake, but your source only claims they are supposedly "eyeing it."Misty » 23 Oct 2017 12:27 pm » wrote: Says the economic genius.
That $2400 cap will only discourage middle class people from saving for their retirement jackass.
Is that the same NY Times you would dismiss out of hand if I used it as a source?Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 12:24 pm » wrote:So rather than admitting that you lied about him, you tell a new lie.
Psychopath.![]()
And not that facts ever get in the way of your lies, his claims were largely supported by the NYTimes.
They have to find a way to pay for their tax cuts for the rich.Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 12:29 pm » wrote:My mistake, but your source only claims they are supposedly "eyeing it."
I doubt very, very much they'd ever be so stupid as to do it.
But that won't stop you from smearing Trump on the basis of a rumor.
Try reading what I actually write before you post some knee jerk response.With America already facing a retirement crisis, there's a general consensus that lawmakers need to do more to convince workers to save for their golden years.
That's why reports that GOP lawmakers are considering capping pre-tax 401(k) contributions at $2,400 annually -- compared with $18,000 currently -- caused alarm and concern, with some voters calling the idea "horrible" and "disastrous" on Twitter.
President Donald Trump weighed in on Monday, vowing there will be "NO change to your 401(k)" and praising the current limits.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says ... ak-limits/

Donald Trump Punches Back At Widow Of La David Johnson After Her ‘GMA’ Interview.
Myeshia Johnson this morning confirmed Trump said on the call, “that he knew what he signed up for, but it hurts anyway.”
“It made me cry, because I was very angry at the tone of his voice, and how he said it.
He couldn’t remember my husband’s name… He told me had my husband’s report on front of him.
That’s when he actually said ‘La David.’ I heard him stumbling trying to remember my husband’s name.
Florida Rep. Wilson was in the vehicle because of her long connection to the family, Johnson said.
“Whatever Miss Wilson said was not fabricated,” Johnson said. “What she said was 100% correct.”
Your new name is "Stretch".
I mentioned the NYTimes because moonbats like you find it credible, Dim.Misty » 23 Oct 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:
Is that the same NY Times you would dismiss out of hand if I used it as a source?
The one the leader of Cult45 says is FAKE News?
![]()
![]()
Where did he say that, liar?Misty » 23 Oct 2017 12:52 pm » wrote:Now he's calling Myeshia Johnson a liar.