Liberal Forum

Stinky McPeterson » 23 Oct 2017 8:04 pm » wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOL...only 30% of americans cont to 401k..............LOLOLOLOL
the average yrly 401k contr is about 1700 bucks........LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
source.............30 yrs personal finance consultation

LOLOLOLOL
Only about 30% of Americans support this president, and he acts like they are the whole **** country.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

FOLKS I AM GOING TO SHOUT THIS

ONLY 5% OF THE POP CAN GO TO THE BANK TOMORROW AND GET 5K IN CASH.REPEAT...GO TO THE BANK AND GET THE CASH

THESE ARE THE ONLY 5% YOU WANT TO LISTEN TOO. THE REST ARE LOSERS....SORRY FOR THE TRUTH....NOT EVERYONE, BUT 95% OF THE 95%.

AND YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK

Stinky McPeterson » 23 Oct 2017 8:11 pm » wrote:FOLKS I AM GOING TO SHOUT THIS

ONLY 5% OF THE POP CAN GO TO THE BANK TOMORROW AND GET 5K IN CASH.REPEAT...GO TO THE BANK AND GET THE CASH

THESE ARE THE ONLY 5% YOU WANT TO LISTEN TOO. THE REST ARE LOSERS....SORRY FOR THE TRUTH....NOT EVERYONE, BUT 95% OF THE 95%.

AND YOU CAN TAKE THAT TO THE BANK

Then you need to listen to me because I can do that many, many times.

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 8:09 pm » wrote: LOLOLOLOL
Only about 30% of Americans support this president, and he acts like they are the whole **** country.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

you misrepresented the 401k stats and i had to correct that...if the av 401k cont is 1700 per yr......what the hell is the difference if it is up to 4800???????

most people can't even save a dollar.......the people who have money have to take care of these financial illiterates their whole god damned lives...most of which are libberturds btw.....sorry

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 8:14 pm » wrote: Then you need to listen to me because I can do that many, many times.

i said 5%...congrats.i can't even do it once btw.......now the trust is a different story trust me

Stinky McPeterson » 23 Oct 2017 8:14 pm » wrote:you misrepresented the 401k stats and i had to correct that...if the av 401k cont is 1700 per yr......what the hell is the difference if it is up to 4800???????

They want to change it to the first $2400, not $4800.

Stinky McPeterson » 23 Oct 2017 8:14 pm » wrote:most people can't even save a dollar.......the people who have money have to take care of these financial illiterates their whole god damned lives...

Which is why it makes no sense to pass policies that will only discourage people from saving more.

Stinky McPeterson » 23 Oct 2017 8:14 pm » wrote:most of which are libberturds btw.....sorry

****.

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 8:22 pm » wrote: They want to change it to the first $2400, not $4800.

Which is why it makes no sense to pass policies that will only discourage people from saving more.

****.

misread..didn't even hear about it until now.........if 30% of the people can only save less than 2k per yr, not even a point.................most don't even know what a 401k is

most can't balance a ck book let alone save a nickel

though i know this article is highly liberal biased.....even their generous and probably very slanted in the percents..i will give you when i have time abstract research

https://www.aol.com/article/finance/201 ... /20830377/

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 8:22 pm » wrote: They want to change it to the first $2400, not $4800.

Which is why it makes no sense to pass policies that will only discourage people from saving more.

****.

sorry...don't mean to be a prick...please feel free to penis gallery my responses...i don't mind...in fact it is kinda kinky

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 8:04 pm » wrote: He doesn't even bother to read my posts before his knee starts jerking and he has to pound out an answer.

Whatever I post, he's reflexively against it..

After I've read several thousand of your lies, I just assume the latest thing you write is, too.


Duuuh.

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 4:00 pm » wrote:
And there we have it.
The 'I've named them many, many times' defense.

If that is the case, then it should be easy for you to dig up a link of one of those many, many times that you posted the names of those women that Clinton had forcible sexual intercourse with against their will.

Given that you didn't pay the slightest attention the many times I have, that you have openly declared your disgust at what I write in my posts, why should I bother?


Especially given that you'll just lie no matter what the facts are?

Psychopath.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/10/22/s ... hn-ohurley

'245 People Bungee Jumping Off of a Bridge at the Same Time'

https://pjmedia.com/video/obligatory-mo ... time-post/

Misty » 23 Oct 2017 1:48 pm » wrote: You drank the Cult45 Kool-Aid.

Speaking of drinking the kool-aid, here's your glorious Obama Economy, Dim.

Obama was terrible for economic growth
Jonathon Trugman April 1, 2017 | 9:13pm
Last week the Commerce Department released its third revision for fourth-quarter 2016 gross domestic product. The number came in at a paltry 2.1 percent, meaning that growth during President Obama’s final year in office — the end of an “Error of Hope” — landed with a big thud at just 1.6 percent.

That low-water mark puts the Obama presidency in last place among all the post-World War II presidents when it comes to economic growth.

http://nypost.com/2017/04/01/obama-was- ... ic-growth/

"RNC Credits Trump's Tweets for Increase in Fundraising

Although President Donald Trump's tweeting habits have been criticized by many Americans in both parties, the Republican National Committee credits his use of Twitter for a surge in donors who have never contributed to the party before, The Hill reported on Monday."

Time for another Twitter tantrum.







BTW, this is what Sen. Bob Corker wrote in an Op-Ed in the Washington Post in August, 2015 about the Iran deal that 45 said he helped President Obama give us.

Sen. Bob Corker: Congress should reject the bad Iran deal.

Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:02 am » wrote:Time for another Twitter tantrum.







BTW, this is what Sen. Bob Corker wrote in an Op-Ed in the Washington Post in August, 2015 about the Iran deal that 45 said he helped President Obama give us.

Sen. Bob Corker: Congress should reject the bad Iran deal.

More money for the RNC. lol

Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 11:02 pm » wrote:Given that you didn't pay the slightest attention the many times I have, that you have openly declared your disgust at what I write in my posts, why should I bother?
Especially given that you'll just lie no matter what the facts are?
Psychopath.

So why do you even bother posting in my thread?

To borrow an expression from John Kelly, " Empty barrels make the most noise."
And you are the emptiest of empty barrels.

You think you can just accuse someone of having committed a series of rapes and not have to prove it?
That's not how it works.

Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:14 am » wrote:

Bob Corker is toast and yet you're OK with his Tweets.

roadkill » 24 Oct 2017 11:07 am » wrote:More money for the RNC. lol

Good. They can run more candidates like Sharron Angle, Todd Akin and Christine O'Donnell the witch.
They are already planning to primary Jeff Flake with Chemtrail Kelli and running the Talibangelist with the toy gun in Alabama.