Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:22 am » wrote: Good. They can run more candidates like Sharron Angle, Todd Akin and Christine O'Donnell the witch.
They are already planning to primary Jeff Flake with Chemtrail Kelli and running the Talibangelist with the toy gun in Alabama.
45 is a compulsive liar, and yet you're OK with his Tweets.roadkill » 24 Oct 2017 11:21 am » wrote:Bob Corker is toast and yet you're OK with his Tweets.
Obsession on your part.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:28 am » wrote: 45 is a compulsive liar, and yet you're OK with his Tweets.
You just ignored the fact that 45 lied to you again, and attacked Bob Corker.
I guess you enjoy being lied to.
Keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
#Cult45
House Republicans are doing the same thing you do.roadkill » 24 Oct 2017 11:33 am » wrote:Obsession on your part.
In other news...
"House Republicans launched new probes into several Obama-era controversies, covering both the Justice Department’s 2016 handling of the Clinton email case and the administration’s approval for the sale of a mining company that gave the Russians partial control over American uranium reserves."
"Hillary isn't the president"...right Misty.
There isn't one single person little Miss Marxist hasn't smeared when that person posed a threat to a Democrat criminal.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 12:13 pm » wrote: Devin Nunes is a compromised partisan hack.
As well as excellent candidates like Johnson of Wisconsin, Marco Rubio, Mike Lee and others.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:22 am » wrote:Good. They can run more candidates like Sharron Angle, Todd Akin and Christine O'Donnell the witch.
You can't even tell believable lies.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:11 am » wrote:
To borrow an expression from John Kelly, " Empty barrels make the most noise."
And you are the emptiest of empty barrels.
The evidence was presented long ago, psycho, and you didn't care enough to even read it.You think you can just accuse someone of having committed a series of rapes and not have to prove it?
That's not how it works.
I'm sure of it.Termin8tor » 24 Oct 2017 12:38 pm » wrote:Do you think any board member with a little common sense believes me to be an "empty barrel?"
Drain that swamp.Small Company With Connections to Trump Administration Wins $300 Million Puerto Rico Recovery Contract
A tiny, 2-year-old energy company from a small town in Montana won a $300 million contract to fix Puerto Rico’s hurricane-ravaged power grid, raising concerns about the decision-making behind the lucrative deal and the company’s ties to people connected to the Trump administration, as well as the company’s ability to fully meet Puerto Rico’s recovery needs.
Whitefish Energy, which at the time of the Hurricane Maria’s landfall had only two full-time employees, now has by far the largest contract of any company involved in Puerto Rico’s recovery, and, according to reporting from the Daily Beast, is primarily financed by a firm run by a major Trump donor who has connections to several members of his administration.
The contract has also raised eyebrows because the company is based in Whitefish, Montana, the hometown of Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/ ... tract.html
Why? Are you implying something?Misty » 24 Oct 2017 7:02 pm » wrote:Perhaps Clem can tell my again how 45 is so tough on Russia/Putin.![]()
Misty » 17 Feb 2017 6:31 pm » wrote: First of all whether or not it affected the outcome of the election is something that can never be proven one way or the other, but that's besides the point.
I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the fact that Russia interfered in our presidential election.
Everybody should be outraged by that whether they like the results of the election or not.
This is exactly why I call you a psychopathic liar. If you honestly believed I'm perceived as a fool, you'd start a thread to ask members in order to embarrass me.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 7:00 pm » wrote: I'm sure of it.
You really have no idea of how you are perceived here on this forum, do you?
That truly is strange, but Puerto Rico made the decision, psycho.Misty » 24 Oct 2017 9:59 pm » wrote:Small Company With Connections to Trump Administration Wins $300 Million Puerto Rico Recovery Contract
Drain that swamp.
Has he been given $150 million from Putin-connected businesses, psycho?Misty » 24 Oct 2017 7:02 pm » wrote:Perhaps Clem can tell my again how 45 is so tough on Russia/Putin.![]()
Do you care that the Russians may have been invited to meddle in our election by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign?Misty » 17 Mar 2017 3:39 pm » wrote: And that's all you've been talking about.
I have talked a lot about the fact that there were a lot of ties and there was a lot of 'contact' between Trump associates and the Russians.
You're the one who keeps distorting that to make it sound like I was only talking about 'collusion' to influence the election.
Do you deny that there were Trump associates who had ties to Russia and had contact with Russians?
And do you deny that some people lied about their ties or their contacts with the Russians?
You're not the least bit curious as to why they were in contact with the foreign adversary that was hacking the DNC?
Do you even care that Russia meddled in our election you partisan hack?
All of Trump’s Russia Ties, in 7 Charts
Or that she accepted $150 million from Putin-connected businesses?Huey » 25 Oct 2017 8:51 am » wrote:
Do you care that the Russians may have been invited to meddle in our election by the DNC and the Clinton Campaign?
Little Miss Marxist once again finds a huge scandal to babble about.Misty » 23 Oct 2017 7:11 pm » wrote:And he only mentioned them AFTER he was asked a question about why he hadn't said anything for 12 days.
A Crime Or Just 'Baloney'? Hillary Clinton Russian Scandal Keeps Getting Worse
6:06 AM ET
FacebookLinkedInTwitterShare Reprints
Clinton Scandals: As evidence grows of actual collusion and possible illegal pay-for-play ties between Hillary Clinton, her closest political allies and Russian officials, the former secretary of state and presidential candidate declares on C-Span "it's the same baloney they've been peddling for years, and there's been no credible evidence by anyone." She called the stories "debunked."
Far from it.
Tuesday, two House investigative committees announced they would start looking into the questionable Uranium One deal that Clinton approved while serving as the nation's top diplomat — a deal that delivered effective control of 20% of the U.S.' uranium mining assets to Russia's state-owned Rosatom, and led to millions of dollars in "donations" to the family Clinton Foundation.
With the Senate already investigating this shady if not outright illegal deal, a spate of Russian-related investigations involving Hillary crony and former campaign Chairman John Podesta and his brother Tony, we may soon find out what's baloney and what's not. But the growing body of evidence suggests possible crimes committed by Clinton and former President Bill Clinton through their power base and family enterprise, the Clinton Foundation.
The sudden re-emergence of the Clinton-Russia nexus — we reported on it last year — is mostly thanks to reports in The Hill and The Daily Caller last week showing that the FBI and Justice Department had found evidence that Russia had bribed a U.S. uranium trucking firm to further Moscow's reach into the U.S. atomic energy industry.
It didn't end there, however. As The Hill reported Tuesday, "They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton's charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill."
This is just one of a number of scandals that Hillary Clinton has embroiled herself in over the last few years. And the revelations just keep coming — turning what was initially claimed as minor contretemps into major commissions of crime.
http://www.investors.com/politics/edito ... ing-worse/