Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 25 Oct 2017 4:12 pm » wrote:Watch her pivot from Putin being the biggest, HUGEST threat to the country to being a really nice guy who just wanted to fight childhood poverty in Africa.

Termin8tor » 25 Oct 2017 4:20 pm » wrote:No, no, I want her to run again!

Dark Money Group Received Massive Donation In Fight Against Obama’s Supreme Court Nominee

A dark money organization that spent $7 million to block former President Obama’s Supreme Court pick received just three donations between 2015 and 2016, but one transaction really counted: A single $17.9 million contribution from a mystery donor.

The Judicial Crisis Network (JCN), a Washington, D.C.-based conservative nonprofit, saw its revenues explode as it ran ads thanking Republican senators who successfully prevented Merrick Garland, Obama’s pick to replace Antonin Scalia, from receiving a confirmation hearing.

It also sent millions of dollars to nonprofits that worked to elect conservative state judicial candidates and attorneys general.

Earlier this year, JCN spent $10 million on ads to help secure Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation.

The organization’s most recent tax return, covering July 2015 to June 2016, shows JCN’s anti-Garland spending spree was fueled by three contributions.

The $17.9 million donation accounted for 96.6 percent of its revenue.

Before the donation, the organization had never reported more than $6 million in revenue since its 2005 creation.



Because it is a nonprofit, JCN isn’t required to publicly disclose its donors, and the organization declined to answer questions about the source of its massive cash infusion.

But in the past, much of its funding has come from the Wellspring Committee, a secretive Virginia-based dark money organization.

Wellspring reported giving JCN more than $15 million between 2012 and 2015; it was one of only two contributors to JCN between July 2014 and June 2015.

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 4:46 pm » wrote:
Our democracy is broken.

roadkill » 25 Oct 2017 5:26 pm » wrote:People like Rep Frederica Wilson are accomplishing their goal...
https://downtrend.com/71superb/black-th ... eing-white

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 4:32 pm » wrote: You two should get a room where you can jerk each other off while you chant, "Hillary! Hillary! Hillary!"
Obsessive freaks.

Yeah, apparently the new fake scandal involving the seemingly endless and omnipotent evil of Hillary Clinton is that her campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped pay for the dossier that ties Donald Trump to Russia, as well as details his enjoyment of piss whores.

Putting aside that Clinton and the DNC were paying a Washington, DC firm for the information (and not paying any foreign agents), we knew that Democrats were picking up the bill for it (after it had been initially paid for by Republicans who were trying to stop Trump) back in January, even as early as last October, although I suppose the Clinton campaign part is a newish wrinkle (if we all pretend we didn't assume that to be the case).

This being Hillary Clinton, and Republicans being ****, of course, there is now an enormous uproar on the right because we're all doomed to live in this unceasing loop where every action by Clinton is the height of criminality.

I fully expect Breitbart to have a report on how Clinton's farts are the real cause of the California fires, and every **** low-browed yahoo will take that to be dogma.

On the Steele dossier payments, Trump blathered today, "I think it’s very sad what they've done with this fake dossier.

It was made up, and I understand they paid a tremendous amount of money, and Hillary Clinton always denied it.

The Democrats always denied it.

And now only because it’s going to come out in a court case, they said, yes, they did it.

They admitted it, and they're embarrassed by it.

But I think it’s a disgrace. It’s just really -- it’s a very sad -- it’s a very sad commentary on politics in this country."

There are about 5 lies in those brain turds there, but the biggest, by far, is that the dossier is fake.

In fact, it's still being investigated, with a good part of it already confirmed as true.

The right is just trying to turn us away from its legitimacy and onto Clinton as liar.

What the Clinton connection does is affirm that it was opposition research for a campaign.

And Trump and his conservative **** should understand that.

They spent a whole bunch of time this summer defending Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, and Donald Trump, Jr. (aka "That douche in every 1980s college comedy") for meeting with actual Russians in order to, they claim, get oppo research on Clinton directly from the Russians. (They also claim they got nothing.)

In fact, here's Trump from July: "Most people would’ve taken that meeting. It’s called opposition research, or even research into your opponent.

I’ve only been in politics for two years, but I’ve had many people call up, ‘Oh gee, we have information on this factor or this person’, or, frankly, Hillary.

That’s very standard in politics. Politics is not the nicest business in the world, but it’s very standard where they have information and you take the information."

That ****'s illegal when it involves direct contact with someone from a foreign country.

Conservative commentators were quick to jump on the "it's just oppo research so who gives a ****" wagon.

It's a "micro story" because getting oppo research is "nothing new," said the unceasingly dumb Kayleigh McEnany.

Skeevy ex-**** Jason Chaffetz declared it a "nothingburger."

Newt "Yes, We're Still Talking About this Bastard" Gingrich asserted that "virtually every campaign in the world" would have taken the meeting.

So you got that, right?

Meeting with actual Russian agents in private in hopes of getting dirt on Clinton is totally fine with Trump and the GOP.

It's normal. It's what you do. Who wouldn't do that?

But paying an American research company for research?

That's a **** outrage. In fact, as the White House said today, that's "the real Russia scandal."

Go **** yourselves in a bed of piss.

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 4:32 pm » wrote: You two should get a room where you can jerk each other off while you chant, "Hillary! Hillary! Hillary!"
Obsessive freaks.

A white supremacist in Olympia, Washington stabbed an interracial couple this week, and then told police that he planned to attack Black Lives Matter protesters at a nearby Trump rally.

Via Mic.com, The Olympian reports that a 32-year-old man named Daniel B. Rowe attacked a black man and a white woman as they were standing outside of a bar kissing one another.

Rowe ended up grazing the woman with his knife, while plunging his knife into the man. The man chased Rowe and then tripped him as he tried to run away. Rowe fell into a car and was knocked unconscious until law enforcement officials arrived on the scene.

Rowe subsequently told police that if they released him from custody, he planned attend a pro-Trump rally and attack Black Lives Matter protesters. He has been charged with two counts of second-degree assault with a deadly weapon and one count of malicious harassment, The Olympian notes.

Rowe — who has a “white power” tattoo and a Confederate flag tattoo — told police that he belonged to a white supremacist group and said that he swore a “blood oath” to fight with minorities in the streets.

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/white- ... rally/amp/

roadkill » 25 Oct 2017 7:10 pm » wrote:I'm not obsessive...I'm just a regular freak.
And then there's you...Hillary's not president, president, president. (she's just a crook, crook, crook)
Now I'm giving you a gift...Trump interviewed by Lou Dobbs...
http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/201 ... hoice.html

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 7:16 pm » wrote: Don't bother.
I just read about the tongue bath that Dobbs gave 45 on Twitter.

Did Dobbs say anything besides 'right?'

Termin8tor » 23 Oct 2017 2:32 pm » wrote:Hey liar, the Clinton's most recent corruption and felonies were only a year or so ago. Likely less than that, involving obstruction of justice.
Lie much?

Misty » 21 Oct 2017 11:45 am » wrote: This smells real bad.
U.S.Attorneys are supposed to be independent.
45 seems to only have an interest in those that will have jurisdiction over him and his businesses.

I heard he is also taking a keen interest in who will be the U.S. Attorney that will oversee Mar-A-Lago.
He could be interviewing candidates there and we would never know because he refuses to tell us who he is meeting with there.

For the but Obama did it too crowd:
"Former President Barack Obama never interviewed a U.S. attorney candidate during his two terms."
This is highly unusual.

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 4:32 pm » wrote: You two should get a room where you can jerk each other off while you chant, "Hillary! Hillary! Hillary!"
Obsessive freaks.

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 10:37 pm » wrote:Congress is trying to write their tax reform cut bill and 45 is kneecapping them by taking things off the table in his Tweets.

This is the man who boasts about how he makes great deals.

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 9:47 pm » wrote: Okay Puss, I'll bite.
Which felonies did the Clintons commit a year ago or less?

Let me guess.....you've posted it many times before, I just haven't bothered to read it, right?

Misty » 25 Oct 2017 7:13 pm » wrote:But....but....but....Antifa!

Misty » 24 Oct 2017 11:28 am » wrote: I guess you enjoy being lied to.

Justice Department agrees to settle lawsuits over IRS scrutiny of tea party groups
The targeting of tea party organizations that applied for tax-exempt status was a major controversy of the Obama administration, as hundreds of conservative-leaning groups received scrutiny. In some cases, it delayed the processing of applications for years.

By Matt Zapotosky
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... 4407c1316f