Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
29 Oct 2017 11:07 am
I don't see anything that's inaccurate, unless Mueller has a huge surprise Monday, assuming that's true at all.Misty » 29 Oct 2017 11:03 am » wrote:Trump tweets
So what's your point?
29 Oct 2017 11:10 am
Which puts Trump light years ahead of Kristol.Misty » 29 Oct 2017 11:06 am » wrote:Imploring your followers to "DO SOMETHING" doesn't seem to suggest the calm of confidence that goes with knowledge of one's innocence.
Trump knows that he's in a fight against massive Beltway corruption, most obviously by the Clinton's and their cronies, but far more widespread and to a considerable degree on both sides.
McCain and Romney didn't have the stamina to tell the truth about Obama and the Beltway, the losers.
29 Oct 2017 1:35 pm
Yeah, I'm absolutely terrified that your party is being dragged down by Hillary and leftist Obama.Misty » 27 Oct 2017 8:12 pm » wrote:You members of Cult45 must be terrified of the Mueller investigation.
The desperation to change the subject is palpable.
Who really colluded with the Russians?
Who used false information from them to interfere in a US presidential election?
It's increasingly looking like it was Democrats who did so, especially Hillary and Obama.
WOW! Obama Campaign Paid Nearly $1 Million To Law Firm Connected To Fusion GPS
October 29, 2017 by Joshua Caplan 53 Comments
ShareTweetEmail
In yet another twist to the Clinton/DNC/Fusion GPS saga, Federal Election Commission (FEC) records show former president Barack Obama’s campaign organization, Obama For America (OFA), paid $972,000 to Perkins Coie, the law firm connected to Fusion GPS.
OFA, Obama’s official campaign arm in 2016, paid nearly $800,000 to Perkins Coie in 2016 alone, according to FEC records. ...
The timing and nature of the payments to Perkins Coie by Obama’s official campaign arm raise significant questions about whether OFA was funding Fusion GPS, how much Obama and his team knew about the contents and provenance of the dossier long before its contents were made public, and whether the president or his government lieutenants knowingly used a partisan political document to justify official government actions targeting the president’s political opponents named in the dossier.
The connection between the Obama camp and Fusion GPS don’t end there.
“The same attorney that sent Clinton/DNC money to Fusion GPS also represented Obama’s campaign,” tweeted The Federalist co-founder Sean Davis Sunday.
In an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer this week, Rep. Sean Duffy (R-WI) asked why President Obama was briefed on the ‘Trump dossier,’ if it was Clinton campaign opposition research, rather then an intelligence report authored by the CIA?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10 ... usion-gps/
29 Oct 2017 7:37 pm
45's lawyer must think we are all stupid.
White House lawyer: Trump tweets not a reaction to Mueller probe.
White House lawyer Ty Cobb said Sunday the president's tweets calling an inquiry into his ties with Russia a "witch hunt" and calling for an investigation into Hillary Clinton are not a reaction to special counsel Robert Mueller's ongoing probe.
"His tweets today are not, as some have asked, a reaction to anything involving the special counsel with whom the White House continues to cooperate," Cobb told NBC News.
Trump lashed out Sunday morning in a series of tweets, calling allegations that he colluded with Russia "phony."
He then called for Congress to "DO SOMETHING" about, among other things, Clinton's ties to a dossier of unverified allegations about Trump.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... -probe?amp
29 Oct 2017 9:42 pm
Never saw a more disgusting group of people than this bunch.
Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh has opened an investigation into Westminster Management — a division of Kushner Companies, the business owned by the family of President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
The Hill said on Sunday night that Frosh is investigating Westminster — which operates 17 properties across the state of Maryland — for shady debt collection practices and “poor upkeep” inside the properties.
According to an exposé in The Baltimore Sun, Westminster used aggressive and potentially illegal practices to extract money from tenants, including civil arrests.
No other property management firm in the state has been as aggressive in its collection practices.
Court records, the Sun said, show that 20 Kushner tenants were arrested and detained on debt collection charges.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/kushne ... ect-debts/
30 Oct 2017 7:20 am
What did the Clinton's give the Russians for the $145 million they received, speaking of disgusting?Misty » 29 Oct 2017 9:42 pm » wrote:Never saw a more disgusting group of people than this bunch.
And isn't it funny that charges were infrequently pursued against the Trump's until AFTER he took office?
That's often abuse of power by Democrats. They're infamous for it.
30 Oct 2017 11:56 am
45 lied? No. Say it isn't so.
1. Mueller didn't say that, and his investigations are not over.
2. Mueller was not restricted to looking into collusion.
From Rod Rosenstein’s letter appointing Mueller special counsel.
3. George Papadopoulos plead guilty for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Kremlin-connected Russians, and is now cooperating with Mueller.
1. Mueller didn't say that, and his investigations are not over.
2. Mueller was not restricted to looking into collusion.
From Rod Rosenstein’s letter appointing Mueller special counsel.
3. George Papadopoulos plead guilty for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Kremlin-connected Russians, and is now cooperating with Mueller.
30 Oct 2017 12:02 pm
30 Oct 2017 12:14 pm
What, Trump can't express his own opinion, psycho?Misty » 30 Oct 2017 11:56 am » wrote:Also, there is NO COLLUSION!
1. Mueller didn't say that, and his investigations are not over.
Got one single shred of evidence of collusion yet?
No? Then you're full of crap as usual.
He was appointed based on a lie by a political hack, James Comey, and his investigation is likely a violation of the Constitution.2. Mueller was not restricted to looking into collusion.
If an unpopular politician and his associates are investigated by an Independent Counsel appointed on the basis of a lie who will prosecute anything in someone's background even years before they got into office, our democracy will not survive.
30 Oct 2017 12:18 pm
Why? He didn't say anything controversial, psycho.Misty » 30 Oct 2017 12:02 pm » wrote:This wormy apple didn't fall far from the diseased tree.
Can never keep his stupid mouth shut.
30 Oct 2017 3:09 pm
Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to use false information to smear Trump and steal the presidential election.Misty » 27 Oct 2017 8:07 pm » wrote:Whoops! Remember that meeting that they first told us was about adoption?
This story just keeps evolving.
Drip, drip, drip.
And almost certainly corrupted key institutions of government in the process.
Can't get much more 3rd World than that.
we know that the Trump Dossier was not just a product funded by Democrats, but was commissioned by the general counsel of the Clinton presidential campaign. After the Trump campaign collusion hysteria fomented by Democrats and their media friends roughly since the election, we learn that Russian disinformation (as it seems to me) disseminated by the friends of Vladimir Putin (i.e., the Russian officials identified by alphabetic descriptors in the dossier) has come to us courtesy of Hillary Clinton herself. Yet John Podesta, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and campaign general counsel Marc Elias have all denied knowledge, either now or in the past. Whole lotta lyin’ goin’ on. As for Hillary herself, well, “she may or may not have been aware.”
But there is more. Rowan Scarborough has reported that the first of the dossier memos was circulated last year in late June. The first dossier memo is dated June 20, 2016, and cites Sources A (“a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure”) and B (“a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin”). Sources A and B tout the collusion scenario. Sources A and B were not out to help Donald Trump, were they? They were out to throw sand in our gears or to help Hillary Clinton....
the anti-Trump conspiracy that’s exactly what was needed: FISA coverage, “wiretaps.” There was no time to do the painstaking research on Trump and his associates–they needed FISA and they needed it NOW. They’d already been turned down at least once. ...
A “dossier” that could provide that sort of “reason to believe” would justify a FI and then FISA coverage. And therefore access to Trump campaign related communications (the extent would be dependent on the nature of the FISA order, who were the USPERs listed as targets–Page for sure, Flynn maybe, etc.). NB: Although they were claiming Trump collusion with Russia, what they were really targeting was campaign communications. By claiming that key people were foreign agents they could collect ALL their domestic communications with anybody.
This is why I believe that the dossier took on added importance after the initial denial of a FISA order.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... this-3.php
30 Oct 2017 3:14 pm
Why is this thread still defined as "Hot"? Besides the fact that I'm here.
This thread started in the stone age and became "Hot" after it reached 100 responses.
Maybe there should be different criteria for "Hot". Or maybe change it to "roadkill".
This thread started in the stone age and became "Hot" after it reached 100 responses.
Maybe there should be different criteria for "Hot". Or maybe change it to "roadkill".
30 Oct 2017 3:24 pm
30 Oct 2017 3:28 pm
Because the thread starter is smoking hot.roadkill » 30 Oct 2017 3:14 pm » wrote:Why is this thread still defined as "Hot"?
30 Oct 2017 3:36 pm
That proves it...I knew you were a dike.
In other news...
"The officials say the mission was approved by PresidentTrump and carried out in coordination with Libya’s internationally recognized government."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10 ... ttack.html
30 Oct 2017 3:37 pm
Three lies in one sentence.Termin8tor » 30 Oct 2017 3:09 pm » wrote:Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to use false information to smear Trump and steal the presidential election.
Aside from the lie that everything in that dossier was false, she never made any part of it public.
Christopher Steele himself said that the dossier was never meant to be made public because it consisted of raw intelligence.
Spy behind Trump dossier says info was never meant for public eyes.
And which Russians did HRC collude with?
Almost certainly.......weasel words used by Clem to smear someone without any facts to back it up.Termin8tor » 30 Oct 2017 3:09 pm » wrote:And almost certainly corrupted key institutions of government in the process.
30 Oct 2017 3:39 pm
30 Oct 2017 3:41 pm
Good work.roadkill » 30 Oct 2017 3:39 pm » wrote:US captures key militant in Benghazi attack.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10 ... ttack.html
30 Oct 2017 4:01 pm
"She never made any part of it public."Misty » 30 Oct 2017 3:37 pm » wrote:
Three lies in one sentence.
Aside from the lie that everything in that dossier was false, she never made any part of it public.
Christopher Steele himself said that the dossier was never meant to be made public because it consisted of raw intelligence.
Spy behind Trump dossier says info was never meant for public eyes.
What, you think Hillary herself would do that? Liar.
The most salacious, damaging details are false, as almost everyone accepts, liar.
It doesn't matter what Steele says, liar. It matters what was actually done with it by Hillary's operatives, and they peddled it until they finally got it into the press.
So that's lie 2.
And which Russians did HRC collude with?
The un-named Russian sources cited in my source, Dim.
Proving that as usual, you didn't even read it.
Liar. I've expressed broadly accepted opinion backed by facts among countless conservatives.Almost certainly.......weasel words used by Clem to smear someone without any facts to back it up.
Even many Democrats are running for their lives. People including Clinton associates and maybe even the Clinton's themselves will go to federal prison over this.
And speaking of weasels, do you have one single shred of evidence that Trump or his officials have committed any crimes associated with him or his campaign or his conduct as candidate or president?
No, you're just a lying smear artist.
30 Oct 2017 4:03 pm
.Misty » 30 Oct 2017 3:24 pm » wrote:
Maybe that's why Tony Podesta resigned.
That lobbying firm works primarily for Democrats and is a lobbying power in the Beltway.
Say, isn't his brother John very, very close to the Clinton's?
Didn't John Podesta illegally fail to report many millions of dollars he received from the Russians in a sweetheart deal?
Who is online
In total there are 4079 users online :: 9 registered, 15 bots, and 4055 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, FJB, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: okhttp, ADmantX, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, proximic, YandexBot, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, bingbot, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7