Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 30 Oct 2017 4:01 pm » wrote:What, you think Hillary herself would do that? Liar.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 5:06 pm » wrote: Are you saying that someone on her campaign made it public?
Proof? Link?

McCain was the one who passed the dossier to Comey, who then briefed Trump and Obama on it, and then Buzzfeed published it.

Facebook says Russia-linked posts may have reached 126 million users.

Facebook Inc. says a Russian group posted more than 80,000 times on its service during and after the 2016 U.S. presidential election, potentially reaching as many as 126 million users.

The company plans to disclose these numbers to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the testimony.

The person declined to be named because the committee has not officially released the testimony.

Facebook, Twitter Inc. and Google, a division of Alphabet Inc., are scheduled to testify at three hearings Tuesday and Wednesday.

Twitter plans to tell the same committee that it has uncovered and shut down 2,752 accounts linked to the same group, Russia's Internet Research Agency, which is known for promoting pro-Russian government positions.

That number is nearly 14 times as large as the number of accounts Twitter handed over to congressional committees three weeks ago, according to a person familiar with the matter who was not authorized to speak publicly about the new findings before Tuesday's hearing.

http://www.latimes.com/business/technol ... story.html

Huey » 30 Oct 2017 5:37 pm » wrote: At least we on the right can point to post after post supporting the Russia Russia Trump investigations. If only to shut you the **** up.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 6:44 pm » wrote: You must be talking about some other forum.

Huey » 30 Oct 2017 7:02 pm » wrote:Nope.
So you agree that at this point the only proof of collusion w/Russia is from the campaign of the candidate YOU voted for, correct?
And you do support an investigation into it, correct?

Misty » 02 Aug 2017 9:59 pm » wrote:Actually no.
I have said all along that I believe that it probably has much more to do with money than collusion, and it looks like Mueller is going down that road.

Timeline: Campaign knew Russia had Clinton emails months before Trump 'joke'

Months before candidate Donald Trump asked Russia to "find" Hillary Clinton's missing private server emails - a statement the campaign later called a joke - a Russian operative told a campaign aide "the Russians had emails of Clinton," according to a plea agreement released Monday.

In the first guilty plea of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, George Papadopoulos admitted lying to the FBI about contact with Russian agents that offered the campaign "thousands" of damaging emails about Clinton.

Papadopoulos claims he would eventually be told by a campaign supervisor to travel to Russia to meet with government officials "if feasible," a trip that never happened.

In the context of the timeline of events, Papadopoulos was told of Russian hacking before the rest of the country, and weeks before the Trump campaign made its first denial of Russian involvement in the election.

March 24: A professor introduced Papadopoulos to an alleged niece of Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to the court documents, Papadopoulos told his campaign supervisor the subject of the meeting was "to arrange a meeting between us and the Russian leadership to discuss U.S.-Russia ties under President Trump." "Great work," replied the supervisor, who said he would work the offer through the campaign. The supervisor is not named.

Papadopoulos would later find out the so-called niece was not, in fact, related to Putin.

April: Papadopoulos maintained contact with both the woman and professor to set up a meeting throughout April, keeping the campaign apprised of his contact.

April 29: The professor told Papadopoulos the Russians had "thousands" of Clinton's emails containing dirt. The next day, Papadopoulos thanked the professor for his help setting up a possible meeting between Russians and Trump.

"It's history making if it happens," said the campaign aide.

June 14: The Washington Post revealed that the DNC had been breached by those thought to be Russian hackers.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... -trump?amp

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 5:06 pm » wrote: Are you saying that someone on her campaign made it public?
Proof? Link?

McCain was the one who passed the dossier to Comey, who then briefed Trump and Obama on it, and then Buzzfeed published it.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 8:07 pm » wrote: So you think Hillary colluded with Russia to help her lose the election?

Termin8tor » 30 Oct 2017 10:59 pm » wrote:So you think that Hillary would pay over $10 million for information, the most salacious details false, that so it wouldn't be leaked to the press?
Don't be freaking ridiculous, Dim. It was worthless if it was kept private.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 8:07 pm » wrote: You mean like you have been so supportive of the investigations into the Trump campaign?

So you think Hillary colluded with Russia to help her lose the election?

What I know is that many Trump campaign officials had contacts with Russians and lied about it.
One of them just plead guilty to that charge.

What I also know is that they showed a willingness to work with Russians to get dirt on Hillary.

You can deflect all you want, and Republicans can investigate whatever they want, it won't stop Mueller.
Pretty sure he's just getting started.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 11:58 pm » wrote:FOX STATE TV is now attacking Robert Mueller picturing him in front of a Russian flag.

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 11:10 pm » wrote: In case you forgot the dossier was made public when it was published on Buzzfeed AFTER the election in January 2017, so what would be the point of either her or her campaign leaking it then?
It wouldn't change the outcome of an election that was over.