Liberal Forum

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 11:10 pm » wrote: In case you forgot the dossier was made public when it was published on Buzzfeed AFTER the election in January 2017, so what would be the point of either her or her campaign leaking it then?
It wouldn't change the outcome of an election that was over.

Huey » 31 Oct 2017 9:00 am » wrote: That is not the truth, the whole truth, and nuttin' but the truth. The contents and speculation of the document was made public by motherjones on Oct 31, 2016:

A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... ald-trump/

The dossier was not released IN ITS ENTIRETY until Jan 17. In case YOU forgot.

Termin8tor » 31 Oct 2017 9:06 am » wrote: I'm absolutely sure she forgot.

She'd never lie!

Misty » 30 Oct 2017 7:53 pm » wrote:This is what I have been saying all along.

Follow the money

Termin8tor » 31 Oct 2017 7:33 am » wrote:The Deep State is in revolt against Trump, yet the psychopath calls Fox "state tv."

Termin8tor » 31 Oct 2017 7:38 am » wrote:Not for lack of trying, psycho. They obviously wanted it to be picked up by the media.

Misty » 31 Oct 2017 3:14 pm » wrote:Whooops!

Climate denying, blah, blah, blah.

Sam Clovis, who emailed with George Papadopoulos about Russia, is going before the Senate on November 9.

Misty » 31 Oct 2017 3:08 pm » wrote:Pulled that one out of your ***, didn't you?
There was no 'trying' necessary.
If they wanted to make it public, one phone call to a reporter would have easily done it.
They obviously didn't do that.

But you just keep making **** up.

t's highly likely that Obama officials used a false document as an excuse to engage in illegal political surveillance of Trump and officials.

That's what the huge unmasking scandal is about; a massive, unConstitutional abuse of power.

Misty » 31 Oct 2017 3:00 pm » wrote: Take that 'Deep State' **** and shove it up your *** you brainwashed dingbat.

FOX has become nothing more than a propaganda arm of the WH.

Misty » 31 Oct 2017 3:00 pm » wrote:
Take that 'Deep State' **** and shove it up your *** you brainwashed dingbat.

It therefore strongly suggests that it was the FBI that was instrumental in spreading the dossier to the media, most of which was too embarrassed to publish it until Buzzfeed came along and did it... for the clicks.


So to summarize:


Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid to uncover and package dirt, whether factual or not, on Trump which eventually found its way in the Trump dossier

In doing so, the Clintons and the DNC were effectively collaborating with "deep" sources, both among the UK spy apparatus and inside Russia

Once Trump won, the FBI was instrumental in "leaking" the dossier to the mainstream media and select still unknown recipients (the same way Comey "leaked" his personal notebooks just a few months later, following his termination, to launch a probe of Trump).

The former head of the FBI who was supposed to probe Clinton's State Department - and the Clinton Foundation - for a bribery and kickback scheme involving Russia’s U.S. nuclear business, is now investigating Trump for Russia collusion instead

But wait, it gets better: as Ken Vogel, formerly the chief investigative reporter at Politico and currently at the NY Times just reported, "When I tried to report this story, Clinton campaign lawyer @marceelias pushed back vigorously, saying "You (or your sources) are wrong."
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-2 ... mp-dossier

Misty » 29 Oct 2017 11:06 am » wrote:Imploring your followers to "DO SOMETHING doesn't seem to suggest calm of confidence that goes with knowledge of one's innocence.

Robert Mueller’s big catch was low-level, unpaid intern
By Paul Sperry October 30, 2017 | 11:38pm
While the Russia-obsessed media self-combust, the biggest takeaway isn’t “Russia collusion,” but the revelation, buried in footnotes, that the FBI has had in its possession “high-level” Trump campaign ­e-mails since last year — and yet all investigators could get out of them is a false-statement guilty charge against a young, unpaid campaign aide.

From e-mail exchanges among “high-ranking campaign officials” examined by investigators — including Paul Manafort — there apparently has emerged no evidence of collusion or espionage by the campaign.

We can glean this from the just-unsealed indictment of George Papadopoulos, who volunteered to work on the Trump campaign’s foreign policy advisory council, which met just one time.

In the 14-page document, Robert Mueller’s prosecutors maintain that Papadopoulos, a twentysomething think-tank nerd who jumped ship from the Ben Carson campaign, met with individuals posing as Russian officials who promised dirt on Hillary Clinton.

There was nothing illegal about what Papadopoulos did. The only crime alleged in the indictment is that he lied to federal agents when they asked him about the contacts last January....

The media elite are nonetheless trying to make “Russian collusion” hay over the Papadopoulos guilty plea, because they got bupkis on that front from the Manafort indictment. That 31-page document, also just unsealed, focuses entirely on the former Trump campaign chairman’s business activities, not campaign activities or events.
http://nypost.com/2017/10/30/robert-mue ... id-intern/

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 10:25 am » wrote:Remember how after the mass shooting in Las Vegas they said it was not the time for politics?




The 'Diversity Visa Lottery Program' passed through Congress on a bi-partisan vote and was signed into law by George H.W. Bush.

But according to 45 it's a 'Democrat' lottery system, and It's all Chuck Schumer's fault.

roadkill » 01 Nov 2017 10:33 am » wrote:Trump was addressing the terror attack and how the guy got into the country. Big difference.
Las Vegas was not the time for politics. This is a whole different situation than a terrorist coming from another country and with respects to groups like ISIS.
The dems push for lax immigration vetting...that's very dangerous.
We have enough problems with resident nut jobs.

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:13 am » wrote: Again the Diversity Visa Lottery Program passed through Congress on a bi-partisan vote and was signed into law by George H.W. Bush.

Schumer was only one member of the House back then, so to hold him responsible for this is ridiculous, but that what 45 does.
He always needs to shift the blame away from him and onto someone else.

He is the POTUS, and he said he was going to stop these attacks.

roadkill » 01 Nov 2017 11:15 am » wrote:Looks like Trump's views of immigration are different than previous presidents. You do follow the news...right?
Trump's version may help.

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:20 am » wrote: How would his travel ban have stopped this attack?
Uzbekistan is not even on the list of countries in the ban.

How would his version stop people who are already here or were born here from becoming radicalized on the internet?

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:13 am » wrote:Again the Diversity Visa Lottery Program passed through Congress on a bi-partisan vote and was signed into law by George H.W. Bush.

Schumer was only one member of the House back then, so to hold him responsible for this is ridiculous, but that is what 45 does.
He always needs to shift the blame away from him and onto someone else.

He is the POTUS, and he said he was going to stop these attacks.