Liberal Forum

Bigsky » 01 Nov 2017 5:49 pm » wrote: so did new York take a vote and give Stephen the right to speak for everyone there?

What he said was absolutely true.
New Yorkers will never live in fear.
The night of the attack children in NYC were out Trick or Treating.
The big Halloween Parade went on as scheduled, and this weekend the NYC Marathon will go on as well.

Bigsky » 01 Nov 2017 5:49 pm » wrote:**** lips Clinton and **** head schumer said he wanted my guns after every mass shooting...so did the *** by the way....

So which one are you, a convicted violent felon or someone who has been adjudicated by a court to be mentally ill?
Because those are the people they do not want to have guns.
And the majority of this country agrees with them.

Bigsky » 01 Nov 2017 5:49 pm » wrote:why cant King Trump enjoy the same privilege? and why do new Yorkers have to be mowed down by goat **** just so Stephen Colbert can play tough guy on t.v?

I don't see how you saw that video as him playing 'tough guy.'
All he said is that the hearts of everyone who works on his show go out to the victims of the attack, and he praised the residents of NYC for refusing to live in fear.

45 blamed Chuck Schumer for the attack.

Now shut up and send me a dick pic.

Jaimie Nawaday, former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, explains to Rachel Maddow why former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort is not charged with tax crimes even though they're described in the indictment. Duration: 5:47

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watc ... 6690371588

Jaimie Nawaday, former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, explains to Rachel Maddow the specifics of how the special counsel's money laundering charge against Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort works. Duration: 2:03

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watc ... 6691907595

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:27 pm » wrote: What he said was absolutely true.
New Yorkers will never live in fear.
The night of the attack children in NYC were out Trick or Treating.
The big Halloween Parade went on as scheduled, and this weekend the NYC Marathon will go on as well.

So which one are you, a convicted violent felon or someone who has been adjudicated by a court to be mentally ill?
Because those are the people they do not want to have guns.
And the majority of this country agrees with them.

I don't see how you saw that video as him playing 'tough guy.'
All he said is that the hearts of everyone who works on his show go out to the victims of the attack, and he praised the residents of NYC for refusing to live in fear.

45 blamed Chuck Schumer for the attack.

Now shut up and send me a dick pic.

it was chuck schumer that brought the guy in here....his bill....so 45 correctly blamed him. all democrats are to blame. we don't need to be taking people in that align with sharia...it is really that simple. I am neither a felon or mentally ill... shall not be infringed is the law...and congress is breaking the **** law...why do you condone it? and yes he was playing tough guy...with other peoples lives...he has armed security and all the safety he could want....and come the next mass shooting he is gonna call for people to lose their right to own and bear arms.
the game the left is playing is a "have your cake and eat it too" game. ya know what really pisses me off...this **** *** mother **** is the first to call for taking a RIGHT away from the citizens of this country and leave them defenseless against the very goat **** *** holes that he lobbies to bring into the country....ya see....Colbert is a **** dick head against my right to speech, religion, self defense, and assembly and redress...

https://youtu.be/buFbk5fQCRc
https://youtu.be/ktr9MYFdadc
https://youtu.be/j9MvxwrsOZc

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:12 pm » wrote:Two hacks trying to deflect attention away from the real scandal.
They failed on Susan Rice, so now they are going after Samantha Power.

Blah, blah, blah from the psychopath.

Please, please keep corrupt moonbat Nancy Pelosi as your leader.

A Post-Obama Democratic Party in Search of Itself
The 44th president left office as one of the most popular in American history. He also left behind a party struggling to find an identity — and to reconnect with voters in time for the 2018 elections.
By ROBERT DRAPERNOV. 1, 2017
n Nov. 9, 2016, about 12 hours after Hillary Clinton conceded defeat to Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi, the House minority leader, convened a conference call with her fellow House Democrats. Most of them were still back home in their respective districts and still in shock. Not only would Trump be president, but the Senate remained in G.O.P. control, and — despite rosy predictions from Pelosi and her party’s pollsters — so did the House.

Several members on the call later told me they expected their leader to offer some show of contrition, an inventory of mistakes made or, at minimum, an acknowledgment that responsibility for the previous night’s disaster began at the top. Already, Trump’s sweep of what had for years been Democratic strongholds in the Rust Belt had led to a fast-congealing belief that the party had lost touch with white working-class voters.

But Pelosi sounded downright peppy on the call, noting a few vulnerable House seats that the Democrats had managed to hang onto. As for those working-class voters, “To say we don’t care about them is hard to believe,” Pelosi insisted, according to a transcript of the call I obtained. “I have to take issue and say I don’t think anybody was unaware of the anger.” The Democrats weren’t out of touch, she said. They just hadn’t made their case clearly enough to voters — or as she put it, “We have to get out there and say it in a different way.”

“It reminded me of that scene at the end of ‘Animal House,’ where Kevin Bacon is standing in the middle of all this chaos, screaming: ‘Remain calm! All is well!’ ”

Scott Peters, a congressman from California who was on the call, told me. “After telling us before that we were going to pick up 20 seats, and we end up with six, underlaid with Clinton losing, I had no use for that kind of happy talk.” During and after Pelosi’s monologue, Democratic representatives who were listening texted and called one another incredulously, but Peters was one of the few who spoke up on the line. “I think we’re missing something,” he told Pelosi. “We’re just not hearing what’s on people’s minds.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/maga ... share&_r=0

The centipede drops another shoe.

Sam Clovis withdraws from consideration for Agriculture post after his name surfaced in Russia probe.

The nomination of Sam Clovis to be the Agriculture Department’s chief scientist was controversial both because of questions about his lack of relevant experience and news this week that he was one of the top officials on the Trump campaign aware of efforts by foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos to broker a relationship between the campaign and Russian officials.

Clovis, who now serves as the department’s senior White House adviser, informed President Trump of his decision in a letter dated Nov. 1.

“The political climate inside Washington has made it impossible for me to receive balanced and fair consideration for this position,” Clovis wrote in the letter.

“The relentless assaults on you and your team seem to be a blood sport that only increases in intensity each day.

As I am focused on your success and the success of this Administration, I do not want to be a distraction or negative influence, particularly with so much important work left to do for the American people.”

Clovis was tentatively slated to have a hearing before the Senate Agriculture Committee on Nov. 9.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pol ... 5797a72712

He blames the 'political climate' for the fact that he told George Papadopoulos he’d done “great work” with his initial outreach to Russians who wanted to set up a meeting, and said he “would encourage” Papadopoulos to set one up “off the record.”

He should never have been nominated for the job as the USDA's top scientist anyway.
He has no academic credentials in either science or agriculture.
He was a talk radio host.

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 11:12 pm » wrote: Two hacks trying to deflect attention away from the real scandal.

Uh, what "real scandal." Do you have one single shred of actual evidence that Trump or his officials committed any crimes?

No?

That's "real."

They failed on Susan Rice, so now they are going after Samantha Power.

See you when more details break about this massive scandal.

Termin8tor » 02 Nov 2017 10:52 am » wrote:Blah, blah, blah from the psychopath.
Please, please keep corrupt moonbat Nancy Pelosi as your leader.

For the ten thousandth time, I am NOT a Democrat, and Pelosi is NOT my leader.
I think she needs to get out of the way and make room for new leadership.

Misty » 01 Nov 2017 10:46 pm » wrote:So the Liar-In-Chief pulls a $12,000,000 price tag for the Steele dossier out of his *** and his protege Clem tells basically the same lie, except he marked the price tag down to $10,000,000.

Given that he relied on the WashPost, it was out of their ***.

So you're accusing the Post of lying?

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 10:55 am » wrote:
For the ten thousandth time, I am NOT a Democrat, and Pelosi is NOT my leader.

Oh so you attack Republicans and defend Democrat criminals and spread Democrat Talking Point Lies because you're not a Democrat.

Then you truly are insane.

Bigsky » 02 Nov 2017 5:02 am » wrote:it was chuck schumer that brought the guy in here....his bill....so 45 correctly blamed him. all democrats are to blame.

Actually the bill was supported by a bipartisan group of legislators and signed by President George H.W. Bush.

Schumer was a member of the gang of 8 who worked on immigration reform in 2013.
That bill would have done away with the Visa Diversity Program and increased merit based visas, which is what 45 always talks about, but it didn't pass the House.

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:09 am » wrote:Schumer was a member of the gang of 8 who worked on immigration reform in 2013.
That bill would have done away with the Visa Diversity Program and increased merit based visas, which is what 45 always talks about, but it didn't pass the House.

What a bunch of hogwash. The Diversity Visa program is stupid.

It should have been eliminated on its own, but Democrats prevented that.

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:09 am » wrote: Actually the bill was supported by a bipartisan group of legislators and signed by President George H.W. Bush.

Schumer was a member of the gang of 8 who worked on immigration reform in 2013.
That bill would have done away with the Visa Diversity Program and increased merit based visas, which is what 45 always talks about, but it didn't pass the House.

Schumer was the lead sponsor of the bill.

A little more:


Some of that bill was later folded into the Family Unity and Employment Opportunity Immigration Act of 1990. According to the bill summary, it “[p]rovides for preference allocation systems for admission of family-sponsored, employment-based, and diversity immigrants, respectively. Bases diversity immigration on identification of low-admission states and regions.”
The bill — which had 32 co-sponsors, including Schumer and seven Republicans — passed the House 231-192 with a majority of Democrats voting for it, and a majority of Republicans against it.

Not really bipartisan.

THe senate version was:

The Senate version of the bill,
the Immigration Act of 1990, sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy, included similar provisions for “Diversity Immigrants.” Under the bill, diversity visa applicants were required to have a high school education or its equivalent or “two years of work experience in an occupation requiring at least two years of training or experience.” It passed the Senate overwhelmingly,
89-8. The bill received wide Republican support, including from Sen. Mitch McConnell, now the Senate majority leader. It was signed into law by Republican President George H.W. Bush.

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/11/schume ... a-lottery/


You will also find this little factiod:

A 2011
Congressional Research Service report similarly said that “[c]ritics of the diversity lottery warn that it is vulnerable to fraud and misuse and is potentially an avenue for terrorists, citing the difficulties of performing background checks in many of the countries eligible for the diversity lottery. Supporters respond that background checks for criminal and national security matters are performed on all prospective immigrants seeking to come to the United States, including those winning diversity visas.”


Schumer was instrumental in passing this bill. but that was along time ago. What is more troubling is if this was such a security risk why did none of the players involved write a stand alone bill to kill the program?

I just found out on Twitter that a 47 year old white guy killed three people in a Walmart last night.



I saw nothing about this on TV last night or this morning.

If he was a Muslim it would have been wall to wall coverage.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/01/us/colora ... index.html

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 10:52 am » wrote:The centipede drops another shoe.

He blames the 'political climate' for the fact that he told George Papadopoulos he’d done “great work” with his initial outreach to Russians who wanted to set up a meeting, and said he “would encourage” Papadopoulos to set one up “off the record.”

Oh my gosh, there might have been a meeting?

Wow, if that's not proof of terrible crimes, what is?

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:22 am » wrote:I just found out on Twitter that a 47 year old white guy killed three people in a Walmart last night.

Smearing the NRA on the basis of zero evidence?

How typical of psychopathic behavior.

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:09 am » wrote: Actually the bill was supported by a bipartisan group of legislators and signed by President George H.W. Bush.

Schumer was a member of the gang of 8 who worked on immigration reform in 2013.
That bill would have done away with the Visa Diversity Program and increased merit based visas, which is what 45 always talks about, but it didn't pass the House.

That bill and goat **** infiltration in general is a progressive LEFT anti Christian ideal....to deny that is silly. Chuck is the head of the party who concocted that **** head plan...he owns it...along with his co-conspirators...the cons are racist islamaphobes remember

Termin8tor » 02 Nov 2017 10:59 am » wrote:Oh so you attack Republicans and defend Democrat criminals and spread Democrat Talking Point Lies because you're not a Democrat.
Then you truly are insane.

What law says that I must be registered in a political party?
I am a Liberal, so naturally my views would be more aligned with Democrats than with Republicans, but I guess you are too dense to understand that.

You really don't see the irony of you accusing someone else of spreading talking point lies?
Seriously?

You, who gets your marching orders straight from right wingnut blogs like gateway pundit?

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:57 am » wrote: What law says that I must be registered in a political party?
I am a Liberal, so naturally my views would be more aligned with Democrats than with Republicans, but I guess you are too dense to understand that.

You really don't see the irony of you accusing someone else of spreading talking point lies?
Seriously?

You, who gets your marching orders straight from right wingnut blogs like gateway pundit?

Your state laws say you have to be to vote in the primary.

Bigsky » 02 Nov 2017 11:48 am » wrote:That bill and goat **** infiltration in general is a progressive LEFT anti Christian ideal....to deny that is silly. Chuck is the head of the party who concocted that **** head plan...he owns it...along with his co-conspirators...the cons are racist islamaphobes remember

He was not the Democratic leader in the Senate when that bill was passed.
He was a member of the House.

Misty » 02 Nov 2017 11:57 am » wrote: What law says that I must be registered in a political party?
I am a Liberal, so naturally my views would be more aligned with Democrats than with Republicans, but I guess you are too dense to understand that.

Then you are admitting that I'm correct, "your party" is the Democrats and his little to do with registration.

Stunning that it took you literally years to admit the obvious truth.

You really don't see the irony of you accusing someone else of spreading talking point lies?
Seriously?

You, who gets your marching orders straight from right wingnut blogs like gateway pundit?

I get "marching orders" because i cite sources I generally agree with? How **** stupid.

Gateway is sometimes partisan to the point of bad judgement, but mostly it cites other accepted sources. I reject what I find to be inaccurate.


So it's not only stupid but dishonest to accuse me of lying when I cite it.