Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
5 Nov 2017 9:48 pm
"Democrats are not running anything."Misty » 05 Nov 2017 5:34 pm » wrote:Democrats are not running anything.
So unless you went to the Evelyn Wood School for speed reading, you didn't even bother to read that piece, right?
Because you just couldn't wait that long to start the whataboutism and take a swipe at Democrats.
Nevermind that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross failed to disclose the fact that he has shared business interests with Russian President Vladimir Putin's son-in-law.
Just another Trump official who lied about his ties to Russia.
Nothing to see here.
But Hillary.......
You finally figured it out.
BTW...I took the Evelyn Wood sped redin' class and I'm a master skimmer.
6 Nov 2017 10:54 am
Collusion?
He sent emails concerning Vladimir Putin to at least seven campaign officials, and made six requests for Trump or representatives of his campaign to meet in Russia with Russian politicians, including one request made in person at a meeting where both 45 and Jeff Sessions were present.
He has now plead guilty to lying to federal investigators about this and is 'actively cooperating' with their investigation.
Update: George Papadopolous, a member of 45's foreign policy advisory panel was offered dirt on Hillary by the Russians, including thousands of her stolen emails.Misty » 26 Oct 2017 4:28 pm » wrote:The head of Cambridge Analytica, the research company contracted by the Trump campaign in 2016, reached out to Julian Assange/WikiLeaks to get access to thousands of Hillary Clinton's emails.
Trump confidant Roger Stone had communications with Julian Assange and Gucifer 2.0, the hacker believed by the U.S. government to be affiliated with Russia.
Republican operative Peter Smith who claimed to have connections with senior people on the Trump campaign such as Michael Flynn, recruited cyber security experts to try to get in touch with Russian hackers in an effort to obtain Hillary Clinton's emails.
Russians reached out to Donald Trump Junior to help the campaign by providing dirt on Hillary, and he, Manafort and Kushner met with them.
Campaign chair Paul Manafort reached out to a friend of Putin's (Oleg Derapaska) and offered to provide him with briefings on the campaign.
He sent emails concerning Vladimir Putin to at least seven campaign officials, and made six requests for Trump or representatives of his campaign to meet in Russia with Russian politicians, including one request made in person at a meeting where both 45 and Jeff Sessions were present.
He has now plead guilty to lying to federal investigators about this and is 'actively cooperating' with their investigation.
6 Nov 2017 10:56 am
Hey Dim, "collusion" isn't a crime.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 10:54 am » wrote:Collusion?
Update: George Papadopolous, a member of 45's foreign policy advisory panel was offered dirt on Hillary by the Russians, including thousands of her stolen emails.
He sent emails concerning Vladimir Putin to at least seven campaign officials, and made six requests for Trump or representatives of his campaign to meet in Russia with Russian politicians, including one request made in person at a meeting where both 45 and Jeff Sessions were present.
He has now plead guilty to lying to federal investigators about this and is 'actively cooperating' with their investigation.
Nor is accepting dirt from the Russians.
Imbecile.
6 Nov 2017 10:56 am
And yet you blame them for everything.roadkill » 05 Nov 2017 9:48 pm » wrote:You finally figured it out.
Go figure.
6 Nov 2017 11:18 am
Tell me something I don't know jackass.Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 10:56 am » wrote:Hey Dim, "collusion" isn't a crime.
Just because it's not a crime, that doesn't make it right.Misty » 04 Nov 2017 3:44 pm » wrote:Collusion is not a crime, but conspiracy is, and I'm sure that is the crime that Mueller is working on as we speak.
Actually it is illegal to accept anything of value from a foreign government in an election and oppo research has value. Campaigns pay for it all the time.
Steve Schmidt who ran John McCain's campaign said that if he had been offered dirt on Obama from the Russians or any other foreign country he would have contacted the FBI immediately.
It's ironic that you are ready to throw Hillary in jail for 'colluding' with Russians because Fusion GPS hired former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to investigate Trump's Russia-related activities, and yet you turn a blind eye to all the contacts that Trump campaign officials had directly with Russians and lied about.
6 Nov 2017 11:26 am
There's a mountain of evidence of felonies by Democrats including your last presidential candidate.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:18 am » wrote:
Tell me something I don't know jackass.
Just because it's not a crime, that doesn't make it right.
What does little Miss Marxist shriek loudly about?
Not the felonies.
6 Nov 2017 11:30 am
Oh gosh, it "wasn't right."Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:18 am » wrote:Tell me something I don't know jackass.
Just because it's not a crime, that doesn't make it right.
What about felonies by Democrats? Are they "not right?"
Because you're not paying the slightest attention to them, as usual.
CLETA MITCHELL: BRAZILE DESCRIBES
“A MASSIVE VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW” THAT “TRIGGERS CRIMINAL PENALTIES”
I’m not on Facebook, but I was told that Cleta Mitchell’s page contains a brief discussion of the legal implications of the Hillary Clinton-DNC scandal. As many of our readers know,
Cleta Mitchell is a star lawyer. She has played a leading role in defending conservatives targeted by the IRS under the Obama administration and in pushing to hold the IRS accountable for the targeting.
Here is Cleta’s take on the Clinton-DNC scandal as it appears appears on Facebook, according to what I was told (her first sentence is a quote from Donna Brazile):
“Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to Brooklyn.”
If this statement by Donna Brazile is true and if those transfers actually happened, then what she says the DNC and the Clinton campaign did was a massive violation of federal law, and triggers criminal penalties.
It underscores what I’ve always said: the Democrats and left wing groups have no compunctions about demanding contribution limits and restrictions on the free speech rights of the American people because THEY have no intention of abiding by the rules and the laws they write for others.
Political Party committees such as the DNC have statutory limits on the amount of money the party can give (or transfer) to a candidate. A joint fundraising committee such as the one Donna Brazile describes cannot be used to circumvent the contribution limit for any donor. ANY DONOR. So IF the DNC transferred funds to the Clinton campaign as stated by Donna Brazile, it was a knowing and willful action involving amounts of $25,000 or more. Which triggers a criminal offense under the Federal campaign finance law.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... alties.php
6 Nov 2017 11:34 am
Are you still lying that the MSM aren't biased?Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:18 am » wrote: Tell me something I don't know jackass.
Why didn't they cover this huge story?
ABC, CBS, NBC Initially Fail to Cover Donna Brazile’s Claim That the DNC Rigged Primary for Clinton
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... y-clinton/
6 Nov 2017 11:45 am
Oh, look.Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 11:34 am » wrote:Are you still lying that the MSM aren't biased?
Why didn't they cover this huge story?
I debunked your lie about me saying collusion was a crime, so you quickly switched gears.
First of all, this is nothing new.
We heard this during the primary elections.
Secondly, I have seen this story covered everywhere, so Breitbart is full of ****.
I won't click on Breitbart and add to their ad revenues.
What do they mean by they 'initially' failed to cover this?
Her book won't even be released until tomorrow and she was all over TV this past weekend.
6 Nov 2017 11:58 am
At least nine people in Trump’s orbit had contact with Russians during campaign and transition.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... story.html
6 Nov 2017 11:58 am
Because most of the social ills in the country are directly attributable to the left.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 10:56 am » wrote: And yet you blame them for everything.
Go figure.
6 Nov 2017 12:11 pm
I never claimed you did, so you're lying again to avoid my question.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:45 am » wrote: Oh, look.
I debunked your lie about me saying collusion was a crime, so you quickly switched gears.
6 Nov 2017 12:14 pm
The corrupt liberal MSM generally refuse to report Democrat scandals until there's so much publicity elsewhere, that they are forced into doing so to cover their sorry butts.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:45 am » wrote:First of all, this is nothing new.
We heard this during the primary elections.
Secondly, I have seen this story covered everywhere, so Breitbart is full of ****.
I won't click on Breitbart and add to their ad revenues.
What do they mean by they 'initially' failed to cover this?
Her book won't even be released until tomorrow and she was all over TV this past weekend.
And why no coverage of Brazile's literal fear for her life?
Because that would reveal the multitude of massive scandals so important that she obviously feared for her life.
6 Nov 2017 12:53 pm
Even liberal sources are conceding that I'm correct, Mr. Legal Beagle.bobgnote » 06 Nov 2017 12:49 pm » wrote: "COLLUSION" is what happens during 18 U.S.C. 1505/2384 aggravation of neglected RICO violations, moron.
Your amount of stupid during a dumb-down is not funny, even for emoticons.
I have yet to see any public figure claim collusion by itself is illegal.
6 Nov 2017 1:00 pm
Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:58 am » wrote:At least nine people in Trump’s orbit had contact with Russians during campaign and transition.
Oh my, contact!
Is that illegal, psycho?
"Collusion! Collusion!" babble Democrat Talking Point Liars, but not when Democrats illegally collude.
However for the record, if this action isn't generally prosecuted, Podesta shouldn't be either, if this is all he did.UH-OH! Tony Podesta Did Not Register As Foreign Agent When Lobbying For Clinton-Uranium One Deal
November 6, 2017 by Joshua Caplan 60 Comments
ShareTweetEmail
Tony Podesta, the Democrat powerbroker and founder of the Podesta Group, failed to register as a foreign agent while lobbying for the Clinton-Uranium One deal. “Podesta collected lobbying fees of $180,000 from Uranium One, according to the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, that discloses lobbying documents filed with Congress,” reports Richard Pollock of the Daily Caller.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11 ... -one-deal/
Same standard I have for Manafort.
6 Nov 2017 1:52 pm
It was all part of God's plan.
Conservative writer: God was ‘answering prayers’ of Texas victims by letting them get shot.
Hans Fiene, a Lutheran pastor who is also a regular contributor to the right-wing website The Federalist, has written a new column in which he explains that allowing 26 people to die at the hands of a crazed gunman at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, this weekend was actually God’s way of answering their prayers.
Fiene begins his column by attacking liberals who have mocked Republican politicians who only offer “thoughts and prayers” for shooting victims — and who don’t take any direct action that could prevent future shootings.
He then explains to liberals that it was part of God’s plan that over two dozen people would get shot up while in their own house of worship.
“It may seem, on the surface, that God was refusing to give such protection to his Texan children,” he writes.
“But we are also praying that God would deliver us from evil eternally.
Through these same words, we are asking God to deliver us out of this evil world and into his heavenly glory, where no violence, persecution, cruelty, or hatred will ever afflict us again.”
Fiene then says that, in order to fully defeat evil eternally, God has to let evil get some temporary victories, such as this weekend’s mass shooting.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/conser ... x8.twitter
6 Nov 2017 1:54 pm
So why do you suppose they all lied about it, if it was perfectly okay?
6 Nov 2017 1:57 pm
There are lots of reason to lie that have nothing to do with crimes.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 1:54 pm » wrote: So why do you suppose they all lied about it, if it was perfectly okay?
If every lie a politician told was a crime, the Clinton's would be imprisoned for 1,000 years, Dim.
6 Nov 2017 2:22 pm
So why did you accuse several Democrats of 'illegally' colluding with the Russians?Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:Even liberal sources are conceding that I'm correct, Mr. Legal Beagle.
I have yet to see any public figure claim collusion by itself is illegal.
Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 1:00 pm » wrote:"Collusion! Collusion!" babble Democrat Talking Point Liars, but not when Democrats illegally collude.
6 Nov 2017 2:28 pm
Because of actual related felonis, psycho.Misty » 06 Nov 2017 2:22 pm » wrote: So why did you accuse several Democrats of 'illegally' colluding with the Russians?
Who is online
In total there are 2965 users online :: 6 registered, 17 bots, and 2942 guests
Bots: CensysInspect, Mediatoolkitbot, TTD-Content, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, Yahoo! Slurp, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Firefox/7.0, ADmantX, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, Applebot, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot