Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 2:28 pm » wrote:Because of actual related felonis, psycho.

Wilbur Ross: Accusations that I failed to disclose Russia-linked investments are 'evil'

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said Monday that there is “nothing whatsoever improper” about the relationship between an international shipping company he holds significant investments in and a Russian energy company whose owners include an oligarch subject to U.S. sanctions and a family member of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Disclosure documents previously filed by Ross show that the commerce secretary holds an investment worth between $2 million and $10 million in partnerships that have a stake in Navigator Holdings, the shipping company, according to The New York Times.

Navigator earns millions every year, the Times reported, via business with Sibur, a Russian energy company whose owners include Gennady Timchenko, a friend of Putin’s who is subject to U.S. sanctions, and Kirill Shamalov, Putin’s son-in-law.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/ ... hip-244592

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 1:52 pm » wrote:It was all part of God's plan.

Here's How A False Conspiracy Theory About The Texas Shooter Being Antifa Went Viral

Tweets with false reporting, a doctored screenshot, and a boost from Google.

A gunman opened fire inside the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, on Sunday, killing 26 people and leaving dozens of others injured.

As initial information about the shooting was reported, not much was immediately known about the suspect, who authorities later identified as 26-year-old Devin P. Kelley.

On Monday, authorities said the shooting was the result of a "domestic situation," and that Kelley had sent "threatening texts" to his mother-in-law, who attended the church where the shooting took place.

But by the time news of the actual motivations of the shooter were shared by authorities, a false narrative had already taken hold thanks to right-wing commentators, websites, YouTubers, and other sources.

With no evidence to back up their claims, they peddled a conspiracy theory that Kelley was affiliated with "antifa."

Here's how it spread.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 7:13 pm » wrote: The truth is meaningless to these people.
They lie as much as their dear leader.

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 7:19 pm » wrote:Hillary is not our leader.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 7:26 pm » wrote: Don't you have any conspiracy theories to spread?
Nice tribute siggy.

roadkill » 06 Nov 2017 7:34 pm » wrote:I can't spread anything...you used up all the peanut butter.

Sharyl: What was it that convinced him that he had to be let go?

45: Well I think we found out something about him may be involved with or with certain nations and I don't even know exactly what it was in particular but there was a point at which we just felt Paul would be better off because we don't want to have any potential conflicts.

And if there was a conflict I don't want to be involved in any conflicts even though it was I could have kept them longer.

I don't think anybody would have complained. But we don't want to have any potential conflicts of interest at all.

http://fullmeasure.news/news/full-episo ... ber-5-2017

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 7:38 pm » wrote: I was going to say something very dirty, but I shall refrain, because I am a lady.


FYI my hair is not quite that curly, and it's darker than that.
It's more like this:It's



As a matter of fact it's just like that.
Even the length.

Misty » 05 Nov 2017 1:02 pm » wrote:

charles.thompson » 06 Nov 2017 8:46 pm » wrote:Ah. Now I understand. You are jealous of blondes.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 2:36 pm » wrote: You sure do love to throw that 'felony' word around a lot in connection to Democrats don't you?

So now you can tell me, which Democrats have been charged with, convicted of, or plead guilty to any felony involving the 2016 campaign or anything else for that matter.

Tick Tock.

you hack.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 2:36 pm » wrote: You sure do love to throw that 'felony' word around a lot in connection to Democrats don't you?

Former Clinton Advisor Calls For Special Prosecutor to Investigate Hillary Over Uranium One Scandal
November 6, 2017 by Joshua Caplan 6 Comments
ShareTweetEmail
The Clinton machine is losing support in its fight against an avalanche of explosive accusations, ranging from rigging the 2016 Democrat primary, to helping sell a sizable portion of the United States’ uranium supply to Russia.

Former Clinton advisor Doug Schoen is calling for a special prosecutor to investigate the failed presidential candidate’s role in the Uranium One scandal.


Mediaite reports:


Democratic pollster and former Clinton ally Doug Schoen believes the scandals surrounding Hillary Clinton warrant a special prosecutor.


In reaction to the Donna Brazile bombshell in which she alleged the DNC rigged the 2016 primary, Schoen, who worked for President Bill Clinton‘s ’96 campaign and Hillary Clinton’s ’08 campaign, claimed that the entire Democratic Party “stinks from the head down” and that everyone “has a stain on their hands.”


“And with this new revelation tonight emails that it probably involved gross negligence, it strengthens my call on that and others for a special prosecutor to look at that, [James] Comey, the gross negligence, to look at the email deal more generally, to look at Uranium One, the dossier, all of it,” Schoen declared. “Because at this point, what we know is getting more and more troubling. I say this as a loyal Democrat… This is not partisan. This is about preserving our democracy.”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11 ... e-scandal/

She flipped off President Trump — and got fired from her government contracting job.



It was the middle-finger salute seen around the world.

Juli Briskman's protest aimed at the presidential motorcade that roared past her while she was on her cycling path in Northern Virginia late last month became an instantly viral photo.

Turns out it has now cost the 50-year-old marketing executive her job.

On Halloween, after Briskman gave her bosses at Akima, a government contracting firm, a heads-up that she was the unidentified cyclist in the photo, they took her into a room and fired her, she said, escorting her out of the building with a box of her things.

"I wasn't even at work when I did that," Briskman said. "But they told me I violated the code-of-conduct policy."

Her bosses at Akima, who have not returned emails and calls requesting comment, showed her the blue-highlighted Section 4.3 of the firm's social-media policy when they canned her.

"Covered Social Media Activity that contains discriminatory, obscene malicious or threatening content, is knowingly false, create [sic] a hostile work environment, or similar inappropriate or unlawful conduct will not be tolerated and will be subject to discipline up to an [sic] including termination of employment."

But Briskman wasn't wearing anything that connected her to the company when she was on her ride, nor is there anything on her personal social-media accounts — where she wordlessly posted the photo without identifying herself — to link her to the firm.

She identifies herself as an Akima employee on her LinkedIn account but makes no mention of the middle-finger photo there.

Wait. It gets even more obscene.

Because Briskman was in charge of the firm's social-media presence during her six-month tenure there, she recently flagged something that did link her company to some pretty ugly stuff.

As she was monitoring Facebook this summer, she found a public comment by a senior director at the company in an otherwise civil discussion by one of his employees about the Black Lives Matter movement.

"You're a f------ Libtard a------," the director injected, using his profile that clearly and repeatedly identifies himself as an employee of the firm.

In fact, the person he aimed that comment at was so offended by the intrusion into the conversation and the coarse nature of it that he challenged the director on representing Akima that way.

So Briskman flagged the exchange to senior management.

Did the man, a middle-aged executive who had been with the company for seven years, get the old "Section 4.3" boot?

Nope. He cleaned up the comment, spit-shined his public profile and kept on trucking at work.

But the single mother of two teens who made an impulsive gesture while on her bike on her day off?

Adios, amiga.

Her mistake, said Bethesda lawyer Bradley Shear, who specializes in social-media issues, was her honesty.

"You can't see her face; she is totally unidentified in that picture," he said.

"But once she identified herself to her employer, they had to consider that information."

The company takes into account how the image of an employee flipping off the president looks and whether it may draw negative attention or threats, said Shear, who has a blog devoted to such matters.

But what about the First Amendment?

That will save you from being punished by the government for your words, but it doesn't protect your paycheck, he said.

"You can say whatever you want," he said. "You might not get jailed for what you say, but you might not get the job you want."

Briskman is not a strident activist.

In fact, after years of working all over the world as part of the nation's diplomatic corps, she's usually pretty reserved.

"I think I gave money for clean water once," she said.

During the Women's March the day after Trump's inauguration, she couldn't make it into Washington.

Instead, she said, she stood in somber protest outside the CIA headquarters with a "Not My President" sign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/ ... story.html

Termin8tor » 06 Nov 2017 10:22 pm » wrote:A very few people in your party still have integrity, thankfully,.

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 11:44 pm » wrote:

Misty » 06 Nov 2017 7:38 pm » wrote: I was going to say something very dirty, but I shall refrain, because I am a lady.


FYI my hair is not quite that curly, and it's darker than that.
It's more like this:It's



As a matter of fact it's just like that.
Even the length.