Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Nov 2017 12:43 pm
Devlin Barrett was quoting John Danforth who said it was 'grotesque.'Termin8tor » 15 Nov 2017 6:01 am » wrote:Here's how the corrupt WashPost, one of your sources, operates.
It's the voice of the corrupt Beltway.
It isn't grotesque at all, and I'll bet 2/3 of Americans would like it investigated further.
He also directly quoted other named Justice Dept. officials.
What is dishonest about that?
So no comment on that totally fake gateway pundit story?
You're not going to defend that total **** story that was based on a Tweet by a man who falsely portrayed himself as a war hero?
15 Nov 2017 12:51 pm
Gateway is a partisan website that almost always get stories right. They don't claim to be objective like the MSM lies they are.Misty » 15 Nov 2017 12:43 pm » wrote: So no comment on that totally fake gateway pundit story?
Have you EVER commented on my point about the entire corrupt liberal MSM lying for six months that Trump was under criminal investigation?
No?
Then **** off.
15 Nov 2017 12:55 pm
I didn't say it was dishonest. I said it's corrupt.Misty » 15 Nov 2017 12:43 pm » wrote:Devlin Barrett was quoting John Danforth who said it was 'grotesque.'
He also directly quoted other named Justice Dept. officials.
What is dishonest about that?
Fox has cited many FBI agents, former Justice officials and others who are absolutely convinced there should be prosecution of these crimes.
The WashPost didn't cite ANYONE who thought it's a good idea, just those who oppose it.
That isn't reporting. Do you honestly believe they couldn't find anyone with a different opinion?
That's a pro-Beltway piece of garbage trying to protect not only the Clinton's, but all the corrupt hacks around them.
15 Nov 2017 12:57 pm
Please. I went on there yesterday, and I never saw so much **** all in one place.Termin8tor » 15 Nov 2017 12:51 pm » wrote:Gateway is a partisan website that almost always get stories right. They don't claim to be objective like the MSM lies they are.
You can be biased, and still be honest.
Did I touch a nerve?Termin8tor » 15 Nov 2017 12:51 pm » wrote:Have you EVER commented on my point about the entire corrupt liberal MSM lying for six months that Trump was under criminal investigation?
No?
Then **** off.
15 Nov 2017 1:02 pm
Have you answered that question, EVER?Misty » 15 Nov 2017 12:57 pm » wrote: Did I touch a nerve?
Haven't you noticed that people who have some integrity are absolutely nauseated by your endless partisan lies and ****?
15 Nov 2017 1:05 pm
I just double checked what stories they have, and it's reasonably accurate.Misty » 15 Nov 2017 12:57 pm » wrote: Please. I went on there yesterday, and I never saw so much **** all in one place.
You can be biased, and still be honest.
Given that they don't have any pretense to be a "news" source, that gives at least as much integrity as the NYTimes or WashPost or any network.
All of whom have lied for decades in denying their obvious bias.
Oh, but that's right. You've told the same lie.
15 Nov 2017 6:53 pm
15 Nov 2017 6:55 pm
Says the liar.Termin8tor » 15 Nov 2017 1:05 pm » wrote:I just double checked what stories they have, and it's reasonably accurate.
16 Nov 2017 6:50 am
Blah, blah, blah, babbles the psychopath.Misty » 15 Nov 2017 6:55 pm » wrote: Says the liar.
Why no response to the rest of my post?
Given that they don't have any pretense to be a "news" source, that gives at least as much integrity as the NYTimes or WashPost or any network.
All of whom have lied for decades in denying their obvious bias.
Oh, but that's right. You've told the same lie.
16 Nov 2017 7:28 pm
How disgusting.
Trump to lift ban on importing elephant trophies from Africa.
President Trump has decided to let big game hunters like his sons Eric and Donald Jr. import the heads of elephants into the United States, reversing an Obama-era ban from 2014.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service confirmed the move in a statement Wednesday night, saying it will begin issuing permits for elephant trophies from Zimbabwe and Zambia, even though the creatures are still listed under the Endangered Species Act.
[.....]
The elephant — which typically is hunted for its ivory tusks — has been listed as a “threatened” species since 1978.
President Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., sparked widespread outrage several years ago when pictures showing him posing with a dead pachyderm surfaced on social media.
One particular photo, which received most of the attention, showed him holding up the elephant’s severed tail.
Trump’s second son, Eric, has also faced criticism for his big game hunting after similar images emerged of him with a dead leopard and other creatures.
While much of Africa’s wildlife is endangered due to poachers, savanna elephants may be the most threatened.
The population plummeted by roughly 30 percent — or 144,000 — from 2007 to 2014, according to the 2016 Great Elephant Census. It dropped 6 percent in Zimbabwe alone.
“Reprehensible behavior by the Trump Admin,” tweeted The Elephant Project, a nonprofit organization dedicated to the conservation of African pachyderms.
https://nypost.com/2017/11/16/trump-to- ... om-africa/
16 Nov 2017 7:38 pm
Right back atcha.Termin8tor » 15 Nov 2017 1:02 pm » wrote:Haven't you noticed that people who have some integrity are absolutely nauseated by your endless partisan lies and ****?
16 Nov 2017 9:55 pm
17 Nov 2017 1:06 pm
How did Roger Stone know it was Al Franken's 'time in the barrel' before the news broke?
Stone appeared to know Franken allegation was coming.
Former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone appeared to know there were sexual misconduct allegations involving Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) hours before they became public.
Stone has been banned from Twitter, but at 1 a.m. on Thursday morning an account connected to him tweeted a quote from the Republican political operative.
"Roger Stone says it's Al Franken's 'time in the barrel'.
Franken next in long list of Democrats to be accused of 'grabby' behavior," read the tweet from Enter the Stone Zone.
Enter the Stone Zone is an account that claims to share "political commentary" from Stone.
Hours later, Leeann Tweeden, a KABC-AM news anchor, accused Franken of kissing and groping her without her consent in 2006.
Tweeden said the incidents occurred during a USO tour to entertain troops abroad.
She also tweeted a photograph of Franken as evidence.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... was-coming
17 Nov 2017 4:51 pm
Let's not forget these women who the SCROTUS called liars and said that he was going to sue after the election.
At the 1 minute 20 second mark.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4OUCHsojlAE
At the 1 minute 20 second mark.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4OUCHsojlAE
17 Nov 2017 4:54 pm
They are welcome to prove it. From a non biased standpoint all of these accusations (red or blue) need to have some semblance of credibility not just an accusation that is no more than a he said, she said.
17 Nov 2017 4:57 pm
Abusers and harassers don't do their dirty work in front of witnesses.crimsongulf » 17 Nov 2017 4:54 pm » wrote:They are welcome to prove it. From a non biased standpoint all of these accusations (red or blue) need to have some semblance of credibility not just an accusation that is no more than a he said, she said.
It almost always comes down to he said, she said.
If one of your kids told you they were molested, would you ask them to prove it?
17 Nov 2017 5:01 pm
So who do we believe??????? Freaky Franken not included because of photographic evidence.Misty » 17 Nov 2017 4:57 pm » wrote: Abusers and harassers don't do their dirty work in front of witnesses.
It almost always comes down to he said, she said.
Do we take the accusers background into account?????
Do we take an obviously agenda driven media source into account???
17 Nov 2017 7:13 pm
17 Nov 2017 7:17 pm
Do you think the media had an agenda to bring down Harvey Weinstein?crimsongulf » 17 Nov 2017 5:01 pm » wrote:So who do we believe??????? Freaky Franken not included because of photographic evidence.
Do we take the accusers background into account?????
Do we take an obviously agenda driven media source into account???
If it's just one or two accusers, you can question it, but I think when you have multiple accusers, you probably should believe them.
Why would a bunch of women who don't know each other lie?
19 Nov 2017 8:09 am
If you have a family member in a rest home you may want to know this...I've heard the stories but this video is damning.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/18/ww ... shows.html
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/18/ww ... shows.html
Who is online
In total there are 4570 users online :: 5 registered, 14 bots, and 4551 guests
Bots: Bolt, Adsbot, proximic, ADmantX, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, okhttp, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7