Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 831 832 833 834 835 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
9 Jan 2018 3:38 pm
9 Jan 2018 3:38 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 09 Jan 2018 3:32 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 09 Jan 2018 11:03 am » wrote:We should all go back to horse and buggy days and burn wood, right imbecile? :rofl:
Figures you would be in favor of killing safety regulations, doing away with money set aside for spill cleanups and then expanding offshore drilling exponentially.
Because just like you that makes no sense.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.


The usual,"Republicans are going to kill you" Democrat Talking Point Lie.

Modern society rests on reasonably priced energy production, primarily petroleum based. Drilling can be done quite safely.

But Obama and you leftists have made exploration increasingly difficult to the degree you could. If it wasn't for fracking done almost entirely on private lands, energy prices would be extremely high and the economy would have been even worse under Obama than it was.

Only a wackjob or a liar would claim that regulations cannot be safely cut after almost 30 years of expansion.
User avatar
Nobody
10 Jan 2018 11:20 am
10 Jan 2018 11:20 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
White House transcript fails to include line from Trump on clean DACA bill.

The official White House transcript of President Trump's comments on immigration failed to include a line from the president regarding a clean bill to address recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

During the meeting on Tuesday, Trump was asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) if he would support "a clean DACA bill."

"Yeah, I would like to do it," Trump said during the meeting, according to The Washington Post.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) then told the president he needed to be "clear."

“I think what Senator Feinstein is asking here — when we talk about just DACA, we don’t want to be back here two years later. You have to have security," McCarthy said during the meeting.

The White House's official transcript did not include the line from Trump saying, "Yeah, I would like to do it."

A White House official said anything left out of the transcript was not done on purpose, according to the Post, and that the conversation's context was clear.
It was not done on purpose?
Right.
Of course it was done on purpose.

I watched that whole thing live and it was clear that 45 had no idea what a 'clean bill' means.
User avatar
Nobody
10 Jan 2018 6:00 pm
10 Jan 2018 6:00 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 10:10 am
11 Jan 2018 10:10 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 10 Jan 2018 6:00 pm » wrote:We already know that Donald Trump and his campaign encouraged and cooperated with Moscow's election interference. blah, blah, blah
No, that's a lie. Even honest Democrats have admitted there's no evidence of this.

That's why they've stopped screeching about collusion and have picked up the next Democrat Talking Point Lie that Trump is mentally unstable and unfit for office.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 10:27 am
11 Jan 2018 10:27 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 09 Jan 2018 9:05 am » wrote:But I'm not surprised that you are willing to overlook it, considering that you are also willing to overlook the fact that he is a racist, misogynist, xenophobic bigot who was willing to work with a foreign adversary in order to win an election.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.

You've lied over and over and over that Trump isn't a real conservative or a real Republican.

I would concede that we couldn't be 100% sure before the election how he would govern.

But now we know, yet you continue to lie, citing fake conservatives' opinions, as if they matter. :\
we have the most conservative Republican President in a century or so — far, far more conservative than even Ronald Reagan ever was.
https://spectator.org/deeply-torn-over- ... ovember-7/
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Trump waives criminal punishments for convicted banks, including Deutsche Bank, to whom he owes $130,000,000-$300,000,000.

The Trump Administration just published a small notice in the Federal Register announcing that it would waive the outstanding criminal sanctions against some of the world's largest banks, Citigroup, JPMorgan, Barclays, UBS and Deutsche Bank.

The banks were facing sanctions stemming from a variety of wrongdoing, including the trillions' worth of fraud in the LIBOR scandal, and Deutsche Bank's role in laundering $10B for Russian oligarchs.

Donald Trump owes Deutsche Bank at least $120,000,000 (and as much as $300,000,000) which the bank loaned him after he defaulted on a $640,000,000 loan they extended to him, and then sued the bank for $3,000,000,000 for its role in the 2008 crisis, on which he blamed his default.

All told, Deutsche Bank and its co-lenders have given the Trump Organization over $2.5B in loans.
No conflict there. [/sarcasm]
So much for all that **** about being tough on Wall Street.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 12:31 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:31 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm » wrote: No conflict there. [/sarcasm]
So much for all that **** about being tough on Wall Street.
Boingboing.com? :rofl: :rofl:

How **** hilarious given that you have rejected all my sources, including the most mainstream.

Not to mention, it's very well reported that Obama was shaking down banks on very, very flimsy grounds, then illegally diverting much of the funds to leftist organizations.

That's a violation of both federal law and the Constitution, not that you care.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 12:33 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:33 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm » wrote:blah,blah,blah
Why no comment on this, psycho?
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 10:27 am » wrote: You've lied over and over and over that Trump isn't a real conservative or a real Republican.

I would concede that we couldn't be 100% sure before the election how he would govern.

But now we know, yet you continue to lie, citing fake conservatives' opinions, as if they matter. :\
we have the most conservative Republican President in a century or so — far, far more conservative than even Ronald Reagan ever was.
https://spectator.org/deeply-torn-over- ... ovember-7/
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2018 12:39 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:39 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 10:27 am » wrote:
Misty » 09 Jan 2018 9:05 am » wrote:But I'm not surprised that you are willing to overlook it, considering that you are also willing to overlook the fact that he is a racist, misogynist, xenophobic bigot who was willing to work with a foreign adversary in order to win an election.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.
You've lied over and over and over that Trump isn't a real conservative or a real Republican.
I would concede that we couldn't be 100% sure before the election how he would govern.
But now we know, yet you continue to lie, citing fake conservatives' opinions, as if they matter. :\
we have the most conservative Republican President in a century or so — far, far more conservative than even Ronald Reagan ever was.
https://spectator.org/deeply-torn-over- ... ovember-7/
45 has no set political ideology.
He's all over the place and has no idea what he is doing.

Just today the dotard Tweeted two completely different positions on the reauthorization of the FISA program.

Trump's FISA tweets throw Washington into chaos.

Shame on you for calling people like George Will, Bill Kristol or David Frum fake Conservatives.
These are people that you once respected before you joined Cult45.
And if say you didn't, you're a filthy liar, but we already know that you are.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2018 12:41 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:41 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 12:33 pm » wrote:
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm » wrote:blah,blah,blah
Why no comment on this, psycho?
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 10:27 am » wrote: You've lied over and over and over that Trump isn't a real conservative or a real Republican.
I would concede that we couldn't be 100% sure before the election how he would govern.
But now we know, yet you continue to lie, citing fake conservatives' opinions, as if they matter. :\
we have the most conservative Republican President in a century or so — far, far more conservative than even Ronald Reagan ever was.
https://spectator.org/deeply-torn-over- ... ovember-7/
Check my last post jackass.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 12:45 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:45 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:41 pm » wrote:
we have the most conservative Republican President in a century or so — far, far more conservative than even Ronald Reagan ever was.

https://spectator.org/deeply-torn-over- ... ovember-7/
Check my last post jackass.
Why? All you did was lie again.

Even the WashPost has conceded he's governing in a very principled conservative manner.

What, is it blind luck? :rofl:
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 12:53 pm
11 Jan 2018 12:53 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:39 pm » wrote:45 has no set political ideology.
He's all over the place and has no idea what he is doing.
Yes, yes, that's the Democrat Talking Point Lie, and you tell them so well! :\
Just today the dotard Tweeted two completely different positions on the reauthorization of the FISA program.

Trump's FISA tweets throw Washington into chaos.
Which happens under every president, Dim. Mistakes and mis-statements happen.

You're trying to pretend it only happens under Trump.
Shame on you for calling people like George Will, Bill Kristol or David Frum fake Conservatives.


I never called Kristol or Will "fake conservatives." Will is a white gloved-priss who'd rather lose than get his hands dirty.

Kristol has become quite unhinged in many ways he's lashed out against Trump supporters in irrational and ugly ways.

I haven't seen much sign that Frum is conservative for many, many years now, so yes, I call him a Fake Conservative, based on his columns from long before Trump even ran.
These are people that you once respected before you joined Cult45.
And if say you didn't, you're a filthy liar, but we already know that you are.
You're such a shameless **** liar. How hilarious to be accused of lying by a psychopath like you. :blink:


I had considerable respect for Will, but have considered him to be a priss for a couple decades.

Same with Kristol. When he advocated many years ago that conservatives give up their quest to diminish the power of the federal government, he lost me completely. I have barely paid attention to him since.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 1:16 pm
11 Jan 2018 1:16 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 09 Jan 2018 3:32 pm » wrote: just like you that makes no sense.
When Trump claimed that Trump Tower was wiretapped, journalists accused him of lying.


The Wash Post "Fact checker" gave him four Pinochios.

Was it wiretapped?

If so, why did journalists accuse him of lying?

Not that you'll actually answer. :\
User avatar
nuckin futz
11 Jan 2018 1:36 pm
11 Jan 2018 1:36 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 10:10 am » wrote:
No, that's a lie. Even honest Democrats have admitted there's no evidence of this.

That's why they've stopped screeching about collusion and have picked up the next Democrat Talking Point Lie that Trump is mentally unstable and unfit for office.
Image
User avatar
roadkill
11 Jan 2018 1:37 pm
11 Jan 2018 1:37 pm
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2018 1:44 pm
11 Jan 2018 1:44 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
House passes NSA spying bill after Trump tweets cause confusion.

(Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday passed a bill to renew the National Security Agency's warrantless internet surveillance program, overcoming objections from privacy advocates and confusion prompted by morning tweets from President Donald Trump that initially questioned the spying tool.

The legislation, which passed 256-164 and split party lines, is the culmination of a yearslong debate in Congress on the proper scope of U.S. intelligence collection - one fueled by the 2013 disclosures of classified surveillance secrets by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

Senior Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives had urged cancellation of the vote after Trump appeared to cast doubt on the merits of the program, but Republicans forged ahead.

Trump initially said on Twitter that the surveillance program, first created in secret after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and later legally authorized by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, had been used against him but later said it was needed.
Image

About an hour and 45 minutes and a phone call from Paul Ryan later........

Image

That's right, get smart you DOTARD!
User avatar
roadkill
11 Jan 2018 1:48 pm
11 Jan 2018 1:48 pm
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 1:44 pm » wrote:
Image

About an hour and 45 minutes and a phone call from Paul Ryan later........

Image

That's right, get smart you DOTARD!
Poor Misty...over the edge. :sleep:
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 2:36 pm
11 Jan 2018 2:36 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 1:44 pm » wrote:
That's right, get smart you DOTARD!
I don't see any supposed confusion. It's a 95% certainty that the FISA process was abused to illegally surveil Trump.

That a massive abuse of power occurred.

But that this program is important to protect the country.
User avatar
Termin8tor
11 Jan 2018 2:44 pm
11 Jan 2018 2:44 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 11 Jan 2018 12:27 pm » wrote: So much for all that **** about being blah, blah, blah
I'm "stalking" you with more important factual information. :rofl: :rofl:

I'm truly, truly cruel. :clap:
Working-class families are winning big under Trump
by Justin Haskins | Jan 9, 2018, 12:01
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its newest jobs report on Friday, and the data clearly show, under the pro-business policies implemented by the Trump administration, low-income and working-class families are enjoying significant economic gains not experienced in nearly 20 years.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/worki ... le/2645348
User avatar
Nobody
11 Jan 2018 3:10 pm
11 Jan 2018 3:10 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Jan 2018 2:44 pm » wrote:I'm "stalking" you with more important factual information. :rofl: :rofl:
I'm truly, truly cruel. :clap:
Image
1 831 832 833 834 835 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 3971 users online :: 13 registered, 15 bots, and 3943 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, okhttp, CriteoBot, aiohttp, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, curl/7, Yahoo! Slurp, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Googlebot, Applebot, Baiduspider
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search