"The Russians are coming! The Russians are coming!"Misty » 24 Jan 2018 6:54 pm » wrote:RUSSIAN TROLLS USE FOX NEWS' SEAN HANNITY TO UNDERMINE MUELLER'S TRUMP PROBE, REPORT SAYS
Psychopath.Unsealed FISA Court Ruling Shows 85% of Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA Searches Were Illegal and Illegally Provided to Government Outsiders
Oh gosh, the Race Card again.
I think people have had it with a deeply corrupt party that supports and protects serial felons/ rapists like Bill Clinton.I need to tell you something: People have had it with you.
Jesus wants you to go online and spread endless lies and smears about your political opponents.But I had to at least try and reach you.
It’s what Jesus would do.
Maybe you need to read what he said again—if he still matters to you.
Speaking of misinformation and ****, that doesn't undercut my claim at all. I was referring to political loyalty, which every president expects and has a right to, liar.Misty » 24 Jan 2018 9:51 pm » wrote:You are a veritable font of misinformation and ****.Termin8tor » 24 Jan 2018 3:11 pm » wrote:Of course he wants people who are politically loyal. Every president does, Dim.
It's not a no-no at all.
Well obviously some have not been loyal to the law, as the FISA Court documented.
They not only committed felonies, they betrayed a sitting president.Loyalty Is Not What the FBI Director Owes the President | National Review
The FBI director, like all law-enforcement officers, takes an oath to uphold the laws of the United States.
It is not a loyalty oath to the president.
The rule of law demands that enforcement decisions be made based on what the Constitution and congressional statutes dictate, not on political considerations.
As usual, little Miss Marxist is siding with the criminals in her party and smearing the figures of integrity who are exposing it.Misty » 24 Jan 2018 10:07 pm » wrote:DOJ Tells Nunes It Would Be 'Reckless' To Release Memo Without Review.
Yer amazingly naive...the DOJ and many in the FBI were loyal to Obama, and they all, including Obama, sought to undermine Trump and prop up Hillary.Misty » 24 Jan 2018 9:51 pm » wrote: You are a veritable font of misinformation and ****.
You should read the whole article.
You might learn something.
It has been reviewed and will be reviewed again.Misty » 24 Jan 2018 10:07 pm » wrote:DOJ Tells Nunes It Would Be 'Reckless' To Release Memo Without Review.
What does little Miss Marxist do when faced with factual evidence of crimes by Democrats?Misty » 24 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote:
Clem, the one trick pony
Genuine Progress in ‘Draining the Swamp’ Is Bad News for Clintons
New revelations pop up daily about how the DOJ and the FBI mishandled investigations concerning the former first family
by Charles Ortel | Updated 25 Jan 2018 at 9:29 AM
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and his obstructionist Democratic colleagues will not be able to block forever the initiatives and nominees put forward by President Donald Trump.
A key reason is the fact that more and more Trump appointees among front-line prosecutors and other law enforcement positions are peering into the recent past — and offering important context for the public to consider concerning scandals covered up during President Barack Obama’s eight years in the Oval Office. (Yes, there actually were scandals then!)
For example, only weeks after Dana Boente submitted his resignation as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia on October 26, 2017, Americans finally learned that lobbyist William D. Campbell had reams of evidence potentially implicating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation in corruption, money-laundering, and fraud dating back to at least 2009.
Obama’s Department of Justice under Attorney General Eric Holder somehow failed to notice, investigate or prosecute any of the crimes to which Campbell pointed before the 2012 presidential election.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/gen ... -clintons/
"Without a shred of evidence."Misty » 23 Jan 2018 2:59 pm » wrote: Says the moron who squeals about all kinds of crimes committed by Democrats every day without one shred of evidence.
'Hide the ball' — On Capitol Hill, growing frustration with FBI secrecy
by Byron York
Republicans in both House and Senate are growing increasingly frustrated with the Federal Bureau of Intelligence and Justice Department over tight restrictions on classified and other confidential information in the Trump-Russia affair....'
That frustration could be heard Wednesday in a speech from Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
On Jan. 4, Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., chairman of the crime and terrorism subcommittee, sent a criminal referral to the FBI and Justice Department concerning Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored the Trump dossier. In a cover letter, Grassley and Graham suggested that Steele might have lied to the FBI during his association with the bureau as he compiled the dossier.
That's all the cover letter said. The referral itself, which was classified, made the actual case about Steele. Grassley wrote an unclassified version of the referral for public release — finally, the public could understand what the case was about — but first sent it to the FBI to make sure the information in the unclassified version was in fact unclassified.
That's when Grassley got the runaround. The FBI "falsely claimed" — Grassley's words — that a portion of the document was classified and thus held up release. The information was not classified, Grassley said — it was based on "non-government sources" and "the deputy attorney general has discussed the fact at issue with me more than once in an unsecure space and on an unsecure phone line."
"Unfortunately, I suspect something else is really going on here," Grassley said. "It sure looks like a bureaucratic game of hide the ball, rather than a genuine concern about national security."
.....Grassley also offered support for making the House Intelligence Committee "FISA abuse" memo public. Grassley noted that his Senate committee has "access to the same information" House Intel used in writing the memo....
"Based what I know, I agree that as much of this information should be made public as soon as possible, through the appropriate process," Grassley said of the House memo. "And, I don't just mean the summary memos. The government should release the underlying documents referenced in those memos, after deleting any national security information that truly needs to be protected. But most of this story can be told, and should be told. The American people deserve the truth."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron ... le/2646980
Oh my!Misty » 24 Jan 2018 2:47 pm » wrote: You should be ashamed of yourself for smearing our law enforcement agencies like that in an effort to discredit them, only to protect your Cult45 leader.
But you obviously have no shame.
Judicial Watch Chief Investigator: Three FBI Sources Told Me “No Way in Hell” The FBI Phone Glitch Story Is Real
January 24, 2018 by Jim Hoft 47 Comments
1.5KShare133TweetEmail
Judicial Watch Chief Investigator Chris Farrell told Lou Dobbs on Wednesday he spoke with three different FBI officials who disputed the claims by the DOJ and Deep State officials that the Peter Strzok – Lisa Page phone messages were lost in a “glitch” is a complete lie.....
Chris Farrell: Meanwhile I have talked to three FBI agents who told me this whole lost text message thing with Samsung is absolute baloney. That there is no way in the world this could have happened. That the FBI actively monitors agents’ communications both from an insider threat and a counter-intelligence prospective. And that their back-ups had back-ups. So three different sources have told me there’s no way in hell that it’s possible, that someone is deliberately sabotaging this or deliberately deleting or lying.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01 ... eal-video/
Integrity? Nunes?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 8:25 am » wrote:As usual, little Miss Marxist is siding with the criminals in her party and smearing the figures of integrity who are exposing it.Misty » 24 Jan 2018 10:07 pm » wrote:DOJ Tells Nunes It Would Be 'Reckless' To Release Memo Without Review.
Not exactly part of the 'deep state' is he?Stephen Boyd is an American lawyer who currently serves as the United States Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs.
Boyd graduated from the University of Alabama School of Law.
He served as the communications director for Jeff Sessions when Sessions was serving as a U.S. Senator.
On April 25, 2017, Boyd was nominated by President Donald Trump for the position of Assistant Attorney General.
He was confirmed to this position by the United States Senate on August 3, 2017.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Boyd_(attorney)
That's believable!Misty » 24 Jan 2018 6:54 pm » wrote:RUSSIAN TROLLS USE FOX NEWS' SEAN HANNITY TO UNDERMINE MUELLER'S TRUMP PROBE, REPORT SAYS
The Russia ‘Fake News’ Scare Is All About Chilling Speech
Last week Republicans began to call for the release of a memo authored by House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes that purports to lay out a series of abuses connected to the FBI surveillance of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. As often happens these days, a Twitter hashtag evolved around the effort, #ReleaseTheMemo, and was widely retweeted by Republicans and elected officials.
It didn’t take long for a report to emerge claiming that Russian-sponsored Twitter accounts and bots were the real driving force behind the viral call for the release of the memo. Without worrying about the veracity of this convenient claim, all the usual suspects giddily spread the story across social media — probably because they have such a deep reverence for truth in the Era of Trump.![]()
![]()
http://thefederalist.com/2018/01/25/the ... ng-speech/
Yes, absolutely. Joe diGenova called him one of the true heroes on this huge breaking scandal, along with Admiral Rogers, who went to the Trump Tower immediately after the election to inform Trump that he was being wiretapped, to warn him about this huge abuse of power.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 10:47 am » wrote:Integrity? Nunes?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 8:25 am » wrote:As usual, little Miss Marxist is siding with the criminals in her party and smearing the figures of integrity who are exposing it.![]()
Then I retract any criticism I made. He has legitimate concerns. My mistake.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 10:47 am » wrote:He is once again being exposed as a shill for 45, just like after his midnight run to the WH to expose the great unmasking non-scandal.
Do have a clue who Stephen Boyd who wrote that DOJ letter is?
Not exactly part of the 'deep state' is he?
I'll keep this as an example of your endless smears. Yes, Nunes is a man of high integrity.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 10:47 am » wrote:Integrity? Nunes?
![]()
He is once again being exposed as a shill for 45, just like after his midnight run to the WH to expose the great unmasking non-scandal.
Was the FISA court lying when it documented massive abuse and illegalities by Obama officials?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 10:47 am » wrote: Integrity? Nunes?
![]()
He is once again being exposed as a shill for 45, just like after his midnight run to the WH to expose the great unmasking non-scandal.
Uh on.
Aaaaaaargh!TRUMP STORMS DAVOS!
SPEECH: 'INVEST IN AMERICA'
POPS TO 45% APPROVAL
DOW SOARS +200
http://drudgereport.com/
And you never lie!Misty » 24 Jan 2018 12:46 pm » wrote:Just like Nunes lied about his midnight ride to the WH to supposedly give them info that came from the WH.
I see you have your talking points down and are doing your best to spread them, like a good little propaganda artist or a Russian BOT.
Growing Calls for President Trump to Read Explosive FISA Memo During State of Union Address
January 25, 2018 by Jim Hoft
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01 ... n-address/
Maybe because it isn't a massive scandal.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:Trump gets it.
We all know that the corrupt liberal MSM will never adequately report this massive scandal and abuse of power.
And you are in full diversion mode to protect 45.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
My money says he talks about himself for 90% of the speech.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:I'm pretty sure that Trump will mention this scandal very prominently in the State of the Union.
And I'll give even odds he does this, too.