Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 853 854 855 856 857 1,190
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:My money says he talks about himself for 90% of the speech.
This will be the first 'State Of The Trump' speech.
Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?

Are all those many sources I mentioned lying?

Why don't you answer those questions? :huh:
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
And you are in full diversion mode to protect 45.
Diversion from what, psycho?

You have yet to cite one single shred of evidence.

Have you got any yet?

No?

Never thought you did. :\
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Image

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3707 ... y-text-was

But what about the informant he said he had?
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson said Tuesday that an informant has told Congress that a "secret society" was set up within the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice shortly after Donald Trump was elected president.

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/201 ... 060586001/
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm » wrote:"Secret society, etc."

But what about the informant he said he had?
One small error corrected, yes.

Was the FISA Court lying when it documented extensive abuse of FISA warrants and many related crimes?
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm » wrote:
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
And you are in full diversion mode to protect 45.
Diversion from what, psycho?
Oh, I don't know, maybe Mueller handing down two indictments, getting two guilty pleas and breathing down 45's turkey neck?
You know, the reason that you are pointing at squirrels.
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:32 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:32 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm » wrote:Diversion from what, psycho?
Oh, I don't know, maybe Mueller handing down two indictments, getting two guilty pleas and breathing down 45's turkey neck?
You know, the reason that you are pointing at squirrels.
Why did you cut out most of my post? To censor the most important part, of course.


You have yet to cite one single shred of evidence.

Have you got any yet?

No?

Never thought you did. :\
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm » wrote: You know, the reason that you are pointing at squirrels.
Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?



Why don't you answer the question, coward?
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm » wrote:
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm » wrote:"Secret society, etc."
But what about the informant he said he had?
One small error corrected, yes.
Johnson went on National TV and said that he had an informant that told him that members of the FBI were having secret off site meetings.
That is hardly 'one small error' you jerkoff.
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court lying when it documented extensive abuse of FISA warrants and many related crimes?
Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?

Image

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/2 ... letter.pdf

You dismiss out of hand any wrongdoing by 45 or any of his crony cult members, but you blow up a bunch of nothingburgers into the greatest scandals in human history.
You're such a **** lacky.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 2:39 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:39 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:32 pm » wrote:Why did you cut out most of my post?
There's only so much of your **** that I can tolerate.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?
Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.

The United States Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legislative Affairs, Stephen Boyd, who was appointed by 45, said there are no FISA abuses.

Image

http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/2 ... letter.pdf
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:47 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:47 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote: Johnson went on National TV and said that he had an informant that told him that members of the FBI were having secret off site meetings.
That is hardly 'one small error' you jerkoff.
In the overall scope of this scandal, it absolutely is a small error, psycho.

You haven't paid the slightest attention to any of it.
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?
Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?

We are currently aware of any wrongdoing related to the FISA process....
Well gosh, who should we look at as an authoritative source, Boyd or the FISA Court itself, and NSA Director Admiral Rogers, who went to Trump Tower to warn him about it?

You're kidding, right? :clap:
You dismiss out of hand any wrongdoing by 45 or any of his crony cult members, but you blow up a bunch of nothingburgers into the greatest scandals in human history.
You're such a **** lacky.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
You can't even cite a single shred of evidence beyond the minor charges filed so far.

What do I need to deny, Dim? :rofl: :rofl:
There's nothing there, except your endless accusing, smears and lies.

Psychopath. :loco:
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 2:55 pm
25 Jan 2018 2:55 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?

Are all those many sources I mentioned lying?

Why don't you answer those questions? :huh:
Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.
Given that you not only refuse to read the many, many sources I cite, but lie and stonewall everything, I won't waste my time.

You'll just lie, no matter what the evidence and smear everyone and every source I cite. Every conservative source I read supports my claims to one degree or another.

Go read what I've cited in the related threads, and comment.

Or go **** yourself.
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 3:14 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:14 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:Trump gets it.

We all know that the corrupt liberal MSM will never adequately report this massive scandal and abuse of power.

They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
Maybe because it isn't a massive scandal.
Every publication I read and trust believes it is a huge abuse of power.

Who among the following are paranoid or dishonest?

I'll wait.

IBD, the WSJ, National Review, American Spectator, American Thinker, Powerline, and more.

Every political figure and commentator I can think of off the top of my head believes its a huge abuse of power.

Sara Carter, Newt Gingrich, Laura Ingraham, Joe diGenova, John Bolton, Lou Dobbs, Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and on and on.

Every Republican who has seen the Memo believes it to be a huge abuse of power.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:47 pm » wrote:
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?
Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?
"We are currently aware of any wrongdoing related to the FISA process...."
Well gosh, who should we look at as an authoritative source, Boyd or the FISA Court itself, and NSA Director Admiral Rogers, who went to Trump Tower to warn him about it?
Boyd.

That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.

First of all it talks about sections 704 and 705 of FISA, which have to do with U.S. persons who are outside of the U.S..
(So you're trying to make it look like Obama was spying on Trump or his cronies who were inside the U.S. is a bunch of ****.)

And secondly, it talks about 'non-compliant queries' which does not necessarily mean that anything was illegal.

A compliance violation, just means that someone may not have strictly adhered to a guideline.
It does not mean that anyone abused their power, or broke a law.

The DNI's office does a semi-annual assessment of FISA's compliance with procedures and guidelines.

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/Sem ... 20FISA.pdf

You can see some examples of compliance violations here:
A History of FISA Section 702 Compliance Violations

The four timelines below display records of compliance violations with Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

The first timeline displays all violations, and the following three timelines provide a more granular look at separate categories of violations.

These timelines are the only publicly available resources that provide a comprehensive view of the types and patterns of compliance violations over the course of the existence of Section 702.

While these violations are not willful—they are inadvertent or unintentional—they are extremely concerning.
Inadvertent, unintentional and not willful.
Does that sound like an 'abuse of power' to you?
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 3:43 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:43 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote: That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.

First of all it talks about sections 704 and 705 of FISA, which have to do with U.S. persons who are outside of the U.S..
(So you're trying to make it look like Obama was spying on Trump or his cronies who were inside the U.S. is a bunch of ****.)
****. NSA Director Admiral Rogers traveled all the way to NY to warn Trump about the abuse.

After Trump immediately moved his transition team to a facility at his golf course.

And Congressional investigators have discovered wrongdoing including felonies using this secondary surveillance information.

You're a day late and $1 million bucks behind, trying to google when I've spent weeks citing breaking news.
And secondly, it talks about 'non-compliant queries' which does not necessarily mean that anything was illegal.

A compliance violation, just means that someone may not have strictly adhered to a guideline.
It does not mean that anyone abused their power, or broke a law.

Except that we are far, far, FAR beyond that point, psycho.

Nunes and every Republican who has seen the memo are all saying this is an abuse of power.

Journalists and public figures who know and trust them like Gingrich all agree.

You can see some examples of compliance violations here:

Inadvertent, unintentional and not willful.
Does that sound like an 'abuse of power' to you?
How the heck would that group know better than Admiral Rogers and the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee?

Not to mention, it's dated last September, and what's revealed supersedes it.
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 3:47 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:47 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
If you honestly wanted to check this out, you'd take the time to read Gateway, which doesn't do reporting or investigating on its own.

It only cites other sources, and there are always links to those sources.

Instead, you babble,"Gateway, Gateway" in a pathetic attempt to deny this scandal.

As you have done for years with every Democrat scandal.

You don't have the slightest intent to appraise this honestly, only to stonewall and deny.

Just like you stonewalled all the felonies and impeachable acts Clinton committed.

Just like you stonewalled all the serious scandals under Obama.

Just like you stonewalled all the crimes committed by Hillary Clinton.
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 3:54 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:54 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
Oh, and the other ugly part of this scandal is that information was illegally given to "outside groups."

According to Joe deGenova, among those groups were organizations connected to Hillary Clinton and the DNC, including Fusion GPS and Crowdstrike, who bleachbited Hillary's hard drive.

Gosh, nothing suspicious there, right? :\

.
Image
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 3:56 pm
25 Jan 2018 3:56 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:55 pm » wrote:
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?
Are all those many sources I mentioned lying?
Why don't you answer those questions? :huh:
Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.
Given that you not only refuse to read the many, many sources I cite, but lie and stonewall everything, I won't waste my time.
Of course not. You can't.
Because the FISA court NEVER 'documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes.'

I proved that in my last post.

When are you going to stop trusting sites like Gatewaypundit that post distorted and misleading ****?
They make you look like a fool, not that you need much help in that.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Jan 2018 4:11 pm
25 Jan 2018 4:11 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 3:47 pm » wrote:
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
If you honestly wanted to check this out, you'd take the time to read Gateway, which doesn't do reporting or investigating on its own.

It only cites other sources, and there are always links to those sources.
Do they link to Sputnik when they post propaganda from them?

A journalist sacked by the Kremlin-funded Sputnik news network claimed that right-wing U.S. outlets regularly disseminate fake news and conspiracy theories touted by the site.

In an appearance on MSNBC’s The Beat with Ari Melber Tuesday, former White House correspondent Andrew Feinberg accused Sputnik of being “foreign propaganda, not news.”

He went on to claim that Sputnik’s influence on right-wing, pro-Trump, news websites is pervasive: “Many of the most popular articles about things like WikiLeaks and pizzagate and other conspiracy theories were prominently featured on the Sputnik website,” said Feinberg.

“And they get picked up by other American outlets – by Infowars, Breitbart and Gateway Pundit – right-wing media outlets, and Sputnik functions as part of this right-wing media ecosystem.”

http://www.newsweek.com/right-wing-us-n ... nik-664241

I went straight to the DNI's assessment of FISA compliance.
Not Sputnik.
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is a right-wing, far-right, pro-Trump website.

The website is known for publishing falsehoods and spreading hoaxes.

The Gateway Pundit has promoted false rumors about voter fraud and Hillary Clinton’s health.

In October 2017, The Gateway Pundit published an article falsely implicating an innocent person as the shooter in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting.

The article was promoted by Google as a "top story" for searches for his name.

Gateway Pundit asserted that New York Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi had reported that ISIS may have evidence that it was behind the shooting, but Callimachi rejected that she had ever made such an assertion.

In December 2017, Gateway Pundit published a reddit post as evidence that Democratic activists were committing voter fraud in the 2017 Alabama Senate special election.

The redditor behind the post later said that the post was intended "as an obvious troll."

When asked by the Washington Post, the writer of the Gateway Pundit post declined to say whether he had contacted the redditor to verify the information; later the Gateway Pundit story contained an update at the bottom: "Liberals say these are fake Reddit posts(?) Regardless, the posts are still up on Reddit and the posters are still encouraging Democrats to cheat."

Gateway Pundit published other falsehoods during the campaign for the Alabama Senate seat.

In January 2018, Gateway Pundit published a false story that Chuck Schumer received half a million dollars from pro-immigration groups just before a vote related to the United States federal government shutdown of 2018.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit
User avatar
Termin8tor
25 Jan 2018 4:14 pm
25 Jan 2018 4:14 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:56 pm » wrote:Of course not. You can't.
Because the FISA court NEVER 'documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes.'

I proved that in my last post.

When are you going to stop trusting sites like Gatewaypundit that post distorted and misleading ****?
They make you look like a fool, not that you need much help in that.
Speaking of looking like a fool, you're the imbecile who's trying to debate this not in the thread where my documentation is which you haven't read, but in your thread.

How freaking stupid is that? :rofl:

The court is writing in legal terminology, but given that, it's quite obvious the court agrees with my take on this.
FISA Court Finds "Serious Fourth Amendment Issue" In Obama's "Widespread" Illegal Searches Of American Citizens
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 05/24/2017 - 09:52
TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint
A newly released court order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) found that the National Security Agency, under former President Obama, routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall. In describing the violations, the FISA court said the illegal searches conducted by the NSA under Obama were "widespread" and created a "very serious Fourth Amendment issue."


These new discoveries come from a recently unsealed FISA court document dated April 26, 2017 and center around a hearing dated October 26, 2017, just days before the 2016 election, in which the FISA court apparently learned for the first time of "widespread" and illegal spying on American citizens by the NSA under the Obama administration.

"The October 26, 2016 Notice disclosed that an NSA Inspector General (IG) review...indicated that, with greater frequency than previously disclosed to the Court, NSA analysts had used U.S.-person identifiers to query the result of Internet "upstream" collection, even though NSA's section 702 minimization procedures prohibited such queries...this disclosure gave the Court substantial concern."


.
Image


.
Image
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05- ... egal-searc
1 853 854 855 856 857 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 3836 users online :: 11 registered, 18 bots, and 3807 guests
Bots: Custo, YandexBot, ADmantX, Nutch, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, TTD-Content, Pinterest, Bolt, okhttp, facebookexternalhit, curl/7, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, bingbot, proximic
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search