Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:My money says he talks about himself for 90% of the speech.
This will be the first 'State Of The Trump' speech.
Diversion from what, psycho?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:And you are in full diversion mode to protect 45.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson said Tuesday that an informant has told Congress that a "secret society" was set up within the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice shortly after Donald Trump was elected president.
https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/201 ... 060586001/
One small error corrected, yes.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm » wrote:"Secret society, etc."
But what about the informant he said he had?
Oh, I don't know, maybe Mueller handing down two indictments, getting two guilty pleas and breathing down 45's turkey neck?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm » wrote:Diversion from what, psycho?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:And you are in full diversion mode to protect 45.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
Why did you cut out most of my post? To censor the most important part, of course.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm » wrote:Oh, I don't know, maybe Mueller handing down two indictments, getting two guilty pleas and breathing down 45's turkey neck?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:19 pm » wrote:Diversion from what, psycho?
You know, the reason that you are pointing at squirrels.
You have yet to cite one single shred of evidence.
Have you got any yet?
No?
Never thought you did.
Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:28 pm » wrote: You know, the reason that you are pointing at squirrels.
Johnson went on National TV and said that he had an informant that told him that members of the FBI were having secret off site meetings.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm » wrote:One small error corrected, yes.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:24 pm » wrote:"Secret society, etc."
But what about the informant he said he had?
Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:26 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court lying when it documented extensive abuse of FISA warrants and many related crimes?

There's only so much of your **** that I can tolerate.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:32 pm » wrote:Why did you cut out most of my post?
Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?

In the overall scope of this scandal, it absolutely is a small error, psycho.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote: Johnson went on National TV and said that he had an informant that told him that members of the FBI were having secret off site meetings.
That is hardly 'one small error' you jerkoff.
Well gosh, who should we look at as an authoritative source, Boyd or the FISA Court itself, and NSA Director Admiral Rogers, who went to Trump Tower to warn him about it?Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?
We are currently aware of any wrongdoing related to the FISA process....
You can't even cite a single shred of evidence beyond the minor charges filed so far.You dismiss out of hand any wrongdoing by 45 or any of his crony cult members, but you blow up a bunch of nothingburgers into the greatest scandals in human history.
You're such a **** lacky.
![]()
![]()
Given that you not only refuse to read the many, many sources I cite, but lie and stonewall everything, I won't waste my time.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote:Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?
Are all those many sources I mentioned lying?
Why don't you answer those questions?
Every publication I read and trust believes it is a huge abuse of power.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:13 pm » wrote:Maybe because it isn't a massive scandal.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 12:32 pm » wrote:Trump gets it.
We all know that the corrupt liberal MSM will never adequately report this massive scandal and abuse of power.
They're in Full Coverup Mode to protect Democrats.
Boyd.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:47 pm » wrote:Well gosh, who should we look at as an authoritative source, Boyd or the FISA Court itself, and NSA Director Admiral Rogers, who went to Trump Tower to warn him about it?Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote:Did you read Stephen Boyd's letter?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:33 pm » wrote:Was the FISA Court's documentation of extensive abuse of power and related crimes a "squirrel," psycho?
"We are currently aware of any wrongdoing related to the FISA process...."
Inadvertent, unintentional and not willful.A History of FISA Section 702 Compliance Violations
The four timelines below display records of compliance violations with Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The first timeline displays all violations, and the following three timelines provide a more granular look at separate categories of violations.
These timelines are the only publicly available resources that provide a comprehensive view of the types and patterns of compliance violations over the course of the existence of Section 702.
While these violations are not willful—they are inadvertent or unintentional—they are extremely concerning.
****. NSA Director Admiral Rogers traveled all the way to NY to warn Trump about the abuse.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote: That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
First of all it talks about sections 704 and 705 of FISA, which have to do with U.S. persons who are outside of the U.S..
(So you're trying to make it look like Obama was spying on Trump or his cronies who were inside the U.S. is a bunch of ****.)
And secondly, it talks about 'non-compliant queries' which does not necessarily mean that anything was illegal.
A compliance violation, just means that someone may not have strictly adhered to a guideline.
It does not mean that anyone abused their power, or broke a law.
How the heck would that group know better than Admiral Rogers and the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee?You can see some examples of compliance violations here:
Inadvertent, unintentional and not willful.
Does that sound like an 'abuse of power' to you?
If you honestly wanted to check this out, you'd take the time to read Gateway, which doesn't do reporting or investigating on its own.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
Oh, and the other ugly part of this scandal is that information was illegally given to "outside groups."Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
Of course not. You can't.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:55 pm » wrote:Given that you not only refuse to read the many, many sources I cite, but lie and stonewall everything, I won't waste my time.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 2:43 pm » wrote:Post a link from the FISA court that says that, and not some **** from the wingnut site Gatewaypundit.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 2:17 pm » wrote:Was the FISA court lying when it documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes?
Are all those many sources I mentioned lying?
Why don't you answer those questions?
Do they link to Sputnik when they post propaganda from them?Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2018 3:47 pm » wrote:If you honestly wanted to check this out, you'd take the time to read Gateway, which doesn't do reporting or investigating on its own.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:30 pm » wrote:That crap that you have posted a hundred times from Gatewaypundit is garbage.
I knew it had to be ****, so I finally decided to check it out.
It only cites other sources, and there are always links to those sources.
A journalist sacked by the Kremlin-funded Sputnik news network claimed that right-wing U.S. outlets regularly disseminate fake news and conspiracy theories touted by the site.
In an appearance on MSNBC’s The Beat with Ari Melber Tuesday, former White House correspondent Andrew Feinberg accused Sputnik of being “foreign propaganda, not news.”
He went on to claim that Sputnik’s influence on right-wing, pro-Trump, news websites is pervasive: “Many of the most popular articles about things like WikiLeaks and pizzagate and other conspiracy theories were prominently featured on the Sputnik website,” said Feinberg.
“And they get picked up by other American outlets – by Infowars, Breitbart and Gateway Pundit – right-wing media outlets, and Sputnik functions as part of this right-wing media ecosystem.”
http://www.newsweek.com/right-wing-us-n ... nik-664241
The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is a right-wing, far-right, pro-Trump website.
The website is known for publishing falsehoods and spreading hoaxes.
The Gateway Pundit has promoted false rumors about voter fraud and Hillary Clinton’s health.
In October 2017, The Gateway Pundit published an article falsely implicating an innocent person as the shooter in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting.
The article was promoted by Google as a "top story" for searches for his name.
Gateway Pundit asserted that New York Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi had reported that ISIS may have evidence that it was behind the shooting, but Callimachi rejected that she had ever made such an assertion.
In December 2017, Gateway Pundit published a reddit post as evidence that Democratic activists were committing voter fraud in the 2017 Alabama Senate special election.
The redditor behind the post later said that the post was intended "as an obvious troll."
When asked by the Washington Post, the writer of the Gateway Pundit post declined to say whether he had contacted the redditor to verify the information; later the Gateway Pundit story contained an update at the bottom: "Liberals say these are fake Reddit posts(?) Regardless, the posts are still up on Reddit and the posters are still encouraging Democrats to cheat."
Gateway Pundit published other falsehoods during the campaign for the Alabama Senate seat.
In January 2018, Gateway Pundit published a false story that Chuck Schumer received half a million dollars from pro-immigration groups just before a vote related to the United States federal government shutdown of 2018.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit
Speaking of looking like a fool, you're the imbecile who's trying to debate this not in the thread where my documentation is which you haven't read, but in your thread.Misty » 25 Jan 2018 3:56 pm » wrote:Of course not. You can't.
Because the FISA court NEVER 'documented very extensive abuses of power and many crimes.'
I proved that in my last post.
When are you going to stop trusting sites like Gatewaypundit that post distorted and misleading ****?
They make you look like a fool, not that you need much help in that.
FISA Court Finds "Serious Fourth Amendment Issue" In Obama's "Widespread" Illegal Searches Of American Citizens
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 05/24/2017 - 09:52
TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint
A newly released court order from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) found that the National Security Agency, under former President Obama, routinely violated American privacy protections while scouring through overseas intercepts and failed to disclose the extent of the problems until the final days before Donald Trump was elected president last fall. In describing the violations, the FISA court said the illegal searches conducted by the NSA under Obama were "widespread" and created a "very serious Fourth Amendment issue."
These new discoveries come from a recently unsealed FISA court document dated April 26, 2017 and center around a hearing dated October 26, 2017, just days before the 2016 election, in which the FISA court apparently learned for the first time of "widespread" and illegal spying on American citizens by the NSA under the Obama administration.
"The October 26, 2016 Notice disclosed that an NSA Inspector General (IG) review...indicated that, with greater frequency than previously disclosed to the Court, NSA analysts had used U.S.-person identifiers to query the result of Internet "upstream" collection, even though NSA's section 702 minimization procedures prohibited such queries...this disclosure gave the Court substantial concern."
.
.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-05- ... egal-searc