You nailed it.Termin8tor » 30 Jan 2018 7:17 pm » wrote:
The fascistic nature of the Left is even more dangerous than I'd ever thought.
Had Hillary won, not only would all of this been covered up, but the wrongdoing would have continued every worse.
It might well have been the long term destruction of our country as a true democracy.
Without exaggeration.
Look, a squirrel!Misty » 30 Jan 2018 6:22 pm » wrote:Stormy Daniels, Stormy Daniels, blah, blah
I'm paraphrasing somewhat.Misty » 30 Jan 2018 6:22 pm » wrote:Look at that woman's boobs!
Former US Attorney: IG Report Shows McCabe Made FBI Agents Fabricate Evidence – Implicates Obama’s Senior DOJ Officials (VIDEO)
January 30, 2018 by Jim Hoft 24 Comments
342Share36TweetEmail
Former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Joe diGenova and his partner and wife Victoria Toensing joined Lou Dobbs on Tuesday to discuss the growing Deep State scandal to protect Hillary Clinton and destroy candidate and President Donald Trump.
During tonight’s segment Joe DiGenova dropped another bomb on former Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe.
Joe diGenova: There’s going to be resolution. The memo from the House Intelligence Committee will be the start. Next will come the inspector general’s report from the Department of Justice which will devastating. Because it will show Andrew McCabe made FBI agents fabricate evidence to exonerate Hillary Clinton and then there’s going to be a federal grand jury to investigate the Obama administration’s senior Department of Justice officials and the senior members of the FBI.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01 ... als-video/
Could you get a bigger white flag to wave?Misty » 30 Jan 2018 8:21 am » wrote:If you wanna waste your time knock yourself out, but I have had enough of your crazy conspiracy theories and alternative facts.

Russia’s state television channel seems to be happy with President Donald Trump’s decision to not enforce sanctions against Russia that were overwhelmingly approved by both houses of Congress.
Julia Davis, who runs the Russian Media Monitor website, reports via Twitter that Russian TV show host Olga Skabeeva on Tuesday was positively gushing about the White House’s decision to not enforce new sanctions against her country.
“Seemingly, Trump is ours again,” said Skabeeva, according to Davis’ translation. “So far, he’s being quiet and not supporting the sanctions.”
Co-host Evgeny Popov seemingly agreed and told her, “Well, it seems that way.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/01/trump- ... ssion=true
Look at this stunning idiocy.Misty » 31 Jan 2018 12:30 pm » wrote:"Trump is ours again!" Russian TV host celebrates after WH refuses to enforce new sanctions.

Quite possibly. Grave questions have been raised about both.Misty » 31 Jan 2018 1:44 pm » wrote:So Christopher Wray and Rod Rosenstein both 45 appointees are now part of the Deep State?![]()
You're too utterly dishonest to acknowledge that almost everything on Gateway comes from other highly credible sources.I refuse to post the link to Gateway Pundit.

Say, speaking of wild conspiracy theories, what ever happened to that vast Russian collaboration conspiracy about which the corrupt liberal MSM "reported" for over a year?Misty » 31 Jan 2018 1:39 pm » wrote:Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft is already spreading conspiracy theories that the GOP train crash was domestic left-wing terrorism.
This is why Gateway Pundit, which is used as a source here all the time, is not credible.
That's irrelevant if crimes were later committed, like using a Hillary Clinton-funded dossier of lies and smear to re-authorize it.Misty » 31 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote:I wonder if the memo mentions the fact that the original FISA warrant was issued on Carter Page two years before the campaign, because he was being recruited by Russian spies?
The FISA court would not have renewed it without probable cause.
Another lie.Trump on hot mic says he'll release memo.
Schmoozing in the House chamber after delivering his maiden State of the Union speech, a hot mic caught President Donald Trump telling a Republican lawmaker that he was "100 percent" in favor of making public a classified Republican intelligence memo.
The White House had said earlier Tuesday that it would conduct a legal and national security review before Trump decides whether to release the memo.
What makes you think they are his own people.Misty » 31 Jan 2018 3:27 pm » wrote:
Another lie.
Seems his mind is already made up about it without any legal or national security review.
Christopher Wray and Rod Rosenstein have serious issues with the memos, so will he ignore his own people?
If a conservative changes his mind, has a second opinion or is wrong about the time of day, little Miss Marxist, psychopathic liar, slaps the "lie" label on it.Misty » 31 Jan 2018 3:27 pm » wrote:Another lie.
Seems his mind is already made up about it without any legal or national security review.
Christopher Wray and Rod Rosenstein have serious issues with the memos, so will he ignore his own people?
'DESPITE FIERCE OPPOSITION, JOHN KELLY SAYS INTEL MEMO TO BE RELEASED ‘PRETTY QUICK’Misty » 31 Jan 2018 3:27 pm » wrote:
Another lie.
Seems his mind is already made up about it without any legal or national security review.
Christopher Wray and Rod Rosenstein have serious issues with the memos, so will he ignore his own people?
I guess that's a yes then.Devin Nunes Won't Say If He Worked With White House on Anti-FBI Memo
The Republican chairman of the House intelligence committee refused to answer when a colleague asked him if he had coordinated his incendiary surveillance memo with the White House, The Daily Beast has learned.
During Monday’s contentious closed-door committee meeting, Rep. Mike Quigley, a Democrat, asked Nunes point-blank if his staffers had been talking with the White House as they compiled a four-page memo alleging FBI and Justice Department abuses over surveillance of President Trump’s allies in the Russia probe.
According to sources familiar with the exchange, Nunes made a few comments that didn’t answer the question—initially saying that “as far as I know,” he did not collaborate with the White House on the memo—before finally responding that he wouldn’t answer it.
The transcript of the meeting, released the day after this story was initially published, shows Quigley asking “with the greatest respect” if the White House aided Nunes in any way, including consulting with him on the memo.
Nunes initially replied: “I would just answer, as far as I know, no.”
He continued, “And I would just also say that we are well aware the minority has not wanted to conduct this investigation by the public opposition to the subpoenas that we issued back in August that were clearly looking into matters of FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] abuse and other matters.”
Quigley asked Nunes if that meant “none of the staff members that worked for the majority had any consultation, communication at all with the White House?”
Nunes shut Quigley down: “The chair is not going to entertain–” after which Quigley yielded.
Russian collusion isn't a crime and requires no justice.....so how could he obstruct it?Misty » 31 Jan 2018 5:23 pm » wrote: I guess that's a yes then.
Nunes once again carrying water for the WH just like he did with his little midnight run stunt.
If he is working with the WH on this, that sounds pretty much like a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
You don't have to be charged with any underlying crime to be charged with obstruction.Bigsky » 31 Jan 2018 5:34 pm » wrote:Russian collusion isn't a crime and requires no justice.....so how could he obstruct it?
Bigsky » 31 Jan 2018 5:34 pm » wrote:your side on the other hand....wow the **** yer precious Obama was pulling....jeesuz, your defense of him has lost you all credibility.....trump should have had the marines arrest him, Hillary, the entire justice dept and the exec level cia and fbi.....just **** arrest them and kill them in hitlers gas chamber in ouchwitches....
I think you are going to find that that investigation was illegally conductedMisty » 31 Jan 2018 6:35 pm » wrote: You don't have to be charged with any underlying crime to be charged with obstruction.
Interfering with an investigation (obstruction) is in itself a crime.