Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 865 866 867 868 869 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
1 Feb 2018 6:30 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Former Trump legal team spokesman plans to tell Mueller that Hope Hicks hinted at concealing explosive emails about the Trump Tower Russia meeting.

Mark Corallo, the former spokesman of President Donald Trump's legal team, plans to tell the special counsel Robert Mueller that a key White House aide may have sought to obstruct justice last year.

According to The New York Times, Corallo plans to describe a conference call with the White House communications director, Hope Hicks, and Trump last year in which Hicks may have hinted at concealing crucial emails that are relevant to the Russia investigation.

The emails were related to a June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, between several Russia-linked individuals and members of the Trump campaign, that is under heavy scrutiny from Mueller and congressional investigators.
Apparently Mark Corallo was so concerned that he was witnessing an attempt to obstruct justice, that he resigned.

I would ask my buddy Clem why he thinks that 45 went to such lengths to concoct a story that the Trump Tower meeting with Russians was about adoption, if he had nothing to hide.
But he won't answer that question, so I won't bother.
User avatar
Nobody
1 Feb 2018 6:49 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:49 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
The conspiracy theories surrounding FBI agent Peter Strzok may have just taken a big blow.

It turns out that the FBI agent who many conservatives believe secretly plotted to take down President Donald Trump may have actually helped get the president elected.

CNN has obtained emails that show that FBI agent Peter Strzok co-wrote the first draft of the letter that then-FBI Director James Comey sent to Congress in October 2016, announcing that the bureau was reopening an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails.

That letter set off a political firestorm just 11 days before the presidential election and hurt Clinton at the polls — so much so that it may have swung the election in favor of Trump.

This development potentially throws a wrench in conservative theories that Strzok sought to undermine Trump in the run-up to the election, and that special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation is tainted by anti-Trump bias.

And according to a source familiar with Strzok’s thinking, CNN reports, the former FBI agent not only drafted the letter about reopening Clinton’s email server investigation, but also supported reopening the investigation.
Well there goes that theory.
User avatar
roadkill
1 Feb 2018 6:51 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:51 pm
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 6:49 pm » wrote:
Well there goes that theory.
CNN :rofl:


In other news...


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... n=20180201
User avatar
Bigsky
1 Feb 2018 6:53 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:53 pm
User avatar
  
170 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 6:49 pm » wrote:
Well there goes that theory.
weird eh...dems cant win even when they cheat...the guy is an adulterer....and WROTE IN TEXT THAT HE HAD AN INSURANCE POLICY TO KEEP TRUMP OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE...it isn't our fault he is a klutz....
User avatar
Huey
1 Feb 2018 6:55 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:55 pm
User avatar
      
35,649 posts
If you keep it up she will resort to baby trump humping the wall.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
roadkill
1 Feb 2018 6:56 pm
1 Feb 2018 6:56 pm
User avatar
      
21,743 posts
Huey » 01 Feb 2018 6:55 pm » wrote:
If you keep it up she will resort to baby trump humping the wall.
It's OK...she needs the excitement. :drool:
User avatar
Huey
1 Feb 2018 7:03 pm
1 Feb 2018 7:03 pm
User avatar
      
35,649 posts
roadkill » 01 Feb 2018 6:56 pm » wrote:
Huey » 01 Feb 2018 6:55 pm » wrote:
If you keep it up she will resort to baby trump humping the wall.
It's OK...she needs the excitement. :drool:

Considering she voted for trillion dollar stimulus packages then jumped on the it wasn’t enough bandwagon you would think she would be pleased at the moment. Throw in amnesty for 2 million illegals and paid family leave should send send her into a tizzy.

I think she is confused more than is normal. Those are things that a democrat would support.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 7:26 pm
1 Feb 2018 7:26 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 3:36 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 01 Feb 2018 2:36 pm » wrote:Look at the cowardly liar.

A minor ethics problem happens frequently in any administration.

You babble about things like that while dishonestly denying huge abuses of power and felonies by your party.
That jackass is so **** predictable.
A 'minor ethics problem.'
:rofl: :clap: :rofl: :clap: :rofl: :clap:

Using one's government position to enrich yourself or your family is NOT a 'minor ethics problem.'
It's called corruption.
Well I'm very, very happy that you've finally admitted that the Clinton's are deeply corrupt. :rofl: :rofl:

The official you cited used HER OWN MONEY to invest.

The Clinton's sold government access and government favors, i.e. taxpayer money, to make themselves worth 100's of millions of dollars.

Who do you bleat about in fake outrage? The absolutely minor ethical problem.
But I guess it only matters when a Democrat does it.
45 could be caught with a dead hooker or a live boy in his bed and you pinheads would call that a 'minor problem.'
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
You're the one who told years of lies in defense of a serial rapist and smeared his victim.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 7:30 pm
1 Feb 2018 7:30 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Uh, no. Confusion and incompetence in an attempt to obstruct justice is still illegal, Dim.

A former FBI Assistant Director called the Hillary server investigation "a sham investigation;" that FBI procedures were not only not followed, but that granting immunity to witnesses and possible suspects was an egregious ethical violation.

Former Independent Counsel Joe DiGenova said tonight that the FBI's 7th floor is "full of dirty cops" and so is the Obama/Clinton Justice Dept.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 7:34 pm
1 Feb 2018 7:34 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 6:30 pm » wrote:Apparently Mark Corallo was so concerned that he was witnessing an attempt to obstruct justice, that he resigned.

I would ask my buddy Clem why he thinks that 45 went to such lengths to concoct a story that the Trump Tower meeting with Russians was about adoption, if he had nothing to hide.
But he won't answer that question, so I won't bother.
I've answered that question several times, liar.

There was nothing illegal about any such meeting, any more than it was illegal for Hillary Clinton and her campaign to meet with Ukrainian officials to get dirt and smears of Trump.

Nor was it illegal for Hillary and her campaign to pay Steele to create a pack of Russian-fed lies about Trump, which is why she and her campaign hid both.

But there is political embarrassment.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 9:43 pm
1 Feb 2018 9:43 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 31 Jan 2018 5:23 pm » wrote: I guess that's a yes then.
Nunes once again carrying water for the WH just like he did with his little midnight run stunt.
If he is working with the WH on this, that sounds pretty much like a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
We are watching the exposure what was an attempted coup, although I don't believe Mueller was part of it; just the vehicle.
GOP case: FBI probe based on tainted evidence linked to Clinton
BY JOHN SOLOMON
Congressional Republicans are seeking to make the case that the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s campaign and possible collusion with Russia was based on flawed or politically tainted evidence connected to partisans loyal to Hillary Clinton.
The House Intelligence Committee memo spearheaded by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) that is the talk of Washington will be at the center of the argument. The release of that four-page memo is expected as early as Friday.


Another document — an eight-page criminal referral filed with the Justice Department by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — is also part of the GOP case....


Republicans believe both documents will back up arguments that evidence used to justify the FBI’s probe came from partisans loyal to Clinton, sources said. They are also expected to play into arguments from some Republicans that special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russia is based on false information.....


The GOP's arguments that the FBI investigated on flimsy evidence will zero in on ex-British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, whose unverified dossier of Trump allegations gave enormous momentum to the probe during the bitterly fought 2016 presidential election, say sources familiar with the memo.


They will argue the FBI failed to critically assess the political motives and credibility of Steele and did not fully disclose that evidence came from Clinton supporters as it sought to get permission from courts for surveillance warrants.


“The fact that half to three-quarters of the evidence the FBI used to unleash the most awesome of surveillance powers upon Donald Trump’s inner circle came from sources tied directly to his Democratic opponent should worry us all, especially when that happened during an election,”
said one senior Republican directly familiar with the evidence, describing the party’s core concerns.


“The FBI allowed itself to be used by Clinton partisans to parlay single-sourced, mostly unverified evidence into a counterintelligence probe with clear weaknesses that weren’t disclosed,” the source added.

The GOP's arguments that the FBI investigated on flimsy evidence will zero in on ex-British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, whose unverified dossier of Trump allegations gave enormous momentum to the probe during the bitterly fought 2016 presidential election, say sources familiar with the memo.


They will argue the FBI failed to critically assess the political motives and credibility of Steele and did not fully disclose that evidence came from Clinton supporters as it sought to get permission from courts for surveillance warrants.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... to-clinton
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 9:53 pm
1 Feb 2018 9:53 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 6:30 pm » wrote:
According to The New York Times, Corallo plans to describe a conference call with the White House communications director, Hope Hicks, and Trump last year in which Hicks may have hinted at concealing crucial emails that are relevant to the Russia investigation.
Apparently Mark Corallo was so concerned that he was witnessing an attempt to obstruct justice, that he resigned.

I would ask my buddy Clem why he thinks that 45 went to such lengths to concoct a story that the Trump Tower meeting with Russians was about adoption, if he had nothing to hide.
But he won't answer that question, so I won't bother.
I took a closer look at your citation.


Wow, "may have hinted it." :huh:

"May have."

"Hinted at."

That's what you think is a huge piece of breaking evidence, Dim?

And what was this meeting about? Perhaps lying -- to journalists. As Andrew McCarthy noted about this, it isn't a crime to lie to journalists. :clap:

Impeach! Impeach! :rofl: :rofl:

You're painfully stupid.
User avatar
Nobody
1 Feb 2018 10:03 pm
1 Feb 2018 10:03 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Image
Image

That's funny.
I thought the WH said that McCabe was not fired.

Also I believe that some ARE arguing that it's factually inaccurate.

45's FBI Director said that he has "grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy."

That kind of sounds like he's saying that it is factually inaccurate.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 10:33 pm
1 Feb 2018 10:33 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 10:03 pm » wrote:That's funny.
I thought the WH said that McCabe was not fired.

Also I believe that some ARE arguing that it's factually inaccurate.
Oh my gosh, a slight semantic difference between statements! :o

Impeach! Impeach! Impeach! :rofl: :rofl:

45's FBI Director said that he has "grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy."

That kind of sounds like he's saying that it is factually inaccurate.
Rotsa ruck selling that to mainstream Americans. :clap:

This memo is only around 10 to 15% of what will ultimately be revealed, and add the IG's report on top of all that. :)
User avatar
Nobody
1 Feb 2018 10:35 pm
1 Feb 2018 10:35 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
This article is from September, 2016 which shows that Carter Page was on the radar of intelligence officials before 45 was briefed on the Steele dossier in January, 2017 and before it became public.
U.S. intel officials probe ties between Trump adviser and Kremlin

U.S. intelligence officials are seeking to determine whether an American businessman identified by Donald Trump as one of his foreign policy advisers has opened up private communications with senior Russian officials — including talks about the possible lifting of economic sanctions if the Republican nominee becomes president, according to multiple sources who have been briefed on the issue.

The activities of Trump adviser Carter Page, who has extensive business interests in Russia, have been discussed with senior members of Congress during recent briefings about suspected efforts by Moscow to influence the presidential election, the sources said.

After one of those briefings, Senate minority leader Harry Reid wrote FBI Director James Comey, citing reports of meetings between a Trump adviser (a reference to Page) and “high ranking sanctioned individuals” in Moscow over the summer as evidence of “significant and disturbing ties” between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin that needed to be investigated by the bureau.
[.......]
Page came to the attention of officials at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow several years ago when he showed up in the Russian capital during several business trips and made provocative public comments critical of U.S. policy and sympathetic to Putin. “He was pretty much a brazen apologist for anything Moscow did,” said one U.S. official who served in Russia at the time.
[.......]
Page showed up again in Moscow in early July, just two weeks before the Republican National Convention formally nominated Trump for president, and once again criticized U.S. policy.

At the time, Page declined to say whether he was meeting with Russian officials during his trip, according to a Reuters report.

But U.S. officials have since received intelligence reports that during that same three-day trip, Page met with Igor Sechin, a longtime Putin associate and former Russian deputy prime minister who is now the executive chairman of Rosneft, Russian’s leading oil company, a well-placed Western intelligence source tells Yahoo News.

That meeting, if confirmed, is viewed as especially problematic by U.S. officials because the Treasury Department in August 2014 named Sechin to a list of Russian officials and businessmen sanctioned over Russia’s “illegitimate and unlawful actions in the Ukraine.”
So it looks like intelligence officials had every right to look into Carter Page.
Not to mention the fact that in 2014 a FISA warrant was issued on Carter Page because he was cavorting with three Russian spies who were attempting to recruit him.

That FISA warrant has probably been renewed several times since 2014.
Only now when Rod Rosenstein renewed it has it become a big scandal.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 10:51 pm
1 Feb 2018 10:51 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 10:35 pm » wrote:This article is from September, 2016 which shows that Carter Page was on the radar of intelligence officials before 45 was briefed on the Steele dossier in January, 2017 and before it became public.

So it looks like intelligence officials had every right to look into Carter Page.
Not to mention the fact that in 2014 a FISA warrant was issued on Carter Page because he was cavorting with three Russian spies who were attempting to recruit him.

That FISA warrant has probably been renewed several times since 2014.
Only now when Rod Rosenstein renewed it has it become a big scandal.
Except that Trump and officials were being surveilled well after Page had left the White House, and far broader.

How can that be justified, if Page wasn't there?

Not to mention, the Steele Dossier, a collection mostly of lies, smears and unverified rumors and paid for by a political campaign, was used as 3/4 of the justification for some FISA warrant.

I'm quite sure that's a federal crime.
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 11:10 pm
1 Feb 2018 11:10 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 01 Feb 2018 10:35 pm » wrote:This article is from September, 2016 which shows that Carter Page was on the radar of intelligence officials before 45 was briefed on the Steele dossier in January, 2017 and before it became public.
Except that I haven't seen anyone decrying that, psycho, so what's your point?

Look, a squirrel! :\

What was the fake Steele Dossier used for?

Why would FBI agents present highly shaky if not false document paid for by a presidential candidate to a FISA court?

Sounds like a federal crime. :)
User avatar
Termin8tor
1 Feb 2018 11:16 pm
1 Feb 2018 11:16 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 31 Jan 2018 2:38 pm » wrote:I wonder if the memo mentions the fact that the original FISA warrant was issued on Carter Page two years before the campaign, because he was being recruited by Russian spies?

The FISA court would not have renewed it without probable cause.
You think the fake Steele Dossier was probable cause? You're obviously not a lawyer. :rofl: :rofl:

But don't worry, things will calm down soon; in two or three years. :clap:
Dan Siddons
@SiddonsDan
.@MonicaCrowley: "This is the first of several memos. As bad as bad as this memo might be, my understanding is that there is worse coming down the pike." #ReleaseTheMemo
10:27 AM - Feb 1, 2018
.
Run for your lives, Dems! :clap:
User avatar
Nobody
2 Feb 2018 12:27 am
2 Feb 2018 12:27 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Image
A U.S. Army veteran and green card holder with a felony drug conviction began a hunger strike Wednesday to protest his likely deportation, after a federal court denied his appeal to remain in the U.S., where he has lived since age 8.

Miguel Perez Jr., 39, a Chicago resident who served two tours of duty in Afghanistan and recently finished a prison term on a drug conviction, had sought to remain in the U.S., arguing his life would be in danger if he were deported to Mexico, where drug cartels target veterans with combat experience to work on their behalf, or else.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... ssion=true
Image
User avatar
Nobody
2 Feb 2018 12:29 am
2 Feb 2018 12:29 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
1 865 866 867 868 869 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 2374 users online :: 9 registered, 17 bots, and 2348 guests
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, MicroMessenger, DuckDuckBot, ADmantX, Feedfetcher-Google, proximic, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, okhttp, facebookexternalhit, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, curl/7, Baiduspider
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search