Liberal Forum

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:56 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 10 Feb 2018 6:02 am » wrote:

Misty » 09 Feb 2018 10:37 pm » wrote: Do you have a link for Comey saying that?

You admit you refuse to read any of the sources in my threads, but now you want me to spend time chasing info for you?
You're kidding, right?

So **** predictable.
You spit out some **** and when asked to prove it you do a song and a dance about either how you've posted it many, many times in the past, or you don't have time to prove your ****.

You're on this forum 24/7.
WTF else do you have to do?

The FBI report said that her private server was not hacked.
I posted it in this thread last night, but I'm not going to spend my time chasing info for you.
You will refuse to read it anyway.

There you go.
Two can play that game.

Termin8tor » 10 Feb 2018 6:06 am » wrote:

Misty » 09 Feb 2018 10:37 pm » wrote:

FBI: No evidence Clinton’s email was hacked by foreign powers, but it could have been.The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server found no evidence that her communications were hacked while she was secretary of state, but it made clear that “hostile actors” here and abroad could have done so

I could have been born with two heads and six arms, but I wasn't.

Why are you quoting the corrupt Washington Post that claimed for over a year that Trump collaborated with Russia?

Misty » 09 Feb 2018 11:51 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 09 Feb 2018 10:31 am » wrote:The Democrat Talking Point Liar who told years of lies in defense of a serial rapist is now attacking a man of high integrity for one apparent mistake.

Do you know what your dear leader said about that "serial rapist?"

He said that Bill Clinton was a 'victim.'

And he dismissed and mocked his accusers, calling them 'a terrible group of people' who were 'losers' and said they were 'truly an unattractive cast of characters.'

So the next time you accuse me of defending that 'serial rapist' you might want to think about that.

I never said anything like that about any of those women, and I sure as hell never called Bubba a victim.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 3:03 am » wrote: The BLOTUS you worship and adore defended Rob Porter, the wife beater yesterday, and not one word about the victims.

He defended Roy Moore, a child molester who preyed on young girls, and not one word about the victims.

He defended Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly who sexually harassed countless women, and not one word about the victims.

And he also defended convicted rapist Mike Tyson, but in that case, he did say something about the victim.
He blamed her and said that because he saw her smiling the next day, that must mean that she wasn't raped.

So when it comes to the abuse of women, he always takes the side of the abuser and not the victims.

That's because he is an abuser of women himself who called all of the women who accused him of touching them inappropriately liars.

Termin8tor » 09 Feb 2018 10:31 am » wrote:The Democrat Talking Point Liar who told years of lies in defense of a serial rapist.

Donald Trump used to make light of Bill Clinton's sex scandals. Now they're his main weapon.

Under fire for his hot-mic comments in which he boasts about forcing himself upon women, Donald Trump is now signaling he will go after Hillary Clinton during tonight's presidential debate for her husband's past sex scandals.

When Bill Clinton's sex scandals were still fresh back in the 1990s, however, Trump took a much different approach to discussing them — expressing sympathy for Hillary Clinton, defending Bill Clinton and dismissing his accusers, and in one interview with Howard Stern, making light of Bill Clinton's infidelity.

Already this election season, Trump has called Bill Clinton the "greatest woman abuser of all time" and pointed the finger at Hillary Clinton for what he has described as enabling her husband's sexual misdeeds and attacking the women who came forward against him.

"She's been the total enabler. She would go after these women and destroy their lives," Trump said at a campaign rally in May.

"She was an unbelievably nasty, mean enabler, and what she did to a lot of those women is disgraceful."

Speaking with Wolf Blitzer in November 1999 in video reviewed by CNN's KFile, Trump said Hillary Clinton had been through more public controversy than any women should have to bear.

"I think she's gone through terrible times," Trump told Blitzer in the interview.

"I think she's been through more than any woman should have to bear — everything public.

I mean, women go through this on a private basis and can't take it, she's on the front page of every newspaper every week with what went on in Washington."

A month before, in an interview with CNBC, Trump expressed a similar sentiment about Hillary Clinton and blasted the independent investigator Ken Starr as "a total wacko."

"I think she's a very, very good person," Trump said of Clinton.

"I think she's had a very tough life the last few years.

I mean, what could be tougher than that?

I mean, can you imagine those evenings when he's just being lambasted by this crazy Ken Starr, who is a total wacko?

There's the guy. I mean, he is totally off his rocker.

And can you imagine being lambasted like that all day and then saying, 'Darling, what are we having for dinner?'

It's gotta be pretty tough."

Trump also repeatedly dismissed and at times mocked Bill Clinton's accusers.

In a 2008 interview with CNN, Trump called the Lewinsky scandal "totally unimportant" and said it was "nonsense" that Republicans tried to impeach him.

In another interview, with CNBC in 1998 and first unearthed by the Washington Post, Trump called Clinton accuser Paula Jones "a loser."

In August 1998, Trump again dismissed Jones, and said Bill Clinton was actually the victim.

"I don't necessarily agree with his victims," Trump said to Fox News' Neil Cavuto in a clip uncovered earlier in the year by the "Daily Beast."

"His victims are terrible.

He is, he is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position."

"These people are just, I don't know, where he met them - where he found them," Trump continued.

"But the whole group — it's truly an unattractive cast of characters.

Linda Tripp, Lucianne Goldberg, I mean, this woman, I watch her on television. She is so bad.

The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical."

roadkill » 10 Feb 2018 8:18 pm » wrote:

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:14 pm » wrote:You mean like the time he bought some kid a bicycle and bragged about it endlessly on Twiiter?

No...other times where he helped people in quality substantive ways.
I guess you miss those examples.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 10:04 pm » wrote:

roadkill » 10 Feb 2018 8:18 pm » wrote:

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:14 pm » wrote:You mean like the time he bought some kid a bicycle and bragged about it endlessly on Twiiter?

No...other times where he helped people in quality substantive ways.
I guess you miss those examples.

And yet you can't seem to post one example.


45 is famous for pledging donations to charity, and then forgetting to send the check.

His charitable foundation was a sham.

It was not even registered as a charity, he put none of his own money into it, and in 2015 he admitted to the IRS that he engaged in self dealing (using money from the foundation to buy goodies for himself).

I'm always amazed at how little you Trump Fluffers actually know about the man you worship so much.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 10:04 pm » wrote: And yet you can't seem to post one example.


45 is famous for pledging donations to charity, and then forgetting to send the check.

His charitable foundation was a sham.

It was not even registered as a charity, he put none of his own money into it, and in 2015 he admitted to the IRS that he engaged in self dealing (using money from the foundation to buy goodies for himself).

I'm always amazed at how little you Trump Fluffers actually know about the man you worship so much.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:22 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 10 Feb 2018 5:52 am » wrote:The two guys were fired.

In total contrast, you and your party told years of lies on behalf of a serial rapist /serial felon and kept him in office.

The SCROTUS that you worship is the one who called Bill Clinton a victim

He also defended a wife beater again today.


But you ignored that too.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 9:29 pm » wrote:Since Clem knows 45 so well, maybe he can tell me which version is true.
What he said about Bill and Hillary Clinton in the 90's or what he said about them in 2016.

So riddle me this Puss......

Was Donald Trump telling the truth in the 90's when he said that Bill Clinton was a "victim" of a bunch of "terrible" women and expressed sympathy for Hillary, or was he telling the truth in 2016, when after he himself was accused by many women of sexual misconduct, said that Bill Clinton is the "greatest woman abuser of all time" and called Hillary his 'enabler?'

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:22 pm » wrote:He also defended a wife beater again today.



But you ignored that too.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:42 pm » wrote:You mean like you are doing by constantly changing the subject to Obama or the Clintons?

Termin8tor » 12 Feb 2018 9:18 am » wrote:

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:42 pm » wrote:You mean like you are doing by constantly changing the subject to Obama or the Clintons?

Why do you keep ignoring the evidence I've presented of the massive abuse of power by Obama, HRC and their corrupt officials?

indago » 12 Feb 2018 10:34 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 12 Feb 2018 9:18 am » wrote:Why do you keep ignoring the evidence I've presented of the massive abuse of power by Obama, HRC and their corrupt officials?

Termin8tor

"THE SKY IS FALLING" . . "THE SKY IS FALLING"

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 10:04 pm » wrote:I'm always amazed at how little you Trump Fluffers actually know about the man you worship so much.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 9:29 pm » wrote: So riddle me this Puss......'

BOOM! Judicial Watch President: CIA Laundered Clinton-DNC Dossier Into White House Intel Briefing – It’s Time to Question Obama
February 12, 2018 by Jim Hoft
Chairman of the House Intel Committee, Devin Nunes plans to investigate former CIA Director John Brennan and other Obama officials for their role in promoting Hillary’s phony dossier.

According to investigative reporter, Paul Sperry, Chairman Nunes is also investigating whether Brennan perjured himself in a public testimony about the dossier.

This morning former secret service agent Dan Bongino told FOX and Friends John Brennan is in a world of trouble:

Dan Bongino: My sources are telling me John Brennan is in a world of trouble right now! In May of 2017 Brennan said under oath on the hill, “Oh, I didn’t know who commissioned the dossier. Which is amazing! Because the CIA has a central role in the verification of foreign assets and information we get from foreign assets. It is not plausibly deniable that John Brennan did not know who commissioned that dossier. He’s in a world of trouble because he raised his right hand and he said the exact opposite…

Judicial Watch founder and president Tom Fitton says it is time to question Obama on what he knew about his administration spying on Donald Trump.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02 ... ion-obama/

Ricky Tavy » 12 Feb 2018 11:06 am » wrote:
Draining the swamp? Well, perhaps ...

Thirty-seven administration officials who’ve resigned or been fired under Trump

Fired Sally Yates. Deputy attorney general. Days with administration: 11. Refused to enforce Trump’s entry ban. Preet Bharara. U.S. attorney. Days with administration: 51. Part of purge of U.S. attorneys. James B. Comey. FBI director. Days with administration: 110. Allegedly pressured by Trump to scale down investigations.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:56 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 10 Feb 2018 6:02 am » wrote:You admit you refuse to read any of the sources in my threads, but now you want me to spend time chasing info for you?

You're kidding, right?

Comey didn't "say" it. It was in the memo he was writing, then someone cut it out. Another phrase "gross negligence" was cut out that would have made it crystal clear that Hillary had violated the law. Those words are in the actual law.

Comey and high officials in the FBI very likely obstructed justice.

So **** predictable.
You spit out some **** and when asked to prove it you do a song and a dance about either how you've posted it many, many times in the past, or you don't have time to prove your ****.

The FBI report said that her private server was not hacked.
I posted it in this thread last night, but I'm not going to spend my time chasing info for you.
You will refuse to read it anyway.

There you go.
Two can play that game.

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:56 pm » wrote:The FBI report said that her private server was not hacked.
I posted it in this thread last night, but I'm not going to spend my time chasing info for you.
You will refuse to read it anyway.

There you go.
Two can play that game.

Have the Cubans Broken into Hillary Clinton’s E-Mail?
Obama’s friends Fidel & Raul Castro may have gotten valuable info through her carelessness.
By Frank Calzon — November 7, 2016
Hillary Clinton was right when, a few weeks ago, she accused Russia of breaking into her e-mail server. There is more to the story, however, as Fox News reported last Thursday: “There’s about a 99 percent chance that up to five foreign intelligence agencies may have accessed and taken emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... ked-it-too

Misty » 10 Feb 2018 8:14 pm » wrote: You mean like the time he bought some kid a bicycle and bragged about it endlessly on Twiiter?

Democrats ought to worry about the midterm elections
Jen Kerns By Jen Kerns | Fox News
The collapse of Democrats’ popularity on the much-ballyhooed generic ballot foreshadows tough midterm elections for them in November.


Until this week, pundits nearly everywhere favored Democrats to win ...


The latest responses are very troubling for Democrats.


New polling shows that Democrats have lost their recent 15-point lead over Republicans, dropping to only a two-point lead
for a critical election they had hoped to paint as a referendum on President Trump and writ large, Republicans.


However, historically speaking, the news is more daunting for Democrats. Compared to where they stood in the 2014 midterm elections, Democrats are actually faring worse at this point than they were then.


In the 2014 midterms, Democrats were ahead on the generic ballot by an impressive eight points most of the year. However their lead eventually vanished, and Republicans ultimately trounced them at the ballot box, retook the U.S. Senate and won a big majority of seats in the House of Representatives.


By comparison, Democrats’ current poll numbers also rate worse than their generic ballot ranking in the 2010 midterms.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/02/ ... tions.html