Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 90 91 92 93 94 1,190
User avatar
RichClem
4 Jun 2011 8:47 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Speaking of retards, what kind of utter imbecile wouldn't think it highly important that Clinton is a rapist/ serial felon, and that Democrats stand by him to this day?You still stand by Bush, doncha, retard?Way to deflect from my question. What kind of utter imbecile wouldn't think it highly important that Clinton is a rapist/ serial felon, and that Democrats stand by him to this day?Answer the question, moonbat.Regarding your non-point, Bush didn't commit those crimes, nor did he sanction them, duuh.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jun 2011 9:06 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
Way to deflect from my question. What kind of utter imbecile wouldn't think it highly important that Clinton is a rapist/ serial felon, and that Democrats stand by him to this day?Answer the question, moonbat.Regarding your non-point, Bush didn't commit those crimes, nor did he sanction them, duuh.Rich, you glory-hole frequenting, child molesting little freak, what evidence do you have that clinton commited the crimes you accuse him of? I know you for a serial molester of young boys, but I have no evidence.
User avatar
RichClem
4 Jun 2011 9:15 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Way to deflect from my question. What kind of utter imbecile wouldn't think it highly important that Clinton is a rapist/ serial felon, and that Democrats stand by him to this day?Answer the question, moonbat.Regarding your non-point, Bush didn't commit those crimes, nor did he sanction them, duuh.Rich, you glory-hole frequenting, child molesting little freak, what evidence do you have that clinton commited the crimes you accuse him of? I've cited the evidence so many times, little Miss Marxist has needed intense therapy.The evidence was strong enough that many Clinton supporters believed it including members of the media.I know you for a serial molester of young boys, but I have no evidence.If you didn't have obscenity-filled bulls***, you wouldn't even exist.
Oldschool
4 Jun 2011 9:22 am
Oldschool
posts
Rich, you glory-hole frequenting, child molesting little freak, what evidence do you have that clinton commited the crimes you accuse him of? I know you for a serial molester of young boys, but I have no evidence.Come on now, Rich hasn't been able to get it up since 2008.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jun 2011 9:41 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
Come on now, Rich hasn't been able to get it up since 2008.He molests them by sucking on their asses.
User avatar
RichClem
4 Jun 2011 9:44 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Come on now, Rich hasn't been able to get it up since 2008.He molests them by sucking on their asses.Is this the best you pathetic moonbats can come up with?Talk about running on empty.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jun 2011 9:45 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
I've cited the evidence so many times, little Miss Marxist has needed intense therapy.The evidence was strong enough that many Clinton supporters believed it including members of the media.That's funny. I saw a well-meaning con challenge you to present the evidence, and all you did was flame the guy. The funny thing was, the con WANTED to believe you. He WANTED the evidence on Clinton.You had nothing. And now, when challenged, you make reference to having posted it some other day, in some other thread. But you produce nothing. As obssessed as you are with this subject, one would expect a catalogued, referenced, notated body of evidence ready for pasting. That you have no such documentation demonstrates that you are just living in your own little world.Talk about running on empty.By the way - I consider clinton a criminal murderer for dropping bombs on civilians in serbia. I'm perfectly willing to consider evidence against him, or any other politician.You just don't HAVE any.
User avatar
RichClem
4 Jun 2011 9:52 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
That's funny. I saw a well-meaning con challenge you to present the evidence, and all you did was flame the guy. The funny thing was, the con WANTED to believe you. He WANTED the evidence on Clinton.You had nothing. And now, when challenged, you make reference to having posted it some other day, in some other thread. But you produce nothing. As obssessed as you are with this subject, one would expect a catalogued, referenced, notated body of evidence ready for pasting. That you have no such documentation demonstrates that you are just living in your own little world.Talk about running on empty.By the way - I consider clinton a criminal murderer for dropping bombs on civilians in serbia. I'm perfectly willing to consider evidence against him, or any other politician.You just don't HAVE any.I don't have any? What, are you lying, or just plain stupid?I've started 2, 3 threads about it. How can you have been on the board without seeing the evidence I've cited over and over and over and over?"No evidence?" The victim appeared on national television.Get your head out of your a** once in a while, moonbat.And I don't care that you're an utter imbecile about Clinton, too.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jun 2011 10:03 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
I don't have any? What, are you lying, or just plain stupid?I've started 2, 3 threads about it. How can you have been on the board without seeing the evidence I've cited over and over and over and over?"No evidence?" The victim appeared on national television.Get your head out of your a** once in a while, moonbat.And I don't care that you're an utter imbecile about Clinton, too.Once again, when challenged for evidence, you call the one asking for evidence an idiot for wanting it - just as you have every other time anyone has asked to see the evidence. I'm not even asking for proof - just evidence. You have nothing, or you would readily produce it.
User avatar
RichClem
4 Jun 2011 10:10 am
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Once again, when challenged for evidence, you call the one asking for evidence an idiot for wanting it - just as you have every other time anyone has asked to see the evidence. I'm not even asking for proof - just evidence. You have nothing, or you would readily produce it.I "have nothing."Okay, if I produce evidence, will you admit you're a brainless troll?As if there was any doubt of that.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
4 Jun 2011 10:12 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
I "have nothing."Okay, if I produce evidence, will you admit you're a brainless troll?As if there was any doubt of that.No, dummy, if you produce evidence, I'll admit you have evidence. You would have to confess to your glory hole activites to get me to falsely label myself in exchange.
User avatar
Nobody
4 Jun 2011 11:35 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
WOW! That was an interesting exchange. Now onto my subject.......It seems that 10 year old Piper Palin said to a Times Magazine photographer, "Thanks for ruining our vacation."Now, I don't blame the poor child for that. After all, I'm sure it was her Mommy Dearest, the shameless attention whore, who probably told her that this little exursion was a family vacation.I'm sure when Piper is a little older, she will come to understand that when you go on a family vacation, it's usually in a station wagon, or an anonymous looking Winnebego, not a huge *** bus with a picture of the Constitution, the website of your Political Action Committee, and your signature on it.BTW, don't family vacations usuually take place after school ends for the summer? Why isn't Piper in school? Edited by MistyBlue, 04 June 2011 - 11:38 AM.
User avatar
Nobody
4 Jun 2011 2:00 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Medicare fraud criminal Governor Rick Scott of Florida campaigned as a 'small governent' Conservative.Over and over during his campaign he said that he was in favor of small 'leave-me alone' less intrusive government.However his actions since he took office would prove otherwise.Scott issued an executive order that will mandate forced drug testing of public sector workers in this state at least quarterly, despite the Fourth Amendment protection we have in this country against unreasonable search and seizure that has generally banned blanket invasive drug testing like this.This week, Scott signed a bill into law that would require people applying for welfare to be drug tested. The wasteful program created by this law subjects Floridians who are impacted by the economic downturn, as well as their families, to a humiliating search of their urine and body fluids without cause or even suspicion of drug abuse.Yesterday Scott also signed the first of five abortion-restricting bills passed by the state Legislature. The five bills, the rest of which Scott is also expected to sign, force women to undergo ultrasounds prior to having an abortion, prohibit private insurance coverage of abortion care in the new state health-insurance exchange, require young women to prove to a judge that they understand the medical risks of their abortions in order to bypass parental permission requirements, establish state-sanctioned license plates that funnel money to anti-choice "crisis pregnancy centers" and begin the process of amending the state constitution to prohibit the government funding of abortion.Florida Republicans filed a total of 18 bills to restrict abortion rights during the session -- the third most in the country, according to the ACLU, and twice the number of anti-choice laws introduced last year in the state, according to NARAL Pro-Choice America.Meanwhile on Thursday, Governor Rick Scott signed into law a bill that will restrict doctors' ability to ask patients whether they own firearms. I guess gun owners have a Constitutional right to privacy, but women don't.What about female gun owners? I guess they're only entitled to privacy concerning their weapons. Their uteruses are obviously exempt from that right. Edited by MistyBlue, 04 June 2011 - 02:02 PM.
User avatar
Nobody
4 Jun 2011 2:59 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
JoeLib
4 Jun 2011 3:27 pm
JoeLib
posts
I don't have any? What, are you lying, or just plain stupid?I've started 2, 3 threads about it. How can you have been on the board without seeing the evidence I've cited over and over and over and over?"No evidence?" The victim appeared on national television.Get your head out of your a** once in a while, moonbat.And I don't care that you're an utter imbecile about Clinton, too.Wow. All you have to do to be ironclad credible is to go on television.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
5 Jun 2011 8:55 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,753 posts
Medicare fraud criminal Governor Rick Scott of Florida campaigned as a 'small governent' Conservative.Over and over during his campaign he said that he was in favor of small 'leave-me alone' less intrusive government.However his actions since he took office would prove otherwise.Scott issued an executive order that will mandate forced drug testing of public sector workers in this state at least quarterly, despite the Fourth Amendment protection we have in this country against unreasonable search and seizure that has generally banned blanket invasive drug testing like this.This week, Scott signed a bill into law that would require people applying for welfare to be drug tested. The wasteful program created by this law subjects Floridians who are impacted by the economic downturn, as well as their families, to a humiliating search of their urine and body fluids without cause or even suspicion of drug abuse.You just don't understand socialism, republican-style. You see, the companies that produce these ersatz "drug tests" - tests which have an ABYSMAL fail rate, by the way - have an "in" with the governor. This is what these stupid republican shills on the board don;t get: their party is the party of socialism for the rich. This law is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth from the florida taxpayers to the company that has the "in" with the governor. Their cover-story is the old "law and order" bait and switch. Yesterday Scott also signed the first of five abortion-restricting bills passed by the state Legislature. The five bills, the rest of which Scott is also expected to sign, force women to undergo ultrasounds prior to having an abortion, prohibit private insurance coverage of abortion care in the new state health-insurance exchange, require young women to prove to a judge that they understand the medical risks of their abortions in order to bypass parental permission requirements, establish state-sanctioned license plates that funnel money to anti-choice "crisis pregnancy centers" and begin the process of amending the state constitution to prohibit the government funding of abortion.Florida Republicans filed a total of 18 bills to restrict abortion rights during the session -- the third most in the country, according to the ACLU, and twice the number of anti-choice laws introduced last year in the state, according to NARAL Pro-Choice America.Meanwhile on Thursday, Governor Rick Scott signed into law a bill that will restrict doctors' ability to ask patients whether they own firearms. I guess gun owners have a Constitutional right to privacy, but women don't.What about female gun owners? I guess they're only entitled to privacy concerning their weapons. Their uteruses are obviously exempt from that right. Part of that legislation is a bone to the medical community, which is one of the republicans' corporate sponsors, and which will make millions off of those ultra-sounds. The rest of it is face-saving, since the repubs were busted red handed paying for abortion coverage for 20 years at the RNC.
User avatar
Nobody
19 Jun 2011 2:09 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Just when you think Republicans/Conservatives couldn't go any lower........A new political ad created by a conservative group is being called the most outrageously racist and sexist in history.Turn Right USA, a Republican political action committee, recently created an ad that features two Black men rapping about white California Dem. Janice Hahn. In the video, Hahn is depicted as a stripper who is dancing in between two gun-toting, male, black gangsters singing the lyrics, Give me that cash ho, so we can shoot up the streets. The ad also shows the stripper giving one of the men oral sex in the ad.The video claims that Hahn allegedly hired gang members to be gang intervention specialists allowing them to get out of jail and commit more crimes.http://newsone.com/n...ad-janice-hahn/I wonder what would happen if a Liberal group put out an ad about, let's say.....Sarah Palin, depicting her as a stripper on a pole and referring to her as a 'Bitch' and a 'Ho'?
Chuck!
19 Jun 2011 4:56 pm
Chuck!
posts
I wonder what would happen if a Liberal group put out an ad about, let's say.....Sarah Palin, depicting her as a stripper on a pole and referring to her as a 'Bitch' and a 'Ho'?Remember that time all of you were saying she faked her pregnancy to cover up her daughter's?
JoeLib
19 Jun 2011 6:51 pm
JoeLib
posts
Remember that time all of you were saying she faked her pregnancy to cover up her daughter's?Did the anti-Palin ad insinuate that she was a whore?
Chuck!
19 Jun 2011 8:34 pm
Chuck!
posts
Simple "whore" would be one of the nicer things said about her from the Liberals here, Joe, as you well know.
1 90 91 92 93 94 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 3751 users online :: 9 registered, 16 bots, and 3726 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, coccocbot, Kinza, DuckDuckGo, Not, Pinterest, LCC, ADmantX, proximic, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search