Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Jan 2019 11:36 am » wrote:This jackass has no business running as a Democrat.

Yeah, anyone who doesn't go along with the dishonest Democrat Smear Machine gets thrown under the bus.

Sanders might be a political loon, but at least he has considerable integrity on issues.

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:

Misty » 17 Jan 2019 11:36 am » wrote:This jackass has no business running as a Democrat.

Yeah, anyone who doesn't go along with the dishonest Democrat Smear Machine gets thrown under the bus.

Says the jackass who is perfectly willing to throw any Republican or Conservative who does not toe the Trump line in front of a speeding locomotive.

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:Sanders might be a political loon, but at least he has considerable integrity on issues.

He's not a Democrat.
Let him run as an Independent, or a Socialist or whatever the **** he is.

Misty » 17 Jan 2019 1:02 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:Yeah, anyone who doesn't go along with the dishonest Democrat Smear Machine gets thrown under the bus.

Says the jackass who is perfectly willing to throw any Republican or Conservative who does not toe the Trump line in front of a speeding locomotive.

I judge people on their actions, wackjob. You take a tiny smattering of fake conservatives and lie that they represent Conservatism.

Beltway hack and MS-LSD shill Steve Schmidt, a "real conservative?" Pro-abortion, anti-2nd Amendment, Big Government Max Boot?

Without your Official Democrat Talking Point Lies, you're utterly lost.

Is half the country and almost every conservative pundit deranged for supporting Trump's excellent policies?

Not that you'll give an honest, direct answer.

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 12:07 pm » wrote:

Misty » 17 Jan 2019 11:35 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 6:51 am » wrote:Hey Dim, Trump knows he didn't collude with Russia, and there still isn't one single shred of evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
And this particular company has made adequate reforms.
So what's your point, other than to babble and shriek,"Russia! Russia! Russia!" ?

Is there any Trump lie that you won't swallow?
You obviously have no gag reflex.

Well gosh, who should we believe, the WSJ oped page, regular critics of Trump which had an editorial in detail about the reforms the company made?

Or a Democrat Talking Point Liar like you?

Those sanctions were imposed in part because of Russian aggression in Crimea.

The new chairman of Rusal’s board (Jean-Pierre Thomas) is a booster of the Kremlin’s agenda in Eastern Europe, including some of the activity that got Deripaska sanctioned in the first place.

Thomas started a group called the International Association of the Friends of Crimea, and proposed that the group would help open up Crimea for tourists and business people, in other words, blessing Russia’s occupation of the peninsula.

If you really believe that Deripaska has ceded control of Rusal, then I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn you might want to buy.

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 6:51 am » wrote:

Misty » 16 Jan 2019 8:49 pm » wrote:So, even before Mueller has finished his investigation, the Trump administration along with a bunch of complicit Republican Senators are about to lift sanctions related to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, the man who Paul Manafort was briefing during the campaign.

Hey Dim, Trump knows he didn't collude with Russia, and there still isn't one single shred of evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
And this particular company has made adequate reforms.
So what's your point, other than to babble and shriek,"Russia! Russia! Russia!" ?

Here you go Precious.
The Russians having a good laugh about the sanctions vote.



These are some of the traitors that they are celebrating.



The coward Romney who talks all tough caved on his first vote.
So much for Russia being our greatest geopolitical foe, huh?

Misty » 17 Jan 2019 6:32 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Jan 2019 6:51 am » wrote:

Misty » 16 Jan 2019 8:49 pm » wrote:So, even before Mueller has finished his investigation, the Trump administration along with a bunch of complicit Republican Senators are about to lift sanctions related to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, the man who Paul Manafort was briefing during the campaign.

Hey Dim, Trump knows he didn't collude with Russia, and there still isn't one single shred of evidence of criminal wrongdoing.
And this particular company has made adequate reforms.
So what's your point, other than to babble and shriek,"Russia! Russia! Russia!" ?

Here you go Precious.
The Russians having a good laugh about the sanctions vote.



These are some of the traitors that they are celebrating.



The coward Romney who talks all tough caved on his first vote.
So much for Russia being our greatest geopolitical foe, huh?

Russia ain’t **** and never has been during my lifetime.

TRUMP HAS RACKED UP MORE THAN 1,400 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

In the two years since he took office, President Trump racked up more than 1,400 conflicts of interest involving the government, those trying to influence it and the Trump Organization, according to a report released today by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

President Trump used the presidency to enrich himself by repeatedly promoting his businesses as extensions of his administration.

Political allies, wealthy donors, special interests and foreign governments adopted a key tactic of patronizing Trump’s businesses to curry favor with the Trump administration.

Here are some of the key findings from CREW’s tracking of Trump’s conflicts of interest:

President Trump made 118 visits to his properties in his second year in office, bringing his two-year total to 281 visits to properties he still profits from in office.

In his second year in office, President Trump and other White House staff promoted Trump businesses on at least 87 occasions.

119 federal officials, 53 members of Congress and at least 33 state officials made visits to Trump properties during Trump’s second year in office.

More than 150 political committees, including campaigns and party committees, have spent nearly $5 million at Trump businesses since he became president.

At least 13 special interest groups lobbied the White House since Trump’s inauguration, some for the first time, around the same time they also patronized a Trump property.

At least three foreign countries held events at Trump properties during Trump’s second year in office—two of them did so after having held similar events elsewhere in previous years.

Four Mar-a-Lago members have been considered for ambassadorships since his election, and three other members—with no federal government experience—acted as off-the-books shadow officials in Trump’s Veterans Administration.

“It is hard to imagine that the President of the United States could rack up a staggering 1,400 conflicts of interest, yet here we are,” said CREW Executive Director Noah Bookbinder.

“Not only has President Trump still refused to divest from his businesses, he seems to have doubled down by reinforcing the idea that the Trump Organization is an extension of the Trump Administration.”

In total, CREW found more than 900 conflicts in the second year of the Trump administration.

This presents a clear picture of a presidency used to turn a profit and the president’s businesses serving as points of access to the corridors of power.

“This report shows that as special interests, foreign governments and political allies continue to pour money into Trump’s coffers, the American public is left in the dark about whether presidential decisions and policy are being made in the best interest of the country or in the best interest of the president’s own bottom line,” Bookbinder said.

Once again trying to intimidate a witness who is scheduled to testify before Congress.



And why is he watching FOX News TRUMP TV and Tweeting at 10 AM?
Doesn't he have anything better to do, like opening up the gov't maybe?

Not the first time he has tried to intimidate Cohen by going after his family.
He did it on FOX News TRUMP TV last week and he did it on Twitter last month.

Why are we paying for Mike Pompeo to bring his wife on an official trip?

Susan Pompeo's travels during shutdown angers some diplomats.

At a time when most State Department staff weren't allowed to travel for work and some weren't even allowed to use their work phones, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's wife Susan embarked on an eight-day trip with her husband, requiring unpaid staffers to prepare and support her across the Middle East.

Many diplomats, already demoralized by the partial government shutdown, were angry, according to multiple sources familiar with the situation.

"Eyebrows were raised from the start, from the planning, on why is she coming, and why is she coming during the shutdown?," one person familiar with the matter told CNN.

A senior State Department official said "This is BS. You don't bring more people that need staffing, transportation, etc. when embassy employees are working without being paid."

It was Susan Pompeo's presence on the trip at a time State Department staff are working without pay that seemed to cause the furor.

There are also questions over whether the use of State Department staffers' time to assist her violated federal regulations.

These people are tone deaf.
Drain the swamp!

Does anyone in this administration know how to tell the truth?

Democratic Senator Seeks Perjury Investigation of Kirstjen Nielsen

After releasing a damning draft memo that showed the Trump administration planned to "traumatize" migrant children with family separations and expedite deportation by denying asylum hearings, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) on Friday called for an FBI investigation into whether Homeland Security Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen lied when she testified before Congress about the policy.

In a letter sent to FBI Director Christopher Wray, the senator noted that "compelling new evidence has emerged revealing that high-level Department of Homeland Security officials were secretly and actively developing a new policy and legal framework for separating families as far back as December 2017."

"Despite this fact," Merkley continued, "while testifying under oath before the House Committee on the Judiciary, Secretary Nielsen stated unequivocally 'I'm not a liar, we've never had a policy for family separation.'"

Given the "conflicting facts," Merkley formally demanded an immediate investigation.

OHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

The Latest: Mueller's office says BuzzFeed report inaccurate

The special counsel's office has issued a rare public statement disputing the accuracy of a news report saying that President Donald Trump told his personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.

The statement by Robert Mueller's office on Friday night doesn't cite any specific errors.

Spokesman Peter Carr says, "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mu ... c3bbc1d076

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2019 7:36 pm » wrote:OHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
The Latest: Mueller's office says BuzzFeed report inaccurate
The special counsel's office has issued a rare public statement disputing the accuracy of a news report saying that President Donald Trump told his personal attorney Michael Cohen to lie to Congress.
The statement by Robert Mueller's office on Friday night doesn't cite any specific errors.
Spokesman Peter Carr says, "BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate."
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mu ... c3bbc1d076

Yes, I know.
They are not saying what exactly is inaccurate.
Everyone, including me, has been very careful to say 'IF' this story is true.

Two things I found suspicious were that they made it sound like this was a leak from two investigators involved in the investigation, and Mueller's people don't leak.

And secondly, no other media outlet was able to corroborate the story.

I guess we will have to wait and see.

We know that Cohen lied to Congress about the Trump Tower Moscow project, and Trump lied all through the campaign about not having any business in Russia.

Michael Cohen's sentencing memo said that he lied to Congress in order to 'minimize the links between the Moscow Project and Individual-1 (Trump).

So it would not be so far fetched to think that Trump instructed him to lie.

After all these are the same people who were paying off porn stars and Playboy models and paying people in Walmart bags full of cash to rig online polls.

Not exactly angels, both of them.

[quote="Misty » 18 Jan 2019 9:04 pm"][/quote]

A big tell to me was when Ronan Farrow ( ) said that it was offered to him and he turned it down.

That says a lot.


Mueller's team isn't going to make a statement on a Friday night unless it is all hooey.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2019 9:21 pm » wrote:A big tell to me was when Ronan Farrow ( ) said that it was offered to him and he turned it down.That says a lot.

Yes I just heard that.

crimsongulf » 18 Jan 2019 9:21 pm » wrote:Mueller's team isn't going to make a statement on a Friday night unless it is all hooey.

Their statement is not saying that it's All hooey.
It's kind of vague.
Buzzfeed is asking them for a clarification, which they won't get.

I wish Mueller would finish his work already, so we can get past this ****.

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 9:04 pm » wrote:Yes, I know.
They are not saying what exactly is inaccurate.
Everyone, including me, has been very careful to say 'IF' this story is true.

The corrupt liberal MSM refuses to report the biggest scandal in US history, all fact based, but they were salivating about impeaching Trump on the basis of this piece of trash.

Anyone who put a few seconds of thought into it would have known it didn't make sense.


Why would Trump suborn perjury to deny a non-crime? Duuuuh!

But the corrupt hacks in the Fake News business jumped all over it.

There were plenty of red flags that the BuzzFeed Cohen story was BS
By Thomas Lifson
Yesterday, the Trump-haters on cable news were having orgasms over the prospect of an actual Trump crime – suborning perjury – being pursued by the Mueller team and driving the president from office, and leaked to Buzzfeed. Amber Athey of the Daily Caller counted 179 mentins of the words “Impeach,” “Impeachment,” or “Impeachable” on CNN and MSNBC.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... z5d3wuiZjN

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 7:30 pm » wrote:Does anyone in this administration know how to tell the truth?

Yeah, the president who's keeping almost all his campaign promises, unlike supposed non-liars Clinton and Obama who broke most of theirs.

Never saw you accused either of them of lying, despite their huge whoppers over literal life and death issues.

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 7:22 pm » wrote:Why are we paying for Mike Pompeo to bring his wife on an official trip?

These people are tone deaf.
Drain the swamp!

And once again little Miss Marxist bleats in fake outrage over something she'd NEVER complain about when a Democrat does it.

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 7:22 pm » wrote: Drain the swamp!

That's what Trump is working on, moonbat.


Why else would the Beltway be so bitterly opposed to everything he's doing?

And it's exactly why Obama, his corrupt officials and Deep State officials are still attempting the coup against him.

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 6:36 pm » wrote:TRUMP HAS RACKED UP MORE THAN 1,400 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Here are some of the key findings from CREW’....

CREW, the partisan group that didn't see any conflict of interest when Clinton was paid $500,000 by Putin allies?

And when the Clinton Crime Foundation got $20 million from Putin cronies?

Yet you shriek in fake outrage over hotel rooms being booked and from, gasp, "appearances?"

This is what you call real FAKE News.

A nameless faceless rancher claiming that terrorists are coming across the Southern border.

She says that she obviously doesn't have any proof of that but she's talked to several people who have told her that, and she has seen 'prayer rugs' that some of these supposed terrorists have left behind.
Of course she did not produce any of these so-called 'prayer rugs' or even a picture of them.

So who loves this kind of story?

It's the guy who cries FAKE News anytime a story comes out that is not favorable to him, and says you can't trust anonymous sources.

But a story like this based on anecdotal evidence from an anonymous source must be true because it fits his narrative.

Border rancher: 'We've found prayer rugs out here. It's unreal'

"There’s a lot of people coming in not just from Mexico," the rancher said.

"People, the general public, just don’t get the terrorist threats of that.

That’s what’s really scary. You don’t know what’s coming across.

We’ve found prayer rugs out here.

It’s unreal. It’s not just Mexican nationals that are coming across."