Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 9:04 pm » wrote:Yes, I know.
They are not saying what exactly is inaccurate.
Everyone, including me, has been very careful to say 'IF' this story is true.

The corrupt liberal MSM refuses to report the biggest scandal in US history, all fact based, but they were salivating about impeaching Trump on the basis of this piece of trash.

How many times are you going to repeat that ****?

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:Anyone who put a few seconds of thought into it would have known it didn't make sense.

The story raised a couple of red flags for me.
1. Mueller's team does not leak
And
2. No other media outlet was able to confirm it.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:Why would Trump suborn perjury to deny a non-crime? Duuuuh!

Maybe because all through the campaign he lied about having nothing to do with Russia, while he was in negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
And no one builds something like that in Moscow without Putin's okay.

The reason the story had plausibility is because Individual-1 had already directed his fixer Michael Cohen to commit a felony once.

So if he did it once it's not that far-fetched to believe that he might have done it again.

These are people who pay people off in bags of cash like **** gansters to rig polls.
They are dirty as hell.
The whole lot of them.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:But the corrupt hacks in the Fake News business jumped all over it.

Of course they reported the story. How could they not?
But they were all very careful to say that their network had been unable to confirm it.
And the phrase 'IF the story is true' was uttered many times.

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 2:53 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:The corrupt liberal MSM refuses to report the biggest scandal in US history, all fact based, but they were salivating about impeaching Trump on the basis of this piece of trash.

How many times are you going to repeat that ****?

The biggest scandal in US history, accepted by every credible conservative source in the country, is "****?"

And how do you know that, psychopath?

You haven't even read the evidence.

Yet you'll salivate over Fake News about Trump.

You're freaking deranged.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 9:04 pm » wrote:Yes, I know.
They are not saying what exactly is inaccurate.
Everyone, including me, has been very careful to say 'IF' this story is true.

The corrupt liberal MSM refuses to report the biggest scandal in US history, all fact based, but they were salivating about impeaching Trump on the basis of this piece of trash.

How many times are you going to repeat that ****?

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:Anyone who put a few seconds of thought into it would have known it didn't make sense.

The story raised a couple of red flags for me.
1. Mueller's team does not leak
and
2. No other media outlet was able to confirm it.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:Why would Trump suborn perjury to deny a non-crime? Duuuuh!

Maybe because all through the campaign he lied about having nothing to do with Russia, while he was in negotiations to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
And no one builds something like that in Moscow without Putin's okay.

Jan. 11, 2017: Trump tells reporters that he has "no deals that could happen in Russia because we've stayed away," adding that he could "make deals in Russia very easily" but "I just don't want to because I think that would be a conflict."

That was a big fat lie that he repeated many times.

The reason the story had plausibility is because Individual-1 had already directed his fixer Michael Cohen to commit a felony once.

So if he did it once it's not that far-fetched to believe that he might have done it again.

These are people who pay people off in bags of cash like **** gansters to commit crimes.
They are dirty as hell.
The whole lot of them.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:But the corrupt hacks in the Fake News business jumped all over it.

Of course they reported the story. How could they not?
But they were all very careful to say that their network had been unable to confirm it.
And the phrase 'IF the story is true' was uttered many times.

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 2:53 pm » wrote:These are people who pay people off in bags of cash like **** gansters to rig polls.
They are dirty as hell.
The whole lot of them.

Gangsters rig polls?

In what delusional Fake Liberal Fantasy World does that happen?

Yet the Clinton's enrich themselves illegally by many of millions of dollars by selling access, favors, government funding and foreign policy, yet you pretend there's no scandal there.

Yes, you're a shameless Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Leftist fascis little Miss Marxist seems to be censoring my posts.

Now she'll throw a hissy fit over the word "censor."

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:16 am » wrote:The corrupt liberal MSM refuses to report the biggest scandal in US history, all fact based, but they were salivating about impeaching

How many times are you going to repeat that ****?es.

That "****" is accepted by every credible conservative source in the country, that have documented it step by step.

And how do you know it's ****?

You haven't even read the evidence I've cited.

Yes, you're a shameless Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 2:34 pm » wrote:This is what you call real FAKE News.

A nameless faceless rancher claiming that terrorists are coming across the Southern border.

She says that she obviously doesn't have any proof of that but she's talked to several people who have told her that, and she has seen 'prayer rugs' that some of these supposed terrorists have left behind.
Of course she did not produce any of these so-called 'prayer rugs' or even a picture of them.

So who loves this kind of story?

It's the guy who cries FAKE News anytime a story comes out that is not favorable to him, and says you can't trust anonymous sources.

But a story like this based on anecdotal evidence from an anonymous source must be true because it fits his narrative.

So because you haven't seen proof, it's Fake News?

The Examiner quotes eyewitnesses, wackjob. How do you know they're lying?

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:18 am » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 7:30 pm » wrote:Does anyone in this administration know how to tell the truth?

Yeah, the president who's keeping almost all his campaign promises, unlike supposed non-liars Clinton and Obama who broke most of theirs.

You really need some new talking points Precious.
Yours are getting old and tired.
I have reminded you several times of all the campaign promises that 45 has NOT kept, yet you just keep repeating that crap.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 8:18 am » wrote:Never saw you accused either of them of lying, despite their huge whoppers over literal life and death issues.

Anyone who pretends that any other politician in history ever lied as much as this guy does, must be either a partisan political hack, a shameless liar, or a moron.
Or in your case, all three.

You don't think your boy lies about life and death issues?
How about how he pretends that North Korea is no longer a nuclear threat?
Has his buddy Kim given up one Nuke jackass?

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 2:34 pm » wrote:This is what you call real FAKE News.
A nameless faceless rancher claiming that terrorists are coming across the Southern border.

In fact, officials from the Trump administration have intercepted many possible terrorists. Until they actually try to commit terror, no one knows for sure, but they fit the profile.
So your claim is fake, as usual.

You know where the most people on the terrorist watch list have been apprehended jackass?
Either coming through legal ports of entry on the Northern border or entering the U.S. by air.

But I never saw Trump say he wants to build a wall between the U.S. and Canada.

Reality check: More terror suspects have entered the U.S. from Canada than from Mexico
By Calvin Woodward The Associated Press

The State Department issued a report in September finding “no credible evidence indicating that international terrorist groups have established bases in Mexico, worked with Mexican drug cartels or sent operatives via Mexico into the United States.”

It went on : “The U.S. southern border remains vulnerable to potential terrorist transit, although terrorist groups likely seek other means of trying to enter the United States.”
[....]
State Department reports on terrorism have expressed more concern about Canada, which unlike Mexico has been home to “violent extremists inspired by terrorist groups such as ISIS and al-Qaida and their affiliates and adherents,” as it said in 2017.

When it comes to land crossings, Canada has more often been the source of terrorism suspects entering the U.S., though not in great numbers.

By far the majority of people who arouse concern try to enter by air.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4824976/us-m ... ts-canada/

You live in a fact free zone.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 3:09 pm » wrote:

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 2:34 pm » wrote:This is what you call real FAKE News.
A nameless faceless rancher claiming that terrorists are coming across the Southern border.
She says that she obviously doesn't have any proof of that but she's talked to several people who have told her that, and she has seen 'prayer rugs' that some of these supposed terrorists have left behind.
Of course she did not produce any of these so-called 'prayer rugs' or even a picture of them.
So who loves this kind of story?
It's the guy who cries FAKE News anytime a story comes out that is not favorable to him, and says you can't trust anonymous sources.
But a story like this based on anecdotal evidence from an anonymous source must be true because it fits his narrative.

So because you haven't seen proof, it's Fake News?

You really are a moron aren't you?
Putin's Pet is the one who tells us that we can't trust stories based on anonymous sources.

Every day on this forum you Deplorables laugh off anything posted by us Libs that relies on anonymous sources without even reading it. I see it all the time.

You would NEVER accept anything I posted that was based on second hand anecdotal evidence from an anonymous source and you know it.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 3:09 pm » wrote:The Examiner quotes eyewitnesses, wackjob. How do you know they're lying?

Did you even read it jackass?

There are no 'eyewitnesses' to these supposed 'prayer rugs' quoted in the article.

One person is named in the article who said that some people from the Philippines showed up on his property last year.

Pinheads like you shout 'FAKE News' all the time, but if it fits your Cult leader's narrative you gobble it up like the good little sycophantic lickspittles that you are.

I have had my fill of your nonsense for one day you obsequious little Trump toady.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 3:23 pm » wrote:

Misty » 19 Jan 2019 3:20 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 3:06 pm » wrote:In fact, officials from the Trump administration have intercepted many possible terrorists. Until they actually try to commit terror, no one knows for sure, but they fit the profile.
So your claim is fake, as usual.

You know where the most people on the terrorist watch list have been apprehended jackass?
Either coming through legal ports of entry on the Northern border or entering the U.S. by air.
But I never saw Trump say he wants to build a wall between the U.S. and Canada.
You live in a fact free zone.

What utter hogwash. I didn't write a word about Canada or express any opinion on it.
You dishonestly claimed that worries about terrorists coming across the border was "fake news."
That's an obvious and utter lie, as border agents and national security officials have specifically said.
And the Examiner quotes people who have seen the prayer rugs.
You don't live in a fact free zone.
You just lie like the psychopath you are.

You must be on **** crack.
I'm not goung to waste one minute responding to that nonsense.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X0Bt-ga8vJc

She's right.
I have lived in the Poconos since 2010 and this is the mildest winter yet.
We just had our first real snow storm.

Winter has finally arrived.

Termin8tor » 21 Jan 2019 12:22 pm » wrote:Bump.
Will little Miss Marxist admit she was wrong when she smeared Trump as spreading Fake News?

I'm holding my breath in anticipation.

Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2019 4:03 pm » wrote: Yeah, anyone who gets their facts right is a Trump toady.
Psychopath.

Border rancher: 'We've found prayer rugs out here. It's unreal'
by Anna Giaritelli
| January 16, 2019
Ranchers and farmers near the U.S.-Mexico border have been finding prayer rugs on their properties in recent months, according to one rancher who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by cartels who move the individuals.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... its-unreal

You posted the same story I did you stupid jackass.
It is based on anecdotal evidence by a nameless faceless anonymous source who said that she had no proof for what she is saying.

Trumplethinskin has told us time and time again that we are not to trust stories based on anonymous sources.
Why won't you listen to him?

Termin8tor » 21 Jan 2019 12:33 pm » wrote:

Misty » 21 Jan 2019 12:29 pm » wrote:Listen ****.

blah, blah, blah, you're the stupidest president ever!

You're actually wasting your time quoting some moonbat on twitter about winter?
Ignoring the excellent job Trump is doing as president?

Did you miss the part where I said that we are also having the mildest winter since I have been in PA?

Termin8tor » 21 Jan 2019 12:33 pm » wrote:How's the economy doing after eight horrific Obama years, psycho?

You're deeply deranged.

Horrific?

Keep crowing about the economy you jackass.
It's probably headed for the dumper because of this insane Trump shutdown.

Termin8tor » 21 Jan 2019 12:58 pm » wrote:

Misty » 21 Jan 2019 12:52 pm » wrote:Did you miss the part where I said that we are also having the mildest winter since I have been in PA?

That will obviously lead to impeachment, due to Trump's inability to get the weather correct every time.

You are off your **** nut.

Termin8tor » 21 Jan 2019 12:54 pm » wrote:

Misty » 21 Jan 2019 12:49 pm » wrote:

Bump. Will little Miss Marxist admit she was wrong when she smeared Trump as spreading Fake News?
I'm holding my breath in anticipation.

You posted the same story I did you stupid jackass.
It is based on anecdotal evidence by a nameless faceless anonymous source who said that she had no proof for what she is saying.

What, you don't trust the Washington Examiner to find honest ordinary Americans who are telling the truth?
But unless you can prove they were lying, this is a valid, fact based news story, not Fake News as you lied.

What a bunch of ****.
You Trump toadies shout FAKE News and brush off anything based on anonymous sources every **** day.
And you NEVER prove that what was written was not true.
Double standard much?

And the hits just keep on comin'.

Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled.

Jared Kushner's application for a top secret clearance was rejected by two career White House security specialists after an FBI background check raised concerns about potential foreign influence on him — but their supervisor overruled the recommendation and approved the clearance, two sources familiar with the matter told NBC News.

The official, Carl Kline, is a former Pentagon employee who was installed as director of the personnel security office in the Executive Office of the President in May 2017.

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.

They said the number of rejections that were overruled was unprecedented — it had happened only once in the three years preceding Kline's arrival.

30 cases?
There were 30 people whose security clearances were turned down by career security experts and this guy approved them all?
WTF?

ON JULY 27TH, 2016, FIVE DAYS AFTER ROGER STONE COMMUNICATED WITH WIKILEAKS THROUGH AN INTERMEDIARY, TRUMP SAID THIS:



AMD THAT SAME DAY, RUSSIA FOR THE FIRST TIME TRIED TO HACK INTO SERVERS IN HILLARY CLINTON'S PERSONAL CAMPAIGN OFFICE.

Misty » 27 Jan 2019 11:15 am » wrote:ON JULY 27TH, 2016, FIVE DAYS AFTER ROGER STONE COMMUNICATED WITH WIKILEAKS THROUGH AN INTERMEDIARY, TRUMP SAID THIS:

Oh my gosh, he made a joke! Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!

And what were Trump and his operatives looking for anyway?
Evidence of Hillary Clinton's countless felonies as she and her fake husband enriched themselves by selling access, government funding, favors and foreign policy.

About which you don't give a rat's ***.

AMD THAT SAME DAY, RUSSIA FOR THE FIRST TIME TRIED TO HACK INTO SERVERS IN HILLARY CLINTON'S PERSONAL CAMPAIGN OFFICE.

Given that they never turned over the computer to the FBI, how do you know that?

Tech experts say the download speed was too high to have been done over the net. It had to have been done with something like a flash drive by someone who had access; i.e. an insider.