Liberal Forum

https://www.mediamatters.org/video/2019 ... are/222940

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing ... ssion=true

Here come the conspiracy theories.





https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... _hoax.html


What she said.

AP source: Mueller report not expected next week.

Special counsel Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation is not expected to be delivered to the Justice Department next week, a senior department official told The Associated Press on Friday.

The official could not discuss the matter publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity. It was not immediately clear when the report might come, though Mueller is showing signs of concluding his probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and ties to the Trump campaign.

Personally I don't really care what Mueller's report says.
I have known since before the election that 45 was not fit for the office he holds, and those feelings have only been compounded by what has come to light since the election.

It's clear that he surrounded himself with a bunch of criminals who were perfectly willing to collude with a foreign adversary and use what they knew to be stolen material in order to win an election.

(And in the case of Paul Manafort, provide the Russians with proprietary inside polling from the campaign to help them understand which areas of the country they needed to target with their disinformation.)

45 himself repeatedly praised Wikileaks for disseminating what he knew were hacked/stolen emails.

Almost every one of his campaign officials were meeting with Russians and lying about it, which innocent people don't do.

And we are supposed to believe that he knew nothing about what they were doing, including members of his own family?

Right.

It really doesn't matter to me whether or not Mueller can prove that it rose to the level of a conspiracy.

As far as any obstruction of justice, that was pretty much done out in the open, starting with the firing of James Comey.

45 admitted openly to Lester Holt that he did it with 'this Russia thing' on his mind, and he told two Russian officials in the Oval Office that it took the pressure off of him.

That said, I do not want to see him impeached only to be found not guilty in the Senate.
His supporters would see that as a win.

And if by some chance he was found guilty in the Senate, that will only feed into their false narrative about the so-called 'Deep State Coup.'

The best way for him to leave office is to be defeated badly enough in the 2020 election, that phony calls of voter fraud would fall on deaf ears.

He needs to be soundly rejected by the American electorate.

This article reveals what Mueller has already reported through what have been called his 'speaking indictments.'

It reads in part:

Mueller has spoken loudly, if indirectly, in court — indictment by indictment, guilty plea by guilty plea.

In doing so, he tracked an elaborate Russian operation that injected chaos into a U.S. presidential election and tried to help Trump win the White House.

He followed a GOP campaign that embraced the Kremlin’s help and championed stolen material to hurt a political foe.

And ultimately, he revealed layers of lies, deception, self-enrichment and hubris that followed.

Woven through thousands of court papers, the special counsel has made his public report.

Court records reveal a Mueller report right in plain view.

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich) is joining Democrats in co-sponsoring a joint resolution to block President Trump's emergency declaration seeking additional funds to build physical barriers along the southern border.

Amash is the sole Republican to sign on to measure, according to Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), who is spearheading the efforts.

"Right now I believe that we're at about 226 or 227 co-sponsors including one Republican, Justin Amash, and I look forward to getting more support as the days go on," Castro told reporters on a call Friday.

Amash's office said the congressman feels the situation does not qualify as a national emergency.

"A national emergency declaration for a non-emergency is void.

A prerequisite for declaring an emergency is that the situation requires immediate action and Congress does not have an opportunity to act.

@POTUS @realDonaldTrump is attempting to circumvent our constitutional system," Amash tweeted following Trump's announcement.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4311 ... eclaration

Misty » 23 Feb 2019 12:08 pm » wrote: The same Congressional Republicans who joined me in blasting Pres. Obama's executive over-reach now cry out for a king to usupr powers, blah, blah

Except that there is a very strong case to make that Trump is acting on specific powers given to him by Congress years ago.

We won't know who's correct until SCOTUS rules.

Termin8tor » 23 Feb 2019 1:30 pm » wrote:

Misty » 23 Feb 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:The same Congressional Republicans who joined me in blasting Pres. Obama's executive over-reach now cry out for a king to usupr powers, blah, blah

Except that there is a very strong case to make that Trump is acting on specific powers given to him by Congress years ago.
We won't know who's correct until SCOTUS rules.

Those powers were to be used in the case of a national emergency.
This is NOT a national emergency.
45 admitted as much when he said, "I could do the wall over a longer period of time. I didn’t need to do this. But I’d rather do it much faster."

Once again he stepped on his own dick.

Little Miss Marxist is once again censoring my posts.

Like all leftists, she can't tolerate the truth being seen.

Misty » 23 Feb 2019 12:08 pm » wrote:The same Repubs who joined me in blasting Pres. Obama's executive overreach now cry for a king to usurp legislative powers.

If your faithfulness to the Constitution depends on which party controls the White House, then you are not faithful to it.

Except that Congress specifically authorized emergency spending for situations like this.

Trump has an excellent record before SCOTUS. I don't think he's lost a case yet, and I expect he'll win this one.

In contrast, "Constitutional expert" Obama had far more losses than any recent president, sometimes 9-0.

Not that the facts ever get in the way of a psychpath......

.

Termin8tor » 25 Feb 2019 7:19 am » wrote:Not that the facts ever get in the way of a psychpath......

If you are going to create a meme, maybe you should know the difference between 'there' and 'their.'
45 said he loves the poorly educated and apparently y'all love him too.

Cohen to Testify That Trump Engaged in Criminal Conduct While in Office

Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former lawyer, plans on Wednesday for the first time to publicly accuse the president of engaging—while in office—in criminal conduct related to a hush-money payment to a porn star, a person familiar with his expected testimony before Congress said.

Appearing before the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Cohen also plans to make public some of Mr. Trump’s private financial statements and allege that Mr. Trump at times inflated or deflated his net worth for business and personal purposes, including avoiding paying property taxes, the person said.
[.........]
Mr. Cohen’s planned testimony comes 13 months after the Journal first reported that Mr. Cohen paid $130,000 in October 2016 to former adult-film star Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, to buy her silence after she alleged having a sexual encounter with Mr. Trump.

In his testimony Wednesday, Mr. Cohen will provide documentation of his reimbursement for the $130,000 Clifford payment, which he received in monthly installments of $35,000 throughout 2017, the person familiar with his testimony said. Mr. Cohen intends to show the panel a signed check, the person said.

Mr. Trump signed some of the checks reimbursing Mr. Cohen, which Mr. Cohen began receiving after Mr. Trump took office, according to another person familiar with the payments.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/cohen-to-t ... 1551175201

As Cohen rivets Washington, White House announces Kushner met with Saudi crown prince.

Ironic for a man who ran his campaign based on HRC's mishandling of classified info.

Trump Ordered Officials to Give Jared Kushner a Security Clearance

WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered his chief of staff to grant his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, a top-secret security clearance last year, overruling concerns flagged by intelligence officials and the White House’s top lawyer, four people briefed on the matter said.

Mr. Trump’s decision in May so troubled senior administration officials that at least one, the White House chief of staff at the time, John F. Kelly, wrote a contemporaneous internal memo about how he had been “ordered” to give Mr. Kushner the top-secret clearance.

The White House counsel at the time, Donald F. McGahn II, also wrote an internal memo outlining the concerns that had been raised about Mr. Kushner — including by the C.I.A. — and how Mr. McGahn had
recommended that he not be given a top-secret clearance.

The disclosure of the memos contradicts statements made by the president, who told The New York Times in January in an Oval Office interview that he had no role in his son-in-law receiving his clearance.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/28/us/p ... rance.html

Trump and his daughter both lied through their teeth about this.

Mr. Trump said he played no role in directing White House officials to arrange for Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser, to receive a top-secret clearance.

Mr. Kushner’s application was rejected at least once after concerns were raised by the F.B.I. about his foreign contacts.

The C.I.A., which also raised concerns, has continued to deny him access to “sensitive compartmentalized information.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/us/p ... ule=inline

Ivanka Trump says she and her husband, Jared Kushner, got no special treatment from her father when obtaining their top security clearances.

“There were anonymous leaks about there being issues.

But the president had no involvement pertaining to my clearance or my husband's clearance, zero," Trump told ABC’s Abby Huntsman during an exclusive interview for “The View”.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/ivanka- ... d=60940398

She's as big a liar as her Daddy.

Misty » 28 Feb 2019 8:09 pm » wrote:Ironic for a man who ran his campaign based on HRC's mishandling of classified info.

Trump Ordered Officials to Give Jared Kushner a Security Clearance

Trump and his daughter both lied through their teeth about this.

She's as big a liar as her Daddy.

This is your huge issue on which to impeach Trump?

You're **** demented.

Termin8tor » 28 Feb 2019 8:15 pm » wrote:

Misty » 28 Feb 2019 8:09 pm » wrote:Ironic for a man who ran his campaign based on HRC's mishandling of classified info.

Trump Ordered Officials to Give Jared Kushner a Security Clearance

Trump and his daughter both lied through their teeth about this.
She's as big a liar as her Daddy.

This is your huge issue on which to impeach Trump?

You're an even bigger liar than both of them put together.
I have never called for Trump's impeachment.
Just the opposite.

Misty » 27 Feb 2019 12:36 pm » wrote:I have NOT demanded the impeachment of Trump and have in fact many times said that I am against impeachment without the number of votes to convict in the Senate.

Misty » 18 Jan 2019 1:37 pm » wrote:I never talk about impeachment, because to me unless you can get a conviction in the Senate it will only benefit Moscow's Minion by making him a martyr to his base of Deplorables like you.

Misty » 13 Jun 2018 3:57 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 13 Jun 2018 3:46 pm » wrote:Little Miss Marxist has once again stumbled on grounds for impeachment.

The only people talking about impeachment are you Trumpists, you jackass.
Impeachment without the ability to convict in the Senate is useless.
It will only embolden the dotard.

Any more lies you wanna tell about me, you deplorable degenerate liar?
Like how I accused BARF Kavanaugh of rape?

You would think that after being shown to be a filthy liar so many times, you would stop doing it.
But I guess you can't, because just like with your Dear Leader, it's a sickness.

Mueller expects case against Stone to take five to eight days in court.

Special counsel Robert Mueller expects it will take five to eight days for the government to present its case at trial against Roger Stone, a longtime associate of President Trump.

Mueller and U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu told federal District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in a new filing Friday that's how long they expect it to take to prove their case. They said their calculation includes time for the defense to cross-examine witnesses.

Sounds like a slam dunk.

I be skeeered