Liberal Forum

Misty » 25 Mar 2019 8:55 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 13 Jun 2018 3:59 pm » wrote:Anyone in contact with actual reality knows that Trump is governing conservatively
and has accomplished more than the great Ronald Reagan did in the same period.

That's right Precious. He's had more convicted criminals in his administration
than even most two term presidents.

Misty » 28 Mar 2019 8:47 pm » wrote:Adam Schiff tears Republicans on the Intel Committee a new one.

"You might think it's okay........"

SchiffForBrains is a lying, leaking piece of ****.
His litany of "proof" is nothing but a laundry list of publicly debunked ****.

He has been saying for years that he had PROOF of collusion from their investigation.
He has nothing.

Misty » 19 Mar 2019 10:08 am » wrote:Willful ignorance is the worst kind of stupidity.

Then you must be really, really stupid, because you refuse to read the evidence I've cited about the biggest abuse of power in US history.

Indictments are coming.

So of course you'll censor this post.

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 8:46 am » wrote:

Misty » 19 Mar 2019 10:08 am » wrote:Willful ignorance is the worst kind of stupidity.

Then you must be really, really stupid, because you refuse to read the evidence I've cited about the biggest abuse of power in US history.
Indictments are coming.
So of course you'll censor this post.

No, I'm keeping this one.
Who's going to be indicted Precious?
Name names.

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 8:33 am » wrote:

Misty » 22 Mar 2019 7:05 pm » wrote:And Jared Kushner, who was given a security clearance by his father-in-law over the objections of Intellgence officials, the WH Chief of Staff and the WH Counsel, communicates with MBS on an encrypted app called WhatsApp.
At any other time this would be a HUGE scandal, but these are not ordinary times.
But her emails........
LOCK HER UP!

The usual utter hogwash from a Democrat Talking Point Liar.
According to federal law, the president has the legal authority to over-ride regulations and legally give Kushner security clearance.

I know that asshole.
That doesn't make it right.

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 8:33 am » wrote:Are you claiming that Trump cannot trust his son in law?

I don't give a **** if Trump trusts him.
I am claiming that we can't trust him.
He has huge debts, which is probably why Intellgence officials, the WH Chief of Staff and the WH Counsel recommended that he not be given a clearance.
He could be selling this country out for money.

Kushner had to amend his clearance forms four times because of 100 errors and omissions.
Most people would never get a clearance if they did that.

But we already know that you don't give a **** about any of this.

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:31 am » wrote:

Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:18 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 8:46 am » wrote:Then you must be really, really stupid, because you refuse to read the evidence I've cited about the biggest abuse of power in US history.
Indictments are coming.
So of course you'll censor this post.

No, I'm keeping this one.

Feel free. Unlike you I don't whine pathetically when someone quotes my own words.

Misty: Who's going to be indicted Precious?
Name names.

Former Obama Assistant Director to the FBI Andew McCabe, I'll bet.
Steele. Hopefully Comey. Hopefully John Brennan.
Maybe Sally Yates. It's too early to know.

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:31 am » wrote:But if you really and truly are interested in the piano that's about to fall on your party's empty heads, go read the evidence in my thread.
But the reason you haven't is that you don't give a rat's *** what huge abuses of power your corrupt party commits.

Evidence?
You mean a bunch of opinion pieces from wingnut websites?

Termin8tor » 30 Mar 2019 10:42 am » wrote:Guiliani promised flat out that indictments will be coming.
But you don't care about any of that.

Termin8tor » 31 Mar 2019 1:19 pm » wrote:

Misty » 30 Mar 2019 10:36 am » wrote:Evidence?
You mean a bunch of opinion pieces from wingnut websites?

Here is a liberal just ripping the wackjob you claimed "tells it like it is."

Willa Paskin is a TV critic who has written enlightening articles such as 'Let's Get Philosophical About Truck Nutz.'

Looks like 45 does not want the Mueller Report to come out.

Termin8tor » 01 Apr 2019 9:41 am » wrote:I sure hope little Miss Brownshirt comes back to the board so can censor this!

Awww! You miss me Precious?

Can you say obstruction?



https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/ar ... mp/587176/

“You don’t even have to be convicted of a crime to lose your job (as president) in this constitutional republic if this body determines your conduct as a public official is clearly out of bounds in your role.

Because impeachment is not about punishment.

Impeachment is about cleansing the office.

Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office.”

House of Representatives Prosecutor Lindsey Graham - 1999

This is what Trump called FAKE News in January, 2018.

President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.

After receiving the president’s order to fire Mr. Mueller, the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, refused to ask the Justice Department to dismiss the special counsel, saying he would quit instead, the people said.

“Fake news, folks,” Mr. Trump said. “Fake news. A typical New York Times fake story.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/p ... ussia.html

The Mueller report has shown that in many cases the media had it right.
The only FAKE News came from inside the WH.

Seriously, you can't make this **** up.

AG Baghdad Barr's oldest daughter and youngest daughter's husband who both work in the DOJ have been given other jobs.

His daughter is now working at the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Treasury Department's financial crimes unit, and his son-in-law is now working in the White House Counsel's office where he will be advising the president.

Termin8tor » 23 Apr 2019 6:49 am » wrote:

Seriously, you can't make this **** up.

AG Baghdad Barr's oldest daughter and youngest daughter's husband who both work in the DOJ have been given other jobs.

His daughter is now working at the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Treasury Department's financial crimes unit, and his son-in-law is now working in the White House Counsel's office where he will be advising the president.

No, you can't make this stuff up.
You once again are telling the latest Official Democrat Talking Point Lie and smearing a man of unquestionable integrity on the basis of zero evidence.
And now his family too.
How deeply ugly is that?
Psychopath.

What's the lie jackass?
Are you denying that they got those jobs?

Termin8tor » 24 Apr 2019 3:17 pm » wrote:

Seriously, you can't make this **** up.
AG Baghdad Barr.

Look at little Miss Marxist smear a public servant of high integrity on the basis of zero evidence.
Which just by coincidence is the latest Officil Democrat Talking Point Lie.
Which she claims NEVER to tell.

Again, what's the lie jackass?
Prove to me that Baghdad Barr's daughter and son-in-law did not get the jobs I said they got.

Termin8tor » 24 Apr 2019 3:20 pm » wrote:No collusion.

The Mueller report did not even address the issue of 'collusion' you stupud jackass.
That is a Trumplican talking point lie.

Read the **** report you dope.

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”

In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]”…has frequently been invoked in public reporting about the investigation.

But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the United States Code, nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law.

For those reasons, the Office’s focus in analyzing questions of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law.

The orange skidmark has no idea about how impeachment works.
The SCOTUS can not save him from being impeached and the generally accepted viewpoint of what constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors is any serious abuse of power, including both legal and illegal activities, so you don't have to commit an actual crime to be impeached.
The ultimate authority for determining whether an offense constitutes grounds for impeachment rests with Congress, not the Supreme Court.

The orange skidmark has no idea about how impeachment works.
The SCOTUS can not save him from being impeached and the generally accepted viewpoint of what constitutes high crimes and misdemeanors is any serious abuse of power, including both legal and illegal activities, so you don't have to commit an actual crime to be impeached.
The ultimate authority for determining whether an offense constitutes grounds for impeachment rests with Congress, not the Supreme Court.

Yes, SCOTUS can save him from an impeachment on lies, **** or minor charges.

Congress must abide by the Constitution, and SCOTUS is the final authority on that.


Duuuh.