Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 22 May 2019 1:55 pm » wrote:Are you blind, stupid or lying?

Barr and his team of non-partisan Justice Dept officials determined that based on the Mueller Report's evidence that Trump did not obstruct justice or commit any other crime.

Non-partisan?
You are blind, stupid AND lying.

FYI jackass, Baghdad Barr said that he made his decision on obstruction solely based on what was in the Mueller report, without ever looking at the underlying evidence.

And this is what the report said about obstruction.
Maybe you should get someone to explain it to you, because you don't seem to comprehend what it means.

BUTTTTTTTTTTTTT, Buttttttttttttttt, BUTTTTTTTTTT it did not charge him and CLEARLY said "no further indictments" and clearly, very clearly said "NO COLLUSION"

the entire witch hunt was about collusion.

crimsongulf » 22 May 2019 8:42 pm » wrote:

Misty » 22 May 2019 8:39 pm » wrote:A source for what you liar?

To your signature, one and only one person is to blame and that is Pelosi.
She was trying to appease the **** crazy wing of her party and it blew up in her face.

Are you really that naive Red?
Trump never planned to do anything on infrastructure.
And he used Pelosi as an excuse.

Right after he had his hissy fit and stormed out of the meeting he went out to the Rose Garden to throw a public tantrum for the press, where he had pre-printed signs and handouts all ready.
It was a **** stunt.

It doesn’t make sense that they keep harping on the losing issue- collusion- when there is other ammo to use against Trump.

Violation of emoluments clause, tax evasion, money laundering, blatant nepotism, etc.. there is plenty not to like about Trump, based in reality. Why focus on a fantasy?

Misty » 22 May 2019 8:58 pm » wrote: Are you really that naive Red?
Trump never planned to do anything on infrastructure.
And he used Pelosi as an excuse.

Right after he had his hissy fit and stormed out of the meeting he went out to the Rose Garden to throw a public tantrum for the press, where he had pre-printed signs and handouts all ready.
It was a **** stunt.

What kind of idiot accuses a POTUS of a crime a few hours before a supposedly nonpartisan meeting and expects it to go smoothly.

You need to get in the real world and understand that DJT isn't some *** kissing career politician.

crimsongulf » 22 May 2019 8:52 pm » wrote:BUTTTTTTTTTTTTT, Buttttttttttttttt, BUTTTTTTTTTT it did not charge him and CLEARLY said "no further indictments" and clearly, very clearly said "NO COLLUSION"
the entire witch hunt was about collusion.

The Mueller report never dealt with 'collusion.'
There is no such crime.

I wish you people would read it.

Introduction to Volume One of the Mueller report......page 2.

crimsongulf » 22 May 2019 9:08 pm » wrote:

Misty » 22 May 2019 8:58 pm » wrote:Are you really that naive Red?
Trump never planned to do anything on infrastructure.
And he used Pelosi as an excuse.
Right after he had his hissy fit and stormed out of the meeting he went out to the Rose Garden to throw a public tantrum for the press, where he had pre-printed signs and handouts all ready.
It was a **** stunt.

What kind of idiot accuses a POTUS of a crime a few hours before a supposedly nonpartisan meeting and expects it to go smoothly.
You need to get in the real world and understand that DJT isn't some *** kissing career politician.

There is no infrastructure plan Red.
There never was.
It was all ****.

They spent all the money on tax cuts.

Misty » 22 May 2019 1:51 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 22 May 2019 5:24 am » wrote:No obstruction of justice.

THE MUELLER REPORT
INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME TWO - Page 2

Fourth, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.
Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment.
The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred.
Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also
does not exonerate him.

You are going to have to use a BIGGER red crayon, and write it more times for it to sink in...

SJConspirator » 22 May 2019 8:58 pm » wrote:It doesn’t make sense that they keep harping on the losing issue- collusion- when there is other ammo to use against Trump.

Violation of emoluments clause, tax evasion, money laundering, blatant nepotism, etc.. there is plenty not to like about Trump, based in reality. Why focus on a fantasy?

Two court rulings dealing with his finances went against him this week.
He sees what's coming, which is why he had such a hissy fit today, demanding that Dems stop investigating him.

Misty » 22 May 2019 9:15 pm » wrote: There is no infrastructure plan Red.
There never was.
It was all ****.

They spent all the money on tax cuts.

Why are you running from it being Pelosi's fault?

Besides, when was the last time a frikkin Dem was worried about paying for anything.

your side came up with the Green Nude Eel

Misty » 22 May 2019 9:15 pm » wrote: There is no infrastructure plan Red.
There never was.
It was all ****.

They spent all the money on tax cuts.

Misty backs up her ****!

Unlike you cons who only let your toilet back up, and flow all over the floor!

Here come the DYKES! OMG!

Can't keep y'all in suspence! Here is more Cap'n Pissgums and his merry pirates:

Termin8tor » 23 May 2019 9:06 am » wrote:

Misty: There is no infrastructure plan Red.
There never was.
It was all ****.
They spent all the money on tax cuts.

Oh gosh, what a shame Trump cut taxes to accomplish what Obama promised but never delivered and never meant to;

a strong economy.

Never mind that cutting taxes isn't "spending," psycho.

Tell that to the deficit you moron.

The federal deficit soared last year to $779 billion and is projected to approach $1 trillion in 2019.

Termin8tor » 23 May 2019 9:18 am » wrote:Here's a hint, psycho.

Barr, a public servant of high integrity whose integrity has never been questioned that I recall.

Then you don't recall much.

Baghdad Barr has misled Congress before in 1989 when he wrote an OLC memo summarizing the 'principal conclusions' of a D.O.J. ruling.

It was discovered several years later when the full memo was released that he had left out several of those 'principal conclusions.'

Apparently he sucks at writing summaries.

Barr’s Playbook: He Misled Congress When Omitting Parts of Justice Dep’t Memo in 1989

crimsongulf » 22 May 2019 9:26 pm » wrote:

Misty » 22 May 2019 9:15 pm » wrote:There is no infrastructure plan Red.
There never was.
It was all ****.

Why are you running from it being Pelosi's fault?

It is not Pelosi's fault that the POTUS is a thin-skinned giant snowflake who can't take any kind of criticism.

He is now posting altered videos of Nancy Pelosi on Twitter that make her look like she is slurring her words.
Is that normal behavior for a 72 year old man?

I am so enjoying the fact that Pelosi is triggering the big manbaby, just like you guys enjoy it when he triggers the Libs.

Misty » 24 May 2019 3:48 pm » wrote: It is not Pelosi's fault that the POTUS is a thin-skinned giant snowflake who can't take any kind of criticism.

He is now posting altered videos of Nancy Pelosi on Twitter that make her look like she is slurring her words.
Is that normal behavior for a 72 year old man?

I am so enjoying the fact that Pelosi is triggering the big manbaby, just like you guys enjoy it when he triggers the Libs.

Criticism is not accusing a sitting POTUS of a cover up a couple of hours before you are to have a meeting with him on infrastructure.

Pelosi is not triggering him, he is triggering her trying to push her to go along with the bat **** crazy impeachment push. She knows it is a losing proposition for Dems, but he wants her to go for it.

crimsongulf » 24 May 2019 3:56 pm » wrote:

Misty » 24 May 2019 3:48 pm » wrote:It is not Pelosi's fault that the POTUS is a thin-skinned giant snowflake who can't take any kind of criticism.
He is now posting altered videos of Nancy Pelosi on Twitter that make her look like she is slurring her words.
Is that normal behavior for a 72 year old man?
I am so enjoying the fact that Pelosi is triggering the big manbaby, just like you guys enjoy it when he triggers the Libs.

Criticism is not accusing a sitting POTUS of a cover up a couple of hours before you are to have a meeting with him on infrastructure.

There was never a plan to do infrastructure Red.

Anyway, we already know that he is guilty of at least two cover ups that we know of.
One involving paying hush money to a porn star, and he was covering up the fact that he had a deal for a Trump Tower in Moscow right up until the election.

Michael Cohen is sitting in jail right now because he took part in both of those cover ups.

crimsongulf » 24 May 2019 3:56 pm » wrote:Pelosi is not triggering him, he is triggering her trying to push her to go along with the bat **** crazy impeachment push. She knows it is a losing proposition for Dems, but he wants her to go for it.

Which is why I am against it.
She can't take the bait.

It is so obvious that the orange skidmark is losing his **** because the courts are ruling against him and all of his dirty financial dealings will soon be coming to light.
What is bothering him the most is that people will finally find out that he is not nearly as rich as he says he is.

He was never a great real estate developer Red.
He makes most of his money from licensing deals.

Misty » 24 May 2019 4:22 pm » wrote: There was never a plan to do infrastructure Red.

Anyway, we already know that he is guilty of at least two cover ups that we know of.
One involving paying hush money to a porn star, and he was covering up the fact that he had a deal for a Trump Tower in Moscow right up until the election.

Michael Cohen is sitting in jail right now because he took part in both of those cover ups.

Which is why I am against it.
She can't take the bait.

It is so obvious that the orange skidmark is losing his **** because the courts are ruling against him and all of his dirty financial dealings will soon be coming to light.
What is bothering him the most is that people will finally find out that he is not nearly as rich as he says he is.

He was never a great real estate developer Red.
He makes most of his money from licensing deals.

Cohen is jail for lying.

Look, I am sorry that your Mueller witch hunt came up empty. Polls show the country is ready to move on, but Dems and libs still can't get over the fact that Billary lost.

Now don't get me wrong, because the longer the Dems are doing nothing in Congress but wailing because Mueller was a dud, the less chance they have of beating DJT in 2020.

Instead of whining about impeachment, just frikkin do it.