Liberal Forum

Titties N Beer » 06 Jun 2019 4:15 pm » wrote:My God I pity people who wake up every day with their first thought being how miserable Trump is making them.
Their second thought being how can I be a victim today
Their third thought being how can I be offended today.
Can you imagine a more miserable existence than that?
This will be someone on this board next....................
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nation ... story.html
This woman's name needs to be revealed so we can stay away from her.
My God I pity so many.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 6:56 am » wrote:Hey, did you know that if you close your eyes, click your heels and say magic words to yourself that you can make felonies disappear, wackjob?

nuckin futz » 05 Jun 2019 9:37 pm » wrote:Hey, SQUIRM! You should just give up!
Misty beats your *** every time!

Titties N Beer » 06 Jun 2019 5:23 pm » wrote:I'm going to give the OP a pass on her severe political anger. Constantly being followed by RichKlump for a decade plus will anger up the belly of any one.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 6:32 pm » wrote:Quick, censor this post, brownshirt!

Misty: That makes them un-American scum.

The actual un-American scum are Obama, HRC and their corrupt officials who tried to steal the election, then topple Trump in a coup.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 6:32 pm » wrote:Indictments are coming, and they won't be for process crimes.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 6:30 pm » wrote:

The Gaping Asshole said: Mueller should be honored for his service, but Trump is correct.
Mueller made worse than a fool of himself in his press conference.
He's a Beltway hack, a liar and a snake.

Misty: Except that's not what the orange skidmark said you asshole.

Trump was being polite, but he is correct.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 6:30 pm » wrote:Mueller not only made a fool out of himself, but destroyed his reputation and told a huge lie that he later had to correct.

"He (Mueller) made such a fool out of himself....the last time she....because what people don't report is the letter he had to do to straighten out his testimony because his testimony was wrong."

crimsongulf » 06 Jun 2019 9:46 pm » wrote:Being constantly panty wadded ain't worth the wear and tear on the chicken's ***.
****, enjoy life.

Misty » 06 Jun 2019 9:51 pm » wrote: I guess that advice is for Clem who has a huge pair of Granny panties stuck up his ***.
I'm good. He's not.

crimsongulf » 06 Jun 2019 10:14 pm » wrote:

Misty » 06 Jun 2019 9:51 pm » wrote:I guess that advice is for Clem who has a huge pair of Granny panties stuck up his ***.
I'm good. He's not.

I do the 65 this month and this joint is entertainment only. My tax cut basically paid for my boat and fishing season this year. actually starting to make a tiny profit with my boat restoration mini biz. headed to Canada at the end of the month.
My life is good.

Termin8tor » 06 Jun 2019 3:53 pm » wrote:Obama was president and had the power and the authority to do something, and he did almost nothing.
That's a matter of public record

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 9:32 am » wrote:

Misty: Obama struggled with the issue for sure because he did not want it to look like he was trying to help Hillary and hurt Trump.
He did what he could.

That's a freaking lie. He didn't "do what he could." He did almost nothing.

The Obama administration on Thursday (December 28th, 2016) announced its retaliation for Russian efforts to interfere with the US presidential election, ordering sweeping new sanctions that included the expulsion of 35 Russians.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... ction-hack

That's a matter of public record.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 7:47 am » wrote:If Repubs take the House back and the Barr investigations bear the fruit I expect, Trump will likely go down in history as a great president.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 7:53 am » wrote:

Misty: Polite?
Since when is it polite to trash an American war hero on foreign soil, while sitting in front of the graves of WW2 heroes?
If Obama had done that, he would have been crucified.

Mueller's war record has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that he has become a corrupt Beltway Deep State hack.
And if Obama had been falsely accused, I'd have defended him.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 7:53 am » wrote:

Misty: Nancy Pelosi was asked a question about impeachment and she said that she would not talk about the president on foreign soil, which is exactly what you are supposed to do.

She lied that he committed a crime, and said she wants him to be locked up, wackjob.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 7:53 am » wrote:

Misty: You would defend this **** animal if he had whipped out his dick and taken a piss on one of those graves.
You make me sick.

Shrieks the psychopath who told years of lies in defense of a serial felon / serial rapist.
**** off, psycho.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 1:35 pm » wrote:Obama was president and had the power and the authority to do something, and he did almost nothing. That's a matter of public record.
It only became an issue after HRC lost. They needed an issue with which to frame Trump.

Termin8tor » 07 Jun 2019 8:45 am » wrote:

Misty: And what about that meeting Erik Prince had with Kirill Dmitriev, the head of one of Russia’s sovereign wealth funds, in the Seychelles?
The one he lied to Congress about.

Mueller Exposes Erik Prince’s Lies About His Rendezvous with a Top Russian

You mean the case that relied on a pedophile's testimony?

Life Begins at Conception (Except When That’s Inconvenient for Republicans)

When, exactly, do abortion opponents think life begins?

Over the past few months there has been a rush to pass abortion bans.

Most of these bans center on the idea that abortions should be banned as soon as the fetal heartbeat is detected; that’s because “a heartbeat proves that there’s life that deserves protection under law,” according to a state representative in Kentucky, Robert Goforth.

On the other hand, many, including Mr. Goforth himself, also believe “life begins at conception,” as Tom Cotton, the Republican senator from Arkansas, said on “Meet the Press” last month.

Or to take it still further, that the blastocyst, that clump of cells smaller than a raspberry that forms in the early days after a sperm meets an egg, is a person.

As an Alabama state representative, Terri Collins, put it: “This bill addresses that one issue.

Is that baby in the womb a person? I believe our law says it is. I believe our people say it is. And I believe technology shows it is.”

And yet.

Representative Collins recently sponsored what is arguably the most extreme abortion ban to pass to date — Alabama’s near total prohibition of the procedure, with no exceptions for rape or incest.

But this ban does have one exception: Fertilized eggs, blastocysts, five-day-old embryos — people, according to some definitions — are exempt and can be destroyed, so long as they are not contained in the body of a woman.

“The egg in the lab doesn’t apply,” said Clyde Chambliss, a state senator and another sponsor of the abortion bill.

“It’s not in a woman. She’s not pregnant.”

But I was told by Tom Cotton that life began at conception?

In May, an appellate court in Ohio, in theory, delivered another blow to the “life begins at conception” school of abortion banning, though none of its members seem to have taken notice.

Frozen embryos are not people, it told a couple whose embryos had been lost in a fertility clinic storage tank malfunction.

(Ohio, by the way, was one of the states to pass a heartbeat bill — and so, technically, no inconsistencies here!)

But what are we to make of what happened on Feb. 22, when a 24-year-old woman from Honduras went into labor at 27 weeks pregnant and delivered a stillborn baby at an ICE detention center?

According to ICE, “for investigative and reporting purposes, a stillbirth is not considered an in-custody death.”

Where were the cries of outrage from pro-life corners?

Do some lives begin at conception and others don’t?

Is an immigrant fetus less of a person than a citizen fetus?

Many pro-choice pundits make the argument that abortion opponents are hypocrites for their lack of concern about maternal health and early-childhood programs, and they are.

But these inconsistencies about when “life” begins are far more revealing.

The idea that fertility clinics should be allowed to end “life” in the pursuit of resolving infertility is wholly illogical; the notion that an in-custody stillbirth at 27 weeks is not a death, but that an abortion at six or eight weeks is a murder punishable by up to 99 years in prison, requires wild feats of mental jujitsu.

It’s almost as if the Republican Party considers “life” to be a completely arbitrary notion.

It’s almost as if this isn’t actually about “life” at all.

Misty » 04 Jun 2019 5:20 pm » wrote:Another swamp creature.

OOPS: ELAINE CHAO CAUGHT PIMPING HER FAMILY BUSINESS WITH CHINA

Chao created special path for McConnell’s favored projects.

The Transportation Department under Secretary Elaine Chao designated a special liaison to help with grant applications and other priorities from her husband Mitch McConnell’s state of Kentucky, paving the way for grants totaling at least $78 million for favored projects as McConnell prepared to campaign for reelection.

Chao’s aide Todd Inman, who stated in an email to McConnell’s Senate office that Chao had personally asked him to serve as an intermediary, helped advise the senator and local Kentucky officials on grants with special significance for McConnell — including a highway-improvement project in a McConnell political stronghold that had been twice rejected for previous grant applications.

The circumstances surrounding the Owensboro grant and another, more lucrative grant to Boone County, highlight the ethical conflicts in having a powerful Cabinet secretary married to the Senate’s leader and in a position to help him politically. McConnell has long touted his ability to bring federal resources to his state, which his wife is now in a position to assist.

Chao’s designation of Inman as a special intermediary for Kentucky — a privilege other states did not enjoy — gave a special advantage to projects favored by her husband, which could in turn benefit his political interests. In such situations, ethicists say, each member of a couple benefits personally from the success of the other.

“Where a Cabinet secretary is doing things that are going to help her husband get reelected, that starts to rise to the level of feeling more like corruption to the average American. … I do think there are people who will see that as sort of ‘swamp behavior,’” said John Hudak, a Brookings Institution scholar who has studied political influence in federal grant-making.

In fact, days after launching his 2020 reelection campaign McConnell asked Owensboro’s mayor to set up a luncheon with business and political leaders at which the senator claimed credit for delivering the grant.