Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 94 95 96 97 98 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
19 Aug 2011 1:40 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
It sure looks like he is having fun with that dog. I guess he couldnt quite pray that away.I can't help but be tempted to play around with all these corndog pics. They're asking for it.
diesel79
19 Aug 2011 1:42 pm
diesel79
posts
I can't help but be tempted to play around with all these corndog pics. They're asking for it. You need to make a thread with that pic in it just for JT and chickie. Their heads would explode. HAHA
User avatar
Nobody
19 Aug 2011 4:29 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
You need to make a thread with that pic in it just for JT and chickie. Their heads would explode. HAHA
User avatar
Nobody
24 Aug 2011 11:57 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Nickolas Ashford, husband of Valerie Simpson and half of one of the greatest song writing teams of all time, died on August 22, 2011. Together they wrote such songs as "Let's Go Get Stoned", "Ain't No Mountain High Enough", "You're All I Need To Get By", "Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing", and "Reach Out and Touch (Somebody's Hand)". The duo was inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame in 2002. R.I.P. Nick Ashford. Edited by MistyBlue, 24 August 2011 - 12:07 PM.
nuckin futz
24 Aug 2011 4:20 pm
nuckin futz
posts
What laws did Dems pass to hurt marriage? You have POLITICIZED marriage, as you do everything else in your poisoned mind. How can anyone call marriage a sacred union when 50% of marriages end up in divorce? That is the reality! Marriage started going down the tubes in the 60's with the advent of the SEXUAL REVOLUTION, and the PILL! I guess you missed out on that revolution, and aren't getting laid! LOL!
JoeLib
24 Aug 2011 4:37 pm
JoeLib
posts
So what's your point, that because some conservatives do the wrong thing, we should further undermine marriage by allowing homosexual marriage?Exactly how does homosexual marriage damage heterosexual marriage? I don't like tomatoes. If my neighbor does, and eats one, in what way does that hurt me? Because it's the same thing.
User avatar
RichClem
24 Aug 2011 5:26 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Exactly how does homosexual marriage damage heterosexual marriage? I don't like tomatoes. If my neighbor does, and eats one, in what way does that hurt me? Because it's the same thing.Tomatoes and homosexual marriage are the "same thing."More liberal intellectual brilliance on display.
User avatar
Nobody
25 Aug 2011 4:42 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Tomatoes and homosexual marriage are the "same thing."Speaking of homosexual marriage, how do you feel about Michelle Bachmann being married to a man who is full on Liberace gay?
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 5:45 pm
Redwood
posts
Wow. What a dick. yeah, so.....what's his user name when he posts here because that line of talk is very familiar here.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 6:05 pm
Redwood
posts
Wow, a Republican somewhere in the country made a bad joke?Shocking, yawn.Meanwhile The Chosen One and Democrats are running a $1.6 trillion deficit and refusing to cut spending.That imperils the entire country, but little Miss Marxist is worried about a joke.Stupid clueless moonbat.It wasn't a joke. The joke's on you bat baby
User avatar
RichClem
25 Aug 2011 6:16 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Tomatoes and homosexual marriage are the "same thing."Speaking of homosexual marriage, how do you feel about Michelle Bachmann being married to a man who is full on Liberace gay?There's the liberal-left Modus Operandi; Lie, smear, fabricate, dissemble.You can't defend Liberalism, so you try to destroy its opponents.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 6:30 pm
Redwood
posts
So what's your point, that because some conservatives do the wrong thing, we should further undermine marriage by allowing homosexual marriage?No, let's strengthen marriage by repealing one-party divorce, by strengthening its contract, by acknowledging that liberals were wrong for decades in pushing divorce and claiming it would help women and children.How preposterous.So better to force someone to remain in a nightmare mairrage? That sounds like a VERY good reason to NOT get married. Divorce HAS helped a lot of women,and quite a few men. In clem-world how hellish would it have to be before someone gets a divorce, and secondly ....how many times have you been married?
User avatar
RichClem
25 Aug 2011 6:34 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
So what's your point, that because some conservatives do the wrong thing, we should further undermine marriage by allowing homosexual marriage?No, let's strengthen marriage by repealing one-party divorce, by strengthening its contract, by acknowledging that liberals were wrong for decades in pushing divorce and claiming it would help women and children.How preposterous.So better to force someone to remain in a nightmare mairrage? That sounds like a VERY good reason to NOT get married. Divorce HAS helped a lot of women,and quite a few men. In clem-world how hellish would it have to be before someone gets a divorce, and secondly ....how many times have you been married?Marriage is a legal contract. One-party divorce means that liberal legislators interfered in that contract to the detriment of the person who wants to remain married.Why should one party be able to walk away from what they promised would be a life-long commitment?And divorce is terrible for children. Suck it up and get through it, at least until the kids are grown.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 6:40 pm
Redwood
posts
There's the liberal-left Modus Operandi; Lie, smear, fabricate, dissemble.You can't defend Liberalism, so you try to destroy its opponents.Yes Master Clem, you have taught us well and now we can go forth Speaking the language of TEA, to overthrow their dark little Aryan Aristocracy ! As Gov Perry would say, There's a sucker born every minute, except he'd get confused and say inch....which would extend his lead by another point over Romney.Actually...I ought to run as a Tea candidate. I could fake it better than some of those guys can do it for real. Praise the Lord and bring back Segregation!And Dud,....or dude...whatever, you can't DISASSEMBLE me, I'm built to last, I was made in OHIO by Union labor! Edited by Redwood, 25 August 2011 - 06:54 PM.
User avatar
RichClem
25 Aug 2011 6:59 pm
User avatar
   
1,274 posts
Yes Master Clem, you have taught us well and now we can go forth Speaking the language of TEA, to overthrow their dark little Aryan Aristocracy ! As Gov Perry would say, There's a sucker born every minute, except he'd get confused and say inch....which would extend his lead by another point over Romney.Actually...I ought to run as a Tea candidate. I could fake it better than some of those guys can do it for real. Praise the Lord and bring back Segregation!And Dud,....or dude...whatever, you can't DISASSEMBLE me, I'm built to last, I was made in OHIO by Union labor!Sorry, I don't speak Moonbat-ese.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 7:06 pm
Redwood
posts
No. Because the war gave jobs. A lot of jobs. Mostly to women since the men were out fighting. A lot of the private sector flourished due to tool making, ship and plane construction, and even hollywood. They made a lot of films during that era. Additionally, Americans were forced to buy less of overseas goods and instead they bought American products. yes, I guess you are correct. we will probably not agree, but thats ok:)I think you DID agree. War spending IS Government spending and yes a lot of women worked. My mom made Wright Cyclone Engines for bombers. Worth Note though, us imports between 1935 and 1950 were quite low and likely would have not been high without the War. America was quite self sufficient then with just a few important imports.When I was young anything NOT made in the USA was a novelty. Those were prosperous times.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 7:17 pm
Redwood
posts
I feel like I am in the middle of Brazil on a sultry night.Air conditioning died. It's so 'effing hot in this room. Thank god for industrial strength fans. Otherwise I'd just open up my own sauna.Did I tell you that I am considering joining the Marines?Well, The Marines do fight in steamy jungles a lot so you are halfway there.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 7:28 pm
Redwood
posts
Lies the troll."Sweatshop" is a derogatory term the Lying moonbat Left uses. As I noted, the workers were earning 4, 5 times what they would have at home.Moonbat like you would end that relative prosperity."They" did? Bullcrap. I'll bet 95% of the businesses did no such thing. You're a lying smear artist.If deceit was involved by a few business, that's breach of contract and fraud that doesn't require micro-management of all law abiding businesses.And Saipan's minimum wage was very, very high compared to what they'd earn in their home country.It sure looks like you're a shameless lying troll.And moonbat, what do the following words mean?Leftist moonbat that you are, you'd end their chances at relative prosperity, sending them back to earn far, far, far less under poorer work conditions.I defended the right of businesses to hire these employees if the contract was honored and work environment reasonable.But the facts never get in your way.I read it at the time, I've read about it.And I'm the liar. You seriously think that you can get away with just making stuff up?I've posted more than enough proof to show that what I said is true.All you've done is lie about the facts, and defend indentured servitude. Yes, without any doubt you are a shameless liar. Smear and lie, smear and lie, smear and lie, your Modus Operandi. What, isn't there a rapist/ serial felon for you to defend, moonbat?You ARE the MOONBAT. These people in fact WERE slaves as they made so little they could not pay back th " charge" on them if they worked 10 years and while they were lied to PROMISED one thing, it was a SCAM and it meant year of SLAVERY before they could just get free with NOTHING. I doubt you CARE since obviously SOMEONE made a lot of MONEY and in your value system, that's bottom line.Save the Poor Little Moonbaby line...Lie, Smear....BULL shat...we heard it. The Saipan Slave/sweatshop thing was well documented. BRAG that you are just FINE with slavery,Heck if Union Busting is good, slaves ought to be even MORE Tea Cult.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 8:26 pm
Redwood
posts
It's a constitutionally protected right for women to kill their unborn children?What the hell have you been smoking? I would think it'd be in reverse if you want to get technical!Also, plenty do. That's where a lot of this debate and conflict over the issue comes from. If every woman did it without saying a word concerning it and feel remorse for their actions, I think people would allow it to just fizzle out.Look at it from a landlord's right's view. You got an uninvited, unwanted tenant and you evict it.Until that fetus is independently viable it has the same status as any other organ..........UNLESS Religion trumps other concerns.Then, of course you have to sandbag the constitution to build in a Religiously based exception. The legit way to do that is to amend the constitution with a special exception to the bill of rights. Anything less is a temporary aberration by a Supreme Court that's more partisain than constitutional which pretty much renders the court pointless and the constitution vulnerable Edited by Redwood, 25 August 2011 - 08:33 PM.
Redwood
25 Aug 2011 9:23 pm
Redwood
posts
Mmm, I don't think so. The government can say what it wants but I will never 'okay' evil just because they think it is fine and dandy.Well, We on the OTHER side also have had plenty of cause to hate stuff YOUR side likes but this ain't Somalia and we go through the steps to try to make it right.Nobody gets their way all the time, that's why it's called DEMOCRACY.Our history is all about making the second best choice work for both sides. Heck, pass out " Morning After Pills" Take in a few airhead 15 yr olds,a few 40 yr old crack ho's who got pregnant and can't care for themselves let alone whatever sort of child might pop out. Almost by definition, the woman/girl too thoughtless to NOT get pregnant, who does not think she can DO "mommy" and does not WANT TO.....is unlikely to produce the ideal offspring..and once she DOES right away those same right wingers complain she's on WELFARE feeding the kid off " My Precious Tax Dollar!!" 15 yr later the kid's in jail and you hate him.I've known "righties" who were both Gun Cult and Pro Life. Seemed to have a warped fantasy about a future where he had to shoot some neighbors to protect his beer and TV dinners...and guns enough to shoot a couple dozen of them and some innocent bystanders. Then, next beer, he's all right to life about some baby who at this point is the size of the tater tots he's eating. I guess it could get more strange if Mr Life/Death/Whatever is a bigot and hates (pick a color)unless they are not born yet.So many contradictions. R Paul is so libertarian he'd wipe out 90% of government and 90% of laws, mostly leaving traffic lights,a small army.....and a few hundred thousand guys to monitor women to assure that if one gets pregnant she STAYS pregnant. I guess he'd legalize heroin but outlaw coathangers and perhaps gynecology. Paul's minimalist Gov that privatized schools and roads would have "for Prophet/Profit" Orphan farms where,after being schooled in basic mining or welding skills,Garment trades, and libertarian-Evangelical ideology,the kids could be leased out as apprentices. Cheaper than illegals and English Speaking!Think about it.....Blend Anti-Abortion, Child Labor/cheap wages......SUPER Tea/Libertarian. The English had that going a few hundred years ago before that leftist Charles Dickens invented Bleeding Hearts....or reinvented if you prefer Bible Jesus over Corporate Jesus.
1 94 95 96 97 98 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 4083 users online :: 4 registered, 15 bots, and 4064 guests
Registered users: Vegas, *Roshambo, Squatchman, Cannonpointer
Bots: Not, Pinterest, LCC, proximic, DuckDuckGo, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Kinza, Baiduspider, YandexBot, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Applebot, bingbot
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search