Liberal Forum

NBC has released a video of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein yucking it up at a party that was attended by a bunch of NFL cheerleaders.

The two of them are seen ogling the women and Trump pointing out the hot ones to Epstein.

In an interview with Trump the host of the show that filmed the party, Faith Daniels, talked about how Trump had kissed her on the mouth without her consent.

Sound familiar?

"I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait."

NBC Obtained Trump-Epstein Footage After Trump Kissed an Anchor Without Consent

Attempting to dismiss his social connections to Jeffrey Epstein last week, President Trump said that he “wasn’t a fan” of the financier and that he “knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.”

But a video published by NBC News on Wednesday of the pair appearing to comment on women’s bodies at Mar-a-Lago in 1992 seems to make this yet another example of the president denying the existence of an occasion that was recorded on tape.

As The Cut explains:

The tape was filmed as part of a talk-show profile of Trump’s post-divorce life, and shows Trump surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills, who were in Florida to play against the Miami Dolphins.

Trump dances with them, grabs them, bites his lip, and at one point, grabs a woman around her waist, pulls her against him, and then pats her butt.

Part way through the tape, Epstein arrives at the future president’s resort with two other guests.

They stand around the edges of the dance floor, watching the women dance.

Trump talks to Epstein and another man, pointing out various women, gesturing toward one and appearing to say to Epstein, “Look at her, back there. She’s hot.”

Epstein grins and nods. Trump then whispers something in Epstein’s ear, and the billionaire doubles over in laughter.

The video, which shows Trump grabbing women in a manner consistent with his own description on the Access Hollywood tape, came about because Trump nonconsensually kissed NBC anchor Faith Daniels on the lips in public.

(The forced kiss was originally reported by NBC during the 2016 campaign.)

As the Washington Post explains:

The footage was taken for a feature on Trump that aired on the NBC talk show “A Closer Look” [in November 1992].

On the segment, host Faith Daniels described Trump’s agreeing to come on the show after he kissed the news anchor on the lips in front of photographers at a charity dinner in New York while her husband’s back was turned …

“You kissed me on the lips in front of the paparazzi, and I said, ‘That’ll cost you.
I’m booking you on the show,’” Daniels said to Trump.

“Uh-huh. I know. That’s great,” Trump responded, adding: “It was so open and nice.”

“So open and nice?” interjected Daniels. “Wait a minute.”

In his 1992 appearance on A Closer Look, Daniels also questions the recently divorced Trump on how he would explain the party in which he was seen groping NFL cheerleaders to his oldest son, Donald Trump Jr.

“He’s 14, and, uh, he could really understand that one,” Trump responded. He added, in one of his greatest appraisals of Trump Jr. to date: “No, that one’s alright.”

I'm automatically attracted to beautiful women and their automatically attracted to me.

I'm a lucky bastard I will admit that.

Misty » 18 Jul 2019 3:18 pm » wrote: Facts are not talking points.
I try to strive for accuracy.

Your "facts" are absolutely talking points, put out by the clinton camp for you to parrot.

You neither independently investigated from a neutral source how many flights clinton took, nor determined how many of those flights were in fact legs of a single tour. You simply aped what their camp put out - and that is what we mean when we accuse someone of running talking points.

Your source was no more neutral than are clem's, nor any more honest and forthcoming. Your facts are disembodied - I have to make assumptions for them to have an exonorating effect. And I am immunized by experience against making positive assumptions about clintons, knowing as I do the definition of is.

Drag a hundred talking points through a political forum and there's no telling HOW many people you can hoodwink.

Misty, you better order more BODY WASH!

I would hate to see what your hot water bill is for all those showers!

Its hard to wash the taint of TERMINHATER OFF!

Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2019 5:44 pm » wrote:

Misty » 18 Jul 2019 3:18 pm » wrote: Facts are not talking points.
I try to strive for accuracy.

Your "facts" are absolutely talking points, put out by the clinton camp for you to parrot.

I must have missed those emails from the Clinton Camp.

The Clintons are history.
Neither of them are ever going to run for office again.
Yet they still seem to live rent free inside a lot of people's heads.

Termin8tor » 22 Jul 2019 9:08 am » wrote:Little Miss Marxist will have to censor this to hide the truth.

"Cruelty is the policy!" shrieks the board's premier psychopath / Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Reality is the exact opposite, as usual.
And she was dead silent at the larger number of deaths under Obama.

TRUMP SAVES LIVES AT THE BORDER
We are a few days late with this, but it bears repeating if you haven’t already seen it: deaths at the U.S.’s Southern border have declined during the Trump administration:

I have explained this to you several times now, but I can't seem to make you understand it.
You keep conflating two different issues.

There have always been deaths due to people trying to illegally enter the country through the desert or across the Rio Grande.
Most of those were adult male Mexican men coming here to find work.
They were NOT families who were seeking asylum.

And the reason those deaths have declined is because Mexico's economy has improved and not as many of those men are coming here to find work.

That is not at all what is happening now.
Because families from Central America who are coming here to seek asylum are being turned away, or told they will have to wait at a legal port of entry indefinitely, they are trying to enter the country in between the legal ports of entry, which is much more dangerous.

And as a result, this is what we are seeing.



The people who died crossing the border under Obama were not asylum seekers who were turned away.
He did NOT turn away asylum seekers.

And Obama had no control over how many Mexicans were coming here to find work and crossing the border illegally.
That number goes up and down according to how the Mexican economy is doing.

Termin8tor » 20 Jul 2019 8:47 am » wrote:

Misty » 12 Jul 2019 9:11 pm » wrote:You lying sack of ****.

Speaking of, how many thousand times have you accused Trump of being racist?

More lies and propaganda from Joseph Goebbels.





https://www.apnews.com/afs:Content:6348420521

You need to fact check those Memes you gaping asshole.
Your side lies......all the time.

nuckin futz » 20 Jul 2019 9:45 am » wrote:Misty, you better order more BODY WASH!

I would hate to see what your hot water bill is for all those showers!

Its hard to wash the taint of TERMINHATER OFF!

I need to scrub myself down with a **** Brillo pad after being around him.

Misty » 22 Jul 2019 4:23 pm » wrote: I must have missed those emails from the Clinton Camp.

You know where you get your talking points - don't puff yourself up like you're one of the people on the wiped servers.

Misty » 22 Jul 2019 4:23 pm » wrote: The Clintons are history.

Yeah, no.

Here's the thing. I have you telling me hiltery is irrelevant so that you can score a low-hanging point on a chat board while absolving yourself from having to mount a credible defense for the ****, criminal, raping, child molesting camp with which you are associated. Just call your leaders irrelevant to escape defending them while repeating their talking points - a clever, clintonesque strategy.

And then I have rachael maddow, a power player in democrat circles and a known party apparatchik. You say one thing and she says the opposite.

In my place, whom would YOU believe?

"HILLARY IS VERY MUCH IN THE GAME. SHE IS NOT A RETIED POLITICIAN" - RACHAEL MADDOW.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5YSOqYeTDM

IMO, the most important part of the Muller hearings came at the very end.

Former special counsel Robert Mueller made one thing clear in his marathon testimony before Congress on Wednesday: Russia interfered in the US election, and the threat to American democracy remains in 2020.

“They’re doing it as we sit here,” Mueller said at one point during his appearance before the House Intelligence Committee, “and they expect to do it during the next campaign.”

But Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, ended the second of two hearings with a clear, precise exchange with Mueller.

Schiff, in his closing questions to Mueller, asked if “knowingly accepting assistance from a foreign government,” to which Mueller responded “a crime.”

Schiff continued, adding that if knowingly accepting assistance from a “foreign government during a presidential campaign is an unethical thing to do.”

“And a crime in certain circumstances,” Mueller responded.

Schiff continued: “To the degree that it undermines our democracy and our institutions, we can agree that it’s also unpatriotic.”

“True,” Mueller replied, in a rare instance of directly answering a question outside the confines of the report.

Shortly after, Schiff questioned whether public officials acting unethically “also exposes them to compromise particularly in dealing with foreigners.”

“Is that true?” Schiff asked.

“True,” Mueller responded again. The exchange continues as follows:

Schiff: That foreign partner can expose their wrongdoing and extort them.

Mueller: True.

Schiff: That conduct can be of a financial nature if you have a financial motive or elicit business dealing, am I right?

Mueller: Yes.

Schiff: It could also just involve deception. If you are lying about something that can be exposed, then you can be blackmailed.

Mueller: Also true.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... dam-schiff

Unpatriotic, unethical and subject to blackmail.
And Trump supporters don't give a damn.

Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., read several examples of Trump’s heaping praise upon WikiLeaks, the anti-secrecy website that published stolen emails and documents sent between Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

“This just came out … WikiLeaks. I love WikiLeaks," Quigley read from one of Trump's campaign-trail appearances in October 2016.

"This WikiLeaks stuff is unbelievable," Trump said a couple of days later. "It tells you the inner heart, you gotta read it."

"This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove,” he had said at the end of that month. And in the following days, Trump said, "Boy, I love reading those WikiLeaks.”

“Do any of those quotes disturb you?” Quigley asked Mueller.

Mueller struggled to find the words to respond before he said, “Problematic is an understatement, in terms of giving some … hope or some boost to what is and should be illegal activity.”

https://aol.it/2GrDpsn

In other breaking news, Mueller pissed in snowflakes Cheerios.

Trumplicans are celebrating the following facts:

That the president and members of his campaign willingly and happily accepted foreign intel which was described by Mueller as unpatriotic, unethical and in certain instances a crime.

That the president was not exonerated for obstructing justice, and that the president can be charged with a crime (obstruction of justice) after he leaves office.

That the president gave 'hope and a boost' to illegal activity by his constant praising of WikiLeaks.

That the president's campaign chairman Paul Manafort tried to make money during the campaign from a Russian oligarch.

That the president's NSA director Michael Flynn tried to make money during the campaign from the autocratic government of Turkey.

That Donald Trump tried to make money during the campaign from Moscow.

That the president refused to be interviewed by Robert Mueller and was not truthful in his written answers to the Special Counsel's questions.

That Trump's campaign manager, deputy campaign manager personal lawyer and NSA director were all indicted for lying,

crimsongulf » 24 Jul 2019 8:59 pm » wrote:In other breaking news, Mueller pissed in snowflakes Cheerios.

Mueller said he was going to stick to only what was in his report.
Having read the report, I already knew exactly what Mueller was going to say, so my Cheerios are piss free.

The fact that Trumpies are talking all about his style and nothing about the substance of the hearings tells me a lot.

Mueller said he was going to stick to only what was in his report.
Having read the report, I already knew exactly what Mueller was going to say, so my Cheerios are piss free.

The fact that Trumpies are talking all about his style and nothing about the substance of the hearings tells me a lot.

He was supposed to investigate Russian interference in the election, psycho, yet testified that the Steele Dossier was outside his purview.

Uh, where did Steele get his lies? From Russian officials.

See anything suspicious in that? No, you'll toady to the Official Democrat Talking Point Lies.

Why would someone who believes he was totally exonerated behave this way?

Trump Yells ‘Fake News,’ Hurls Personal Insults At Female Reporter For Quoting Mueller Testimony



President Trump lashed out at a female reporter Wednesday afternoon after she correctly pointed out that former special counsel Robert Mueller confirmed in testimony to Congress earlier in the day that the president could still be indicted after he leaves office.

“Mueller said you could be charged once you leave office,” CBS News correspondent Paula Reid told the president.

“You’re fake news and you’re right at the top of the list also!” Trump angrily shouted back.
“Let me tell you. Go back to…”

“That is what he said,” the reporter countered.

“That’s not what he said,” Trump falsely claimed.

“Read his correction. Read his correction,” he shouted. “If you read his correction, you’ll find out.”

“That’s why people don’t deal with you. You’re not an honest reporter,” he said as he turned and walked away from the reporter.

In fact, Mueller confirmed that President Trump could be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office.

“Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?” Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) asked Mueller during the former special counsel’s testimony.

“Yes,” Mueller replied.

Buck appeared to be taken aback by Mueller’s response.

“You believe that he could committed – you could charge the president of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?” Buck repeated his question.

“Yes,” Mueller confirmed.

Where was he telling Paula Reid to go back to?
Scotland?

https://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?surname=Reid

Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2019 1:03 pm » wrote:You're quoting that psychopathic liar Schiff?

Says the gaping asshole who quoted the liar Baghdad Barr who said that the Mueller Report totally exonerated Trump.

Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2019 1:15 pm » wrote:Gosh, are you accusing not only Barr, but Rosenstein and their entire team of obstructing justice?

I'm accusing Barr of lying.

Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2019 1:15 pm » wrote:That's very, very unpatriotic, psycho.

You know what's unpatriotic Precious?
Willingly taking help from a foreign adversary in order to win an election.

Termin8tor » 25 Jul 2019 1:15 pm » wrote:WHy didn't you answer my question?
Did Schiff ever find that evidence of collusion he claimed he had that no one else had seen?
Come on, cite it, wackjob.
You cited him as a, guffaw, credible source.

The collusion was obvious, but there is no such crime in the criminal code.

Maybe you missed the part about how Trump was giving a 'boost' to WikiLeak's crimes by publicly praising them and how many members of his campaign were meeting with Russians and lying about it, and how his campaign chairman supplied the Russians with inside campaign info in order to help them know where to target their disinformation campaign.

If it walks like a duck, it might be collusion.

Can you tell me one thing that you heard in the hearing yesterday that made you proud of Trump's behavior during the campaign?

Let me guess.
You didn't watch, right?

You prefer to remain willfully ignorant and just regurgitate your FOX News TRUMP TV talking points.

I no longer have any tolerance for people who think that anything this president and his officials did during the campaign was okay.

It was unpatriotic, anti-American and disloyal to the country, and if you support it, so are you.
And the POTUS said he would do it again.

SCHIFF: Paul Manafort was trying to make money or achieve debt forgiveness from a Russian oligarch?

MUELLER: Generally that is accurate.

SCHIFF: Michael Flynn was trying to make money from Turkey?

MUELLER: True.

SCHIFF: Donald Trump was trying to make millions from a real estate deal in Moscow?

MUELLER: To the extent you’re talking about the hotel in Moscow?

SCHIFF: Yes.

MUELLER: Yes.

SCHIFF: When you investigation looked into these matters, numerous Trump associates lied to your team, the grand jury, and to Congress?

MUELLER: A number of persons that we interviewed in our investigation turns out did lie.

SCHIFF: Mike Flynn lied?

MUELLER: He was convicted of lying, yes.

SCHIFF: George Papadopoulos was convicted of lying?

MUELLER: True.

SCHIFF: Paul Manafort was convicted of lying?

MUELLER: True.

SCHIFF: Paul Manafort was - in fact, went so far as to encourage other people to lie?

MUELLER: That is accurate.

SCHIFF: Manafort’s deputy, Rick Gates, lied?

MUELLER: That is accurate.

SCHIFF: Michael Cohen, the president’s lawyer, was indicted for lying?

MUELLER: True.

SCHIFF: He lied to stay on message with the president?

MUELLER: Allegedly by him.

SCHIFF: And when Donald Trump called your investigation a witch hunt, that was also false, was it not?

MUELLER: I’d like to think so, yes.

SCHIFF: Well, your investigation is not a witch hunt. Is...

MUELLER: It is not a witch hunt.

SCHIFF: When the president said the Russian interference was a hoax, that was false, wasn’t it?

MUELLER: True.

SCHIFF: We decided publically it was false?

MUELLER: He did say publically that it was false, yes.

SCHIFF: And when he told it to Putin, that was false, too, wasn’t it?

MUELLER: That I’m not familiar with.

SCHIFF: When the president said he had no business dealings with Russia, that was false, wasn’t it?

MUELLER: I’m not going to go into the details of the report that are along those lines.

SCHIFF: When the president said he had no business dealings with Russia, in fact he was seeking to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, was he not?

MUELLER: I think there - there are some questions about when this was accomplished.

SCHIFF: You would consider a billion dollar deal to build a tower in Moscow to be business dealings, wouldn’t you, Director Mueller?

MUELLER: Absolutely.

SCHIFF: In short, your investigation found evidence that Russia wanted to help Trump win the election, right?

MUELLER: I think generally that would be accurate.

SCHIFF: Russia informed campaign officials of that?

MUELLER: I’m not certain to what conversation you’re referring to.

SCHIFF: Well, through an intermediary then informed Papadopoulos that they could help with the anonymous release of stolen emails?

MUELLER: Accurate.

SCHIFF: Russia committed federal crimes in order to help Donald Trump?

MUELLER: When you’re talking about computer crimes in the charge...

SCHIFF: Yes.

MUELLER: ... in our case, absolutely.

SCHIFF: The Trump campaign officials built their strategy - their messaging strategy around those stolen documents?

MUELLER: Generally that’s true.

SCHIFF: And then they lied to cover it up.

MUELLER: Generally, that’s true.