Liberal Forum

billbatard » 30 Jul 2019 9:43 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:28 am » wrote:Here's a huge threat to US democracy.Is one single Democrat going to talk about it?

Will the corrupt liberal MSM report it prominently?

I doubt it.

Because they don't care.

well good for them i love china go china!!!

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:46 am » wrote:
So you think it's great that they are interfering in the presidential election.

I knew you'd melt down into a babbling little leftist wackjob.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:46 am » wrote:
So you think it's great that they are interfering in the presidential election.

I knew you'd melt down into a babbling little leftist wackjob.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:09 am » wrote:Why have liberals been lying that Trump's latest tweets against Cummings were racist?

Because he's exposing Democrats' virulent institutional racism.

Annoyed Liberall » 30 Jul 2019 9:44 am » wrote: Whatever you say.

I can see that you are not able to answer questions.
We have a few other like you here.
Carry on.

billbatard » 30 Jul 2019 9:49 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:46 am » wrote:So you think it's great that they are interfering in the presidential election.

I knew you'd melt down into a babbling little leftist wackjob.

as long as marxists are doing it yes i'm on their side i hope they send nuclear missiles crashing down on your wretched cities

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:56 am » wrote:
Just as I predicted. You're a silly little dweeb and a troll.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:28 am » wrote:Here's a huge threat to US democracy.
Is one single Democrat going to talk about it?
Will the corrupt liberal MSM report it prominently?
I doubt it. Because they don't care.

China Covertly Subverting Trump Reelection

China is conducting an aggressive disinformation and influence
campaign designed to block the re-election of President Trump in 2020,
according to a dissident Chinese billionaire who until recently
was close to senior Beijing leaders.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:46 am » wrote:

billbatard » 30 Jul 2019 9:43 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 9:28 am » wrote:Here's a huge threat to US democracy.Is one single Democrat going to talk about it?
Will the corrupt liberal MSM report it prominently?
I doubt it.
Because they don't care.

well good for them i love china go china!!!

So you think it's great that they are interfering in the presidential election.
I knew you'd melt down into a babbling little leftist wackjob.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 2:08 pm » wrote:......it was Hillary who colluded with Russia.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 2:11 pm » wrote:

What goes around comes around Precious.
You showed no concern when Russia helped your guy in 2016.
I can't believe you actually have the balls to post that **** you **** hypocrite.

**** you, psycho. The whole Russia hoax is being exposed, and it was your candidate who colluded with Russia.
Indictments are coming, and they won't be for process crimes or tax fraud.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 2:14 pm » wrote:Steele testified in Britain that he got the information from Russian officials, wackjob.

Termin8tor » 30 Jul 2019 2:22 pm » wrote:Who benefited most from Russia's interference in the election?
From Ukraine's?
Your candidate, Hillary Clinton.

Ronald Reagan referred to Africans as "monkeys" during racist phone call with Richard Nixon.

A newly-released recording from Richard Nixon's presidency reveals that Ronald Reagan, the next Republican to be elected commander-in-chief, once referred to people from Africa as "monkeys."

"Last night, I tell you, to watch that thing on television as I did," Reagan, then the governor of California, can be heard saying to Nixon during a phone call following China's recognition by the U.N.

After Nixon interrupted to affirm what Reagan had said, the governor pressed on.

"To see those — those monkeys from those African countries — damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes," Reagan said.

Nixon responded with audible laughter.

"Had the story stopped there, it would have been bad enough.

Racist venting is still racist.

But what happened next showed the dynamic power of racism when it finds enablers," Tim Naftali wrote about the recording in the Atlantic.

"Nixon used Reagan’s call as an excuse to adapt his language to make the same point to others.

Right after hanging up with Reagan, Nixon sought out Secretary of State William Rogers.

When Nixon found Rogers, he mentioned Reagan's comments as a way of arguing that American foreign policy should account for racist views.

"As he said, he saw these— these, uh — these cannibals on television last night.

And he says, ‘Christ, they weren’t even wearing shoes, and here the United States is going to submit its fate to that,’ and so forth and so on," Nixon told Rogers.

crimsongulf » 02 Aug 2019 6:33 pm » wrote:Eleyesha has not a single accomplishment to his name and DJT told the truth. Even Eleyesha is on video calling his district drug-infested. There was nothing racist, it was simply a true statement that the left has a problem with.
How many millions and probably billions have been thrown at his district and not one single thing has changed.

In late summer 2016, the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump embarked on what he claimed was an appeal to African American voters.

In August, Trump traveled to Michigan for an event that was part of the push, though reporters noted that his speech was actually given in a predominantly white suburb of Lansing.

“What the hell do you have to lose?” Trump said, addressing his question to black voters.

The point, he said, was that African American communities were already a shambles, and their condition could only improve. The remarks drew shocked reactions at the time.

Three years later, as the president attacks Representative Elijah Cummings, a Baltimore Democrat, the answer to his question is clear.

Trump has sabotaged a law that guaranteed health insurance for many African Americans.

He has undermined protections for voting rights.

His Justice Department has stopped going after police departments that discriminated against African Americans.

He has rolled back environmental protections.

Beyond policy, he has used rhetoric that suggests the citizenship of African Americans and other minorities is conditional and less than that of white Americans.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... se/594994/

Gopher Eyes » 02 Aug 2019 8:39 pm » wrote: I guess you didn't hear his long rant last night about the horrible conditions in every inner city.
Inner city is code for black.

Isn't he supposed to be the president of the whole country, or is he just the president of rural America?
During his campaign and in his inaugural address he promised to fix the problems in cities like Baltimore or Chicago.