Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 976 977 978 979 980 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
4 Oct 2019 8:52 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
crimsongulf » 04 Oct 2019 8:36 pm » wrote:
Misty » 04 Oct 2019 8:30 pm » wrote:You wanna talk about lying Red?
Seriously?
Yes, I do. why did the pencil-necked geek bald-faced lie about contact with the "whistelblower"? Sure make the "whistleblower" suspect.
Schiff never met with the whistleblower.
The whistleblower met with a member of his staff to get some guidance on how to file a complaint, which BTW according to the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) is standard operating procedure.
Burr said it happens all the time.
The whistleblower never told Schiff's staff member what the subject of the complaint was.

The Liar-In-Chief said that Schiff helped the whistleblower write the complaint, which of course is not true.
But then 99% of what he says is not true, and I'm being generous.
crimsongulf » 04 Oct 2019 8:36 pm » wrote:Why won't Pelosi call a vote on impeachment proceedings?
You need to ask her that.
I don't speak for her.
crimsongulf » 04 Oct 2019 8:36 pm » wrote:You know as well as I do this is just another Kavanaugh type whining drying Dem hit job and as usual, DJT will win.
I know no such thing.
And I also did not believe that in the Kavanaugh case.
If nothing else he proved that he does not have the temperament to be a SCOTUS justice by the way he comported himself during the hearing.
crimsongulf » 04 Oct 2019 8:36 pm » wrote:You folks turn a blind eye to what is obviously a witchhunt. you have been on a witchhunt since the night of the election.
The only thing that is obvious to me is that 45 is the most corrupt president we have ever had, and you folks are perfectly willing to turn a blind eye to what is blatantly obvious to the rest of us.
User avatar
solon
5 Oct 2019 2:16 pm
User avatar
   
693 posts
Termin8tor » 05 Oct 2019 7:32 am » wrote:
The "whistle blower' is not a whistle blower. He grossly abused the statute and spread several falsehoods about Trump.

You are a LIAR. I have PUNKED you on this over and over. You are a LIAR so you keep telling this LIE because you get sheer joy from telling STUPID LIES

There was no quid pro quo. No aid was threatened to be withheld.

You are a LIAR. Quid pro Quo is not necessary in this case anyway but there IS PLENTY of it. They were told they wouldnt get a meeting till they played ball and the AID WAS BEING WITHHELD with NO credible reason for it. Even the acting Amabassador in his text message was saying it was CRAZY to withhold aid

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/10/04/us/politics/ukraine-text-messages-volker.html
On September 1, Ambassador Taylor sought clarification of the requirements for a White House visit:
7

[9/1/19, 12:08:57 PM] Bill Taylor: Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?
[9/1/19, 12:42:29 PM] Gordon Sondland: Call me
[9/9/19, 12:47:11 AM] Bill Taylor: As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.

Schiff lied through his teeth denying that his staff had contact with him.

That is not what Schiff said the whistleblower did NOT tell them the content of his complaint but was asking for advise how to take the issue forward


Schiff never shared the information with his fellow Repubs, which is stunningly sleazy and unethical given that Dems are basing impeachment only on this one set of false charges.

You are a LIAR. He never HAD the information about the CONTENTS of the complaint until it broke YOU ARE A LIAR

So as usual you're siding with the sleazebags against the victim.
As USUAL you make any excuse not matter how STUPID no natter how much you have to LIE to make excuses for the BLATANT and RAMPANT corruption of your GOD Trump
User avatar
crimsongulf
5 Oct 2019 8:54 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
Misty » 04 Oct 2019 8:52 pm » wrote: Schiff never met with the whistleblower.
The whistleblower met with a member of his staff to get some guidance on how to file a complaint, which BTW according to the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) is standard operating procedure.
Burr said it happens all the time.
The whistleblower never told Schiff's staff member what the subject of the complaint was.

The Liar-In-Chief said that Schiff helped the whistleblower write the complaint, which of course is not true.
But then 99% of what he says is not true, and I'm being generous.

You need to ask her that.
I don't speak for her.

I know no such thing.
And I also did not believe that in the Kavanaugh case.
If nothing else he proved that he does not have the temperament to be a SCOTUS justice by the way he comported himself during the hearing.

The only thing that is obvious to me is that 45 is the most corrupt president we have ever had, and you folks are perfectly willing to turn a blind eye to what is blatantly obvious to the rest of us.
doesn't matter, he knew about it and lied his pencil-necked geek *** off.
User avatar
nuckin futz
6 Oct 2019 12:44 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
At the summit, Trump aggressively lobbied for Russia to be readmitted into the G7, refused to hold it accountable for violating international law, blamed former President Barack Obama for Russia's annexation of Crimea, and expressed sympathy for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
One former senior Justice Department official, who worked closely with the former special counsel Robert Mueller when he was the FBI director, told Insider Trump's behavior was "directly out of the Putin playbook. We have a Russian asset sitting in the Oval Office."
ImageAbout this websitebusinessinsider.comUS spies say Trump's G7 performance suggests he's either a 'Russian asset' or a 'useful idiot' for Putin
User avatar
solon
6 Oct 2019 2:24 pm
User avatar
   
693 posts
[quote="Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2019 8:30 am"]

You have zero sense of irony. :rofl: :rofl:

You are so STUPID I doubt you even know what irony is

Despite claims by the board's premier psychopath, little Miss Marxist, that only "right wingnut hoax /conspiracy sources" support my claim, it is now mainstream conservative thought.

Your CLAIM is a LIE. Everytime I SHOVE the FACTS IN YOUR FACE you just ignore them and LIE AGAIN so GFY

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/timel/In July 2016, the FBI began investigating the Russian government’s attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election, including whether President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were involved in those efforts.The START of the whole thing was a bunch of intelligence agencies like Estonia and Germany and Britian was telling OUR intelligence agencies that whenever they were spying on KNOWN and suspected Russian intelligence assets they kept hearing Trump campaign people

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201-russiaGCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland.

Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.

Trump was getting advance notice from wikileaks about their dumps wikileaks was called by Trumps own pick for head of the CIA a hostile intelligence agency but Trump touted them at LEAST 100 times

https://www.vox.com/2019/4/19/18507743/

... -wikileaksImageTrumps campaign manager repeatedly gave a man he KNEW was connected to Russian Military Intelligence INTERNAL polling data and Manafort discussed their strategy for the midwest with him

https://www.newsweek.com/paul-manafort- .

The report noted that Manafort instructed his longtime colleague Rick Gates to provide Kilimnik with internal Trump campaign polling data and briefings on the campaign's strategies. For years, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together closely on political campaigns in Ukraine. Manafort even nicknamed Kilimnik his "Russian brain." The FBI has determined that Kilimnik, who was once a Russian military translator, has links to Russian intelligence services.

Sessions, Page, Manafort, Papadopolous, Jared, Don jr, Gates, Mcfarland ALL had contacts with Russians then LIED about them. Either you can cough up an innocent explanation for all that LYING or that alone justifies the investigationThe Trump campaign had more than 140 contacts with Russians the normal presidential campaign has ZERO

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201

Jan 26, 2019 - Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries,If you cannot show why all of that is SO NORMAL it should be illegal to have investigated it then STFU and stop making a FOOL out of yourselfYou are a LIAR and you know it ADDRESS THE FACTS or STFUImage
User avatar
Nobody
8 Oct 2019 8:19 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Senator Lindsey Graham, a close ally of President Donald Trump, once said that a president's refusal to comply with congressional oversight was an impeachable offense.

In an unearthed video from December 1998 circulating on Twitter on Friday, the South Carolina legislator passionately states that Richard Nixon could have been impeached for failing to comply with subpoenas from Congress.

"The day Richard Nixon failed to answer that subpoena is the day he was subject to impeachment because he took the power from Congress over the impeachment process away from Congress, and he became the judge and jury," Graham said two decades ago.

At the time, then-Representative Graham was a member of the House Judiciary Committee, and subsequently served as a manager in the unsuccessful impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton.

Watch the video here:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-BBWkCp1
User avatar
Nobody
8 Oct 2019 8:26 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 06 Oct 2019 11:26 am » wrote:As far as I can tell, Democrats are blatantly violating the Constitution, never mind their appalling lack of basic fair play.
Fair play?
That's rich coming from a member of your party.
:rofl:

The Constitution says that the House “shall have the sole power of impeachment,” but provides no process or rules, meaning each House that has considered it has proceeded as it chose to.

Elections have consequences Precious.
User avatar
Nobody
8 Oct 2019 8:33 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 05 Oct 2019 7:32 am » wrote:The "whistle blower' is not a whistle blower.
He grossly abused the statute and spread several falsehoods about Trump.
There was no quid pro quo. No aid was threatened to be withheld.
Schiff lied through his teeth denying that his staff had contact with him.
Schiff never shared the information with his fellow Repubs, which is stunningly sleazy and unethical given that Dems are basing impeachment only on this one set of false charges.
So as usual you're siding with the sleazebags against the victim.
WOW!

And you say I'm the one who spouts talking points?

THE GAPING ASSHOLE: There was no quid pro quo. No aid was threatened to be withheld.

What **** planet do you live on?
User avatar
solon
9 Oct 2019 4:41 pm
User avatar
   
693 posts
[quote="Termin8tor » 09 Oct 2019 9:58 am"]

Hoft again the STUPIDEST Man on the internet and I have SHOWN GatewayPunditis a site without a SHRED of legitimacy. YOU are still a GUTLESS COWARD who has RUN screaming from ALL OF THE FACTS I have shoved down your THROAT on this thread.

You are a PROVEN LIAR and an ignorant brainwashed MORON
User avatar
Nobody
10 Oct 2019 8:40 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 10 Oct 2019 8:33 am » wrote:
Misty » 03 Oct 2019 6:43 pm » wrote:Another attempt to discredit Adam Schiff goes down in flames.
Adam Schiff discredited himself long ago with his blatant lies.
That's hysterical coming from the biggest Trump sycophantic lickspittle on Earth.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
10 Oct 2019 8:46 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 09 Oct 2019 4:37 am » wrote:You're obviously very, very, VERY unhappy with the way things are going.
Au contraire Precious.
I am thrilled to see 45's massive corruption being unveiled.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Oct 2019 5:41 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
President Trump fans broke out into a chant of “Lock him Up” Thursday night after Eric Trump mentioned Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

“How do you think his son is feeling right now after embezzling a lot of money, taking a lot of money?”
Eric Trump told his father’s Minneapolis rally.

“The crookedness. He’s not looking too good either.”

Trump’s middle son then suggested changing the popular Trump rally chant against 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton to a 2020 version.

“Maybe ‘Lock her up’ goes to ‘Lock him up.’ I don’t know,” Eric said in a warm-up act speech.

“Lock him up. I like ‘Lock her up’ a little bit more.”

Gesturing to a member of the crowd at the Target Center, Eric offered thanks for the “good idea.”

The crowd took his lead and burst into chants of “Lock him up! Lock him up!”

https://nypost.com/2019/10/10/eric-trum ... lis-rally/
I can't believe the balls on that guy.
There is no proof that Hunter Biden ever 'embezzled' a dime from anyone or did anything illegal.
45 attacked Hunter Biden so viciously that many cable TV hosts refused to even air his comments.

This whole family of frauds, con artists and grifters are the ones who should be locked up for good.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Oct 2019 6:45 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Oct 2019 6:05 pm » wrote:
This whole family of frauds, con artists and grifters are the ones who should be locked up for good.
Gosh, what happened to that holy standard of innocent until proven guilty you bleated about when dishonestly defending Bill Clinton?
You have zero standards, other than double standards.
Why don't you tell that to 45 and his stupid son who are accusing Hunter Biden of all kinds of crimes?

Hunter Biden is a private citizen and they are viciously attacking him.

45 AKA Individual-1 committed campaign finance fraud, and he had a fraudulent charitable foundation and a fraudulent university.

So it's pretty rich that he should accuse anyone else of being corrupt or having committed crimes.

And don't talk to me about standards.

You accuse people of crimes all the time based only on the speculative **** that you read on your wingnut websites.

That is NOT evidence.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Oct 2019 7:43 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Oct 2019 6:53 pm » wrote:
Misty » 11 Oct 2019 6:45 pm » wrote:45 AKA Individual-1 committed campaign finance fraud, and he had a fraudulent charitable foundation and a fraudulent university.
So it's pretty rich that he should accuse anyone else of being corrupt or having committed crimes.
And don't talk to me about standards.
You accuse people of crimes all the time based only on the speculative **** that you read on your wingnut websites.
That is NOT evidence.
I cited John Solomon having 450 pages of evidence against the Bidens.
You censored my post.
Solomon is a liar and a hack just like you.
User avatar
Nobody
11 Oct 2019 11:01 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Oct 2019 6:19 pm » wrote:
I can't believe the balls on that guy.
There is no proof that Hunter Biden ever 'embezzled' a dime from anyone or did anything illegal.
Trump never accused him of "embezzling" anything, liar.
I never said he did.
It was his moron son who said it you jackass.
Misty » 11 Oct 2019 5:41 pm » wrote:
President Trump fans broke out into a chant of “Lock him Up” Thursday night after Eric Trump mentioned Joe Biden and his son Hunter.

“How do you think his son is feeling right now after embezzling a lot of money, taking a lot of money?” Eric Trump told his father’s Minneapolis rally.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
12 Oct 2019 9:23 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,765 posts
Termin8tor » 12 Oct 2019 7:08 am » wrote:
Yeah, every single conservative source in the entire country is wingnut, right wackjob?

Without your pre-written Talking Point Lies, you suck as a liar. :rofl:

And of course not response to this; just censorship.
Stop mass-bumping your threads, jackass. I just took time out of my busy trolling to bump 10 non-clem threads in order to remove your obnoxious block-bumped traffic jam from the top of the page.

I can think of easier ways to address your **** boardsmanship. :ninja:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Termin8tor
12 Oct 2019 9:34 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Cannonpointer » 12 Oct 2019 9:23 am » wrote: Stop mass-bumping your threads, jackass. I just took time out of my busy trolling to bump 10 non-clem threads in order to remove your obnoxious block-bumped traffic jam from the top of the page.

I can think of easier ways to address your **** boardsmanship. :ninja:
You didn't appreciate the humorous cartoons? :huh:
User avatar
Cannonpointer
12 Oct 2019 9:39 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,765 posts
Termin8tor » 12 Oct 2019 9:34 am » wrote: You didn't appreciate the humorous cartoons? :huh:
I didn't appreciate seeing anyone on the board bumping ten of their own threads to dominate the front page.

It makes this place look like a clown show - which I readily grant it IS, but we're trying to fly that fact under the radar and your mass self-bumping rather defeats our purpose.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Termin8tor
12 Oct 2019 10:00 am
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Cannonpointer » 12 Oct 2019 9:39 am » wrote: I didn't appreciate seeing anyone on the board bumping ten of their own threads to dominate the front page.

It makes this place look like a clown show - which I readily grant it IS, but we're trying to fly that fact under the radar and your mass self-bumping rather defeats our purpose.
I repent!

Until next time I forget.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
12 Oct 2019 10:19 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,765 posts
Termin8tor » 12 Oct 2019 10:00 am » wrote:
I repent!

Until next time I forget.
:LOL:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 976 977 978 979 980 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 5683 users online :: 14 registered, 15 bots, and 5654 guests
Bots: Mediatoolkitbot, facebookexternalhit, DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, CriteoBot, ADmantX, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Baiduspider, Googlebot, bingbot, GPTBot
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search