Oh look!Termin8tor » 16 Oct 2019 7:10 am » wrote:What do the words "expanding exponentially" mean?
Because that's what the Durham investigation is doing.
Katherine Herridge of Fox said in her 20 years of experience, it's highly likely that Durham has found evidence of serious crimes.
I already told you more than once.Termin8tor » 16 Oct 2019 7:10 am » wrote:What do the words "expanding exponentially" mean?
State Department probe of Clinton emails finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information.
A multiyear State Department probe of emails that were sent to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s private computer server concluded there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information by department employees, according to a report submitted to Congress this month.
The report appears to represent a final and anticlimactic chapter in a controversy that overshadowed the 2016 presidential campaign and exposed Clinton to fierce criticism that she later cited as a major factor in her loss to President Trump.
In the end, State Department investigators found 38 current or former employees “culpable” of violating security procedures — none involving material that had been marked classified — in a review of roughly 33,000 emails that had been sent to or from the personal computer system Clinton used.
Overall, investigators said, “there was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”
The report cited “instances of classified information being inappropriately” transmitted, but noted that the vast majority of those scrutinized “were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them.”
The release comes as Trump continues to raise the Clinton email issue to attack Democrats, even as new evidence has emerged of apparent security lapses by senior officials in his own administration.
Diplomats involved in pressuring Ukraine to pursue investigations that would politically benefit Trump used private phones and texting apps to trade messages about their efforts, according to records released by leaders of the House impeachment inquiry.
The State Department probe focused on internal communications that were up to nine years old.
DANCE Treason Monkey DANCE we both know you are so STUPID you will never even TRY to ADDRESS THE FACTS GOD you are STUPIDTermin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 6:48 am » wrote:
How did the Clinton's enrich themselves by 100's of millions of dollars from special interests and foreign governments?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2015/10/13/how-the-clintons-made-more-than-230-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/#422199592ae3
like LOTS of ex presidents including Reagan mostly speaking fees
Which ended as soon as they were both out of government?
You are a LIAR they left Gov broke and built up their money LATER you do NOTHING but LIE CONSTANTLY because you are always too STUPID to know what you are talking about
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2015/10/13/how-the-clintons-made-more-than-230-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/#422199592ae3
Why was desperately poor Ukraine a huge contributor to the Clinton Crime Foundation?
You are a LIAR. You cannot show ONE illegal thing done by the Clinton foundation nor that the Clintons ever took a DIME from it you are just a LIAR
Why was its most corrupt Oligarch a huge contributor to the Clinton Crime Foundation?
To buy goodwill? From a WORLDWIDE RESPECTED Charity foundation that NOT ONE BIT of wrongdoing has EVER been shown? Unlike Trumps TOTALLY ILLEGAL and FRAUDULENT Foundation that had to close up. That was NEVER efen chartered. That acted like a Trump slush fund? That ADMITTED self dealing? GOD you are STUPID
Run, Forrest, run!
Your obsession with the Clintons is not going to save your dear leader Precious.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 6:48 am » wrote:How did the Clinton's enrich themselves by 100's of millions of dollars from special interests and foreign governments?
Which ended as soon as they were both out of government?
Why was desperately poor Ukraine a huge contributor to the Clinton Crime Foundation?
Why was its most corrupt Oligarch a huge contributor to the Clinton Crime Foundation?
The orange skidmark is using government agencies to do all kinds of useless political investigations, distracting them from concentrating on the important issues they should be dealing with.State Department probe of Clinton emails finds no deliberate mishandling of classified information.
A multiyear State Department probe of emails that were sent to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s private computer server concluded there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information by department employees, according to a report submitted to Congress this month.
The report appears to represent a final and anticlimactic chapter in a controversy that overshadowed the 2016 presidential campaign and exposed Clinton to fierce criticism that she later cited as a major factor in her loss to President Trump.
In the end, State Department investigators found 38 current or former employees “culpable” of violating security procedures — none involving material that had been marked classified — in a review of roughly 33,000 emails that had been sent to or from the personal computer system Clinton used.
Overall, investigators said, “there was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.”
The report cited “instances of classified information being inappropriately” transmitted, but noted that the vast majority of those scrutinized “were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them.”
The release comes as Trump continues to raise the Clinton email issue to attack Democrats, even as new evidence has emerged of apparent security lapses by senior officials in his own administration.
Diplomats involved in pressuring Ukraine to pursue investigations that would politically benefit Trump used private phones and texting apps to trade messages about their efforts, according to records released by leaders of the House impeachment inquiry.
The State Department probe focused on internal communications that were up to nine years old.
Save him from what? You haven't got a shred of evidence of one single crime yet, psycho.Your obsession with the Clintons is not going to save your dear leader Precious.
As she runs from the factual information I posted.So no comment on this?
As if I'd accept the corrupt State Dept. word for anything. The Obama State Dept. was deeply involved in the biggest abuse of power in US history.
Funny how you left that out.The State Department has finally finished its three-year-plus investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email issue — and says 38 current and former officials could face criminal charges,according to the Associated Press on Friday and as quoted by other news organizations.
https://www.lifezette.com/2019/10/state ... e-charges/
Beware the POOL BOY!He is virile, strong, well tanned, and while you are away at work, he is BANGING YOUR WIFE! I know, I was one for 20 years! We took over from the milk man who dissapeared from 'murica!
You are a LIAR you called the Russia investigation the biggest abuse of power in history for that to even be CLOSE to true there would have had to be NO REASON to investigate the Trump Russia issue except politics so either EXPLAIN THISTermin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 3:42 pm » wrote:
As if I'd accept the corrupt State Dept. word for anything. The Obama State Dept. was deeply involved in the biggest abuse of power in US history.
You are a LIAR and you KNOW IT. I have PUNKED you mercilessly on this issue you are a LIAR.
At least two former Assistant FBI Directors have said that there was obstruction of justice to cover up her crimes.
Yet she was just cleared AGAIN by the justice dept. You are a BRAINWASHED MORON
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/us/politics/state-dept-inquiry-clinton-emails.htmlGOD you are STUPID
Nor did even the State Dept. giver he a clean bill of health. No one in the Obama administration cared what crimes were committed, so there was never a real investigation.
You are a LIAR there were NINE DIFFERENT investigations in the House alone. Then the State Dept just did another one to satisfy CORRUPT PATHOLOGICAL LIAR Trump and his buttboy Barr
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/18/us/politics/state-dept-inquiry-clinton-emails.html
Funny how you left that out.
I don't need to come up with them.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 3:46 pm » wrote:Yeah, a RINO sellout.Kasich says he's now for Trump's impeachment.
THAT'S MY BOY!
Rotsa ruck coming up with an impeachable act or crime, wackjob.
This investigation was done by the Trump State Department you **** jackass.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 3:42 pm » wrote:As if I'd accept the corrupt State Dept. word for anything. The Obama State Dept. was deeply involved in the biggest abuse of power in US history.
The AP did NOT say they could face 'criminal charges' you **** liar.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 3:42 pm » wrote:Funny how you left that out.The State Department has finally finished its three-year-plus investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email issue — and says 38 current and former officials could face criminal charges,according to the Associated Press on Friday and as quoted by other news organizations.
https://www.lifezette.com/2019/10/state ... e-charges/
Why do you keep using these FAKE News websites?WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department has completed its internal investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of private email and found violations by 38 people, some of whom may face disciplinary action.
https://www.apnews.com/14b14afc5d8647858489a2cf5385c28d
WTF does that mean?Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 4:28 pm » wrote:The State Dept. will NEVER be "Trump's."Misty » 19 Oct 2019 4:25 pm » wrote:This investigation was done by the Trump State Department you **** jackass.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 3:42 pm » wrote:As if I'd accept the corrupt State Dept. word for anything. The Obama State Dept. was deeply involved in the biggest abuse of power in US history.
And by 'controversial' policies you mean illegal policies.Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 4:28 pm » wrote:Like Reagan, he has to cut them out of the most important and controversial policies.
Were the 11,000 Kurds who died fighting ISIS for us terrorists?Termin8tor » 19 Oct 2019 4:25 pm » wrote:Huge numbers of the Syrian Kurds are close to or members of the PKK, a Kurdish terrorist group that has killed 10's of thousands of Turkish citizens.Misty » 19 Oct 2019 4:19 pm » wrote:Hey Precious?
The orange skidmark says that the Kurds are 'incredibly happy.'
Do you think that the Kurds are 'incredibly happy' right now?
Should we go to war protecting them?




Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2019 12:01 pm » wrote:
The Bidens' corruption is just the tip of a huge iceberg.
There IS no Biden corruption. That is just a LIE that you keep telling over and over hoping DESPERATELY that if you tell a lie often ENOUGH it will magically become true. GOD you are STUPID. Cough up the DETAILS with EVIDENCE of any Biden corruption or STFU
And it looks like George Soros was right in the middle of it. I have long suspected that he made most of his money buying off corrupt government officials.
More tinfoil hat STUPIDITY you were brainwashed with. Cough up that evidence or STFU you are a PROVEN LIAR and all you do is toss out VAGUE accusations. YOU are a LIAR. Assertions made WITHOUT evidence can be dismissed without evidence and you are just a LIAR
"There were no major scandals during my presidency," lied Obama.
No he is CORRECT as everyone paying attention to REALITY KNOWS. YOU are a LIAR. You are a PROVEN LIAR
No scandals that the corrupt liberal MSM were willing to cover.
Since they are confined to REALITY and do not print the DELUSIONAL FANTASIES and LIES you keep telling YEAH they are unwilling to print your LIES STUPIDITY AND FANTASIES
Termin8tor » 21 Oct 2019 3:49 pm » wrote:
You are STILL a GUTLESS COWARD who is FAR TOO STUPID to address the FACTS so GFY
I would sooner gouge my eyes out with a rusty spoon than read that crap from Gatewaypundit.Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2019 10:14 am » wrote:I know you're sincerely interested in the truth, so I'm sure you'll read this, not censor it.![]()
So you wanted Obama to send thousands of our troops to fight in Syria's civil war?Termin8tor » 20 Oct 2019 10:16 am » wrote:When did you EVER show pictures of the 500,000 people who died in Syria's civil war when Obama was president due to his bungling, psycho?Misty » 19 Oct 2019 5:03 pm » wrote:Were the 11,000 Kurds who died fighting ISIS for us terrorists?
NEVER!
So **** you, your fake outrage and your ****.