Liberal Forum

greatnpowerfuloz » 03 Jan 2014 1:52 pm » wrote: Huey is equal parts RichClem stupidity and Golfboy's naggy, whiny, hair splitting, goal post moving annoyance.

That's actually pretty apt.

Termin8tor » 25 Nov 2019 7:48 am » wrote:

Misty » 24 Nov 2019 4:02 pm » wrote:Funny how the IG report has suddenly become 'weak' and 'powerless.'

I have always said that the biggest bombshells and most important indictments would come from the Durham investigation.

OOOOPS!

Barr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup.

The prosecutor handpicked by Attorney General William P. Barr to scrutinize how U.S. agencies investigated President Trump’s 2016 campaign said he could not offer evidence to the Justice Department’s inspector general to support the suspicions of some conservatives that the case was a setup by American intelligence, people familiar with the matter said.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s office contacted U.S. Attorney John Durham, the prosecutor Barr personally tapped to lead a separate review of the 2016 probe into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the people said.

The inspector general also contacted several U.S. intelligence agencies.

Among Horowitz’s questions: whether a Maltese professor who interacted with a Trump campaign adviser was actually a U.S. intelligence asset deployed to ensnare the campaign, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the inspector general’s findings have not been made public.

But the intelligence agencies said the professor was not among their assets, the people said.

And Durham informed Horowitz’s office that his investigation had not produced any evidence that might contradict the inspector general’s findings on that point.

The previously unreported interaction with Durham is noted in a draft of Horowitz’s forthcoming report on the Russia investigation, which concludes that the FBI had adequate cause to launch its Russia investigation, people familiar with the matter said. Its public release is set for Monday.

Termin8tor » 04 Dec 2019 12:29 pm » wrote:Gosh, where is little Miss Marxist?

You miss me Precious?

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 10:48 am » wrote: OOOOPS!

BANG ZOOM that is gonna leave a MARK on H8er

solon » 05 Dec 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 10:48 am » wrote:OOOOPS!

BANG ZOOM that is gonna leave a MARK on H8er

I have to wonder if both Horowitz and Durham find that there was no coup, who is going to break the news to the orange skidmark?

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 10:48 am » wrote:

Termin8tor » 25 Nov 2019 7:48 am » wrote:I have always said that the biggest bombshells and most important indictments would come from the Durham investigation. He has the power to subpoena, indict and cut deals to gain cooperation from lower level criminals.
His investigation is now criminal and "expanding exponentially."
Gosh, what does that imply, psycho?
A lot of wrongd
Barr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup.
oing will be exposed in the IG report, but I'm never highly optimistic about what a bureaucrat with limited power will do.

OOOOPSBarr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup.

Now why would I possibly believe what the corrupt WashPost claims, psycho?

Don't you have any reliable sources?

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:33 pm » wrote:

solon » 05 Dec 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:BANG ZOOM that is gonna leave a MARK on H8er

I have to wonder if both Horowitz and Durham find that there was no coup, who is going to break the news to the orange skidmark?

I don't care what it's called. I want Obama and Deep State officials indicted and punished for their crimes.

Devin Nunes and Intelligence Committee members already made eight criminal referrals to the Justice Dept.

Horiwitz is making at least one criminal referral by the top Mueller investigation lawyer for altering evidence.

Durham's investigation is "expanding exponentially." If you want to believe the **** the corrupt WashPost carries, go right ahead.

I find it hard to believe that one overall charge to be made is conspiracy tying it all together.

And why are your only allies babbling wackjobs and psychpoathic liars like yourself?

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:34 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 10:48 am » wrote:OOOOPS! Barr’s handpicked prosecutor tells inspector general he can’t back right-wing theory that Russia case was U.S. intelligence setup.

Now why would I possibly believe what the corrupt WashPost claims, psycho?
Don't you have any reliable sources?

Why don't you check your precious Gatewaypundit?

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:33 pm » wrote: I have to wonder if both Horowitz and Durham find that there was no coup, who is going to break the news to the orange skidmark?

What I wonder is that AFTER Durham and Horowitz reports come out and ADMIT this righting conspiracy theory has ZERO credibility will H8er keep saying that they ARE going to be indicted ANYWAY by maybe the FAIRIES or Justice trolls or something I mean reality is just not his strong suit

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:39 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:33 pm » wrote:

solon » 05 Dec 2019 12:20 pm » wrote:BANG ZOOM that is gonna leave a MARK on H8er

I have to wonder if both Horowitz and Durham find that there was no coup, who is going to break the news to the orange skidmark?

I don't care what it's called. I want Obama and Deep State officials indicted and punished for their crimes.

And I want to wake up tomorrow as a beautiful rich young heiress, but I doubt that will happen.

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:39 pm » wrote:Devin Nunes and Intelligence Committee members already made eight criminal referrals to the Justice Dept.

Devin Nunes should make a criminal referral for himself.
He is up to his eyeballs in this whole conspiracy.
Why is he dealing with Lev Parnas?
And why did he not disclose that to the Intel Committee and recuse himself?
He's as dirty as the rest of them.

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:39 pm » wrote:Horiwitz is making at least one criminal referral by the top Mueller investigation lawyer for altering evidence.

Yeah, but it's not the ones you were hoping for, is it?

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:54 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:39 pm » wrote:I don't care what it's called. I want Obama and Deep State officials indicted and punished for their crimes.

Devin Nunes and Intelligence Committee members already made eight criminal referrals to the Justice Dept.

Horiwitz is making at least one criminal referral by the top Mueller investigation lawyer for altering evidence.

Durham's investigation is "expanding exponentially." If you want to believe the **** the corrupt WashPost carries, go right ahead.

I find it hard to believe that one overall charge to be made is conspiracy tying it all together.

And why are your only allies babbling wackjobs and psychpoathic liars like yourself?

And I want to wake up tomorrow as a beautiful rich young heiress, but I doubt that will happen.

Devin Nunes should make a criminal referral for himself.
He is up to his eyeballs in this whole conspiracy.
Why is he talking to Lev Parnas?
And why did he not disclose that to the Intel Committee and recuse himself?
He's as dirty as the rest of them.

Oh my, Nunes made a phone call? Since when is that an indictable offense, psycho?

Conspiracy? WTF are you babbling about now?

Why aren't you demanding that Schiff and other Democrat liars and witnesses with conflicts of interest recuse themselves? Because you're a dishonest hack.

How utterly typical of you that you defend criminals with a mountain of evidence against them, but smear people of high integrity on the basis of zero evidence.
That's your Modus Operandi going back many, many years; lie for the corrupt Democrat Party.

Yeah, but it's not the ones you were hoping for, is it?

As if you have a **** clue. Nunes and Repubs almost certainly referred for prosecution all those individuals I've named.

And more will come.

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:04 pm » wrote:
Gateway didn't carry 2 1/2 years of anti-Trump Fake News, lies, propaganda and ****.

NOBODY DID. YOU are a LIAR. YOU keep telling LIES for Russian Military Intelligence because you are a TRAITOR. YOU not legitimate sources. What you HATE about legitimate sources are NOT that they LIE about Trump but that they tell the TRUTH about him and REFUSE to tell the LIES you prefer about him. YOU are a TRAITOR who HATES FACTS, HATES the truth and HATES reality.

Your sources did.

NO they didnt YOU are a LIAR a PROVEN LIAR and a TRAITOR

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:54 pm » wrote:Yeah, but it's not the ones you were hoping for, is it?

.

I'll bet that most of them will be indicted.

Almost certainly they're already under criminal investigation.

You're too cowardly to make any predictions.

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:19 pm » wrote:
You have just as much evidence against Nunes as you do against Trump.

And HOW MUCH evidence do you have against those Obama officials you keep LYING ABOUT? My GOD you are STUPID you KNOW you haven't got a SHRED of evidence but the EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP is all OVER he himself released the call that showed his blatant corruption. the Mueller report DOCUMENTED 10 counts of his OBSTRUCTIVE ACTS that more than 1000 prosecutors said they would have INDICTED Trump on if he wer not president your IGNORANCE your BRAINWASHED STUPIDITY at DENYING REALITY does not make REALITY go away you are a LIAR



How many crimes did Mueller accuse Trump of?

He DOCUMENTED 10 YOU are a LIAR and a BRAINWASHED MORON



How many crimes did Barr and his Justice Dept. team determine Trump committed?

Barr is a PARTISAN HACK that he is LYING for Trump doesnt CHANGE reality either the FACTS is that Cohen is in PRISON patry for a campaign finance FELONY that he commited FOR Trump at TRUMPS direction which we HEARD on a published phone call. GOD you are STUPID. If Trump were not President he would ALREADY BE INDICTED instead of being called individual one You are a LIAR



But you'll defend Democrat felons to the ends of the earth.

Those Democratic FELONS are a DELUSIONAL FANTASY you have SHOW US YOUR EVIDENCE or STFU you brainwashed MORON

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 2:49 pm » wrote:

The WashPost is attempting to cover up the biggest scandal in US history with disingenuous, deceitful ****.
'
YOu are a PROVEN LIAR and you KNOW it. There was NO scandal in the Russia investigation it was JUSTIFIED that is what Horowitz is going to say that is what Durham is going to say and meanwhile YOU are still a GUTLESS COWARD who will not address the FACTS

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/06/timel ...


July 2016, the FBI began investigating the Russian government’s attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election, including whether President Donald Trump’s campaign associates were involved in those efforts.The START of the whole thing was a bunch of intelligence agencies like Estonia and Germany and Britian was telling OUR intelligence agencies that whenever they were spying on KNOWN and suspected Russian intelligence assets they kept hearing Trump campaign people


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... nks-russia


GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland.


Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance that also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.


Trump was getting advance notice from wikileaks about their dumps wikileaks was called by Trumps own pick for head of the CIA a hostile intelligence agency but Trump touted them at LEAST 100 times


https://www.vox.com/2019/4/19/18507743/ ...


Trumps campaign manager repeatedly gave a man he KNEW was connected to Russian Military Intelligence INTERNAL polling data and Manafort discussed their strategy for the midwest with him


https://www.newsweek.com/paul-manafort- .


The report noted that Manafort instructed his longtime colleague Rick Gates to provide Kilimnik with internal Trump campaign polling data and briefings on the campaign's strategies. For years, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together closely on political campaigns in Ukraine. Manafort even nicknamed Kilimnik his "Russian brain." The FBI has determined that Kilimnik, who was once a Russian military translator, has links to Russian intelligence services.


Sessions, Page, Manafort, Papadopolous, Jared, Don jr, Gates, Mcfarland ALL had contacts with Russians then LIED about them. Either you can cough up an innocent explanation for all that LYING or that alone justifies the investigation


The Trump campaign had more than 140 contacts with Russians the normal presidential campaign has ZERO


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... e=REGIWALLJan 26, 2019 -


Donald J. Trump and 18 of his associates had at least 140 contacts with Russian nationals and WikiLeaks, or their intermediaries

ADDRESS the FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 2:49 pm » wrote:This source is excellent.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/20 ... ore-177807

Right.




https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-last-refuge/

Giuliani goes back to Ukraine to meet with a bunch of shady characters.
****.

As impeachment drama marches forward in Washington, D.C., focusing on a call between President Donald Trump and the president of Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani traveled to Kyiv.

The president's personal attorney is meeting with current and former Ukrainian officials who have served as key sources for his questionable theories about Ukrainian corruption and election meddling as part of a documentary series by far-right network One America News Network (OAN) that is intended to discredit the impeachment process.

OAN previously confirmed to ABC News that Giuliani is in Europe conducting interviews as part of their investigative documentary series, which seeks to debunk what it describes as "the impeachment hoax" and offer proof of Ukrainian corruption and 2016 election meddling, according to a spokesperson for the network.

Among those with whom Giuliani has met is pro-Russian Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach, a former member of the Party of Regions, the political party of Ukraine's toppled pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych.

In recent weeks, Derkach has held a series of press conferences pushing unsupported theories attacking ousted U.S. Ambassador Maria Yovanovitch and leveling allegations without proof that Hunter Biden received corrupt payments.

At the press conferences, Derkach has presented dubious documents that he has also frequently misrepresented.

Derkach posted photos Thursday with Giuliani in Kyiv.



In addition to his meeting with Derkach, Giuliani met with former Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuriy Lutsenko as part of the project, according to a spokesperson for Lutsenko.

Removed from his post as the country's top law enforcement official earlier this year, Lutsenko has been one of Giuliani's key sources of information about Ukraine.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rudy-gi ... d=67519317

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:13 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:54 pm » wrote:Yeah, but it's not the ones you were hoping for, is it?

I'll bet that most of them will be indicted.

How much will you bet?

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:13 pm » wrote:Almost certainly they're already under criminal investigation.

By whom?

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:13 pm » wrote:You're too cowardly to make any predictions.

I predict you are wrong.

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:02 pm » wrote:

Misty » 05 Dec 2019 12:54 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 12:39 pm » wrote:I don't care what it's called. I want Obama and Deep State officials indicted and punished for their crimes.
Devin Nunes and Intelligence Committee members already made eight criminal referrals to the Justice Dept.

Devin Nunes should make a criminal referral for himself.
He is up to his eyeballs in this whole conspiracy.
Why is he talking to Lev Parnas?
And why did he not disclose that to the Intel Committee and recuse himself?
He's as dirty as the rest of them.

Oh my, Nunes made a phone call? Since when is that an indictable offense, psycho?

Why is he talking to Lev Parnas?
Anyway, according to Lev Parnas' lawyer, Nunes and his staff took a little trip to Vienna to dig up dirt on Biden.
Supposedly it cost us taxpayers about $57,000.

Sounds like he was using his office and taxpayer money to dig up political dirt.
Can you say Hatch Act?

Termin8tor » 05 Dec 2019 1:02 pm » wrote:Why aren't you demanding that Schiff and other Democrat liars and witnesses with conflicts of interest recuse themselves? Because you're a dishonest hack.

What conflicts?
Name them.

Nunes has been working for Trump all along.
Don't forget about his little midnight run.
He should be no where near that Committee.