"Goodies?" The only thing I saw she got was absolutely routine; a trademark for goods she sells.Misty » 18 Jan 2020 9:34 pm » wrote:You're so concerned about what Hunter Biden did in 2015, but not a word about how Trump's family is right now profiting from their connection to the him.
His daughter and son-in-law actually work in the WH.
She's getting all kinds of goodies from China
That's it? One loan and a routine trademark?and he got a cash infusion to save his building at 666 Fifth Avenue that was under water for years.
A Canadian asset-management company swooped in and agreed to take a 99-year lease on the building, paying a near-century’s worth of rent upfront.
That's quite a good deal, huh?
Oh, and the major investor in that company is Qatar.
Jared has all kinds of secret dealings in the Middle East.
He regularly talks to MBS through an encrypted app.
And God only knows what foreign sweetheart deals Uday and Qusay are making off their Daddy's position.
By cutting that part of my post out of your reply and remaining silent about it, you once again proved that you are nothing but a phony partisan hack.
You love to attack Dems and Libs, but you look the other way or make lame excuses whenever it's someone on your side who is corrupt.
So spare me your **** about Hunter Biden.
This family of grifters makes him look like a piker.
I thought liberals hated guilt by association.Misty » 18 Jan 2020 8:58 pm » wrote:The first two members of Congress to endorse Trump are both headed to prison.
What exactly has Trump done, to incur such hysterical hatred?Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 7:20 am » wrote:
I thought liberals hated guilt by association.
Clearly not.
Anything to smear a soon to be great president.
It's a complicated question. Liberalism is a belief system that requires an inability to accept objective reality, which is why liberals refuse to read non-liberal sources.Famagusta » 19 Jan 2020 7:22 am » wrote:What exactly has Trump done, to incur such hysterical hatred?Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 7:20 am » wrote:I thought liberals hated guilt by association.
Clearly not.
Anything to smear a soon to be great president.
Beat Hillary?
Yeah, it's very strange he's going after the sleazy family about which lots of evidence of corruption and likely criminal activity is being revealed.Misty » 18 Jan 2020 9:34 pm » wrote:Funny how he only seems to be interested in seeking evidence of corruption regarding the Bidens.
He has never asked any country to investigate someone else for corruption..
Biden was enriching more family members than just Hunter
By Andrea Widburg
On January 21, Peter Schweizer’s newest book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, will be released. It should sell well given that pre-sales have already put it at #14 on the Amazon charts. As a preview of coming attractions, the New York Post published an extract from the book detailing “How five members of Joe Biden’s family got rich through his connections.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... unter.html
I thought Liberalism was supposed to encompass tolerance and acceptance of differing points of view.Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 7:28 am » wrote:
It's a complicated question. Liberalism is a belief system that requires an inability to accept objective reality, which is why liberals refuse to read non-liberal sources.
Encountering information like that causes them great emotional pain, no kidding. Seeing Trump not only repeal legislation they have sought for decades but speak politically incorrectly drives them batty.
Their emotional security rests on being liberal, so when Liberal Fake Reality is challenged, they react with rage and hate. Their self esteem is being undermined.
Read Eric Hoffer's "The True Believer" among many books that have been written about this.
Key words,"supposed to."Famagusta » 19 Jan 2020 8:03 am » wrote:I thought Liberalism was supposed to encompass tolerance and acceptance of differing points of view.Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 7:28 am » wrote:It's a complicated question. Liberalism is a belief system that requires an inability to accept objective reality, which is why liberals refuse to read non-liberal sources.
Encountering information like that causes them great emotional pain, no kidding. Seeing Trump not only repeal legislation they have sought for decades but speak politically incorrectly drives them batty.
Their emotional security rests on being liberal, so when Liberal Fake Reality is challenged, they react with rage and hate. Their self esteem is being undermined.
Read Eric Hoffer's "The True Believer" among many books that have been written about this.
It's the superiority complex which gets me.Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 8:21 am » wrote:
Key words,"supposed to."
Classical liberals, i.e. most conservatives fit the description, but Classical Liberalism is almost the opposite of today's Liberalism.
Actual liberals are rather leftist, and they are highly intolerant.
I have a politically demented leftist friend who foolishly tries to force his opinions about Trump on me, simply on his opinion and severely limited knowledge.
He stupid claims that I'm "always Trump" because I reject the groundless accusations he makes against Trump.
Except the guy, in his '50's, has never in his life read conservative opinion or books. His ignorance is astounding.
I ask him why I should give up not only my own knowledge and judgment but that of my trust sources simply on his word.
To which he has no answer, so he avoids the question and goes on another raving rant.
It's truly scary to watch.
Especially given how they actually live their lives.Famagusta » 19 Jan 2020 8:56 am » wrote:
It's the superiority complex which gets me.
The British are adept at this.
You are a LIAR you are a GUTLESS COWARD and you are a TRAITOR you keep telling LIES SO STUPID only other Treason Monkey MORONS take them seriously you dont try to SHOW or substantiate ANY of the LIES you tell. You didnt even TRY to SHOW the media inciting violence because you are a LIAR and you have this delusion that if you tell a LIE often enough it will magically become trueTermin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 1:27 pm » wrote:
Say, where is Mikey these days?
EVERYONE WAS IN THE LOOPNunes aide communicated with Parnas about Ukraine campaign, messages show.
House Democrats released new documents Friday evening showing extensive contact between an associate of President Trump’s personal attorney and an aide to the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee regarding the effort to obtain material from Ukrainian prosecutors that would be damaging to former vice president Joe Biden.
The text messages between Lev Parnas, who functioned as Rudolph W. Giuliani’s emissary to Ukrainian officials, and Derek Harvey, an aide to Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, indicate Nunes’s office was aware of the operation at the heart of impeachment proceedings against the president — and sought to use the information Parnas was gathering.
The newly released texts show that Parnas was working last spring to set up calls for Harvey with the Ukrainian prosecutors who were feeding Giuliani information about Biden.
“Also do you want to interview the general prosecutor who got [ditched] by Biden ? Also the anti corruption prosecutor ? Let me know,” Parnas wrote on April 19.
“Does tomorrow work?” Harvey responded.
The messages also show that Harvey met with Parnas and Giuliani at the Trump hotel in Washington.
Harvey and a spokesman for Nunes did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The text messages corroborate Parnas’s previous claims that he arranged conversations with the Ukrainian prosecutors for the Nunes aide.
And they deepen questions about how much Nunes knew about the pressure campaign — even as he served as one of Trump’s most vociferous defenders during the House impeachment hearings.
Here's a hint, wackjob.Termin8tor » 19 Jan 2020 7:11 am » wrote:Here's a hint, wackjob. If Trump was doing something nefarious, he'd be interfering by seeking criminal investigations into all Democrat front runners.Misty » 18 Jan 2020 9:34 pm » wrote:Funny how he only seems to be interested in seeking evidence of corruption regarding the Bidens.
He has never asked any country to investigate someone else for corruption.
Hey, great job at getting the issue backwards, as usual.Misty » 20 Jan 2020 12:42 pm » wrote:I guess you didn't read Rudy's letter to Zelensky.
It specifies that Rudy was acting in his capacity as Trump's private attorney; in other words, he was representing the president's personal political interests and not the country's interests.

Another dud in the string of bombshells![]()
![]()
.
By Charles Hurt - The Washington Times - Thursday, January 16, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:
You have to pity the bombshell-shocked American citizen trying to take seriously all the “shocking,” “stunning” and “bombshell” news coming out of Washington these days.
It is a little maddening — though mostly amusing — watching Rachel Maddow and the breathless news wags on MSNBC and CNN contorting themselves during interviews with greasy “witnesses” to supposedly nefarious behavior in Ukraine as to why exactly what they are claiming is so important and damning.
Or, “bombshell!,” as they like to say. And, certainly, “impeachable!”
HINT: If it takes exhaustive and complicated explanations to pinpoint precisely why something is a “bombshell,” then it is not a “bombshell.” That is the point of a “bombshell.” It is so powerful that it does not need to come wrapped in complicated explanations.
But there is no rabbit hole these people will not venture down in pursuit of President Trump. There is no zany conspiracy theory they will not gulp down to keep the party going. And there is no arcane strip of federal code from centuries gone by that they won’t dust off to construct their rickety case for impeachment.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... ombshells/
That's Russian disinformation you gaping asshole.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:53 pm » wrote:Hey, great job at getting the issue backwards, as usual.Misty » 20 Jan 2020 12:42 pm » wrote:I guess you didn't read Rudy's letter to Zelensky.
It specifies that Rudy was acting in his capacity as Trump's private attorney; in other words, he was representing the president's personal political interests and not the country's interests.
The Clinton campaign and Obama officials colluded with Ukraine and committed the biggest abuse of power in US history.
He was doing nothing for the American people.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:53 pm » wrote:Gosh, how unfair that Guliani is trying to not only clear his client, but resolve that for the American people.![]()
Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:53 pm » wrote:Indictments are coming, and they won't be for process crimes or tax fraud.
And yet, Rudy's letter to Zelensky said that he was acting as Sniffles' personal attorney, NOT on behalf of the country.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:49 pm » wrote:Here's a hint, psycho. Investigating corruption and likely criminal wrongdoing by a high former government official and candidate for president absolutely is in the country's interest.
Any honest person would admit that, but you're not honest.
You have not one iota of evidence to back that up.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 1:10 pm » wrote:Hey, who cares about literally hundreds of felonies committed by Obama and Deep State officials?![]()
Not little Miss Marxist.
Your predictions are worthless Miss Clemmo, so that gives me hope.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 1:10 pm » wrote:When they do happen, then Trump is easily re-elected, they'll have to tighten your restraints and give you heavy meds, psycho.![]()
Seriously?Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:45 pm » wrote:Oh my gosh, he communicated??!!Misty » 20 Jan 2020 12:27 pm » wrote:Nunes aide communicated with Parnas about Ukraine campaign, messages show.
EVERYONE WAS IN THE LOOP![]()
Huge scandal.
Says the babbling brook of Liberal Forum.Termin8tor » 20 Jan 2020 12:45 pm » wrote:Babble away.