Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
23 Jan 2020 2:12 pm
She lies, as she cherry picks.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 11:21 am » wrote:Cherry pick much?"I can't see! I can't see!"
"Then open your eyes, numbskull!"
Trump’s Latest Manufacturing Jobs Achievements Should Terrify 2020 Democrats
Justin Haskins
The most recently available jobs data show since January 2017, Trump’s first month in office, more than 480,000 manufacturing jobs have been added, substantially more than anything achieved by the Obama or Bush administrations, both whom watched as huge numbers of manufacturing jobs left the country. Trump’s half-a-million manufacturing jobs gain is the largest increase, in terms of percentage of manufacturing jobs gained, since the 1970s.
Some of the state-specific data are even worse for Democrats. In Iowa, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Trump’s first-term manufacturing job figures have far surpassed those recorded under the Obama administration.
The most stunning turnaround occurred in Pennsylvania, where nearly 23,000 manufacturing jobs have been added since Trump entered the White House. About 6,000 of those jobs were added in the first six months of 2019, the most recent data available. Under President Obama, Pennsylvania lost 45,000 jobs in manufacturing, and some of those losses occurred in his second term, completely unrelated to the 2008 financial crisis.
If Trump wins in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Wisconsin—never mind all three—then it’s going to be extremely tough for Democrats to beat him.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trumps-la ... 12754.html
That 480,000 figure is national. How is that cherry picking, psycho?
And why are you censoring accurate factual information?
To hide the truth.
23 Jan 2020 2:19 pm
The board's premier psychopath is in Full Coverup Mode to hide the truth.Misty » 22 Jan 2020 5:05 pm » wrote:A psychopath like you is hardly in the position to judge anyone else's mental health.
"Gateway isn't accurate!" she shrieks.
How many egregious mistakes did your sources make about the Steele Dossier and the Russian Collusion Hoax?
I've lost count, coverage was such a freaking joke.
Did my sources fawn over con artist Michael Avenatti -and promote him to run for president?
Did My sources carry criminal John Brennan lying that Trump committed treason, then hire him to be a commentator?
Did my sources hire dishonest, corrupt federal employees like McCabe who were fired for cause are under criminal investigation?
No, your sources did.
23 Jan 2020 2:31 pm
Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:07 pm » wrote:Why aren't you bitterly complaining that Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election?Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:57 pm » wrote:CRICKETS
And that her officials, Obama officials and DNC officials colluded with Ukraine to interfere in the same election?
What's wrong Precious?
Nothing to say about how Sniffles got caught once again misusing a non-profit, something he just paid a 2 milion dollar fine for doing?
As far as Hillary colluding with the Russians, that never happened.
But even if it did, it's okay now, because your party is about to acquit a man who openly solicited help for his 2016 campaign from the Russians when he said, "Russia if you're listening......."
And he has openly solicited help from two foreign countries for the 2020 election, Ukraine and China.
You can't say that it is okay when Trump does it, but not okay when a Dem does it.
When your party acquits Sniffles, and they will, they will be giving the green light to every future candidate to seek dirt on their political opponents from foreign countries.
That is the precedent set by your corrupt party that you will have to live with.
23 Jan 2020 2:42 pm
Almost immediately after Chief Justice John Roberts gaveled in Wednesday’s session of President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, bored and weary senators started openly flouting some basic guidelines in a chamber that prizes decorum.
A Democrat in the back row leaned on his right arm, covered his eyes and stayed that way for nearly a half-hour.
Some openly snickered when lead prosecutor Adam Schiff said he’d only speak for 10 minutes.
And when one of the freshman House prosecutors stood to speak, many of the senator-jurors bolted for the cloak rooms, where their phones are stored.
“I do see the members moving and taking a break,” observed freshman Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, one of the House prosecutors, in mid-speech at the center podium.
“I probably have another 15 minutes.”
The agony of the senator-jurors had begun to show the night before, with widespread but more subtle struggles to pay attention to opening arguments.
Gum-chewing, snacking, yawning and alleged napping could be seen throughout the cramped chamber.
Around midnight, things got looser.
Senators paced and chatted near the wall.
Then the prosecutors and Trump’s defense team got into a back-and-forth over who was lying and making false allegations about Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to help him politically.
Roberts admonished everyone to tone it down.
The Senate, he reminded those gathered, is the “world’s greatest deliberative body,” functioning, for now, as a court of impeachment.
It has a tradition of civility — and for grave and rare impeachment trials, specific rules: No coffee or snacking on the floor.
No pacing, note-passing, working on other matters or chit-chat.
Technically, only water is allowed in the Senate chamber, but there have been exceptions in years past for milk and even eggnog.
“There’s coffee, but it’s miserable coffee” in the cloakrooms, according to Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La.
“I mean you would wish it on a Democrat, no one else,” he said, adding, “Just joking.”
It’s all designed to focus the senator-jurors on the issues at hand.
So napping is not, in theory, part of the plan.
But for many, Wednesday hurt. Roberts had gaveled Tuesday’s session closed at 1:50 a.m.
Fewer than 12 hours later, the senators were back, with little sleep, for more of the same impeachment story, told by Schiff and his team in exhaustive detail.
Even with Roberts’ scolding still fresh, many senators were in no mood for rules or traditions.
Well into Schiff’s second hour of opening arguments, he moved on from discussing the first of two charges against Trump.
“Now let me turn to the second article,” Schiff said.
That prompted several senators to shift in their seats and smile at each other in apparent bemusement.
It also sparked a small exodus for the cloakroom, especially on the Republican side, including Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri and Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas.
Within the first hour, Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia could be seen at his desk in the back row, leaning on his right arm with a hand covering his eyes.
He stayed that way for around 20 minutes, then shifted to rest his chin in the same hand, eyes closed, for about five more minutes.
Despite the late-night votes, Warner’s day had started as scheduled at a 10 a.m. Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.
Crow, a military veteran speaking on the impact of Trump’s holdup of military aid to Ukraine, had trouble holding the Senate’s attention.
Some senators left their seats and headed to cloakrooms, stood in the back or openly yawned as he spoke.
At one point during his address, more than 10 senators’ seats were empty.
Crow wondered aloud if the Senate wanted to take a recess.
No dice. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said there would be no break until dinner, more than an hour later.
The water-only practice seemed to be one guideline the senators could get around by tradition.
Cotton, R-Ark., for example, was seen drinking a glass of milk early in the day.
Spokeswoman Caroline Tabler said Cotton was drinking skim milk — a nice complement to the chocolate snacks he and other senators were getting in their cloakroom and from one lawmaker’s desk.
Like so much about the fusty Senate, even the beverage exceptions are rooted in history.
Cassidy told reporters that milk joined water as the officially permitted drinks in the Senate chamber in the 1950s.
Cassidy, a doctor, said that at the time, milk was believed to be a treatment for stomach ulcers.
According to the Senate Historical Office, Sen. Robert LaFollette, R-Wis., drank eggnog during a 1908 filibuster, and Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, while still a Democrat in 1957, drank orange juice during his record 24-hour filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.
Factoids aside, the novelty of the impeachment trial had clearly worn off Wednesday.
Senators had heard the Trump-Ukraine story before, many times.
Their boredom, one Republican senator suggested, had become a challenge to the prolific House managers’ strategy.
Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota said the less wordy president’s legal team had “read the Senate” better.
“It was a long day and the House managers did a lot of repeating the same material,” Rounds told reporters.
“I’ve got 20 pages of notes, and towards the end, we were basically hearing the same thing over again.
It was a diatribe.”
https://apnews.com/326336f2b37f03a521e8 ... SocialFlow
23 Jan 2020 2:44 pm
You're as shameless a liar as your dweeb buddy BV.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:As far as Hillary colluding with the Russians, that never happened.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:07 pm » wrote:Why aren't you bitterly complaining that Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election?
And that her officials, Obama officials and DNC officials colluded with Ukraine to interfere in the same election?
Crickets.
Or blatant lies.
Real Clear Investigations, a rock solid source, made a very strong case that she exactly that.
And Steele testified that one of his sources was a former Russian intelligence officer and others were Ukrainian.
Gosh, you forgot to call me a Russian bot, wackjob.
23 Jan 2020 2:50 pm
OIC, so it's the government of DC that is corrupt, and not the man who ran a phony university and a phony charity.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:40 pm » wrote:Deflect from what, psycho, that the corrupt Democrat dominated government of DC filed a lawsuit?Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:Hey look, a squrrel!
You are such a hoot.
Are we only limited to one subject here now?Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:40 pm » wrote:The subject lately wasn't that. It was Trump's supposed collusion with Ukraine.
You're the one deflecting.
When did that rule go into effect?
I did answer the question.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:40 pm » wrote:Answer the questions, rather than just lying.
It's perfectly okay now to ask a foreign government for dirt on a political rival.
That will be the precedent set by your corrupt party when they acquit Sniffles, and they will.
23 Jan 2020 2:59 pm
Why did you cut out what I said after that?Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:44 pm » wrote:You're as shameless a liar as your dweeb buddy BV.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:As far as Hillary colluding with the Russians, that never happened.
Real Clear Investigations, a rock solid source, made a very strong case that she exactly that.
Sorry Precious.But even if it did, it's okay now, because your party is about to acquit a man who openly solicited help for his 2016 campaign from the Russians when he said, "Russia if you're listening......."
And he has openly solicited help from two foreign countries for the 2020 election, Ukraine and China.
You can't say that it is okay when Trump does it, but not okay when a Dem does it.
When your party acquits Sniffles, and they will, they will be giving the green light to every future candidate to seek dirt on their political opponents from foreign countries.
That is the precedent set by your corrupt party that you will have to live with.
Your corrupt party says it's okay now to collude with foreign governments for dirt on political rivals.
Live with it.
23 Jan 2020 3:06 pm
I stopped to refute your complete lie, psycho.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:59 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 2:44 pm » wrote:You're as shameless a liar as your dweeb buddy BV.
Real Clear Investigations, a rock solid source, made a very strong case that she exactly that.
Why did you cut out what I said after that?
Steele testified that one of his sources was a former Russian intelligence officer and others were Ukrainian.
Who hired Steele? The company HRC hired through cutouts, to hide her involvement, accomplished criminal that she is.
Gosh, Trump sought evidence of deep corruption not only by Biden, but his son and many, many Democrats cronies?Sorry Precious.
Your corrupt party says it's okay now to collude with foreign governments for dirt on political rivals.
Live with it.
Oh my!
Boy are you going to be shocked when the evidence is released, and I'd be surprised if there weren't indictments.
Rudy Fires Warning Shot – Going to Release Evidence on the Biden’s Millions in Corrupt Deeds!
Joe Hoft by Joe Hoft
Everything I tried to tell the press last March is now coming out, and more. I will now start to reveal the evidence directly to you, the People. The Biden Family Enterprise made millions by selling public office. Then when Joe was Obama’s Point Man, they ALL made millions.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/0 ... upt-deeds/
23 Jan 2020 3:27 pm
23 Jan 2020 3:30 pm
I have had my fill of your disinformation, propaganda and lies for one day.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:06 pm » wrote:Yadda, yadda, yadda.......
23 Jan 2020 3:33 pm
Oh look, a propaganda cartoon. How cute.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 3:30 pm » wrote: I have had my fill of your disinformation, propaganda and lies for one day.
Great job at ignoring the facts that I cited.
Why didn't you whine,"Gateway! Gateway!" ?
Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:06 pm » wrote:Steele testified that one of his sources was a former Russian intelligence officer and others were Ukrainian.
Who hired Steele? The company HRC hired through cutouts, to hide her involvement, accomplished criminal that she is.
Gosh, Trump sought evidence of deep corruption not only by Biden, but his son and many, many Democrats cronies?
Oh my!
Boy are you going to be shocked when the evidence is released, and I'd be surprised if there weren't indictments.
Rudy Fires Warning Shot – Going to Release Evidence on the Biden’s Millions in Corrupt Deeds!
Joe Hoft by Joe Hoft
Everything I tried to tell the press last March is now coming out, and more. I will now start to reveal the evidence directly to you, the People. The Biden Family Enterprise made millions by selling public office. Then when Joe was Obama’s Point Man, they ALL made millions.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/0 ... upt-deeds/
23 Jan 2020 3:36 pm
David Corn, the lying leftist who spread the fake Steele Dossier as part of the coup attempt against Trump?Misty » 23 Jan 2020 3:27 pm » wrote:David Corn; ever talk to a member of a cult?
Who has yet to admit he was part of a huge hoax?
That David Corn?
You're kidding, right?
He is the ultimate cult member.
23 Jan 2020 3:56 pm
So were my links.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:54 pm » wrote: I was specifically referring to during the impeachment hearings in the House.
I trust your memory - but I trust my links, more.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:54 pm » wrote: I followed them pretty closely and I don't remember the WH actually invoking EP over any of the witnesses that testified.
Like I said, there is a process.
I trust your understanding of the process, which I have zero doubt are not your haphazard memories of civics class but rather are information you received from sources that I would not ever read - but again, I trust my links, more.
My link says he invoked. Hill's attorneys say he invoked. Bannon sat and refused to answer questions, manifestly invoking.
But your technical argument and memories from watching are cool, too.
Yeah, good faith took the last bus for the coast around 1987. I watched it pull out and distinctly remember the bon voyagee party which was hosted by Bugs Bunny (a personal friend).Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:54 pm » wrote:When the privilege is invoked (in writing), there are usually back and forth negotiations between the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch, where they are supposed to negotiate in good faith in order to reach some kind of accommodation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTfV_l8AUjU
If it went to court, it must have been in writing.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:54 pm » wrote: The WH did try to say that senior White House aides enjoy 'absolute immunity' from congressional subpoenas in regards to former WH Attorney Don McGahn being subpoenaed, but they were laughed out of court.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
23 Jan 2020 4:04 pm
Well, again, you say he did not invoke, perfesser google says he did. Ima side with the perfesser. He prolly went ta collige.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:36 pm » wrote:
Yeah.
It says that the WH attempted to use EP.
And that they tried to limit what Fiona Hill could say to Congress.
It also says that the White House did not try to block her from testifying but told her lawyers about areas that could fall under executive privilege.
That sounds like warnings.
They didn't actually go through the process I posted.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
23 Jan 2020 4:10 pm
23 Jan 2020 4:12 pm
Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:48 pm » wrote:You obviously don't give a rat's *** how many crimes and abuses of power your party commits.
23 Jan 2020 4:14 pm
The claim of 'absolute immunity' went to court, not a claim of Executive Privilege.Cannonpointer » 23 Jan 2020 3:56 pm » wrote:If it went to court, it must have been in writing.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 1:54 pm » wrote:The WH did try to say that senior White House aides enjoy 'absolute immunity' from congressional subpoenas in regards to former WH Attorney Don McGahn being subpoenaed, but they were laughed out of court.
23 Jan 2020 4:17 pm
Says the brainwashed zombie.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:36 pm » wrote:David Corn, the lying leftist who spread the fake Steele Dossier as part of the coup attempt against Trump?Misty » 23 Jan 2020 3:27 pm » wrote:David Corn; ever talk to a member of a cult?
Who has yet to admit he was part of a huge hoax?
That David Corn?
You're kidding, right?
He is the ultimate cult member.
23 Jan 2020 4:19 pm
Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:48 pm » wrote:Yes, Trump is so corrupt, he actually wants to clean out corruption in the Beltway.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:59 pm » wrote:Sorry Precious.
Your corrupt party says it's okay now to collude with foreign governments for dirt on political rivals.
Live with it.
23 Jan 2020 4:22 pm
Oh gosh. You made another phony excuse for Sniffles The Clown. Horrors.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:53 pm » wrote:Oh gosh, he made a joke. Horrors.Misty » 23 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:your party is about to acquit a man who openly solicited help for his 2016 campaign from the Russians when he said, "Russia if you're listening......."
Is he the president or a **** comedian?
Oh, I don't know.Termin8tor » 23 Jan 2020 3:53 pm » wrote:What specifically were the Russians going to do in that regard?
Hack some emails maybe?
You **** gaping asshole.
Who is online
In total there are 5571 users online :: 19 registered, 15 bots, and 5537 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, MR-7, michaelf, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: Yahoo! Slurp, Pandalytics, facebookexternalhit, Pinterest, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, proximic, Kinza, Baiduspider, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, CriteoBot, bingbot, curl/7