Liberal Forum

WTF is he talking about? I believe the federal crime Mr. Kadiddlehopper is referring to is the one that says you cannot touch another person's mail. He wants it repealed so he can rifle through your mail. Or maybe he is trying to say that the USPS is a federal crime. It ain't easy trying to figure out how his brain works, my guess is that it just does not. Edited by E G de la Serna, 15 November 2011 - 06:33 PM.

You know as much as some of these people here make stupid comments about different things, there is a few comments that make me laugh out loud. The cheese sliding off the cracker is one of them. I borrowed it from "The Green Mile." It's a classic that always makes me laugh.I believe the federal crime Mr. Kadiddlehopper is referring to is the one that says you cannot touch another person's mail. He wants it repealed so he can rifle through your mail. Or maybe he is trying to say that the USPS is a federal crime. It ain't easy trying to figure out how his brain works, my guess is that it just does not.That's a very logical conclusion!

I think his cheese is sliding off the cracker. Poor thing. Notice he hasn't been around much, with all the Republican candidates imploding like they are. It must be tough on him.I wonder how he feels about the latest revelations about Newt being on Freddie Mac's payroll? I suspect it's something like this......

84-year-old, 4 foot 10 inch tall Dorli Rainey, who was pepper sprayed by police at an OWS rally in Seattle said:Something funny happened on my way to a transportation meeting in Northgate. As I got off the bus at 3rd and Pine I heard helicopters above. Knowing that the problems of New York would certainly precipitate action by Occupy Seattle, I thought I better check it out. Especially since only yesterday the City Government made a grandiose gesture to protect free speech. Well free speech does have its limits as I found out as the cops shoved their bicycles into the crowd and simultaneously pepper sprayed the so captured protesters. If it had not been for my Hero (Iraq Vet Caleb) I would have been down on the ground and trampled. This is what democracy looks like. It certainly left an impression on the people who rode the No. 1 bus home with me. In the women's movement there were signs which said: "Screw us and we multiply."

Poor thing. Notice he hasn't been around much, with all the Republican candidates imploding like they are. It must be tough on him.Whoever wins the Repub nomination is likely to beat Obama. Given that Perry is inarticulate in debates, I'd be happy as heck to see Newt win the nomination.What record does Obama have to run on? Obama-care, which is more unpopular than ever?The 12% and still rising real unemployment rate?The $1.3 trillion deficit?The massively expanding $15 trillion national debt?Go ahead, chortle how terrible the Repub field is. Any one of them would make a far, far superior president to the Marxist Empty Suit.I wonder how he feels about the latest revelations about Newt being on Freddie Mac's payroll?There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. As you've insisted forever and a day, Fannie and Freddy have nothing to do with our present problems.And you never lie. WTF? He said: If worse came to worse, it (mail) would be delivered in bulk to an area, divided into large parcels, and neighbors would help each other out. Wow, it'd be really tough for me to drive half a mile, pick up my mail and that of my neighbors a few times a week, right?And I said: That would be illegal.So he says: Hey moonbat, I've noted several times that it is a federal crime and it ought to be repealed. WTF is he talking about? Not even you are this stupid, so I can only assume you're dissembling.

Whoever wins the Repub nomination is likely to beat Obama.Well given that the Republicans are working feverishly to enact as many restrictions on voting by people who tend to vote for Democrats as they can, I'd say that they could possibly swing the election using their usual voter suppression and disenfranchisement tricks.Given that Perry is inarticulate in debates, I'd be happy as heck to see Newt win the nomination.Only in debates? ROFLGo ahead, chortle how terrible the Repub field is. Any one of them would make a far, far superior president to the Marxist Empty Suit.Yes, of course I'm sure that Bachmann, who thinks that the Founding Fathers worked tirelessly until 'slavery was no more', or Cain who doesn't know that China has had nukes since 1964, and says he doesn't need to know anything about foreign policy, or Perry who can't even name the government agencies he says he wants to abolish, would all make far superior presidents than the one we have now.I lay awake at night in fear that one of these clowns might actually gain access to the nuclear launch codes.

Whoever wins the Repub nomination is likely to beat Obama.Well given that the Republicans are working feverishly to enact as many restrictions on voting by people who tend to vote for Democrats as they can, I'd say that they could possibly swing the election using their usual voter suppression and disenfranchisement tricks.Translated into honest English, Repubs want to cut down on Democrats' massive voter fraud schemes.Given that Perry is inarticulate in debates, I'd be happy as heck to see Newt win the nomination.Only in debates? ROFLHis last debate overall was his best, but he did freeze on one question. I've seen and heard him a number of times on tv and radio, and he's acceptably articulate.Take away Obama's teleprompter, and he's not much better, never mind that his Socialist/ Leftist philosophy is stunningly stupid.Yes, of course I'm sure that Bachmann, who thinks that the Founding Fathers worked tirelessly until 'slavery was no more', or Cain who doesn't know that China has had nukes since 1964, and says he doesn't need to know anything about foreign policy, or Perry who can't even name the government agencies he says he wants to abolish, would all make far superior presidents than the one we have now.The usual dishonest Leftist claptrap, about as accurate as claiming Obama thinks there are 57 states.For instance, Cain studied the fine details of Chinese nuclear capabilities, but facts never get in the way of your Democrat Talking Point Lies.Every single Repub candidate would be far, far superior to the Marxist Empty Suit.I lay awake at night in fear that one of these clowns might actually gain access to the nuclear launch codes.I lay awake at night knowing utter imbeciles like you have the right to vote.

Arizona Supreme Court Overturns Gov. Jan Brewer's Removal Of Redistricting ChairThe Arizona Supreme Court dealt Republican Gov. Jan Brewer a blow Thursday, overturning her decision to oust the chairwoman of the state's independent redistricting commission. The Arizona Republic reported that the court found that Brewer's removal of Colleen Coyle Mathis did not meet state constitution guidelines.Brewer removed Mathis on Nov. 2, with the consent of the Republican-controlled Senate, for holding too many secret meetings and for drafting a map that Brewer said did not meet guidelines for compact districts and keeping together "communities of interest."In court papers, Brewer had argued that Mathis did not use a grid format, as specified in the state constitution, for creating the districts. In addition, Brewer argued that Mathis, a registered independent from Tucson, did not disclose her husband's involvement in the campaign of a Democratic state legislator in her application for the commission. Brewer's spokesman said it is possible that the governor could seek Mathis' removal at a future date. "The governor strongly disagrees with the decision," spokesman Matthew Benson said.He said the governor, who was in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, will meet with legislative leaders to consider options. He said the court's order, which he described as "sparse," potentially leaves the door open for the governor to return with a more-specific letter spelling out reasons for removal.Brewer made the move, which many Democrats had said was a "naked power play," after the state's Republican congressional delegation had lobbied against the draft map released by the redistricting commission. The draft map contained four Republican leaning seats, two Democratic leaning seats and three toss-up seats. Arizona Democrats had said that Brewer made the decision following a call from Marilyn Quayle, the wife of former Vice President Dan Quayle and mother of Rep. Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.), a charge that Mrs. Quayle has denied. Ben Quayle and Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) were both placed in the same district in the draft map. The court's decision was rumored in the days preceding the decision, which came after oral arguments Thursday afternoon in Phoenix. Several sources told The Huffington Post that they expected the court to reinstate Mathis, but also suggested that it would be possible for Brewer to remove her in the future with more specific charges. Arizona Democrats are cheering the court's decision."I was pleased with the order of the court," said State Rep. Matt Heinz (D-Tucson), who was in the courtroom for Thursday's hearing. "I believe it continues the independence of this constitutional branch of government, the independent commission. The attempt of the Republican caucus to hijack the independence of this commission was ghastly."Brewer became completely incoherent when trying to defend her actions. She could not explain what offenses Mathis had committed that could possibly justify her impeachment.Listen to Governor Jan Brewer struggling to explain why she fired Ms. Mathis, here.

Translated into honest English, Repubs want to cut down on Democrats' massive voter fraud schemes.Massive voter fraud that George Bush's Justice Department and Karl Rove, who tried as hard as they could, were unable to prove.In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter FraudFive years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews. Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as of last year.[...]Many of those charged by the Justice Department appear to have mistakenly filled out registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules.Got that Puss? There is absolutely no evidence that lots of people were voting twice, or voting in phony names.

Rachel Maddow: Newt Gingrich Running Scams Akin To A Nigerian Prince E-MailLast night Rachel Maddow took some time to explain how Newt Gingrich makes a living. For instance.....there was a letter he spammed sent out, to a bunch of Doctors inviting them to a ceremony where they would receive his '2010 Champions of Medicine' award which was a nice little certificate. Or his entrepreneur of the year award, which included an engraved gavel.All you had to do to claim your award, was pay a paltry $5,000 to attend a banquet where you got a chance to rub shoulders with Newt.Newt makes his living by scamming people, or selling access to himself to anyone willing to pay.VIDEO

Massive voter fraud that George Bush's Justice Department and Karl Rove, who tried as hard as they could, were unable to prove.As one expert I cited noted, without voter ID laws, there is literally no evidence. Rotsa ruck indicting anyone without evidence.But in fact, SCOTUS upheld voter ID laws on the specific grounds that voter fraud has a long history in the US, as even Chris Mathews admitted recently regarding Phillie.Got that Puss? There is absolutely no evidence that lots of people were voting twice, or voting in phony names.Chicago!Philadelphia!St. Louis!Milwaukee!What a freaking liar you are, geez.

MistyBlue, on 19 November 2011 - 12:04 PM, said:Massive voter fraud that George Bush's Justice Department and Karl Rove, who tried as hard as they could, were unable to prove.As one expert I cited noted, without voter ID laws, there is literally no evidence. So we need new laws to prove that people are breaking the existing laws?Do you ever read your own ****?Seriously.

As one expert I cited noted, without voter ID laws, there is literally no evidence.So we need new laws to prove that people are breaking the existing laws?Do you ever read your own [excrement]?Seriously.If someone can vote 20 times in a day in different locations without anyone checking his ID, how can anyone catch him?Duuuh!This is exactly what Chris Mathews admits Democrats did for years and almost certainly continue to do today.Unlike you, Mathews has the integrity to admit it.Rachel Maddow: Newt Gingrich Running Scams Akin To ‘A Nigerian Prince E-Mail’That clueless lying moonbat?She lied the other night that Gingrich resigned under a cloud of ethics charges. No, he was cleared of every single false allegation made against him, except one very minor technical violation. Edited by RichClem, 20 November 2011 - 10:21 AM.

If someone can vote 20 times in a day in different locations without anyone checking his ID, how can anyone catch him?Duuuh!Duuuh!States keep voter registration databases. If someone wanted to vote in 20 different places, they would need to register in 20 different districts.If you really think that it's so easy to vote multiple times, then I suggest you try it. LOLShe (Maddow) lied the other night that Gingrich resigned under a cloud of ethics charges. No, he was cleared of every single false allegation made against him, except one very minor technical violation.Gingrich is the only Speaker of the House to have been disciplined for ethics violations.He had eighty-four ethics charges filed against him.The House voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, including a $300,000 fine to recoup the money spent on the investigation.I'd say that's quite a cloud.

If someone can vote 20 times in a day in different locations without anyone checking his ID, how can anyone catch him?Duuuh!Duuuh!States keep voter registration databases. If someone wanted to vote in 20 different places, they would need to register in 20 different districts.If you really think that it's so easy to vote multiple times, then I suggest you try it. LOLThanks for confirming you don't even read my posts. As Democrat Mathews admitted, they vote in other people's names.She (Maddow) lied the other night that Gingrich resigned under a cloud of ethics charges. No, he was cleared of every single false allegation made against him, except one very minor technical violation.Gingrich is the only Speaker of the House to have been disciplined for ethics violations.He had eighty-four ethics charges filed against him.The House voted 395 to 28 to reprimand Gingrich, including a $300,000 fine to recoup the money spent on the investigation.I'd say that's quite a cloud.How freaking dishonest to claim 83 false charges are a cloud.Even more hilarious from the Democrat Operative Liar who has forever dishonestly denied that Clinton is a rapist/ serial felon.Nor did Gingrich resign because of the one, count 'em, 1 minor ethics charge of which he was guilty.He resigned because Repubs did badly in the '86 elections and because Beltway Repubs wanted to go native. They were tired of fighting for conservative principle. Edited by RichClem, 20 November 2011 - 09:00 PM.

You're quoting Democrat Matthews now? How come Democrats only have credibility when you agree with them? ROFL Edited by MistyBlue, 20 November 2011 - 09:05 PM.

Omand says Harty then stated, I wish we had a Siberia so we could ship them all off to freeze to death and die and clean up the population.We have ANWR, does that count? It could be ANMHMRWR.yeap I know it's from last March.

Cold be hand and heart and bone, and cold be sleep under stone: never more to wake on stony bed, never, till the Sun fails and the Moon is dead. In the black wind the stars shall die, and still on gold here let them lie, till the dark lord lifts his hand over dead sea and withered land.

You're quoting Democrat Matthews now? How come Democrats only have credibility when you agree with them? ROFLWhen a loyal Democrat admits the Democrat Party commits voter fraud, yes, he has credibility.That makes perfect sense, but you'll lie anyway.Nothing to say about how Democrats filed 83 false charges against Gingrich?Figures. Edited by RichClem, 21 November 2011 - 07:46 AM.

This Saturday, Republican candidates for president gathered around for a 'Thanksgiving table forum' debate hosted by the Christian group Family Leader.... Newt Gingrich delivered the applause line of the night, telling Occupy Wall Street, 'go get a job after you take a bath'.All the occupy movement starts with the premise that we all owe them everything, Gingrich said. They take over a public park they didnt pay for to go nearby to use bathrooms they didnt pay forto obstruct those who are going to work to pay the taxes to sustain the bathrooms and sustain the park so they can self-righteously explain that they are the paragons of virtue to which we owe everything. Gingrich suggested 'Occupy Wall Street' was an example of how what he calls 'the left' has collapsed the countrys moral system. We need to reassert something as simple as saying to them, Go get a job right after you take a bath, Gingrich said, to applause from the church crowd.http://www.radioiowa...you-take-a-bathI can't even begin to express my anger at that statement. It's off the charts.People like Newt Gingrich (champion of morality) or Sean Hannity classify all OWS protesters as 'a bunch of dirty hippies' at their own peril.