Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
25 Jan 2020 6:17 pm
Right back atcha.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2020 5:26 pm » wrote:It's all going to come out, and you can't hide.
If you think that all the dirt on Sniffles won't come out when he is acquitted, you are either very naive or very stupid.
25 Jan 2020 9:49 pm
I saw a flying monkey this week. It had a real skinny pencil neck and it flew directly into a brick wall and died.
26 Jan 2020 9:50 am
Deputy WH Counsel Michael Purpura lies repeatedly during Senate Impeachment trial.
1. Michael Purpura said, "There's simply no evidence anywhere that President Trump ever linked security assistance to any investigation."
2.
3.
1. Michael Purpura said, "There's simply no evidence anywhere that President Trump ever linked security assistance to any investigation."
https://youtu.be/5zyXtCPntl8In a news conference, Mulvaney for the first time conceded that the lack of a Ukrainian inquiry into the origins of the Russia investigation played a role in the United States withholding military aid from it over “corruption” issues.
“[Did] he also mention to me, in the past, that the corruption related to the DNC server?” Mulvaney said.
“Absolutely, no question about that. But that’s it. And that’s why we held up the money. ...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... d-pro-quo/
2.
3.
Moments after the end of the Saturday’s Senate impeachment trial of Donald Trump concluded, MSNBC host Brian Williams pointed out that one of Donald Trump’s attorney’s lied on the Senate floor about the president’s Ukraine scandal– and he had a clip handy to prove it.
Sharing footage of attorney Mike Purpura stating the higher-ups in Ukraine were unaware that Donald Trump was withholding aid until after the government helped him by announcing an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden, the MSNBC host called the attorney out.
To make his point that Pupura was being untruthful, Williams then showed a clip of Defense Department official Laura Cooper, who testified that Ukrainians were asking about the delay on the day of the Trump phone call that was the starting point of the impeachment trial.
Trump lawyer Purpura busted by MSNBC for lying on the Senate floor during impeachment trial.
26 Jan 2020 9:58 am
That was the 'abuse of power' you idiot.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2020 5:26 pm » wrote:Oh my!Misty » 25 Jan 2020 5:06 pm » wrote:Are you seriously that stupid?
Lev was the front man in Ukraine tasked with the job of shaking down Zelensky.
And Sniffles said he didn't know him.
He knows him very well, and knew exactly what he was doing.
Except that "shaking down" Zelensky isn't even included in the impeachable acts.
You can if he lies under oath, but Sniffles' lawyers will NEVER let him go under oath because they know that he is incapable of telling the truth.Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2020 5:26 pm » wrote:Nor can you impeach a president for lying.
26 Jan 2020 10:00 am
That has nothing to do with what Sniffles did.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 9:24 am » wrote:So let's see House Dems' record in protecting Ukrainians when Obama was refusing any lethal aid at all.
It's just another deflection.
Look over here!
26 Jan 2020 11:48 am
I already answered that question, so are you going to keep asking it ten times a day for the next ten years?Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 11:44 am » wrote:Didn't your hero Adam Schiff claim there was no FISA abuse?
26 Jan 2020 11:56 am
If he was absolutely correct, then why use Rudy, Lev and Igor to do it when he has the whole investigative apparatus of the United States government at his disposal?Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 10:08 am » wrote:Trump was not absolutely correct to demand that Ukraine cooperate about its interference in the 2016 election at many Dem officials demands. that's his job as Chief Law Enforcement Officer.
Even Baghdad Bill Barr said he wanted nothing to do with it.
And Sniffles' former homeland security adviser Tom Bossert, said that **** about Ukraine was debunked.
26 Jan 2020 12:18 pm
Things you prefer to remain willfully ignorant about.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 10:06 am » wrote:If military aid was so vitally important, why did they vote against it?
Imbecile.
There was a debate in the Obama administration over whether or not to provide Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missiles, because some people felt it might escalate the conflict with Russia.
But between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine.
Under Obama, the federal government started the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, and By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices and medical supplies, and some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
Not just the 'blankets' that you wingnuts claim Obama sent.
Amyway, none of that has anything to do with Sniffles abusing his power and obstructing Congress.
It's just another deflection.
26 Jan 2020 2:11 pm
You're kidding, right? How many years are you behind on this issue?If he was absolutely correct, then why use Rudy, Lev and Igor to do it when he has the whole investigative apparatus of the United States government at his disposal?What a hopeless lying psycho you are.
I make important points.
You censor them in desperation.
Trump was not absolutely correct to demand that Ukraine cooperate about its interference in the 2016 election at many Dem officials demands. that's his job as Chief Law Enforcement Officer.
Trump has been sabotaged or worse by countless officials in the federal government, especially including this corrupt Ambassador.
So like many presidents in history, he chose a private citizen he could trust to carry it out.
Look at the psychotic AGAIN smear a public servant of high integrity on the basis of zero evidence.Even Baghdad Bill Barr said he wanted nothing to do with it.
Why would he? It's not his job at this point.
Oh gosh, one single person who happens to be a Trump official made a claim? Then it must be true, psycho.And Sniffles' former homeland security adviser Tom Bossert, said that **** about Ukraine was debunked.
Except there is evidence even from Trump-haters at Politico, the NYTimes, the Financial Times and more in the conservative media.
And a Ukrainian court declared that Ukraine illegally interfered in the 2016 election.
Never mind the extensive evidence Guliani has and will soon release.
Run, Forrest, run!
26 Jan 2020 2:19 pm
How am I ignorant, liar? There isn't one single weapon in that list. What are they supposed to fight with, vehicles? Medical supplies?Things you prefer to remain willfully ignorant about.What utter ****.
If their wailing and weeping about military aid isn't relevant, psycho, why did they talk so much about it?
That was a large, important part of the "evidence" they presented.
If military aid was so vitally important, why did they vote against it?
Imbecile.
There was a debate in the Obama administration over whether or not to provide Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missiles, because some people felt it might escalate the conflict with Russia.
But between 2014 and 2016, the United States committed more than $600 million in security assistance to Ukraine.
Under Obama, the federal government started the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, and By March 2015, the US had committed more than $120 million in security assistance for Ukraine and had pledged an additional $75 million worth of equipment including UAVs, counter-mortar radars, night vision devices and medical supplies, and some 230 armored Humvee vehicles.
Not just the 'blankets' that you wingnuts claim Obama sent.
Throw night vision devices at advancing Russian soldiers?
Trump did supply them weapons, including crucial anti-tank Javelins.
So all the pathetic wailing about Ukrainians being vulnerable was ****.
Imbecile.
I have never claimed blankets, psycho.
It's a deflection to refute the **** Impeachment Clown hypocrites dishonestly tried to blame on Trump? That their president and they themselves didn't support??Amyway, none of that has anything to do with Sniffles abusing his power and obstructing Congress.
It's just another deflection.
That the Impeachment Clowns made a big part of their presentation?
Without your pre-written Talking Point Lies, you suck at lying.
26 Jan 2020 2:22 pm
Oh look, the psychopath stonewalled the question.Things you prefer to remain willfully ignorant about.If military aid was so vitally important, why did they vote against it?
Imbecile.
And she lied about me being ignorant.
How typical.
My point was correct; Obama and Dems didn't supply Ukraine with any weapons whatsoever.
26 Jan 2020 2:22 pm
[quote="Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:11 pm"]
And a Ukrainian court declared that Ukraine illegally interfered in the 2016 election.
/quote]
No reason to ADDRESS the REST of your PATHETIC repeated LIES we will just talk about THIS one TRAITOR. Where you cite the ruling that ATTACKED anti corruption leaders Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, that ruling has NOW been OVERTURNED and you just keep repeating this LIE because you are a LIAR and a TRAITOR doing Russia's bidding EVERY DAY to weaken America like TRIATORS do
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1
The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeals has canceled a court ruling that found that independent lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, unlawfully interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
That court concluded that Leshchenko and Sytnyk had illegally interfered in Ukraine’s foreign policy when they revealed that the surname and signature of Paul Manafort, then a campaign manager for U.S. presidential hopeful Donald Trump, had been found in the so-called “black ledger” of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. The court also stated that Leshchenko’s actions had caused “interference” in American electoral processes and harmed the Ukrainian state’s interests.
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1
The “black ledger” is alleged to show suspicious payments by the Pary of Regions to a range of individuals and officials. It became a key document implicating Manafort in corruption in Ukraine, and helped to end his tenure as Trump’s campaign chair in August 2016.
H8er the TRAITOR working EVERY DAY to weaken America for Russia
[/size]
And a Ukrainian court declared that Ukraine illegally interfered in the 2016 election.
/quote]
No reason to ADDRESS the REST of your PATHETIC repeated LIES we will just talk about THIS one TRAITOR. Where you cite the ruling that ATTACKED anti corruption leaders Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, that ruling has NOW been OVERTURNED and you just keep repeating this LIE because you are a LIAR and a TRAITOR doing Russia's bidding EVERY DAY to weaken America like TRIATORS do
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1
The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeals has canceled a court ruling that found that independent lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, unlawfully interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
That court concluded that Leshchenko and Sytnyk had illegally interfered in Ukraine’s foreign policy when they revealed that the surname and signature of Paul Manafort, then a campaign manager for U.S. presidential hopeful Donald Trump, had been found in the so-called “black ledger” of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. The court also stated that Leshchenko’s actions had caused “interference” in American electoral processes and harmed the Ukrainian state’s interests.
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1
The “black ledger” is alleged to show suspicious payments by the Pary of Regions to a range of individuals and officials. It became a key document implicating Manafort in corruption in Ukraine, and helped to end his tenure as Trump’s campaign chair in August 2016.
H8er the TRAITOR working EVERY DAY to weaken America for Russia
[/size]
26 Jan 2020 2:29 pm
It's an abuse of power to seek evidence of how a foreign country interfered in the 2016 election?Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:25 pm » wrote:
Didnt Happen you are a LIAR and a TRAITOR and why do you REFUSE to ADDRESS the FACTS you GUTLESS COWARD?
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeals has canceled a court ruling that found that independent lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, unlawfully interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
That court concluded that Leshchenko and Sytnyk had illegally interfered in Ukraine’s foreign policy when they revealed that the surname and signature of Paul Manafort, then a campaign manager for U.S. presidential hopeful Donald Trump, had been found in the so-called “black ledger” of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych’s Party of Regions. The court also stated that Leshchenko’s actions had caused “interference” in American electoral processes and harmed the Ukrainian state’s interests.
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/court-cancels-earlier-ruling-that-ukrainian-officials-interfered-in-us-election.html?cn-reloaded=1
The “black ledger” is alleged to show suspicious payments by the Pary of Regions to a range of individuals and officials. It became a key document implicating Manafort in corruption in Ukraine, and helped to end his tenure as Trump’s campaign chair in August 2016.
ADDRESS the FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD and TRAITOR
26 Jan 2020 2:30 pm
So you believe a court in Ukraine, the country you Trumpettes call the most corrupt country in the world, over that of one of Sniffles' own Homeland Security Advisers.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:11 pm » wrote:And a Ukrainian court declared that Ukraine illegally interfered in the 2016 election.
Just like you believe Putin over Sniffles' own intelligence agency heads.
And you wonder why I call you a Russian bot?
26 Jan 2020 2:31 pm
Why are there three ellipses?Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:29 pm » wrote:This was settled months ago, psycho. Even Trump hating Deep State hack Vindman admitted the transcript is accurate.It's not an actual transcript, blah, blah, blah
- David Corn
Try to keep up.
What was left out?
And it is NOT an actual transcript.
It says so right on the front page.
"A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A number of factors can affect the accuracy of the record, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indicate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear."
That's a big fat lie!Twice in a press conference earlier this month, Trump went out of his way to say the rough transcript was, in fact, a verbatim recounting of his call with Zelensky. "I had a transcript done by very, very talented people -- word for word, comma for comma," said Trump at one point in that early October news conference. "Done by people that do it for a living. We had an exact transcript." Later, he added that the document was "an exact transcript of my call, done by very talented people that do this -- exact, word for word."
Trump echoed that sentiment on Twitter as well.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics ... index.html
26 Jan 2020 2:32 pm
You are A LIAR it was NOT a transcript and I SHOWED you before when you told this LIE that Vindman tried to have relevant CHANGES made to the NOTES about the phone call and NOTES are what we saw. You are A LIAR and A TRAITORTermin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:29 pm » wrote:
This was settled months ago, psycho. Even Trump hating Deep State hack Vindman admitted the transcript is accurate.
Try to keep up.
26 Jan 2020 2:36 pm
As I showed that court ruling was overturned or as the Ukraine court of appeals put it cancelled. that was alawsuit brought by their former CORRUPT president about exposing by anti corruption leaders of Manaforts name associated with the BLACK LEDGER that showed the corruption by Manafort and Poreshenko for Russia. So that supposed court ruling is OVERTURNED and H8er is a LIARMisty » 26 Jan 2020 2:30 pm » wrote: So you believe a court in Ukraine, the country you Trumpettes call the most corrupt country in the world, over that of one of Sniffles' own Homeland Security Advisers.
Just like you believe Putin over Sniffles' own intelligence agency heads.
And you wonder why I call you a Russian bot?
26 Jan 2020 2:43 pm
Yeah year more of your DELUSIONAL FANTASIES about Dems being indicted while IGNORING all the Trump people who have been indicted are awaiting sentencing or have already GONE TO PRISON. GOD you are STUPID.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:36 pm » wrote:
More LIES GFY
Shrieks the psychopath who denies to this day that Hillary Clinton colluded with the Russians via the Steele Dossier.
You are a LIAR telling LIES for Russian Military Intelligence. That dossier BEGAN being paid for by a RIGHTWING PRO CRUZ Group and the Clinton campaign NEVER put ANY of it in the open and paying an AMERICAN COMPANY who hired a Russia expert from BRITAIN to do oppo research on Russia cannot POSSIBLY be colluding with Russia. This is pathetic Russian Military Intelligence propaganda. It is saying that ANY INVESTIGATION of Trump in Russia is colluding with Russia it is about like saying investigating the MOB is colluding with the mob. It is CLASSIC GRU tactics and YOU ARE A TRAITOR
Factually established beyond refute.
YOU ARE A LIAR nothing even CLOSE to that TRAITOR
If anyone is a Russian bot or Putin's pet, it's you, wackjob.
Whether you are a PAID Russian Troll or a TRAITOR doesn't matter you repeat Russian Military Intelligence propaganda every day just like you did HERE TRAITOR
26 Jan 2020 2:48 pm
GUTLESS COWARD H8er once again runs away CRYING from the FACTS that show he is a LIAR a BRAINWASHED MORON and a TRAITOR pushing Russian Military Intelligence propagandaTermin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:47 pm » wrote:
26 Jan 2020 2:55 pm
You don't know if it's true or not?Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2020 2:36 pm » wrote:I don't know if it's true or not, but it and other evidence destroys your lie that this was "debunked."Misty » 26 Jan 2020 2:30 pm » wrote:So you believe a court in Ukraine, the country you Trumpettes call the most corrupt country in the world, over that of one of Sniffles' own Homeland Security Advisers.THE GAPING ASSHOLE SAID: And a Ukrainian court declared that Ukraine illegally interfered in the 2016 election.
Never mind the extensive evidence Guliani has and will soon release.Run, Forrest, run!
But you keep babbling about it?
Do you think that the Republican controlled Senate Intelligence Committee is also lying when they say that it has been debunked?
“Russia was very aggressive and they're much more sophisticated, but the fact that Russia was so aggressive does not exclude the fact that President Poroshenko actively worked for Secretary Clinton,” Republican Sen. John Kennedy claimed on Sunday in an interview with NBC, referring to the former Ukrainian president.
But the Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee thoroughly investigated that theory, according to people with direct knowledge of the inquiry, and found no evidence that Ukraine waged a top-down interference campaign akin to the Kremlin’s efforts to help Trump win in 2016.
The committee’s Republican chairman, Richard Burr of North Carolina, said in October 2017 that the panel would be examining “collusion by either campaign during the 2016 elections."
But an interview that fall with the Democratic consultant at the heart of the accusation that Kyiv meddled, Alexandra Chalupa, was fruitless, a committee source said, and Republicans didn’t follow up or request any more witnesses related to the issue.
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/0 ... nce-074796
Who is online
In total there are 5809 users online :: 20 registered, 15 bots, and 5774 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Squatchman, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, MR-7, michaelf, Beekeeper, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Fuelman
Bots: ADmantX, LCC, DuckDuckBot, proximic, Yahoo! Slurp, Kinza, DuckDuckGo, YandexBot, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7